Dual-energy subtraction radiography improves laryngeal delineation in patients with moderate to severe cervical spondylosis
Purpose To investigate the feasibility of dual-energy subtraction (DES) in patients with moderate-severe cervical spondylosis for improving delineation of the larynx on flat panel detector (FPD) radiography. Materials and methods For 118 patients, we graded conventional/DES anterior–posterior views...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Japanese journal of radiology 2013-07, Vol.31 (7), p.465-470 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 470 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 465 |
container_title | Japanese journal of radiology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Machida, Haruhiko Yoda, Keiko Arai, Yasuko Nishida, Suguru Asanuma, Masayasu Yuhara, Toshiyuki Mori, Takako Tamura, Mieko Ueno, Eiko Sabol, John M. |
description | Purpose
To investigate the feasibility of dual-energy subtraction (DES) in patients with moderate-severe cervical spondylosis for improving delineation of the larynx on flat panel detector (FPD) radiography.
Materials and methods
For 118 patients, we graded conventional/DES anterior–posterior views for delineation of the vocal cords, subglottis, and pyriform sinus using a 5-point scale and lateral views from conventional laryngeal FPD radiography to determine cervical spondylosis severity on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). We compared the delineation of each anatomical structure in both groups of grades 0–1 and grades 2–3 of spondylosis severity between conventional and DES methods and the improved delineation rate for each anatomical structure by DES compared to the conventional method between both groups.
Results
With DES, the delineation of each anatomical structure was significantly better than with conventional radiography for both groups (
P
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11604-013-0219-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1406177000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1406177000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-25a8cc6497f668451e8456e7bd2020cdae2e3c7be8880584d3701a89789bcfdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9rHSEUxSW0NGmSD5BNEbrJZtrr6FNnGZL0DwS6aaE7cfS-F8OMTnTmlUe_fH19aSiFbvSCv3PUcwi5YPCOAaj3hTEJogHGG2hZ1_AjcsK0VA0D_f3F86zYMXldygOAFFyIV-S45UoIobsT8vNmsUODEfNmR8vSz9m6OaRIs_UhbbKd7nc0jFNOWyx0sHkXN2gH6nEIEe1vNEQ61QnjXOiPMN_TMXnMdkY6J1pwixmpw7wNrgrLlKLfDamEckZeru1Q8PxpPyXfPtx-vf7U3H35-Pn66q5xXOi5aVdWOydFp9ZSarFiWBeJqvcttOC8xRa5Uz1qrWGlhecKmNWd0l3v1t7xU3J58K2_eFywzGYMxeEw2IhpKYYJkEwpAKjo23_Qh7TkWF-3p6CmzeWeYgfK5VRKxrWZchhrNoaB2TdjDs2Y2ozZN2N41bx5cl76Ef2z4k8VFWgPQKlHNeT819X_df0FWombUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1400604360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dual-energy subtraction radiography improves laryngeal delineation in patients with moderate to severe cervical spondylosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Machida, Haruhiko ; Yoda, Keiko ; Arai, Yasuko ; Nishida, Suguru ; Asanuma, Masayasu ; Yuhara, Toshiyuki ; Mori, Takako ; Tamura, Mieko ; Ueno, Eiko ; Sabol, John M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Machida, Haruhiko ; Yoda, Keiko ; Arai, Yasuko ; Nishida, Suguru ; Asanuma, Masayasu ; Yuhara, Toshiyuki ; Mori, Takako ; Tamura, Mieko ; Ueno, Eiko ; Sabol, John M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To investigate the feasibility of dual-energy subtraction (DES) in patients with moderate-severe cervical spondylosis for improving delineation of the larynx on flat panel detector (FPD) radiography.
Materials and methods
For 118 patients, we graded conventional/DES anterior–posterior views for delineation of the vocal cords, subglottis, and pyriform sinus using a 5-point scale and lateral views from conventional laryngeal FPD radiography to determine cervical spondylosis severity on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). We compared the delineation of each anatomical structure in both groups of grades 0–1 and grades 2–3 of spondylosis severity between conventional and DES methods and the improved delineation rate for each anatomical structure by DES compared to the conventional method between both groups.
Results
With DES, the delineation of each anatomical structure was significantly better than with conventional radiography for both groups (
P
< 0.0001). The improved delineation rate of the vocal cord and subglottis using DES was significantly higher in grades 2–3 than in grades 0–1 (
P
< 0.05), although there was no significant difference in the delineation rate of the pyriform sinus between the groups (
P
= 0.847).
Conclusion
DES provides better delineation of the laryngeal anatomy than conventional FPD radiography predominantly in patients with moderate-severe cervical spondylosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-1071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-108X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11604-013-0219-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23744489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Larynx - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nuclear Medicine ; Original Article ; Radiography ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Spondylosis - diagnostic imaging ; Subtraction Technique ; X-Ray Intensifying Screens</subject><ispartof>Japanese journal of radiology, 2013-07, Vol.31 (7), p.465-470</ispartof><rights>Japan Radiological Society 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-25a8cc6497f668451e8456e7bd2020cdae2e3c7be8880584d3701a89789bcfdc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11604-013-0219-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11604-013-0219-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23744489$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machida, Haruhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoda, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Yasuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Suguru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asanuma, Masayasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuhara, Toshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamura, Mieko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueno, Eiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabol, John M.</creatorcontrib><title>Dual-energy subtraction radiography improves laryngeal delineation in patients with moderate to severe cervical spondylosis</title><title>Japanese journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose
To investigate the feasibility of dual-energy subtraction (DES) in patients with moderate-severe cervical spondylosis for improving delineation of the larynx on flat panel detector (FPD) radiography.
Materials and methods
For 118 patients, we graded conventional/DES anterior–posterior views for delineation of the vocal cords, subglottis, and pyriform sinus using a 5-point scale and lateral views from conventional laryngeal FPD radiography to determine cervical spondylosis severity on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). We compared the delineation of each anatomical structure in both groups of grades 0–1 and grades 2–3 of spondylosis severity between conventional and DES methods and the improved delineation rate for each anatomical structure by DES compared to the conventional method between both groups.
Results
With DES, the delineation of each anatomical structure was significantly better than with conventional radiography for both groups (
P
< 0.0001). The improved delineation rate of the vocal cord and subglottis using DES was significantly higher in grades 2–3 than in grades 0–1 (
P
< 0.05), although there was no significant difference in the delineation rate of the pyriform sinus between the groups (
P
= 0.847).
Conclusion
DES provides better delineation of the laryngeal anatomy than conventional FPD radiography predominantly in patients with moderate-severe cervical spondylosis.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Larynx - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spondylosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Subtraction Technique</subject><subject>X-Ray Intensifying Screens</subject><issn>1867-1071</issn><issn>1867-108X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9rHSEUxSW0NGmSD5BNEbrJZtrr6FNnGZL0DwS6aaE7cfS-F8OMTnTmlUe_fH19aSiFbvSCv3PUcwi5YPCOAaj3hTEJogHGG2hZ1_AjcsK0VA0D_f3F86zYMXldygOAFFyIV-S45UoIobsT8vNmsUODEfNmR8vSz9m6OaRIs_UhbbKd7nc0jFNOWyx0sHkXN2gH6nEIEe1vNEQ61QnjXOiPMN_TMXnMdkY6J1pwixmpw7wNrgrLlKLfDamEckZeru1Q8PxpPyXfPtx-vf7U3H35-Pn66q5xXOi5aVdWOydFp9ZSarFiWBeJqvcttOC8xRa5Uz1qrWGlhecKmNWd0l3v1t7xU3J58K2_eFywzGYMxeEw2IhpKYYJkEwpAKjo23_Qh7TkWF-3p6CmzeWeYgfK5VRKxrWZchhrNoaB2TdjDs2Y2ozZN2N41bx5cl76Ef2z4k8VFWgPQKlHNeT819X_df0FWombUA</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Machida, Haruhiko</creator><creator>Yoda, Keiko</creator><creator>Arai, Yasuko</creator><creator>Nishida, Suguru</creator><creator>Asanuma, Masayasu</creator><creator>Yuhara, Toshiyuki</creator><creator>Mori, Takako</creator><creator>Tamura, Mieko</creator><creator>Ueno, Eiko</creator><creator>Sabol, John M.</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Dual-energy subtraction radiography improves laryngeal delineation in patients with moderate to severe cervical spondylosis</title><author>Machida, Haruhiko ; Yoda, Keiko ; Arai, Yasuko ; Nishida, Suguru ; Asanuma, Masayasu ; Yuhara, Toshiyuki ; Mori, Takako ; Tamura, Mieko ; Ueno, Eiko ; Sabol, John M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-25a8cc6497f668451e8456e7bd2020cdae2e3c7be8880584d3701a89789bcfdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Larynx - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spondylosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Subtraction Technique</topic><topic>X-Ray Intensifying Screens</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machida, Haruhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoda, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Yasuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Suguru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asanuma, Masayasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuhara, Toshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamura, Mieko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueno, Eiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabol, John M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Japanese journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machida, Haruhiko</au><au>Yoda, Keiko</au><au>Arai, Yasuko</au><au>Nishida, Suguru</au><au>Asanuma, Masayasu</au><au>Yuhara, Toshiyuki</au><au>Mori, Takako</au><au>Tamura, Mieko</au><au>Ueno, Eiko</au><au>Sabol, John M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dual-energy subtraction radiography improves laryngeal delineation in patients with moderate to severe cervical spondylosis</atitle><jtitle>Japanese journal of radiology</jtitle><stitle>Jpn J Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>465</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>465-470</pages><issn>1867-1071</issn><eissn>1867-108X</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To investigate the feasibility of dual-energy subtraction (DES) in patients with moderate-severe cervical spondylosis for improving delineation of the larynx on flat panel detector (FPD) radiography.
Materials and methods
For 118 patients, we graded conventional/DES anterior–posterior views for delineation of the vocal cords, subglottis, and pyriform sinus using a 5-point scale and lateral views from conventional laryngeal FPD radiography to determine cervical spondylosis severity on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). We compared the delineation of each anatomical structure in both groups of grades 0–1 and grades 2–3 of spondylosis severity between conventional and DES methods and the improved delineation rate for each anatomical structure by DES compared to the conventional method between both groups.
Results
With DES, the delineation of each anatomical structure was significantly better than with conventional radiography for both groups (
P
< 0.0001). The improved delineation rate of the vocal cord and subglottis using DES was significantly higher in grades 2–3 than in grades 0–1 (
P
< 0.05), although there was no significant difference in the delineation rate of the pyriform sinus between the groups (
P
= 0.847).
Conclusion
DES provides better delineation of the laryngeal anatomy than conventional FPD radiography predominantly in patients with moderate-severe cervical spondylosis.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>23744489</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11604-013-0219-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1867-1071 |
ispartof | Japanese journal of radiology, 2013-07, Vol.31 (7), p.465-470 |
issn | 1867-1071 1867-108X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1406177000 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Complete Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Child Child, Preschool Feasibility Studies Female Humans Imaging Larynx - diagnostic imaging Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Nuclear Medicine Original Article Radiography Radiology Radiotherapy Retrospective Studies Spondylosis - diagnostic imaging Subtraction Technique X-Ray Intensifying Screens |
title | Dual-energy subtraction radiography improves laryngeal delineation in patients with moderate to severe cervical spondylosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A03%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dual-energy%20subtraction%20radiography%20improves%20laryngeal%20delineation%20in%20patients%20with%20moderate%20to%20severe%20cervical%20spondylosis&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Machida,%20Haruhiko&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=465&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=465-470&rft.issn=1867-1071&rft.eissn=1867-108X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11604-013-0219-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1406177000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1400604360&rft_id=info:pmid/23744489&rfr_iscdi=true |