The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: restrictions on the creation of "saviour siblings" and the relevance of the harm principle
This paper provides an overview of the regulatory developments in the UK which impact on the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo screening techniques for the creation of "saviour siblings." Prior to the changes implemented under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New genetics and society 2013-06, Vol.32 (2), p.154-170 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 170 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 154 |
container_title | New genetics and society |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Smith, Malcolm K. |
description | This paper provides an overview of the regulatory developments in the UK which impact on the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo screening techniques for the creation of "saviour siblings." Prior to the changes implemented under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, this specific use of IVF was not addressed by the legislative framework and regulated only by way of policy issued by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Following the implementation of the statutory reforms, a number of restrictive conditions are now imposed on the face of the legislation. This paper considers whether there is any justification for restricting access to IVF and pre-implantation tissue typing for the creation of "saviour siblings." The analysis is undertaken by examining the normative factors that have guided the development of the UK regulatory approach prior to the 2008 legislative reforms. The approach adopted in relation to the "saviour sibling" issue is compared to more general HFEA policy, which has prioritized the notion of reproductive choice and determined that restrictions on access are only justified on the basis of harm considerations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14636778.2013.788358 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1418132494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1418132494</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ac48372d184d743cbb915e21837867a10b1bf3428accaf79a70f803d0d41f29c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1O3TAUhKOqlUopb9CFRTdscuu_xA4bhBA_lZDYwNpyHBuMHPtynAu6z8BL45Cy6QJY2Tr6ztgzU1W_CF4RLPEfwlvWCiFXFBO2ElKyRn6pdsq4q7uONF9f76yeme_Vj5zvMcaEML5TPV_fWXSxGXVEZxYmH3zWk08R6Tig07GHbQrpdouOzYQoxvIQgc0TeDNDGRVwKgIG7LKVHNrP-tGnDaDs--Djbd5_1ZoxsME-6mjszM2DOw0jWoOPxq-D_Vl9czpku_fv3K1uzk6vTy7qy6vzvyfHl7XhtJtqbbhkgg5E8kFwZvq-WLSUlKFshSa4J71jnEptjHai0wI7idmAB04c7QzbrQ4W3TWkh02xo0afjQ1BR5s2WZHyTEtFx9knUCIJo7ywH6Llz7hhHaYF_f0fel8Ci8Wzog1tih3ctoXiC2Ug5QzWqZLUqGGrCFZz7-qtdzX3rpbey9rRsuajSzDqpwRhUJPehgQOSvo-K_auwgtjg7Lb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2525915066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: restrictions on the creation of "saviour siblings" and the relevance of the harm principle</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Smith, Malcolm K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Malcolm K.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides an overview of the regulatory developments in the UK which impact on the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo screening techniques for the creation of "saviour siblings." Prior to the changes implemented under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, this specific use of IVF was not addressed by the legislative framework and regulated only by way of policy issued by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Following the implementation of the statutory reforms, a number of restrictive conditions are now imposed on the face of the legislation. This paper considers whether there is any justification for restricting access to IVF and pre-implantation tissue typing for the creation of "saviour siblings." The analysis is undertaken by examining the normative factors that have guided the development of the UK regulatory approach prior to the 2008 legislative reforms. The approach adopted in relation to the "saviour sibling" issue is compared to more general HFEA policy, which has prioritized the notion of reproductive choice and determined that restrictions on access are only justified on the basis of harm considerations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-6778</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14636778.2013.788358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>"saviour siblings" ; Artificial Insemination ; Choices ; Development ; Embryology ; Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 ; In vitro fertilization ; Legislation ; PGD and tissue typing ; pre-implantation tissue typing ; Reform ; Reforms ; Regulatory reform ; Restriction ; Siblings ; Tests ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>New genetics and society, 2013-06, Vol.32 (2), p.154-170</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ac48372d184d743cbb915e21837867a10b1bf3428accaf79a70f803d0d41f29c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33751,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Malcolm K.</creatorcontrib><title>The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: restrictions on the creation of "saviour siblings" and the relevance of the harm principle</title><title>New genetics and society</title><description>This paper provides an overview of the regulatory developments in the UK which impact on the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo screening techniques for the creation of "saviour siblings." Prior to the changes implemented under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, this specific use of IVF was not addressed by the legislative framework and regulated only by way of policy issued by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Following the implementation of the statutory reforms, a number of restrictive conditions are now imposed on the face of the legislation. This paper considers whether there is any justification for restricting access to IVF and pre-implantation tissue typing for the creation of "saviour siblings." The analysis is undertaken by examining the normative factors that have guided the development of the UK regulatory approach prior to the 2008 legislative reforms. The approach adopted in relation to the "saviour sibling" issue is compared to more general HFEA policy, which has prioritized the notion of reproductive choice and determined that restrictions on access are only justified on the basis of harm considerations.</description><subject>"saviour siblings"</subject><subject>Artificial Insemination</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Embryology</subject><subject>Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008</subject><subject>In vitro fertilization</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>PGD and tissue typing</subject><subject>pre-implantation tissue typing</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regulatory reform</subject><subject>Restriction</subject><subject>Siblings</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1463-6778</issn><issn>1469-9915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1O3TAUhKOqlUopb9CFRTdscuu_xA4bhBA_lZDYwNpyHBuMHPtynAu6z8BL45Cy6QJY2Tr6ztgzU1W_CF4RLPEfwlvWCiFXFBO2ElKyRn6pdsq4q7uONF9f76yeme_Vj5zvMcaEML5TPV_fWXSxGXVEZxYmH3zWk08R6Tig07GHbQrpdouOzYQoxvIQgc0TeDNDGRVwKgIG7LKVHNrP-tGnDaDs--Djbd5_1ZoxsME-6mjszM2DOw0jWoOPxq-D_Vl9czpku_fv3K1uzk6vTy7qy6vzvyfHl7XhtJtqbbhkgg5E8kFwZvq-WLSUlKFshSa4J71jnEptjHai0wI7idmAB04c7QzbrQ4W3TWkh02xo0afjQ1BR5s2WZHyTEtFx9knUCIJo7ywH6Llz7hhHaYF_f0fel8Ci8Wzog1tih3ctoXiC2Ug5QzWqZLUqGGrCFZz7-qtdzX3rpbey9rRsuajSzDqpwRhUJPehgQOSvo-K_auwgtjg7Lb</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Smith, Malcolm K.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: restrictions on the creation of "saviour siblings" and the relevance of the harm principle</title><author>Smith, Malcolm K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-ac48372d184d743cbb915e21837867a10b1bf3428accaf79a70f803d0d41f29c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>"saviour siblings"</topic><topic>Artificial Insemination</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Embryology</topic><topic>Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008</topic><topic>In vitro fertilization</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>PGD and tissue typing</topic><topic>pre-implantation tissue typing</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regulatory reform</topic><topic>Restriction</topic><topic>Siblings</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Malcolm K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>New genetics and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Malcolm K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: restrictions on the creation of "saviour siblings" and the relevance of the harm principle</atitle><jtitle>New genetics and society</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>154</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>154-170</pages><issn>1463-6778</issn><eissn>1469-9915</eissn><abstract>This paper provides an overview of the regulatory developments in the UK which impact on the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo screening techniques for the creation of "saviour siblings." Prior to the changes implemented under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, this specific use of IVF was not addressed by the legislative framework and regulated only by way of policy issued by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Following the implementation of the statutory reforms, a number of restrictive conditions are now imposed on the face of the legislation. This paper considers whether there is any justification for restricting access to IVF and pre-implantation tissue typing for the creation of "saviour siblings." The analysis is undertaken by examining the normative factors that have guided the development of the UK regulatory approach prior to the 2008 legislative reforms. The approach adopted in relation to the "saviour sibling" issue is compared to more general HFEA policy, which has prioritized the notion of reproductive choice and determined that restrictions on access are only justified on the basis of harm considerations.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/14636778.2013.788358</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1463-6778 |
ispartof | New genetics and society, 2013-06, Vol.32 (2), p.154-170 |
issn | 1463-6778 1469-9915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1418132494 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | "saviour siblings" Artificial Insemination Choices Development Embryology Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 In vitro fertilization Legislation PGD and tissue typing pre-implantation tissue typing Reform Reforms Regulatory reform Restriction Siblings Tests United Kingdom |
title | The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: restrictions on the creation of "saviour siblings" and the relevance of the harm principle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A36%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Human%20Fertilisation%20and%20Embryology%20Act%202008:%20restrictions%20on%20the%20creation%20of%20%22saviour%20siblings%22%20and%20the%20relevance%20of%20the%20harm%20principle&rft.jtitle=New%20genetics%20and%20society&rft.au=Smith,%20Malcolm%20K.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=154&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=154-170&rft.issn=1463-6778&rft.eissn=1469-9915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14636778.2013.788358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1418132494%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2525915066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |