The Development of Accepted Performance Items to Demonstrate Braille Competence in the Nemeth Code for Mathematics and Science Notation
Introduction The purpose of the study presented here was the initial validation of a comprehensive set of competencies focused solely on the Nemeth code. Methods Using the Delphi method, 20 expert panelists were recruited to participate in the study on the basis of their past experience in teaching...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of visual impairment & blindness 2013-05, Vol.107 (3), p.167-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | Journal of visual impairment & blindness |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Smith, Derrick Rosenblum, L. Penny |
description | Introduction
The purpose of the study presented here was the initial validation of a comprehensive set of competencies focused solely on the Nemeth code.
Methods
Using the Delphi method, 20 expert panelists were recruited to participate in the study on the basis of their past experience in teaching a university-level course in the Nemeth code. The Delphi method uses multiple iterations or “rounds” to develop a consensus. The panelists were given the list of competencies developed by a focus group and were asked to rank their importance and the level of resources they would expect a beginning teacher of students with visual impairments to use. With each round, the panelists were provided with the statistical results and comments on the previous round, so they could make an informed decision on their next rating.
Results
Only three rounds were necessary for the panelists to reach a consensus. For writing, the panelists reached a consensus on 12 (41%) statements for importance and 17 (59%) for reference. For reading, they reached a consensus on 19 statements (66%) for importance and 23 (79%) for references. Comments from the panelists focused primarily on the fact that teachers of students with visual impairments need to use resources more often for writing to ensure the quality of their transcriptions, but that they should be able to read without resources. This difference may be due to the panelists’ perception that teachers of students with visual impairments need to be more equipped to back-translate from the Nemeth code into print than to transcribe from print into the Nemeth code.
Discussion
On the basis of the scoring and the comments, the panelists had different expectations for their students. These differences may have been due to their own level of understanding of the Nemeth code or mathematics in general.
Implications for practitioners
This study is the first step in developing a comprehensive set of Nemeth code competencies for the field of special education for students with visual impairments. These competencies will become the benchmark for all university programs as they develop their courses on the Nemeth code. They may also be used for the framework for professional development for in-service teachers of students with visual impairments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0145482X1310700302 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1413416288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A331005430</galeid><ericid>EJ1008209</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0145482X1310700302</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A331005430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-9934943d517904b47fc45a24b46e729fe58d5b1d3a8b917f4b6ac2d5c982fc263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1rFTEQhhdR8Fj9A4IQ8MabbfO52Vwej7VWahWs4N2Sk520KZtkm-QI_oL-bbMe8VvJRcLM876TTKZpHhN8SIiUR5hwwXv6kTCCJcYM0zvNigihWsJld7dZLUC7EPebBzlfY4wJ42TV3F5cAXoBn2CKs4dQULRobQzMBUb0DpKNyetgAJ0W8BmVWGEfQy5JF0DPk3bTBGgT_QwFFs4FVKrlOXgoVzUxAqoe6I2uUa-LMxnpMKL3xn3Fz2OpwRgeNvesnjI8-rYfNB9eHl9sXrVnb09ON-uz1vBOlFYpxhVnoyBSYb7l0houNK2nDiRVFkQ_ii0Zme63ikjLt502dBRG9dQa2rGD5tned07xZge5DN5lA9OkA8RdHghf-tLRvq_o09_Q67hLod5uoJJxKSjp2P8owjmtLe86_IO61BMMLthYG2iW0sOa1T_DgrOFOvwLVdcI3pkYwLoa_0VA9wKTYs4J7DAn53X6PBA8LIMx_DkYVfRkL4LkzHfB8etq2lOsav5on8_6En56zb8dvwDdrr7q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1442482660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Development of Accepted Performance Items to Demonstrate Braille Competence in the Nemeth Code for Mathematics and Science Notation</title><source>Sage Journals</source><creator>Smith, Derrick ; Rosenblum, L. Penny</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Derrick ; Rosenblum, L. Penny</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
The purpose of the study presented here was the initial validation of a comprehensive set of competencies focused solely on the Nemeth code.
Methods
Using the Delphi method, 20 expert panelists were recruited to participate in the study on the basis of their past experience in teaching a university-level course in the Nemeth code. The Delphi method uses multiple iterations or “rounds” to develop a consensus. The panelists were given the list of competencies developed by a focus group and were asked to rank their importance and the level of resources they would expect a beginning teacher of students with visual impairments to use. With each round, the panelists were provided with the statistical results and comments on the previous round, so they could make an informed decision on their next rating.
Results
Only three rounds were necessary for the panelists to reach a consensus. For writing, the panelists reached a consensus on 12 (41%) statements for importance and 17 (59%) for reference. For reading, they reached a consensus on 19 statements (66%) for importance and 23 (79%) for references. Comments from the panelists focused primarily on the fact that teachers of students with visual impairments need to use resources more often for writing to ensure the quality of their transcriptions, but that they should be able to read without resources. This difference may be due to the panelists’ perception that teachers of students with visual impairments need to be more equipped to back-translate from the Nemeth code into print than to transcribe from print into the Nemeth code.
Discussion
On the basis of the scoring and the comments, the panelists had different expectations for their students. These differences may have been due to their own level of understanding of the Nemeth code or mathematics in general.
Implications for practitioners
This study is the first step in developing a comprehensive set of Nemeth code competencies for the field of special education for students with visual impairments. These competencies will become the benchmark for all university programs as they develop their courses on the Nemeth code. They may also be used for the framework for professional development for in-service teachers of students with visual impairments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-482X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-1476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0145482X1310700302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Beginning Teachers ; Blind ; Blindness ; Braille ; Coding ; Curricula ; Delphi method ; Delphi Technique ; Education ; Experts ; Focus Groups ; Mathematical notation ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Education ; Methods ; People with disabilities ; Preservice Teachers ; Printing and writing systems ; Reading ; Sciences ; Secondary school students ; Skills ; Special education ; Special Education Teachers ; Students ; Teacher Competencies ; Teacher Education Programs ; Teaching Methods ; Visual Impairments ; Visually disabled persons ; Writing ; Writing (Composition)</subject><ispartof>Journal of visual impairment & blindness, 2013-05, Vol.107 (3), p.167-179</ispartof><rights>2013 American Foundation for the Blind</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Foundation for the Blind, Inc. May-Jun 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-9934943d517904b47fc45a24b46e729fe58d5b1d3a8b917f4b6ac2d5c982fc263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-9934943d517904b47fc45a24b46e729fe58d5b1d3a8b917f4b6ac2d5c982fc263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0145482X1310700302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0145482X1310700302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1008209$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Derrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblum, L. Penny</creatorcontrib><title>The Development of Accepted Performance Items to Demonstrate Braille Competence in the Nemeth Code for Mathematics and Science Notation</title><title>Journal of visual impairment & blindness</title><description>Introduction
The purpose of the study presented here was the initial validation of a comprehensive set of competencies focused solely on the Nemeth code.
Methods
Using the Delphi method, 20 expert panelists were recruited to participate in the study on the basis of their past experience in teaching a university-level course in the Nemeth code. The Delphi method uses multiple iterations or “rounds” to develop a consensus. The panelists were given the list of competencies developed by a focus group and were asked to rank their importance and the level of resources they would expect a beginning teacher of students with visual impairments to use. With each round, the panelists were provided with the statistical results and comments on the previous round, so they could make an informed decision on their next rating.
Results
Only three rounds were necessary for the panelists to reach a consensus. For writing, the panelists reached a consensus on 12 (41%) statements for importance and 17 (59%) for reference. For reading, they reached a consensus on 19 statements (66%) for importance and 23 (79%) for references. Comments from the panelists focused primarily on the fact that teachers of students with visual impairments need to use resources more often for writing to ensure the quality of their transcriptions, but that they should be able to read without resources. This difference may be due to the panelists’ perception that teachers of students with visual impairments need to be more equipped to back-translate from the Nemeth code into print than to transcribe from print into the Nemeth code.
Discussion
On the basis of the scoring and the comments, the panelists had different expectations for their students. These differences may have been due to their own level of understanding of the Nemeth code or mathematics in general.
Implications for practitioners
This study is the first step in developing a comprehensive set of Nemeth code competencies for the field of special education for students with visual impairments. These competencies will become the benchmark for all university programs as they develop their courses on the Nemeth code. They may also be used for the framework for professional development for in-service teachers of students with visual impairments.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Beginning Teachers</subject><subject>Blind</subject><subject>Blindness</subject><subject>Braille</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Mathematical notation</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Printing and writing systems</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Sciences</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Special education</subject><subject>Special Education Teachers</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher Competencies</subject><subject>Teacher Education Programs</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Visual Impairments</subject><subject>Visually disabled persons</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><issn>0145-482X</issn><issn>1559-1476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1rFTEQhhdR8Fj9A4IQ8MabbfO52Vwej7VWahWs4N2Sk520KZtkm-QI_oL-bbMe8VvJRcLM876TTKZpHhN8SIiUR5hwwXv6kTCCJcYM0zvNigihWsJld7dZLUC7EPebBzlfY4wJ42TV3F5cAXoBn2CKs4dQULRobQzMBUb0DpKNyetgAJ0W8BmVWGEfQy5JF0DPk3bTBGgT_QwFFs4FVKrlOXgoVzUxAqoe6I2uUa-LMxnpMKL3xn3Fz2OpwRgeNvesnjI8-rYfNB9eHl9sXrVnb09ON-uz1vBOlFYpxhVnoyBSYb7l0houNK2nDiRVFkQ_ii0Zme63ikjLt502dBRG9dQa2rGD5tned07xZge5DN5lA9OkA8RdHghf-tLRvq_o09_Q67hLod5uoJJxKSjp2P8owjmtLe86_IO61BMMLthYG2iW0sOa1T_DgrOFOvwLVdcI3pkYwLoa_0VA9wKTYs4J7DAn53X6PBA8LIMx_DkYVfRkL4LkzHfB8etq2lOsav5on8_6En56zb8dvwDdrr7q</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Smith, Derrick</creator><creator>Rosenblum, L. Penny</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Foundation for the Blind</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>The Development of Accepted Performance Items to Demonstrate Braille Competence in the Nemeth Code for Mathematics and Science Notation</title><author>Smith, Derrick ; Rosenblum, L. Penny</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-9934943d517904b47fc45a24b46e729fe58d5b1d3a8b917f4b6ac2d5c982fc263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Beginning Teachers</topic><topic>Blind</topic><topic>Blindness</topic><topic>Braille</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Mathematical notation</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Printing and writing systems</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Sciences</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Special education</topic><topic>Special Education Teachers</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher Competencies</topic><topic>Teacher Education Programs</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Visual Impairments</topic><topic>Visually disabled persons</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Derrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblum, L. Penny</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of visual impairment & blindness</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Derrick</au><au>Rosenblum, L. Penny</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1008209</ericid><atitle>The Development of Accepted Performance Items to Demonstrate Braille Competence in the Nemeth Code for Mathematics and Science Notation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of visual impairment & blindness</jtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>167-179</pages><issn>0145-482X</issn><eissn>1559-1476</eissn><abstract>Introduction
The purpose of the study presented here was the initial validation of a comprehensive set of competencies focused solely on the Nemeth code.
Methods
Using the Delphi method, 20 expert panelists were recruited to participate in the study on the basis of their past experience in teaching a university-level course in the Nemeth code. The Delphi method uses multiple iterations or “rounds” to develop a consensus. The panelists were given the list of competencies developed by a focus group and were asked to rank their importance and the level of resources they would expect a beginning teacher of students with visual impairments to use. With each round, the panelists were provided with the statistical results and comments on the previous round, so they could make an informed decision on their next rating.
Results
Only three rounds were necessary for the panelists to reach a consensus. For writing, the panelists reached a consensus on 12 (41%) statements for importance and 17 (59%) for reference. For reading, they reached a consensus on 19 statements (66%) for importance and 23 (79%) for references. Comments from the panelists focused primarily on the fact that teachers of students with visual impairments need to use resources more often for writing to ensure the quality of their transcriptions, but that they should be able to read without resources. This difference may be due to the panelists’ perception that teachers of students with visual impairments need to be more equipped to back-translate from the Nemeth code into print than to transcribe from print into the Nemeth code.
Discussion
On the basis of the scoring and the comments, the panelists had different expectations for their students. These differences may have been due to their own level of understanding of the Nemeth code or mathematics in general.
Implications for practitioners
This study is the first step in developing a comprehensive set of Nemeth code competencies for the field of special education for students with visual impairments. These competencies will become the benchmark for all university programs as they develop their courses on the Nemeth code. They may also be used for the framework for professional development for in-service teachers of students with visual impairments.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0145482X1310700302</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0145-482X |
ispartof | Journal of visual impairment & blindness, 2013-05, Vol.107 (3), p.167-179 |
issn | 0145-482X 1559-1476 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1413416288 |
source | Sage Journals |
subjects | Agreements Beginning Teachers Blind Blindness Braille Coding Curricula Delphi method Delphi Technique Education Experts Focus Groups Mathematical notation Mathematics Mathematics Education Methods People with disabilities Preservice Teachers Printing and writing systems Reading Sciences Secondary school students Skills Special education Special Education Teachers Students Teacher Competencies Teacher Education Programs Teaching Methods Visual Impairments Visually disabled persons Writing Writing (Composition) |
title | The Development of Accepted Performance Items to Demonstrate Braille Competence in the Nemeth Code for Mathematics and Science Notation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A53%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Development%20of%20Accepted%20Performance%20Items%20to%20Demonstrate%20Braille%20Competence%20in%20the%20Nemeth%20Code%20for%20Mathematics%20and%20Science%20Notation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20visual%20impairment%20&%20blindness&rft.au=Smith,%20Derrick&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=167-179&rft.issn=0145-482X&rft.eissn=1559-1476&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0145482X1310700302&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA331005430%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1442482660&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A331005430&rft_ericid=EJ1008209&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0145482X1310700302&rfr_iscdi=true |