Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review
Abstract Background Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasing problem and investigation of these cysts can be fraught with difficulty. There is currently no gold standard for diagnosis or surveillance. This review was undertaken to determine the present reliability of the characterisation, assessm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] 2013-07, Vol.13 (4), p.436-442 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 442 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 436 |
container_title | Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Jones, M.J Buchanan, A.S Neal, C.P Dennison, A.R Metcalfe, M.S Garcea, G |
description | Abstract Background Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasing problem and investigation of these cysts can be fraught with difficulty. There is currently no gold standard for diagnosis or surveillance. This review was undertaken to determine the present reliability of the characterisation, assessment of malignant potential and diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions using available imaging modalities. Methods A Medline search using the terms ‘pancreatic’, ‘pancreas’, ‘cyst’, ‘cystic’, ‘lesions’, ‘imaging’, ‘PET’. ‘CT’, ‘MRI’ and ‘EUS’ was performed. Publications were screened to include studies examining the performance of CT, MRI, MRCP, EUS and 18-FDG PET in the determination of benign or malignant cysts, cyst morphology and specific diagnoses. Results Nineteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. 18-FDG PET had a sensitivity and specificity of 57.0–94.0% and 65.0–97.0% and an accuracy of 94% in determining benign versus malignant cysts. CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 36.3–71.4% and 63.9–100% in determining benign disease but had an accuracy of making a specific diagnosis of 39.0–44.7%. MRI had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.4–100.0% and 89.7% in assessing main pancreatic duct communication. Conclusion CT is a good quality initial investigation to be used in conjunction with clinical data. MRCP can add useful information regarding MPD communication but should be used judiciously. PET may have a role in equivocal cases to determine malignancy. Further examination of CT-PET in this patient group is warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pan.2013.05.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1415609028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1424390313004468</els_id><sourcerecordid>1415609028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-addc24166e32c6a5b7de54f3117a8a9c5d81a503223cc0b70dd4bc68d193de893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFO3DAQhi3UCijwAFyqSL30sumM7WSTVkJCqKVISD0UzpZ3PIu8TZzFzoL27euwFCQOPY1lf_Nr_I0QpwglAtZfVuXahlICqhKqEmC-Jw5RSz1TLeK7lzOoA_EhpRWAlIjtvjiQqmkBtT4Ul1e9vfPhrhiWhQ-OR469D3bkIkdTZDt6KmibptJx8kNIX4vzIuUb7p8eIz94fjwW75e2S3zyXI_E7Y_vNxc_Z9e_Lq8uzq9nVIEcZ9Y5khrrmpWk2laLueNKLxXi3Da2pco1aCtQUioiWMzBOb2gunHYKsdNq47E513uOg73G06j6X0i7jobeNgkgxqrGlqQTUY_vUFXwyaGPJ3BWutGoYaJwh1FcUgp8tKso-9t3BoEM1k2K5NVmMmygcpky7nn43PyZtGze-n4pzUD33YAZxVZTzSJPAdi5yPTaNzg_xt_9qabOh882e4Pbzm9_sIkacD8ntY8bRkVgNZ1o_4CK92g2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1644831408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jones, M.J ; Buchanan, A.S ; Neal, C.P ; Dennison, A.R ; Metcalfe, M.S ; Garcea, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, M.J ; Buchanan, A.S ; Neal, C.P ; Dennison, A.R ; Metcalfe, M.S ; Garcea, G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasing problem and investigation of these cysts can be fraught with difficulty. There is currently no gold standard for diagnosis or surveillance. This review was undertaken to determine the present reliability of the characterisation, assessment of malignant potential and diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions using available imaging modalities. Methods A Medline search using the terms ‘pancreatic’, ‘pancreas’, ‘cyst’, ‘cystic’, ‘lesions’, ‘imaging’, ‘PET’. ‘CT’, ‘MRI’ and ‘EUS’ was performed. Publications were screened to include studies examining the performance of CT, MRI, MRCP, EUS and 18-FDG PET in the determination of benign or malignant cysts, cyst morphology and specific diagnoses. Results Nineteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. 18-FDG PET had a sensitivity and specificity of 57.0–94.0% and 65.0–97.0% and an accuracy of 94% in determining benign versus malignant cysts. CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 36.3–71.4% and 63.9–100% in determining benign disease but had an accuracy of making a specific diagnosis of 39.0–44.7%. MRI had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.4–100.0% and 89.7% in assessing main pancreatic duct communication. Conclusion CT is a good quality initial investigation to be used in conjunction with clinical data. MRCP can add useful information regarding MPD communication but should be used judiciously. PET may have a role in equivocal cases to determine malignancy. Further examination of CT-PET in this patient group is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-3903</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-3911</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.05.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23890144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Cellular biology ; Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance ; Cystic ; Cysts ; Endocrinology & Metabolism ; Endoscopy ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Histology ; Humans ; Imaging ; Lesion ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Pancreas ; Pancreas - diagnostic imaging ; Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis ; Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Review ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tumors ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 2013-07, Vol.13 (4), p.436-442</ispartof><rights>IAP and EPC</rights><rights>2013 IAP and EPC</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jul/Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-addc24166e32c6a5b7de54f3117a8a9c5d81a503223cc0b70dd4bc68d193de893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-addc24166e32c6a5b7de54f3117a8a9c5d81a503223cc0b70dd4bc68d193de893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23890144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, C.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennison, A.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcea, G</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review</title><title>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]</title><addtitle>Pancreatology</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasing problem and investigation of these cysts can be fraught with difficulty. There is currently no gold standard for diagnosis or surveillance. This review was undertaken to determine the present reliability of the characterisation, assessment of malignant potential and diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions using available imaging modalities. Methods A Medline search using the terms ‘pancreatic’, ‘pancreas’, ‘cyst’, ‘cystic’, ‘lesions’, ‘imaging’, ‘PET’. ‘CT’, ‘MRI’ and ‘EUS’ was performed. Publications were screened to include studies examining the performance of CT, MRI, MRCP, EUS and 18-FDG PET in the determination of benign or malignant cysts, cyst morphology and specific diagnoses. Results Nineteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. 18-FDG PET had a sensitivity and specificity of 57.0–94.0% and 65.0–97.0% and an accuracy of 94% in determining benign versus malignant cysts. CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 36.3–71.4% and 63.9–100% in determining benign disease but had an accuracy of making a specific diagnosis of 39.0–44.7%. MRI had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.4–100.0% and 89.7% in assessing main pancreatic duct communication. Conclusion CT is a good quality initial investigation to be used in conjunction with clinical data. MRCP can add useful information regarding MPD communication but should be used judiciously. PET may have a role in equivocal cases to determine malignancy. Further examination of CT-PET in this patient group is warranted.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance</subject><subject>Cystic</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>Endocrinology & Metabolism</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Lesion</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Pancreas - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>1424-3903</issn><issn>1424-3911</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFO3DAQhi3UCijwAFyqSL30sumM7WSTVkJCqKVISD0UzpZ3PIu8TZzFzoL27euwFCQOPY1lf_Nr_I0QpwglAtZfVuXahlICqhKqEmC-Jw5RSz1TLeK7lzOoA_EhpRWAlIjtvjiQqmkBtT4Ul1e9vfPhrhiWhQ-OR469D3bkIkdTZDt6KmibptJx8kNIX4vzIuUb7p8eIz94fjwW75e2S3zyXI_E7Y_vNxc_Z9e_Lq8uzq9nVIEcZ9Y5khrrmpWk2laLueNKLxXi3Da2pco1aCtQUioiWMzBOb2gunHYKsdNq47E513uOg73G06j6X0i7jobeNgkgxqrGlqQTUY_vUFXwyaGPJ3BWutGoYaJwh1FcUgp8tKso-9t3BoEM1k2K5NVmMmygcpky7nn43PyZtGze-n4pzUD33YAZxVZTzSJPAdi5yPTaNzg_xt_9qabOh882e4Pbzm9_sIkacD8ntY8bRkVgNZ1o_4CK92g2w</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Jones, M.J</creator><creator>Buchanan, A.S</creator><creator>Neal, C.P</creator><creator>Dennison, A.R</creator><creator>Metcalfe, M.S</creator><creator>Garcea, G</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review</title><author>Jones, M.J ; Buchanan, A.S ; Neal, C.P ; Dennison, A.R ; Metcalfe, M.S ; Garcea, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-addc24166e32c6a5b7de54f3117a8a9c5d81a503223cc0b70dd4bc68d193de893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance</topic><topic>Cystic</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>Endocrinology & Metabolism</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Lesion</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Pancreas - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, C.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennison, A.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcea, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, M.J</au><au>Buchanan, A.S</au><au>Neal, C.P</au><au>Dennison, A.R</au><au>Metcalfe, M.S</au><au>Garcea, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]</jtitle><addtitle>Pancreatology</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>436</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>436-442</pages><issn>1424-3903</issn><eissn>1424-3911</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasing problem and investigation of these cysts can be fraught with difficulty. There is currently no gold standard for diagnosis or surveillance. This review was undertaken to determine the present reliability of the characterisation, assessment of malignant potential and diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions using available imaging modalities. Methods A Medline search using the terms ‘pancreatic’, ‘pancreas’, ‘cyst’, ‘cystic’, ‘lesions’, ‘imaging’, ‘PET’. ‘CT’, ‘MRI’ and ‘EUS’ was performed. Publications were screened to include studies examining the performance of CT, MRI, MRCP, EUS and 18-FDG PET in the determination of benign or malignant cysts, cyst morphology and specific diagnoses. Results Nineteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. 18-FDG PET had a sensitivity and specificity of 57.0–94.0% and 65.0–97.0% and an accuracy of 94% in determining benign versus malignant cysts. CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 36.3–71.4% and 63.9–100% in determining benign disease but had an accuracy of making a specific diagnosis of 39.0–44.7%. MRI had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.4–100.0% and 89.7% in assessing main pancreatic duct communication. Conclusion CT is a good quality initial investigation to be used in conjunction with clinical data. MRCP can add useful information regarding MPD communication but should be used judiciously. PET may have a role in equivocal cases to determine malignancy. Further examination of CT-PET in this patient group is warranted.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>23890144</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pan.2013.05.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1424-3903 |
ispartof | Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 2013-07, Vol.13 (4), p.436-442 |
issn | 1424-3903 1424-3911 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1415609028 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accuracy Cellular biology Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance Cystic Cysts Endocrinology & Metabolism Endoscopy Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Gastroenterology and Hepatology Histology Humans Imaging Lesion Magnetic Resonance Imaging NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Pancreas Pancreas - diagnostic imaging Pancreatic Cyst - diagnosis Pancreatic Cyst - diagnostic imaging Pancreatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Positron-Emission Tomography Predictive Value of Tests Radiopharmaceuticals Review Sensitivity and Specificity Studies Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed Tumors Ultrasonography |
title | Imaging of indeterminate pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A50%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20of%20indeterminate%20pancreatic%20cystic%20lesions:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Pancreatology%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20International%20Association%20of%20Pancreatology%20(IAP)%20...%20%5Bet%20al.%5D&rft.au=Jones,%20M.J&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=436&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=436-442&rft.issn=1424-3903&rft.eissn=1424-3911&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pan.2013.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1415609028%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1644831408&rft_id=info:pmid/23890144&rft_els_id=S1424390313004468&rfr_iscdi=true |