Comparison of the Effects of Columellar Strut and Septal Extension Grafts for Tip Support in Rhinoplasty
Background The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of columellar strut and septal extension grafts for reconstruction of caudal nasal supportive structures on the long-term stability of nasal projection and rotation. Methods A comparison was done on the differences between the early- an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aesthetic plastic surgery 2013-08, Vol.37 (4), p.666-673 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 673 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 666 |
container_title | Aesthetic plastic surgery |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Akkus, Ali Murat Eryilmaz, Erhan Guneren, Ethem |
description | Background
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of columellar strut and septal extension grafts for reconstruction of caudal nasal supportive structures on the long-term stability of nasal projection and rotation.
Methods
A comparison was done on the differences between the early- and long-term results of the ratios of nasal projection to nasal length and columella labial angle values in 36 patients who were operated on by the same surgeon using columellar or septal extension grafts.
Results
Both grafts had the effect of increasing nasal projection, and this effect was found to be stable over time. Some increased values of nasal projection obtained in the early postoperative period were lost over time. Although no significant difference was found between the groups, clinical and numerical observations showed that the values decreased less in the group that received septal extension grafts.
Conclusion
The tip position was more stable in cases with septal extension grafts than in those with columellar strut grafts.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00266-013-0141-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1411626658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1411626658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3582b9461d7de2f4a7a1df5dbd7ba343e97a136c1b49caf63330c578593c693a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LBCEYhSWK2j5-QDchdNPNlK86unMZy_YBQdBu0J04M9rOMjNO6kD9-1y2IoIuRNTnHPUchE6BXAIh8ioQQoXICLA0OGSwgybAGc1yymEXTQgTPKMgXg7QYQhrQoBKyffRAWWSTCkXE7SauW7Qvgmux87iuDJ4bq2pYtgsZ64dO9O22uNF9GPEuq_xwgxRt3j-Hk0fmqS79dom3jqPl82AF-MwOB9x0-OnVdO7odUhfhyjPavbYE6-5iP0fDNfzu6yh8fb-9n1Q1YxSWPG8iktCy6glrWhlmupobZ5Xday1IwzU6QNJiooeVFpKxhjpMrlNC9YJQqm2RG62PoO3r2NJkTVNaHa_KE3bgwq5QQipZZPE3r-B1270ffpdYkipCikhCJRsKUq70LwxqrBN532HwqI2tSgtjWoVIPa1KAgac6-nMeyM_WP4jv3BNAtENJR_2r8r6v_df0E4TCSDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1400997719</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Effects of Columellar Strut and Septal Extension Grafts for Tip Support in Rhinoplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Akkus, Ali Murat ; Eryilmaz, Erhan ; Guneren, Ethem</creator><creatorcontrib>Akkus, Ali Murat ; Eryilmaz, Erhan ; Guneren, Ethem</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of columellar strut and septal extension grafts for reconstruction of caudal nasal supportive structures on the long-term stability of nasal projection and rotation.
Methods
A comparison was done on the differences between the early- and long-term results of the ratios of nasal projection to nasal length and columella labial angle values in 36 patients who were operated on by the same surgeon using columellar or septal extension grafts.
Results
Both grafts had the effect of increasing nasal projection, and this effect was found to be stable over time. Some increased values of nasal projection obtained in the early postoperative period were lost over time. Although no significant difference was found between the groups, clinical and numerical observations showed that the values decreased less in the group that received septal extension grafts.
Conclusion
The tip position was more stable in cases with septal extension grafts than in those with columellar strut grafts.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-216X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00266-013-0141-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23708246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nasal Septum - surgery ; Original Article ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Plastic Surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Rhinoplasty - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2013-08, Vol.37 (4), p.666-673</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3582b9461d7de2f4a7a1df5dbd7ba343e97a136c1b49caf63330c578593c693a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3582b9461d7de2f4a7a1df5dbd7ba343e97a136c1b49caf63330c578593c693a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00266-013-0141-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00266-013-0141-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23708246$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akkus, Ali Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eryilmaz, Erhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guneren, Ethem</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Effects of Columellar Strut and Septal Extension Grafts for Tip Support in Rhinoplasty</title><title>Aesthetic plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Aesth Plast Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Background
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of columellar strut and septal extension grafts for reconstruction of caudal nasal supportive structures on the long-term stability of nasal projection and rotation.
Methods
A comparison was done on the differences between the early- and long-term results of the ratios of nasal projection to nasal length and columella labial angle values in 36 patients who were operated on by the same surgeon using columellar or septal extension grafts.
Results
Both grafts had the effect of increasing nasal projection, and this effect was found to be stable over time. Some increased values of nasal projection obtained in the early postoperative period were lost over time. Although no significant difference was found between the groups, clinical and numerical observations showed that the values decreased less in the group that received septal extension grafts.
Conclusion
The tip position was more stable in cases with septal extension grafts than in those with columellar strut grafts.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nasal Septum - surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1LBCEYhSWK2j5-QDchdNPNlK86unMZy_YBQdBu0J04M9rOMjNO6kD9-1y2IoIuRNTnHPUchE6BXAIh8ioQQoXICLA0OGSwgybAGc1yymEXTQgTPKMgXg7QYQhrQoBKyffRAWWSTCkXE7SauW7Qvgmux87iuDJ4bq2pYtgsZ64dO9O22uNF9GPEuq_xwgxRt3j-Hk0fmqS79dom3jqPl82AF-MwOB9x0-OnVdO7odUhfhyjPavbYE6-5iP0fDNfzu6yh8fb-9n1Q1YxSWPG8iktCy6glrWhlmupobZ5Xday1IwzU6QNJiooeVFpKxhjpMrlNC9YJQqm2RG62PoO3r2NJkTVNaHa_KE3bgwq5QQipZZPE3r-B1270ffpdYkipCikhCJRsKUq70LwxqrBN532HwqI2tSgtjWoVIPa1KAgac6-nMeyM_WP4jv3BNAtENJR_2r8r6v_df0E4TCSDw</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Akkus, Ali Murat</creator><creator>Eryilmaz, Erhan</creator><creator>Guneren, Ethem</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Effects of Columellar Strut and Septal Extension Grafts for Tip Support in Rhinoplasty</title><author>Akkus, Ali Murat ; Eryilmaz, Erhan ; Guneren, Ethem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3582b9461d7de2f4a7a1df5dbd7ba343e97a136c1b49caf63330c578593c693a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nasal Septum - surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akkus, Ali Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eryilmaz, Erhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guneren, Ethem</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akkus, Ali Murat</au><au>Eryilmaz, Erhan</au><au>Guneren, Ethem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Effects of Columellar Strut and Septal Extension Grafts for Tip Support in Rhinoplasty</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle><stitle>Aesth Plast Surg</stitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>666</spage><epage>673</epage><pages>666-673</pages><issn>0364-216X</issn><eissn>1432-5241</eissn><abstract>Background
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of columellar strut and septal extension grafts for reconstruction of caudal nasal supportive structures on the long-term stability of nasal projection and rotation.
Methods
A comparison was done on the differences between the early- and long-term results of the ratios of nasal projection to nasal length and columella labial angle values in 36 patients who were operated on by the same surgeon using columellar or septal extension grafts.
Results
Both grafts had the effect of increasing nasal projection, and this effect was found to be stable over time. Some increased values of nasal projection obtained in the early postoperative period were lost over time. Although no significant difference was found between the groups, clinical and numerical observations showed that the values decreased less in the group that received septal extension grafts.
Conclusion
The tip position was more stable in cases with septal extension grafts than in those with columellar strut grafts.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>23708246</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00266-013-0141-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-216X |
ispartof | Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2013-08, Vol.37 (4), p.666-673 |
issn | 0364-216X 1432-5241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1411626658 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Female Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nasal Septum - surgery Original Article Otorhinolaryngology Plastic Surgery Retrospective Studies Rhinoplasty - methods Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Comparison of the Effects of Columellar Strut and Septal Extension Grafts for Tip Support in Rhinoplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A32%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Effects%20of%20Columellar%20Strut%20and%20Septal%20Extension%20Grafts%20for%20Tip%20Support%20in%20Rhinoplasty&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Akkus,%20Ali%20Murat&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=666&rft.epage=673&rft.pages=666-673&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00266-013-0141-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1411626658%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1400997719&rft_id=info:pmid/23708246&rfr_iscdi=true |