Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection
Background Our aim was to evaluate complications and long-term functional outcome in patients who had sphincter reconstruction using the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment. Methods Seven patients underwent reconstruction from 2000...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Techniques in coloproctology 2013-08, Vol.17 (4), p.425-429 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 429 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 425 |
container_title | Techniques in coloproctology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Puerta Díaz, J. D. Castaño Llano, R. Lombana, L. J. Restrepo, J. I. Gómez, G. |
description | Background
Our aim was to evaluate complications and long-term functional outcome in patients who had sphincter reconstruction using the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment.
Methods
Seven patients underwent reconstruction from 2000 to 2010. First, the sigmoid colon was brought down to the perineum as a perineal colostomy, with the procedure protected by a loop ileostomy. Reconstruction of the sphincter mechanism using the gluteus maximus took place 3 months later, and after another 8–12 weeks, the loop ileostomy was closed. We studied the functional outcome of these interventions with follow-up interviews of patients and objectively assessed anorectal function using manometry and the Cleveland Clinic Florida (Jorge-Wexner) fecal incontinence score.
Results
The mean follow-up was 56 months (median 47; range 10–123 months). One patient had a perianal wound infection and another had fibrotic stricture in the colocutaneous anastomosis that required several digital dilatations. Anorectal manometry at 3-month follow-up showed resting pressures from 10 to 18 mm Hg and voluntary contraction pressures from 68 to 187 mm Hg. Four patients had excellent sphincter function (Jorge-Wexner scores ≤5).
Conclusions
Our preliminary results show that sphincter reconstruction by means of gluteus maximus transposition can be effective in restoring gastrointestinal continuity and recovering fecal continence in patients who have undergone APR with permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. Furthermore, the reconstruction procedure can be performed 2–4 years after the APR. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1400622858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1400622858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a0845042aee5f9284bc47929c37643e6e4126b44db3e9233527a0afc8901a5be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoyCabfIBciqGXXtzM6I9lH8uSJoFAL13ITcje8cbBtraSTZP99JXX2xIKPY3Q-70nDY-xa4QvCKBvAgIqTAF5CkWG6f6EnSPyPAWpnj4cziLNhNALdhHCCwBqrfCMLbjgkqsMz9mvdaDE1cnwTMm2HQcaQ9LZ16ab5hiqlhIbDmpPLuyem74ayCe184mnMDhvh8b1U4LtbZvUY9SnC1tPmC03rmt6tyPf9BT16KEDcMlOa9sGujrOJVt_u_2xuk8fv989rL4-ppXQfEgt5FKB5JZI1QXPZVlJXfAiqpkUlJFEnpVSbkpBBRdCcW3B1lVeAFpVkliyz3PuzrufY_yx6ZpQUdvauM8YDEqAjPNc5RH99A_64kYft5opKEBrHSmcqcq7EDzVZuebzvo3g2CmVszciomtmKkVs4-ej8fksexo89fxp4YI8BkIUeq35N89_d_U3_7emSE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1400090777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Puerta Díaz, J. D. ; Castaño Llano, R. ; Lombana, L. J. ; Restrepo, J. I. ; Gómez, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Puerta Díaz, J. D. ; Castaño Llano, R. ; Lombana, L. J. ; Restrepo, J. I. ; Gómez, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Our aim was to evaluate complications and long-term functional outcome in patients who had sphincter reconstruction using the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment.
Methods
Seven patients underwent reconstruction from 2000 to 2010. First, the sigmoid colon was brought down to the perineum as a perineal colostomy, with the procedure protected by a loop ileostomy. Reconstruction of the sphincter mechanism using the gluteus maximus took place 3 months later, and after another 8–12 weeks, the loop ileostomy was closed. We studied the functional outcome of these interventions with follow-up interviews of patients and objectively assessed anorectal function using manometry and the Cleveland Clinic Florida (Jorge-Wexner) fecal incontinence score.
Results
The mean follow-up was 56 months (median 47; range 10–123 months). One patient had a perianal wound infection and another had fibrotic stricture in the colocutaneous anastomosis that required several digital dilatations. Anorectal manometry at 3-month follow-up showed resting pressures from 10 to 18 mm Hg and voluntary contraction pressures from 68 to 187 mm Hg. Four patients had excellent sphincter function (Jorge-Wexner scores ≤5).
Conclusions
Our preliminary results show that sphincter reconstruction by means of gluteus maximus transposition can be effective in restoring gastrointestinal continuity and recovering fecal continence in patients who have undergone APR with permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. Furthermore, the reconstruction procedure can be performed 2–4 years after the APR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1123-6337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1128-045X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23242561</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TECOFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milan: Springer Milan</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Anal Canal - pathology ; Anal Canal - surgery ; Buttocks - surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Colorectal Surgery ; Colostomy - methods ; Fecal Incontinence - prevention & control ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Laparotomy - methods ; Male ; Manometry ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation ; Original Article ; Perineum - surgery ; Postoperative Care - methods ; Proctology ; Quality of Life ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Reoperation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical Flaps - blood supply ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Techniques in coloproctology, 2013-08, Vol.17 (4), p.425-429</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Italia 2012</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Italia 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a0845042aee5f9284bc47929c37643e6e4126b44db3e9233527a0afc8901a5be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a0845042aee5f9284bc47929c37643e6e4126b44db3e9233527a0afc8901a5be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23242561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Puerta Díaz, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castaño Llano, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombana, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restrepo, J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection</title><title>Techniques in coloproctology</title><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><description>Background
Our aim was to evaluate complications and long-term functional outcome in patients who had sphincter reconstruction using the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment.
Methods
Seven patients underwent reconstruction from 2000 to 2010. First, the sigmoid colon was brought down to the perineum as a perineal colostomy, with the procedure protected by a loop ileostomy. Reconstruction of the sphincter mechanism using the gluteus maximus took place 3 months later, and after another 8–12 weeks, the loop ileostomy was closed. We studied the functional outcome of these interventions with follow-up interviews of patients and objectively assessed anorectal function using manometry and the Cleveland Clinic Florida (Jorge-Wexner) fecal incontinence score.
Results
The mean follow-up was 56 months (median 47; range 10–123 months). One patient had a perianal wound infection and another had fibrotic stricture in the colocutaneous anastomosis that required several digital dilatations. Anorectal manometry at 3-month follow-up showed resting pressures from 10 to 18 mm Hg and voluntary contraction pressures from 68 to 187 mm Hg. Four patients had excellent sphincter function (Jorge-Wexner scores ≤5).
Conclusions
Our preliminary results show that sphincter reconstruction by means of gluteus maximus transposition can be effective in restoring gastrointestinal continuity and recovering fecal continence in patients who have undergone APR with permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. Furthermore, the reconstruction procedure can be performed 2–4 years after the APR.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anal Canal - pathology</subject><subject>Anal Canal - surgery</subject><subject>Buttocks - surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery</subject><subject>Colostomy - methods</subject><subject>Fecal Incontinence - prevention & control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparotomy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manometry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Perineum - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps - blood supply</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>1123-6337</issn><issn>1128-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoyCabfIBciqGXXtzM6I9lH8uSJoFAL13ITcje8cbBtraSTZP99JXX2xIKPY3Q-70nDY-xa4QvCKBvAgIqTAF5CkWG6f6EnSPyPAWpnj4cziLNhNALdhHCCwBqrfCMLbjgkqsMz9mvdaDE1cnwTMm2HQcaQ9LZ16ab5hiqlhIbDmpPLuyem74ayCe184mnMDhvh8b1U4LtbZvUY9SnC1tPmC03rmt6tyPf9BT16KEDcMlOa9sGujrOJVt_u_2xuk8fv989rL4-ppXQfEgt5FKB5JZI1QXPZVlJXfAiqpkUlJFEnpVSbkpBBRdCcW3B1lVeAFpVkliyz3PuzrufY_yx6ZpQUdvauM8YDEqAjPNc5RH99A_64kYft5opKEBrHSmcqcq7EDzVZuebzvo3g2CmVszciomtmKkVs4-ej8fksexo89fxp4YI8BkIUeq35N89_d_U3_7emSE</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Puerta Díaz, J. D.</creator><creator>Castaño Llano, R.</creator><creator>Lombana, L. J.</creator><creator>Restrepo, J. I.</creator><creator>Gómez, G.</creator><general>Springer Milan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection</title><author>Puerta Díaz, J. D. ; Castaño Llano, R. ; Lombana, L. J. ; Restrepo, J. I. ; Gómez, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a0845042aee5f9284bc47929c37643e6e4126b44db3e9233527a0afc8901a5be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anal Canal - pathology</topic><topic>Anal Canal - surgery</topic><topic>Buttocks - surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery</topic><topic>Colostomy - methods</topic><topic>Fecal Incontinence - prevention & control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparotomy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manometry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Perineum - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps - blood supply</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Puerta Díaz, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castaño Llano, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombana, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restrepo, J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Puerta Díaz, J. D.</au><au>Castaño Llano, R.</au><au>Lombana, L. J.</au><au>Restrepo, J. I.</au><au>Gómez, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection</atitle><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle><stitle>Tech Coloproctol</stitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>425-429</pages><issn>1123-6337</issn><eissn>1128-045X</eissn><coden>TECOFO</coden><abstract>Background
Our aim was to evaluate complications and long-term functional outcome in patients who had sphincter reconstruction using the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment.
Methods
Seven patients underwent reconstruction from 2000 to 2010. First, the sigmoid colon was brought down to the perineum as a perineal colostomy, with the procedure protected by a loop ileostomy. Reconstruction of the sphincter mechanism using the gluteus maximus took place 3 months later, and after another 8–12 weeks, the loop ileostomy was closed. We studied the functional outcome of these interventions with follow-up interviews of patients and objectively assessed anorectal function using manometry and the Cleveland Clinic Florida (Jorge-Wexner) fecal incontinence score.
Results
The mean follow-up was 56 months (median 47; range 10–123 months). One patient had a perianal wound infection and another had fibrotic stricture in the colocutaneous anastomosis that required several digital dilatations. Anorectal manometry at 3-month follow-up showed resting pressures from 10 to 18 mm Hg and voluntary contraction pressures from 68 to 187 mm Hg. Four patients had excellent sphincter function (Jorge-Wexner scores ≤5).
Conclusions
Our preliminary results show that sphincter reconstruction by means of gluteus maximus transposition can be effective in restoring gastrointestinal continuity and recovering fecal continence in patients who have undergone APR with permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. Furthermore, the reconstruction procedure can be performed 2–4 years after the APR.</abstract><cop>Milan</cop><pub>Springer Milan</pub><pmid>23242561</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1123-6337 |
ispartof | Techniques in coloproctology, 2013-08, Vol.17 (4), p.425-429 |
issn | 1123-6337 1128-045X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1400622858 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Adult Aged Anal Canal - pathology Anal Canal - surgery Buttocks - surgery Cohort Studies Colorectal Surgery Colostomy - methods Fecal Incontinence - prevention & control Female Follow-Up Studies Gastroenterology Graft Survival Humans Laparotomy - methods Male Manometry Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation Original Article Perineum - surgery Postoperative Care - methods Proctology Quality of Life Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods Rectal Neoplasms - pathology Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Reoperation - methods Retrospective Studies Surgery Surgical Flaps - blood supply Treatment Outcome Wound Healing - physiology |
title | Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A07%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20the%20gluteus%20maximus%20muscle%20as%20the%20neosphincter%20for%20restoration%20of%20anal%20function%20after%20abdominoperineal%20resection&rft.jtitle=Techniques%20in%20coloproctology&rft.au=Puerta%20D%C3%ADaz,%20J.%20D.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=425-429&rft.issn=1123-6337&rft.eissn=1128-045X&rft.coden=TECOFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1400622858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1400090777&rft_id=info:pmid/23242561&rfr_iscdi=true |