Effects of Rose Cultivars and Fertilization Rates on Populations of Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Southern Florida
Roses (Rosa spp. L.) are important ornamental hosts of chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). The knowledge of how these thrips affect 8 cultivars of landscape roses popular in Florida (‘Angel Face’, ‘Don Juan’, ‘Pink Summer Snow’, ‘Radeon’, ‘Radrazz’, ‘Radsunny’, ‘St....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Florida entomologist 2013-06, Vol.96 (2), p.403-411 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 411 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 403 |
| container_title | The Florida entomologist |
| container_volume | 96 |
| creator | Mannion, Catharine M Derksen, Andrew I Seal, Dakshina R Osborne, Lance S Martin, Cliff G |
| description | Roses (Rosa spp. L.) are important ornamental hosts of chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). The knowledge of how these thrips affect 8 cultivars of landscape roses popular in Florida (‘Angel Face’, ‘Don Juan’, ‘Pink Summer Snow’, ‘Radeon’, ‘Radrazz’, ‘Radsunny’, ‘St. Patrick’, and ‘Sun Flare’) would help in developing techniques for integrated pest management of S. dorsalis. The effects of 3 rates of fertilizer and cultivars on population densities of chilli thrips and on host plant damage were evaluated. Fertilization rate, plant organ, and cultivar were important in determining S. dorsalis population density. Differences in total numbers of S. dorsalis, damage rating, and in numbers of flowers and buds produced were observed among different fertilizer rates. The higher rates recommended for accelerated floral growth resulted in more S. dorsalis damage, but not in more flowers than the rates suggested for maintenance. Among parts of the rose plant, buds had the highest density of S. dorsalis, followed by flowers and leaves, which had similar low densities. Larger flowers had more S. dorsalis than small flowers, but population densities were similar. Different cultivars of Knock-Out® rose were similar in their susceptibility to S. dorsalis, but ‘Radeon’, ‘Don Juan’, and ‘Sun Flare’ had more damage with lower S. dorsalis abundance and density than other the cultivars. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1653/024.096.0203 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1412563467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A349488868</galeid><jstor_id>23609325</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A349488868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b426t-59946300bca65e23f297311ff9bd602f6ad9f161af24a73a513c6f2d5d8130503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c-LEzEUB_BBFKyrN69CwMuuOPXlZyd7W8pWFxaUtp5DOpNsU6bJmGTE9R_w3zbdEWE9SA6B9z7v8eBbVa8xzLHg9AMQNgcp5kCAPqlmWNKm5hjI02oGgHnNgMHz6kVKBwCQhPNZ9evaWtPmhIJF65AMWo59dt91TEj7Dq1MzK53P3V2waO1zqZIj76EYewfag-Dm9bFHPI-uiGhLsSke5fQ-XZ_n7QPQzZRX6Ltqe06bS6Q82gTxrw30aNVH2KpvqyeWd0n8-rPf1Z9XV1vl5_q288fb5ZXt_WOEZFrLiUTFGDXasENoZbIBcXYWrnrBBArdCctFlhbwvSCao5pKyzpeNdgChzoWXU-7R1i-DaalNXRpdb0vfYmjElhhgkXlIlFoW__oYcwRl-uK4pxKjhhtKj5pO50b5TzNuSo2_I6c3Rt8Ma6Ur-iTLKmaURTBi4eDRSTzY98p8eU1M1m_di-n2wbQ0rRWDVEd9TxXmFQp8hViVyVyNUp8sLfTPyQcoh_LaECJCW89N9N_Z0L5bL_L_sNJ-KzoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1445365243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Rose Cultivars and Fertilization Rates on Populations of Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Southern Florida</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Mannion, Catharine M ; Derksen, Andrew I ; Seal, Dakshina R ; Osborne, Lance S ; Martin, Cliff G</creator><creatorcontrib>Mannion, Catharine M ; Derksen, Andrew I ; Seal, Dakshina R ; Osborne, Lance S ; Martin, Cliff G</creatorcontrib><description>Roses (Rosa spp. L.) are important ornamental hosts of chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). The knowledge of how these thrips affect 8 cultivars of landscape roses popular in Florida (‘Angel Face’, ‘Don Juan’, ‘Pink Summer Snow’, ‘Radeon’, ‘Radrazz’, ‘Radsunny’, ‘St. Patrick’, and ‘Sun Flare’) would help in developing techniques for integrated pest management of S. dorsalis. The effects of 3 rates of fertilizer and cultivars on population densities of chilli thrips and on host plant damage were evaluated. Fertilization rate, plant organ, and cultivar were important in determining S. dorsalis population density. Differences in total numbers of S. dorsalis, damage rating, and in numbers of flowers and buds produced were observed among different fertilizer rates. The higher rates recommended for accelerated floral growth resulted in more S. dorsalis damage, but not in more flowers than the rates suggested for maintenance. Among parts of the rose plant, buds had the highest density of S. dorsalis, followed by flowers and leaves, which had similar low densities. Larger flowers had more S. dorsalis than small flowers, but population densities were similar. Different cultivars of Knock-Out® rose were similar in their susceptibility to S. dorsalis, but ‘Radeon’, ‘Don Juan’, and ‘Sun Flare’ had more damage with lower S. dorsalis abundance and density than other the cultivars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-4040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1653/024.096.0203</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FETMAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lutz: Florida Entomological Society</publisher><subject>calificaciónes de daños ; Chilli thrips ; Cultivars ; damage rating ; Diseases and pests ; Fertilizer rates ; Fertilizers ; Flower buds ; Flowers ; Host plants ; Insect-plant relationships ; Leaves ; partes de planta ; Pests ; Physiological aspects ; plant parts ; Plants ; Population density ; Research Papers ; Rosa ; Rosa spp ; Roses ; Solar flares ; Thripidae ; Thysanoptera ; Trips de pimienta</subject><ispartof>The Florida entomologist, 2013-06, Vol.96 (2), p.403-411</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Florida Entomological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Florida Entomological Society Jun 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b426t-59946300bca65e23f297311ff9bd602f6ad9f161af24a73a513c6f2d5d8130503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b426t-59946300bca65e23f297311ff9bd602f6ad9f161af24a73a513c6f2d5d8130503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1653/024.096.0203$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23609325$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>109,314,780,784,25353,27923,27924,52718,54523,54529</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23609325$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mannion, Catharine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derksen, Andrew I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seal, Dakshina R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Lance S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Cliff G</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Rose Cultivars and Fertilization Rates on Populations of Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Southern Florida</title><title>The Florida entomologist</title><description>Roses (Rosa spp. L.) are important ornamental hosts of chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). The knowledge of how these thrips affect 8 cultivars of landscape roses popular in Florida (‘Angel Face’, ‘Don Juan’, ‘Pink Summer Snow’, ‘Radeon’, ‘Radrazz’, ‘Radsunny’, ‘St. Patrick’, and ‘Sun Flare’) would help in developing techniques for integrated pest management of S. dorsalis. The effects of 3 rates of fertilizer and cultivars on population densities of chilli thrips and on host plant damage were evaluated. Fertilization rate, plant organ, and cultivar were important in determining S. dorsalis population density. Differences in total numbers of S. dorsalis, damage rating, and in numbers of flowers and buds produced were observed among different fertilizer rates. The higher rates recommended for accelerated floral growth resulted in more S. dorsalis damage, but not in more flowers than the rates suggested for maintenance. Among parts of the rose plant, buds had the highest density of S. dorsalis, followed by flowers and leaves, which had similar low densities. Larger flowers had more S. dorsalis than small flowers, but population densities were similar. Different cultivars of Knock-Out® rose were similar in their susceptibility to S. dorsalis, but ‘Radeon’, ‘Don Juan’, and ‘Sun Flare’ had more damage with lower S. dorsalis abundance and density than other the cultivars.</description><subject>calificaciónes de daños</subject><subject>Chilli thrips</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>damage rating</subject><subject>Diseases and pests</subject><subject>Fertilizer rates</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Flower buds</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Insect-plant relationships</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>partes de planta</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>plant parts</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Rosa</subject><subject>Rosa spp</subject><subject>Roses</subject><subject>Solar flares</subject><subject>Thripidae</subject><subject>Thysanoptera</subject><subject>Trips de pimienta</subject><issn>0015-4040</issn><issn>1938-5102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c-LEzEUB_BBFKyrN69CwMuuOPXlZyd7W8pWFxaUtp5DOpNsU6bJmGTE9R_w3zbdEWE9SA6B9z7v8eBbVa8xzLHg9AMQNgcp5kCAPqlmWNKm5hjI02oGgHnNgMHz6kVKBwCQhPNZ9evaWtPmhIJF65AMWo59dt91TEj7Dq1MzK53P3V2waO1zqZIj76EYewfag-Dm9bFHPI-uiGhLsSke5fQ-XZ_n7QPQzZRX6Ltqe06bS6Q82gTxrw30aNVH2KpvqyeWd0n8-rPf1Z9XV1vl5_q288fb5ZXt_WOEZFrLiUTFGDXasENoZbIBcXYWrnrBBArdCctFlhbwvSCao5pKyzpeNdgChzoWXU-7R1i-DaalNXRpdb0vfYmjElhhgkXlIlFoW__oYcwRl-uK4pxKjhhtKj5pO50b5TzNuSo2_I6c3Rt8Ma6Ur-iTLKmaURTBi4eDRSTzY98p8eU1M1m_di-n2wbQ0rRWDVEd9TxXmFQp8hViVyVyNUp8sLfTPyQcoh_LaECJCW89N9N_Z0L5bL_L_sNJ-KzoQ</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Mannion, Catharine M</creator><creator>Derksen, Andrew I</creator><creator>Seal, Dakshina R</creator><creator>Osborne, Lance S</creator><creator>Martin, Cliff G</creator><general>Florida Entomological Society</general><general>The Florida Entomological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Effects of Rose Cultivars and Fertilization Rates on Populations of Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Southern Florida</title><author>Mannion, Catharine M ; Derksen, Andrew I ; Seal, Dakshina R ; Osborne, Lance S ; Martin, Cliff G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b426t-59946300bca65e23f297311ff9bd602f6ad9f161af24a73a513c6f2d5d8130503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>calificaciónes de daños</topic><topic>Chilli thrips</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>damage rating</topic><topic>Diseases and pests</topic><topic>Fertilizer rates</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Flower buds</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Insect-plant relationships</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>partes de planta</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>plant parts</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Rosa</topic><topic>Rosa spp</topic><topic>Roses</topic><topic>Solar flares</topic><topic>Thripidae</topic><topic>Thysanoptera</topic><topic>Trips de pimienta</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mannion, Catharine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derksen, Andrew I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seal, Dakshina R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Lance S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Cliff G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mannion, Catharine M</au><au>Derksen, Andrew I</au><au>Seal, Dakshina R</au><au>Osborne, Lance S</au><au>Martin, Cliff G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Rose Cultivars and Fertilization Rates on Populations of Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Southern Florida</atitle><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>403-411</pages><issn>0015-4040</issn><eissn>1938-5102</eissn><coden>FETMAC</coden><abstract>Roses (Rosa spp. L.) are important ornamental hosts of chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). The knowledge of how these thrips affect 8 cultivars of landscape roses popular in Florida (‘Angel Face’, ‘Don Juan’, ‘Pink Summer Snow’, ‘Radeon’, ‘Radrazz’, ‘Radsunny’, ‘St. Patrick’, and ‘Sun Flare’) would help in developing techniques for integrated pest management of S. dorsalis. The effects of 3 rates of fertilizer and cultivars on population densities of chilli thrips and on host plant damage were evaluated. Fertilization rate, plant organ, and cultivar were important in determining S. dorsalis population density. Differences in total numbers of S. dorsalis, damage rating, and in numbers of flowers and buds produced were observed among different fertilizer rates. The higher rates recommended for accelerated floral growth resulted in more S. dorsalis damage, but not in more flowers than the rates suggested for maintenance. Among parts of the rose plant, buds had the highest density of S. dorsalis, followed by flowers and leaves, which had similar low densities. Larger flowers had more S. dorsalis than small flowers, but population densities were similar. Different cultivars of Knock-Out® rose were similar in their susceptibility to S. dorsalis, but ‘Radeon’, ‘Don Juan’, and ‘Sun Flare’ had more damage with lower S. dorsalis abundance and density than other the cultivars.</abstract><cop>Lutz</cop><pub>Florida Entomological Society</pub><doi>10.1653/024.096.0203</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0015-4040 |
| ispartof | The Florida entomologist, 2013-06, Vol.96 (2), p.403-411 |
| issn | 0015-4040 1938-5102 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1412563467 |
| source | Jstor Journals Open Access |
| subjects | calificaciónes de daños Chilli thrips Cultivars damage rating Diseases and pests Fertilizer rates Fertilizers Flower buds Flowers Host plants Insect-plant relationships Leaves partes de planta Pests Physiological aspects plant parts Plants Population density Research Papers Rosa Rosa spp Roses Solar flares Thripidae Thysanoptera Trips de pimienta |
| title | Effects of Rose Cultivars and Fertilization Rates on Populations of Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Southern Florida |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A40%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Rose%20Cultivars%20and%20Fertilization%20Rates%20on%20Populations%20of%20Scirtothrips%20dorsalis%20(Thysanoptera:%20Thripidae)%20in%20Southern%20Florida&rft.jtitle=The%20Florida%20entomologist&rft.au=Mannion,%20Catharine%20M&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=403-411&rft.issn=0015-4040&rft.eissn=1938-5102&rft.coden=FETMAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1653/024.096.0203&rft_dat=%3Cgale_JFNAL%3EA349488868%3C/gale_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1445365243&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A349488868&rft_jstor_id=23609325&rfr_iscdi=true |