Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review

Abstract Background Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasing problem and investigation of these cysts can be fraught with difficulty. There is currently no gold standard for diagnosis or surveillance. This review was undertaken to determine the present reliability of the characterisation, assessm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] 2013-07, Vol.13 (4), p.436-442
Hauptverfasser: Jones, M.J, Buchanan, A.S, Neal, C.P, Dennison, A.R, Metcalfe, M.S, Garcea, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 442
container_issue 4
container_start_page 436
container_title Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]
container_volume 13
creator Jones, M.J
Buchanan, A.S
Neal, C.P
Dennison, A.R
Metcalfe, M.S
Garcea, G
description Abstract Background Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasing problem and investigation of these cysts can be fraught with difficulty. There is currently no gold standard for diagnosis or surveillance. This review was undertaken to determine the present reliability of the characterisation, assessment of malignant potential and diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions using available imaging modalities. Methods A Medline search using the terms ‘pancreatic’, ‘pancreas’, ‘cyst’, ‘cystic’, ‘lesions’, ‘imaging’, ‘PET’. ‘CT’, ‘MRI’ and ‘EUS’ was performed. Publications were screened to include studies examining the performance of CT, MRI, MRCP, EUS and 18-FDG PET in the determination of benign or malignant cysts, cyst morphology and specific diagnoses. Results Nineteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. 18-FDG PET had a sensitivity and specificity of 57.0–94.0% and 65.0–97.0% and an accuracy of 94% in determining benign versus malignant cysts. CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 36.3–71.4% and 63.9–100% in determining benign disease but had an accuracy of making a specific diagnosis of 39.0–44.7%. MRI had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.4–100.0% and 89.7% in assessing main pancreatic duct communication. Conclusion CT is a good quality initial investigation to be used in conjunction with clinical data. MRCP can add useful information regarding MPD communication but should be used judiciously. PET may have a role in equivocal cases to determine malignancy. Further examination of CT-PET in this patient group is warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pan.2013.05.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1415609028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1424390313004468</els_id><sourcerecordid>1415609028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-addc24166e32c6a5b7de54f3117a8a9c5d81a503223cc0b70dd4bc68d193de893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFO3DAQhi3UCijwAFyqSL30sumM7WSTVkJCqKVISD0UzpZ3PIu8TZzFzoL27euwFCQOPY1lf_Nr_I0QpwglAtZfVuXahlICqhKqEmC-Jw5RSz1TLeK7lzOoA_EhpRWAlIjtvjiQqmkBtT4Ul1e9vfPhrhiWhQ-OR469D3bkIkdTZDt6KmibptJx8kNIX4vzIuUb7p8eIz94fjwW75e2S3zyXI_E7Y_vNxc_Z9e_Lq8uzq9nVIEcZ9Y5khrrmpWk2laLueNKLxXi3Da2pco1aCtQUioiWMzBOb2gunHYKsdNq47E513uOg73G06j6X0i7jobeNgkgxqrGlqQTUY_vUFXwyaGPJ3BWutGoYaJwh1FcUgp8tKso-9t3BoEM1k2K5NVmMmygcpky7nn43PyZtGze-n4pzUD33YAZxVZTzSJPAdi5yPTaNzg_xt_9qabOh882e4Pbzm9_sIkacD8ntY8bRkVgNZ1o_4CK92g2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1644831408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jones, M.J ; Buchanan, A.S ; Neal, C.P ; Dennison, A.R ; Metcalfe, M.S ; Garcea, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, M.J ; Buchanan, A.S ; Neal, C.P ; Dennison, A.R ; Metcalfe, M.S ; Garcea, G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasing problem and investigation of these cysts can be fraught with difficulty. There is currently no gold standard for diagnosis or surveillance. This review was undertaken to determine the present reliability of the characterisation, assessment of malignant potential and diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions using available imaging modalities. Methods A Medline search using the terms ‘pancreatic’, ‘pancreas’, ‘cyst’, ‘cystic’, ‘lesions’, ‘imaging’, ‘PET’. ‘CT’, ‘MRI’ and ‘EUS’ was performed. Publications were screened to include studies examining the performance of CT, MRI, MRCP, EUS and 18-FDG PET in the determination of benign or malignant cysts, cyst morphology and specific diagnoses. Results Nineteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. 18-FDG PET had a sensitivity and specificity of 57.0–94.0% and 65.0–97.0% and an accuracy of 94% in determining benign versus malignant cysts. CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 36.3–71.4% and 63.9–100% in determining benign disease but had an accuracy of making a specific diagnosis of 39.0–44.7%. MRI had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.4–100.0% and 89.7% in assessing main pancreatic duct communication. Conclusion CT is a good quality initial investigation to be used in conjunction with clinical data. MRCP can add useful information regarding MPD communication but should be used judiciously. PET may have a role in equivocal cases to determine malignancy. Further examination of CT-PET in this patient group is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-3903</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-3911</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.05.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23890144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Cellular biology ; Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance ; Cystic ; Cysts ; Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism ; Endoscopy ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Histology ; Humans ; Imaging ; Lesion ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Pancreas ; Pancreas - diagnostic imaging ; Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis ; Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Review ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tumors ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 2013-07, Vol.13 (4), p.436-442</ispartof><rights>IAP and EPC</rights><rights>2013 IAP and EPC</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jul/Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-addc24166e32c6a5b7de54f3117a8a9c5d81a503223cc0b70dd4bc68d193de893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-addc24166e32c6a5b7de54f3117a8a9c5d81a503223cc0b70dd4bc68d193de893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23890144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, C.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennison, A.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcea, G</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review</title><title>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]</title><addtitle>Pancreatology</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasing problem and investigation of these cysts can be fraught with difficulty. There is currently no gold standard for diagnosis or surveillance. This review was undertaken to determine the present reliability of the characterisation, assessment of malignant potential and diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions using available imaging modalities. Methods A Medline search using the terms ‘pancreatic’, ‘pancreas’, ‘cyst’, ‘cystic’, ‘lesions’, ‘imaging’, ‘PET’. ‘CT’, ‘MRI’ and ‘EUS’ was performed. Publications were screened to include studies examining the performance of CT, MRI, MRCP, EUS and 18-FDG PET in the determination of benign or malignant cysts, cyst morphology and specific diagnoses. Results Nineteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. 18-FDG PET had a sensitivity and specificity of 57.0–94.0% and 65.0–97.0% and an accuracy of 94% in determining benign versus malignant cysts. CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 36.3–71.4% and 63.9–100% in determining benign disease but had an accuracy of making a specific diagnosis of 39.0–44.7%. MRI had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.4–100.0% and 89.7% in assessing main pancreatic duct communication. Conclusion CT is a good quality initial investigation to be used in conjunction with clinical data. MRCP can add useful information regarding MPD communication but should be used judiciously. PET may have a role in equivocal cases to determine malignancy. Further examination of CT-PET in this patient group is warranted.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance</subject><subject>Cystic</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Lesion</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Pancreas - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>1424-3903</issn><issn>1424-3911</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFO3DAQhi3UCijwAFyqSL30sumM7WSTVkJCqKVISD0UzpZ3PIu8TZzFzoL27euwFCQOPY1lf_Nr_I0QpwglAtZfVuXahlICqhKqEmC-Jw5RSz1TLeK7lzOoA_EhpRWAlIjtvjiQqmkBtT4Ul1e9vfPhrhiWhQ-OR469D3bkIkdTZDt6KmibptJx8kNIX4vzIuUb7p8eIz94fjwW75e2S3zyXI_E7Y_vNxc_Z9e_Lq8uzq9nVIEcZ9Y5khrrmpWk2laLueNKLxXi3Da2pco1aCtQUioiWMzBOb2gunHYKsdNq47E513uOg73G06j6X0i7jobeNgkgxqrGlqQTUY_vUFXwyaGPJ3BWutGoYaJwh1FcUgp8tKso-9t3BoEM1k2K5NVmMmygcpky7nn43PyZtGze-n4pzUD33YAZxVZTzSJPAdi5yPTaNzg_xt_9qabOh882e4Pbzm9_sIkacD8ntY8bRkVgNZ1o_4CK92g2w</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Jones, M.J</creator><creator>Buchanan, A.S</creator><creator>Neal, C.P</creator><creator>Dennison, A.R</creator><creator>Metcalfe, M.S</creator><creator>Garcea, G</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review</title><author>Jones, M.J ; Buchanan, A.S ; Neal, C.P ; Dennison, A.R ; Metcalfe, M.S ; Garcea, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-addc24166e32c6a5b7de54f3117a8a9c5d81a503223cc0b70dd4bc68d193de893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance</topic><topic>Cystic</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Lesion</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Pancreas - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, C.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennison, A.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcea, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, M.J</au><au>Buchanan, A.S</au><au>Neal, C.P</au><au>Dennison, A.R</au><au>Metcalfe, M.S</au><au>Garcea, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]</jtitle><addtitle>Pancreatology</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>436</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>436-442</pages><issn>1424-3903</issn><eissn>1424-3911</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasing problem and investigation of these cysts can be fraught with difficulty. There is currently no gold standard for diagnosis or surveillance. This review was undertaken to determine the present reliability of the characterisation, assessment of malignant potential and diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions using available imaging modalities. Methods A Medline search using the terms ‘pancreatic’, ‘pancreas’, ‘cyst’, ‘cystic’, ‘lesions’, ‘imaging’, ‘PET’. ‘CT’, ‘MRI’ and ‘EUS’ was performed. Publications were screened to include studies examining the performance of CT, MRI, MRCP, EUS and 18-FDG PET in the determination of benign or malignant cysts, cyst morphology and specific diagnoses. Results Nineteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. 18-FDG PET had a sensitivity and specificity of 57.0–94.0% and 65.0–97.0% and an accuracy of 94% in determining benign versus malignant cysts. CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 36.3–71.4% and 63.9–100% in determining benign disease but had an accuracy of making a specific diagnosis of 39.0–44.7%. MRI had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.4–100.0% and 89.7% in assessing main pancreatic duct communication. Conclusion CT is a good quality initial investigation to be used in conjunction with clinical data. MRCP can add useful information regarding MPD communication but should be used judiciously. PET may have a role in equivocal cases to determine malignancy. Further examination of CT-PET in this patient group is warranted.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>23890144</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pan.2013.05.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1424-3903
ispartof Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 2013-07, Vol.13 (4), p.436-442
issn 1424-3903
1424-3911
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1415609028
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accuracy
Cellular biology
Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance
Cystic
Cysts
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Endoscopy
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Histology
Humans
Imaging
Lesion
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Pancreas
Pancreas - diagnostic imaging
Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis
Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging
Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Positron-Emission Tomography
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiopharmaceuticals
Review
Sensitivity and Specificity
Studies
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tumors
Ultrasonography
title Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A50%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20of%20indeterminate%20pancreatic%20cystic%20lesions:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Pancreatology%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20International%20Association%20of%20Pancreatology%20(IAP)%20...%20%5Bet%20al.%5D&rft.au=Jones,%20M.J&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=436&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=436-442&rft.issn=1424-3903&rft.eissn=1424-3911&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pan.2013.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1415609028%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1644831408&rft_id=info:pmid/23890144&rft_els_id=S1424390313004468&rfr_iscdi=true