THE EFFECTS OF INCREASED ACCESS TO EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION ON SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE AND ABORTION RATES
In 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved access to emergency contraception through pharmacies without a prescription. Several states, however, had previously allowed pharmacy access to emergency contraception. In particular, Washington State was the first state to implement such a pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economic inquiry 2013-07, Vol.51 (3), p.1682-1695 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1695 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1682 |
container_title | Economic inquiry |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | DURRANCE, CHRISTINE PIETTE |
description | In 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved access to emergency contraception through pharmacies without a prescription. Several states, however, had previously allowed pharmacy access to emergency contraception. In particular, Washington State was the first state to implement such a program in 1998. If emergency contraception is used as a substitute for a surgical abortion, then pharmacy access could reduce unintended pregnancy. Pharmacy access, however, could lead to an increase in risk taking, especially among teens or young adults, and hence lead to increased rates of sexually transmitted diseases. In this article, we use county‐level data as well as specific timing of changes in pharmacy access to consider the intended and unintended consequences of pharmacy access to emergency contraception in Washington. The results indicate that while county‐level access to emergency contraception was unrelated to trends in sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and abortions before access changed, access afterwards led to a statistically significant increase in STD rates (gonorrhea rates), both overall and for females. We do not find, however, an impact of pharmacy access on abortion or birth rates. These results are robust to several specification tests (including use of Oregon counties as additional control counties) as well as several falsification tests. (JEL I1, I18, J13) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00498.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1418138047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A336843786</galeid><sourcerecordid>A336843786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6548-ce2f2870d27c635e08d27efcba4ff46d5a38c5d2ede207d0f43eacc925d5ae9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEEmXwHyxxAxIJ_ogT54KLLHO7aG2CkkxjV5bnOCWlTba4Fd2_x1nRRtEksC3bOud5j3ys13EAgh6y4_PKQ35A3RBH1MMQYQ9CP2Le_oUzeUy8dCYQRtTFlJHXzhtjVhBCElA6cTbVOQd8OuVJVYJ8CtIsKXhc8jMQJwkvS1DlgC94MeNZcg2SPKuKOOFfqzTPgF0l_3YZz-fXwIazcpFWlVWepeVYAsSZrXKaFw9wEVe8fOu8auTa6He_zxPncsqr5Nyd57M0ieeuCqjPXKVxg1kIaxyqgFANmb3pRt1Iv2n8oKaSMEVrrGuNYVjDxidaKhVhalM6asiJ8-FQ93bo73babMWmNUqv17LT_c4I5COGCIN--G-U0CDCUYSZRd__ha763dDZRgQKcegjSBB-opZyrUXbNf12kGosKmJCAuaTkAWWcp-hlrrTg1z3nW5aGz7ivWd4O2u9adWzgo9HAsts9X67lDtjRHo6O2Y__cHe7EzbaWM30y6_b81BcoSzA66G3phBN-J2aDdyuBcIitGUYiVG74nRe2I0pXgwpdhb6ZeD9Kd97v1_6wRP0szenr6tNbabR70cfoggJCEVV9lM0OriKogWF6IgvwCTiunx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1727410312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE EFFECTS OF INCREASED ACCESS TO EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION ON SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE AND ABORTION RATES</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>DURRANCE, CHRISTINE PIETTE</creator><creatorcontrib>DURRANCE, CHRISTINE PIETTE</creatorcontrib><description>In 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved access to emergency contraception through pharmacies without a prescription. Several states, however, had previously allowed pharmacy access to emergency contraception. In particular, Washington State was the first state to implement such a program in 1998. If emergency contraception is used as a substitute for a surgical abortion, then pharmacy access could reduce unintended pregnancy. Pharmacy access, however, could lead to an increase in risk taking, especially among teens or young adults, and hence lead to increased rates of sexually transmitted diseases. In this article, we use county‐level data as well as specific timing of changes in pharmacy access to consider the intended and unintended consequences of pharmacy access to emergency contraception in Washington. The results indicate that while county‐level access to emergency contraception was unrelated to trends in sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and abortions before access changed, access afterwards led to a statistically significant increase in STD rates (gonorrhea rates), both overall and for females. We do not find, however, an impact of pharmacy access on abortion or birth rates. These results are robust to several specification tests (including use of Oregon counties as additional control counties) as well as several falsification tests. (JEL I1, I18, J13)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-2583</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00498.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECIND6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Birth control ; Birth rate ; Condoms ; Contraception ; Control ; Disease transmission ; Drug stores ; FDA approval ; Health aspects ; Health care access ; Oral contraceptives ; Pharmacy ; Pregnancy ; Prevention ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD ; Studies ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Economic inquiry, 2013-07, Vol.51 (3), p.1682-1695</ispartof><rights>2012 Western Economic Association International</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Western Economic Association Jul 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6548-ce2f2870d27c635e08d27efcba4ff46d5a38c5d2ede207d0f43eacc925d5ae9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6548-ce2f2870d27c635e08d27efcba4ff46d5a38c5d2ede207d0f43eacc925d5ae9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1465-7295.2012.00498.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1465-7295.2012.00498.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DURRANCE, CHRISTINE PIETTE</creatorcontrib><title>THE EFFECTS OF INCREASED ACCESS TO EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION ON SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE AND ABORTION RATES</title><title>Economic inquiry</title><description>In 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved access to emergency contraception through pharmacies without a prescription. Several states, however, had previously allowed pharmacy access to emergency contraception. In particular, Washington State was the first state to implement such a program in 1998. If emergency contraception is used as a substitute for a surgical abortion, then pharmacy access could reduce unintended pregnancy. Pharmacy access, however, could lead to an increase in risk taking, especially among teens or young adults, and hence lead to increased rates of sexually transmitted diseases. In this article, we use county‐level data as well as specific timing of changes in pharmacy access to consider the intended and unintended consequences of pharmacy access to emergency contraception in Washington. The results indicate that while county‐level access to emergency contraception was unrelated to trends in sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and abortions before access changed, access afterwards led to a statistically significant increase in STD rates (gonorrhea rates), both overall and for females. We do not find, however, an impact of pharmacy access on abortion or birth rates. These results are robust to several specification tests (including use of Oregon counties as additional control counties) as well as several falsification tests. (JEL I1, I18, J13)</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Birth rate</subject><subject>Condoms</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Oral contraceptives</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0095-2583</issn><issn>1465-7295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEEmXwHyxxAxIJ_ogT54KLLHO7aG2CkkxjV5bnOCWlTba4Fd2_x1nRRtEksC3bOud5j3ys13EAgh6y4_PKQ35A3RBH1MMQYQ9CP2Le_oUzeUy8dCYQRtTFlJHXzhtjVhBCElA6cTbVOQd8OuVJVYJ8CtIsKXhc8jMQJwkvS1DlgC94MeNZcg2SPKuKOOFfqzTPgF0l_3YZz-fXwIazcpFWlVWepeVYAsSZrXKaFw9wEVe8fOu8auTa6He_zxPncsqr5Nyd57M0ieeuCqjPXKVxg1kIaxyqgFANmb3pRt1Iv2n8oKaSMEVrrGuNYVjDxidaKhVhalM6asiJ8-FQ93bo73babMWmNUqv17LT_c4I5COGCIN--G-U0CDCUYSZRd__ha763dDZRgQKcegjSBB-opZyrUXbNf12kGosKmJCAuaTkAWWcp-hlrrTg1z3nW5aGz7ivWd4O2u9adWzgo9HAsts9X67lDtjRHo6O2Y__cHe7EzbaWM30y6_b81BcoSzA66G3phBN-J2aDdyuBcIitGUYiVG74nRe2I0pXgwpdhb6ZeD9Kd97v1_6wRP0szenr6tNbabR70cfoggJCEVV9lM0OriKogWF6IgvwCTiunx</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>DURRANCE, CHRISTINE PIETTE</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><general>Western Economic Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>THE EFFECTS OF INCREASED ACCESS TO EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION ON SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE AND ABORTION RATES</title><author>DURRANCE, CHRISTINE PIETTE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6548-ce2f2870d27c635e08d27efcba4ff46d5a38c5d2ede207d0f43eacc925d5ae9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Birth rate</topic><topic>Condoms</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Oral contraceptives</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DURRANCE, CHRISTINE PIETTE</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Economic inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DURRANCE, CHRISTINE PIETTE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE EFFECTS OF INCREASED ACCESS TO EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION ON SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE AND ABORTION RATES</atitle><jtitle>Economic inquiry</jtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1682</spage><epage>1695</epage><pages>1682-1695</pages><issn>0095-2583</issn><eissn>1465-7295</eissn><coden>ECIND6</coden><abstract>In 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved access to emergency contraception through pharmacies without a prescription. Several states, however, had previously allowed pharmacy access to emergency contraception. In particular, Washington State was the first state to implement such a program in 1998. If emergency contraception is used as a substitute for a surgical abortion, then pharmacy access could reduce unintended pregnancy. Pharmacy access, however, could lead to an increase in risk taking, especially among teens or young adults, and hence lead to increased rates of sexually transmitted diseases. In this article, we use county‐level data as well as specific timing of changes in pharmacy access to consider the intended and unintended consequences of pharmacy access to emergency contraception in Washington. The results indicate that while county‐level access to emergency contraception was unrelated to trends in sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and abortions before access changed, access afterwards led to a statistically significant increase in STD rates (gonorrhea rates), both overall and for females. We do not find, however, an impact of pharmacy access on abortion or birth rates. These results are robust to several specification tests (including use of Oregon counties as additional control counties) as well as several falsification tests. (JEL I1, I18, J13)</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00498.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-2583 |
ispartof | Economic inquiry, 2013-07, Vol.51 (3), p.1682-1695 |
issn | 0095-2583 1465-7295 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1418138047 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Abortion Birth control Birth rate Condoms Contraception Control Disease transmission Drug stores FDA approval Health aspects Health care access Oral contraceptives Pharmacy Pregnancy Prevention Sexually transmitted diseases STD Studies Youth |
title | THE EFFECTS OF INCREASED ACCESS TO EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION ON SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE AND ABORTION RATES |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T06%3A14%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20EFFECTS%20OF%20INCREASED%20ACCESS%20TO%20EMERGENCY%20CONTRACEPTION%20ON%20SEXUALLY%20TRANSMITTED%20DISEASE%20AND%20ABORTION%20RATES&rft.jtitle=Economic%20inquiry&rft.au=DURRANCE,%20CHRISTINE%20PIETTE&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1682&rft.epage=1695&rft.pages=1682-1695&rft.issn=0095-2583&rft.eissn=1465-7295&rft.coden=ECIND6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00498.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA336843786%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1727410312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A336843786&rfr_iscdi=true |