Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection

Background Our aim was to evaluate complications and long-term functional outcome in patients who had sphincter reconstruction using the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment. Methods Seven patients underwent reconstruction from 2000...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Techniques in coloproctology 2013-08, Vol.17 (4), p.425-429
Hauptverfasser: Puerta Díaz, J. D., Castaño Llano, R., Lombana, L. J., Restrepo, J. I., Gómez, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 429
container_issue 4
container_start_page 425
container_title Techniques in coloproctology
container_volume 17
creator Puerta Díaz, J. D.
Castaño Llano, R.
Lombana, L. J.
Restrepo, J. I.
Gómez, G.
description Background Our aim was to evaluate complications and long-term functional outcome in patients who had sphincter reconstruction using the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment. Methods Seven patients underwent reconstruction from 2000 to 2010. First, the sigmoid colon was brought down to the perineum as a perineal colostomy, with the procedure protected by a loop ileostomy. Reconstruction of the sphincter mechanism using the gluteus maximus took place 3 months later, and after another 8–12 weeks, the loop ileostomy was closed. We studied the functional outcome of these interventions with follow-up interviews of patients and objectively assessed anorectal function using manometry and the Cleveland Clinic Florida (Jorge-Wexner) fecal incontinence score. Results The mean follow-up was 56 months (median 47; range 10–123 months). One patient had a perianal wound infection and another had fibrotic stricture in the colocutaneous anastomosis that required several digital dilatations. Anorectal manometry at 3-month follow-up showed resting pressures from 10 to 18 mm Hg and voluntary contraction pressures from 68 to 187 mm Hg. Four patients had excellent sphincter function (Jorge-Wexner scores ≤5). Conclusions Our preliminary results show that sphincter reconstruction by means of gluteus maximus transposition can be effective in restoring gastrointestinal continuity and recovering fecal continence in patients who have undergone APR with permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. Furthermore, the reconstruction procedure can be performed 2–4 years after the APR.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1400622858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1400622858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a0845042aee5f9284bc47929c37643e6e4126b44db3e9233527a0afc8901a5be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoyCabfIBciqGXXtzM6I9lH8uSJoFAL13ITcje8cbBtraSTZP99JXX2xIKPY3Q-70nDY-xa4QvCKBvAgIqTAF5CkWG6f6EnSPyPAWpnj4cziLNhNALdhHCCwBqrfCMLbjgkqsMz9mvdaDE1cnwTMm2HQcaQ9LZ16ab5hiqlhIbDmpPLuyem74ayCe184mnMDhvh8b1U4LtbZvUY9SnC1tPmC03rmt6tyPf9BT16KEDcMlOa9sGujrOJVt_u_2xuk8fv989rL4-ppXQfEgt5FKB5JZI1QXPZVlJXfAiqpkUlJFEnpVSbkpBBRdCcW3B1lVeAFpVkliyz3PuzrufY_yx6ZpQUdvauM8YDEqAjPNc5RH99A_64kYft5opKEBrHSmcqcq7EDzVZuebzvo3g2CmVszciomtmKkVs4-ej8fksexo89fxp4YI8BkIUeq35N89_d_U3_7emSE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1400090777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Puerta Díaz, J. D. ; Castaño Llano, R. ; Lombana, L. J. ; Restrepo, J. I. ; Gómez, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Puerta Díaz, J. D. ; Castaño Llano, R. ; Lombana, L. J. ; Restrepo, J. I. ; Gómez, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Our aim was to evaluate complications and long-term functional outcome in patients who had sphincter reconstruction using the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment. Methods Seven patients underwent reconstruction from 2000 to 2010. First, the sigmoid colon was brought down to the perineum as a perineal colostomy, with the procedure protected by a loop ileostomy. Reconstruction of the sphincter mechanism using the gluteus maximus took place 3 months later, and after another 8–12 weeks, the loop ileostomy was closed. We studied the functional outcome of these interventions with follow-up interviews of patients and objectively assessed anorectal function using manometry and the Cleveland Clinic Florida (Jorge-Wexner) fecal incontinence score. Results The mean follow-up was 56 months (median 47; range 10–123 months). One patient had a perianal wound infection and another had fibrotic stricture in the colocutaneous anastomosis that required several digital dilatations. Anorectal manometry at 3-month follow-up showed resting pressures from 10 to 18 mm Hg and voluntary contraction pressures from 68 to 187 mm Hg. Four patients had excellent sphincter function (Jorge-Wexner scores ≤5). Conclusions Our preliminary results show that sphincter reconstruction by means of gluteus maximus transposition can be effective in restoring gastrointestinal continuity and recovering fecal continence in patients who have undergone APR with permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. Furthermore, the reconstruction procedure can be performed 2–4 years after the APR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1123-6337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1128-045X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23242561</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TECOFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milan: Springer Milan</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Anal Canal - pathology ; Anal Canal - surgery ; Buttocks - surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Colorectal Surgery ; Colostomy - methods ; Fecal Incontinence - prevention &amp; control ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Laparotomy - methods ; Male ; Manometry ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation ; Original Article ; Perineum - surgery ; Postoperative Care - methods ; Proctology ; Quality of Life ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Reoperation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical Flaps - blood supply ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Techniques in coloproctology, 2013-08, Vol.17 (4), p.425-429</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Italia 2012</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Italia 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a0845042aee5f9284bc47929c37643e6e4126b44db3e9233527a0afc8901a5be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a0845042aee5f9284bc47929c37643e6e4126b44db3e9233527a0afc8901a5be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23242561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Puerta Díaz, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castaño Llano, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombana, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restrepo, J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection</title><title>Techniques in coloproctology</title><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><description>Background Our aim was to evaluate complications and long-term functional outcome in patients who had sphincter reconstruction using the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment. Methods Seven patients underwent reconstruction from 2000 to 2010. First, the sigmoid colon was brought down to the perineum as a perineal colostomy, with the procedure protected by a loop ileostomy. Reconstruction of the sphincter mechanism using the gluteus maximus took place 3 months later, and after another 8–12 weeks, the loop ileostomy was closed. We studied the functional outcome of these interventions with follow-up interviews of patients and objectively assessed anorectal function using manometry and the Cleveland Clinic Florida (Jorge-Wexner) fecal incontinence score. Results The mean follow-up was 56 months (median 47; range 10–123 months). One patient had a perianal wound infection and another had fibrotic stricture in the colocutaneous anastomosis that required several digital dilatations. Anorectal manometry at 3-month follow-up showed resting pressures from 10 to 18 mm Hg and voluntary contraction pressures from 68 to 187 mm Hg. Four patients had excellent sphincter function (Jorge-Wexner scores ≤5). Conclusions Our preliminary results show that sphincter reconstruction by means of gluteus maximus transposition can be effective in restoring gastrointestinal continuity and recovering fecal continence in patients who have undergone APR with permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. Furthermore, the reconstruction procedure can be performed 2–4 years after the APR.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anal Canal - pathology</subject><subject>Anal Canal - surgery</subject><subject>Buttocks - surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery</subject><subject>Colostomy - methods</subject><subject>Fecal Incontinence - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparotomy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manometry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Perineum - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps - blood supply</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>1123-6337</issn><issn>1128-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoyCabfIBciqGXXtzM6I9lH8uSJoFAL13ITcje8cbBtraSTZP99JXX2xIKPY3Q-70nDY-xa4QvCKBvAgIqTAF5CkWG6f6EnSPyPAWpnj4cziLNhNALdhHCCwBqrfCMLbjgkqsMz9mvdaDE1cnwTMm2HQcaQ9LZ16ab5hiqlhIbDmpPLuyem74ayCe184mnMDhvh8b1U4LtbZvUY9SnC1tPmC03rmt6tyPf9BT16KEDcMlOa9sGujrOJVt_u_2xuk8fv989rL4-ppXQfEgt5FKB5JZI1QXPZVlJXfAiqpkUlJFEnpVSbkpBBRdCcW3B1lVeAFpVkliyz3PuzrufY_yx6ZpQUdvauM8YDEqAjPNc5RH99A_64kYft5opKEBrHSmcqcq7EDzVZuebzvo3g2CmVszciomtmKkVs4-ej8fksexo89fxp4YI8BkIUeq35N89_d_U3_7emSE</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Puerta Díaz, J. D.</creator><creator>Castaño Llano, R.</creator><creator>Lombana, L. J.</creator><creator>Restrepo, J. I.</creator><creator>Gómez, G.</creator><general>Springer Milan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection</title><author>Puerta Díaz, J. D. ; Castaño Llano, R. ; Lombana, L. J. ; Restrepo, J. I. ; Gómez, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a0845042aee5f9284bc47929c37643e6e4126b44db3e9233527a0afc8901a5be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anal Canal - pathology</topic><topic>Anal Canal - surgery</topic><topic>Buttocks - surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery</topic><topic>Colostomy - methods</topic><topic>Fecal Incontinence - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparotomy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manometry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Perineum - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps - blood supply</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Puerta Díaz, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castaño Llano, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombana, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restrepo, J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Puerta Díaz, J. D.</au><au>Castaño Llano, R.</au><au>Lombana, L. J.</au><au>Restrepo, J. I.</au><au>Gómez, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection</atitle><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle><stitle>Tech Coloproctol</stitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>425-429</pages><issn>1123-6337</issn><eissn>1128-045X</eissn><coden>TECOFO</coden><abstract>Background Our aim was to evaluate complications and long-term functional outcome in patients who had sphincter reconstruction using the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment. Methods Seven patients underwent reconstruction from 2000 to 2010. First, the sigmoid colon was brought down to the perineum as a perineal colostomy, with the procedure protected by a loop ileostomy. Reconstruction of the sphincter mechanism using the gluteus maximus took place 3 months later, and after another 8–12 weeks, the loop ileostomy was closed. We studied the functional outcome of these interventions with follow-up interviews of patients and objectively assessed anorectal function using manometry and the Cleveland Clinic Florida (Jorge-Wexner) fecal incontinence score. Results The mean follow-up was 56 months (median 47; range 10–123 months). One patient had a perianal wound infection and another had fibrotic stricture in the colocutaneous anastomosis that required several digital dilatations. Anorectal manometry at 3-month follow-up showed resting pressures from 10 to 18 mm Hg and voluntary contraction pressures from 68 to 187 mm Hg. Four patients had excellent sphincter function (Jorge-Wexner scores ≤5). Conclusions Our preliminary results show that sphincter reconstruction by means of gluteus maximus transposition can be effective in restoring gastrointestinal continuity and recovering fecal continence in patients who have undergone APR with permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. Furthermore, the reconstruction procedure can be performed 2–4 years after the APR.</abstract><cop>Milan</cop><pub>Springer Milan</pub><pmid>23242561</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1123-6337
ispartof Techniques in coloproctology, 2013-08, Vol.17 (4), p.425-429
issn 1123-6337
1128-045X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1400622858
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Adult
Aged
Anal Canal - pathology
Anal Canal - surgery
Buttocks - surgery
Cohort Studies
Colorectal Surgery
Colostomy - methods
Fecal Incontinence - prevention & control
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastroenterology
Graft Survival
Humans
Laparotomy - methods
Male
Manometry
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Muscle, Skeletal - transplantation
Original Article
Perineum - surgery
Postoperative Care - methods
Proctology
Quality of Life
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Reoperation - methods
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Surgical Flaps - blood supply
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing - physiology
title Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A07%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20the%20gluteus%20maximus%20muscle%20as%20the%20neosphincter%20for%20restoration%20of%20anal%20function%20after%20abdominoperineal%20resection&rft.jtitle=Techniques%20in%20coloproctology&rft.au=Puerta%20D%C3%ADaz,%20J.%20D.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=425-429&rft.issn=1123-6337&rft.eissn=1128-045X&rft.coden=TECOFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10151-012-0961-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1400622858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1400090777&rft_id=info:pmid/23242561&rfr_iscdi=true