Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine
Abstract Introduction Systematic reviews are an important knowledge synthesis tool for critical care medicine clinicians and researchers. With new literature available each day, reviewers must balance identifying all relevant literature against timely synthesis. We therefore sought to apply capture-...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of critical care 2013-08, Vol.28 (4), p.469-475 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 475 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 469 |
| container_title | Journal of critical care |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Lane, Daniel, MSc Dykeman, Jonathan, BSc Ferri, Mauricio, MD Goldsmith, Charles H., PhD Stelfox, Henry T., MD, PhD |
| description | Abstract Introduction Systematic reviews are an important knowledge synthesis tool for critical care medicine clinicians and researchers. With new literature available each day, reviewers must balance identifying all relevant literature against timely synthesis. We therefore sought to apply capture-mark-recapture, a novel methodology, to estimate the population of articles available for a systematic review of effective patient rounding practices in critical care medicine. Methods Capture-mark-recapture was applied retrospectively to estimate the population of articles available for a systematic review of 4 bibliographic databases. All research studies (no methodology restrictions) of patient rounding practices in critical care medicine were included. Estimates of article population size were calculated for search of the bibliographic databases, selection of articles for full-text review, and selection of articles for inclusion in the systematic review. Results Capture-mark-recapture estimated a population of 28 839 articles (95% confidence interval [CI], 12 393-70 990) for search of the bibliographic databases, 169 articles (95% CI, 152-202) for full-text review, and 48 articles (95% CI, 39-131) for inclusion in the systematic review. These estimates suggest that our search identified 15% (4462/28 839) of the population of potentially available articles for the search of the bibliographic databases, 79% (133/169) of articles for full-text review, and 79% (38/48) of articles for inclusion in the systematic review. Conclusions The capture-mark-recapture technique can be applied to systematic reviews in critical care medicine with heterogeneous study methodologies to estimate the population of articles available. Capture-mark-recapture may help clinicians who use systematic reviews to estimate search completeness and researchers who perform systematic reviews to develop more efficient literature search strategies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.10.071 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1400398890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0883944112004273</els_id><sourcerecordid>1400398890</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-f4b4c7242d80310b18e346e380a3316148e9392e05e857b8af6a18a940af8e8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk-LFDEQxYMo7uzqF_AgAS9eeqxK0t0JiLAMrgoLHtRzSGeqNb39Z0y6V-boNzftrAp78BRS_F4l9V4x9gxhi4DVq27b-ei3AlDkwhZqfMA2WJZ1oSssH7INaC0LoxSesfOUOgCspSwfszMhJQoUcsN-7txhXiIVg4s3RSR_unKXuOPzNPW8nSKnNIfBzWH8yudvxMdlaCjyqeUuzsH3lOFbF3rX9PSbT8c00yrwPNJtoB-Jh5H7GHLF9dy7_MJA--DDSE_Yo9b1iZ7enRfsy9Xbz7v3xfXHdx92l9eFV9LMRasa5WuhxF6DRGhQk1QVSQ0uD1Oh0mSkEQQl6bJutGsrh9oZBa7VpFt5wV6e-h7i9H3JE9khJE9970aalmRRAUijtYGMvriHdtMSx_w7i9IYWQoFJlPiRPk4pRSptYeYXYpHi2DXgGxn14DsGtBaywFl0fO71kuTHfgr-ZNIBl6fAMpeZOuiTT7Q6LNbOZ3Z7qfw__5v7sl9H8bV9Rs6Uvo3h03Cgv20rsi6ISgAlMjr8QulObam</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1399352409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lane, Daniel, MSc ; Dykeman, Jonathan, BSc ; Ferri, Mauricio, MD ; Goldsmith, Charles H., PhD ; Stelfox, Henry T., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Lane, Daniel, MSc ; Dykeman, Jonathan, BSc ; Ferri, Mauricio, MD ; Goldsmith, Charles H., PhD ; Stelfox, Henry T., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Systematic reviews are an important knowledge synthesis tool for critical care medicine clinicians and researchers. With new literature available each day, reviewers must balance identifying all relevant literature against timely synthesis. We therefore sought to apply capture-mark-recapture, a novel methodology, to estimate the population of articles available for a systematic review of effective patient rounding practices in critical care medicine. Methods Capture-mark-recapture was applied retrospectively to estimate the population of articles available for a systematic review of 4 bibliographic databases. All research studies (no methodology restrictions) of patient rounding practices in critical care medicine were included. Estimates of article population size were calculated for search of the bibliographic databases, selection of articles for full-text review, and selection of articles for inclusion in the systematic review. Results Capture-mark-recapture estimated a population of 28 839 articles (95% confidence interval [CI], 12 393-70 990) for search of the bibliographic databases, 169 articles (95% CI, 152-202) for full-text review, and 48 articles (95% CI, 39-131) for inclusion in the systematic review. These estimates suggest that our search identified 15% (4462/28 839) of the population of potentially available articles for the search of the bibliographic databases, 79% (133/169) of articles for full-text review, and 79% (38/48) of articles for inclusion in the systematic review. Conclusions The capture-mark-recapture technique can be applied to systematic reviews in critical care medicine with heterogeneous study methodologies to estimate the population of articles available. Capture-mark-recapture may help clinicians who use systematic reviews to estimate search completeness and researchers who perform systematic reviews to develop more efficient literature search strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-9441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.10.071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23312123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Confidence intervals ; Critical Care ; Databases, Bibliographic ; Estimates ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Medicine ; Models, Statistical ; Population ; Regression analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Review Literature as Topic ; Statistical modeling ; Systematic review ; Teaching rounds ; Teaching Rounds - organization & administration</subject><ispartof>Journal of critical care, 2013-08, Vol.28 (4), p.469-475</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-f4b4c7242d80310b18e346e380a3316148e9392e05e857b8af6a18a940af8e8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-f4b4c7242d80310b18e346e380a3316148e9392e05e857b8af6a18a940af8e8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944112004273$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23312123$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lane, Daniel, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dykeman, Jonathan, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferri, Mauricio, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, Charles H., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelfox, Henry T., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine</title><title>Journal of critical care</title><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Systematic reviews are an important knowledge synthesis tool for critical care medicine clinicians and researchers. With new literature available each day, reviewers must balance identifying all relevant literature against timely synthesis. We therefore sought to apply capture-mark-recapture, a novel methodology, to estimate the population of articles available for a systematic review of effective patient rounding practices in critical care medicine. Methods Capture-mark-recapture was applied retrospectively to estimate the population of articles available for a systematic review of 4 bibliographic databases. All research studies (no methodology restrictions) of patient rounding practices in critical care medicine were included. Estimates of article population size were calculated for search of the bibliographic databases, selection of articles for full-text review, and selection of articles for inclusion in the systematic review. Results Capture-mark-recapture estimated a population of 28 839 articles (95% confidence interval [CI], 12 393-70 990) for search of the bibliographic databases, 169 articles (95% CI, 152-202) for full-text review, and 48 articles (95% CI, 39-131) for inclusion in the systematic review. These estimates suggest that our search identified 15% (4462/28 839) of the population of potentially available articles for the search of the bibliographic databases, 79% (133/169) of articles for full-text review, and 79% (38/48) of articles for inclusion in the systematic review. Conclusions The capture-mark-recapture technique can be applied to systematic reviews in critical care medicine with heterogeneous study methodologies to estimate the population of articles available. Capture-mark-recapture may help clinicians who use systematic reviews to estimate search completeness and researchers who perform systematic reviews to develop more efficient literature search strategies.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Databases, Bibliographic</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Review Literature as Topic</subject><subject>Statistical modeling</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teaching rounds</subject><subject>Teaching Rounds - organization & administration</subject><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk-LFDEQxYMo7uzqF_AgAS9eeqxK0t0JiLAMrgoLHtRzSGeqNb39Z0y6V-boNzftrAp78BRS_F4l9V4x9gxhi4DVq27b-ei3AlDkwhZqfMA2WJZ1oSssH7INaC0LoxSesfOUOgCspSwfszMhJQoUcsN-7txhXiIVg4s3RSR_unKXuOPzNPW8nSKnNIfBzWH8yudvxMdlaCjyqeUuzsH3lOFbF3rX9PSbT8c00yrwPNJtoB-Jh5H7GHLF9dy7_MJA--DDSE_Yo9b1iZ7enRfsy9Xbz7v3xfXHdx92l9eFV9LMRasa5WuhxF6DRGhQk1QVSQ0uD1Oh0mSkEQQl6bJutGsrh9oZBa7VpFt5wV6e-h7i9H3JE9khJE9970aalmRRAUijtYGMvriHdtMSx_w7i9IYWQoFJlPiRPk4pRSptYeYXYpHi2DXgGxn14DsGtBaywFl0fO71kuTHfgr-ZNIBl6fAMpeZOuiTT7Q6LNbOZ3Z7qfw__5v7sl9H8bV9Rs6Uvo3h03Cgv20rsi6ISgAlMjr8QulObam</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Lane, Daniel, MSc</creator><creator>Dykeman, Jonathan, BSc</creator><creator>Ferri, Mauricio, MD</creator><creator>Goldsmith, Charles H., PhD</creator><creator>Stelfox, Henry T., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine</title><author>Lane, Daniel, MSc ; Dykeman, Jonathan, BSc ; Ferri, Mauricio, MD ; Goldsmith, Charles H., PhD ; Stelfox, Henry T., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-f4b4c7242d80310b18e346e380a3316148e9392e05e857b8af6a18a940af8e8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Databases, Bibliographic</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Review Literature as Topic</topic><topic>Statistical modeling</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teaching rounds</topic><topic>Teaching Rounds - organization & administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lane, Daniel, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dykeman, Jonathan, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferri, Mauricio, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, Charles H., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelfox, Henry T., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lane, Daniel, MSc</au><au>Dykeman, Jonathan, BSc</au><au>Ferri, Mauricio, MD</au><au>Goldsmith, Charles H., PhD</au><au>Stelfox, Henry T., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>469</spage><epage>475</epage><pages>469-475</pages><issn>0883-9441</issn><eissn>1557-8615</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Systematic reviews are an important knowledge synthesis tool for critical care medicine clinicians and researchers. With new literature available each day, reviewers must balance identifying all relevant literature against timely synthesis. We therefore sought to apply capture-mark-recapture, a novel methodology, to estimate the population of articles available for a systematic review of effective patient rounding practices in critical care medicine. Methods Capture-mark-recapture was applied retrospectively to estimate the population of articles available for a systematic review of 4 bibliographic databases. All research studies (no methodology restrictions) of patient rounding practices in critical care medicine were included. Estimates of article population size were calculated for search of the bibliographic databases, selection of articles for full-text review, and selection of articles for inclusion in the systematic review. Results Capture-mark-recapture estimated a population of 28 839 articles (95% confidence interval [CI], 12 393-70 990) for search of the bibliographic databases, 169 articles (95% CI, 152-202) for full-text review, and 48 articles (95% CI, 39-131) for inclusion in the systematic review. These estimates suggest that our search identified 15% (4462/28 839) of the population of potentially available articles for the search of the bibliographic databases, 79% (133/169) of articles for full-text review, and 79% (38/48) of articles for inclusion in the systematic review. Conclusions The capture-mark-recapture technique can be applied to systematic reviews in critical care medicine with heterogeneous study methodologies to estimate the population of articles available. Capture-mark-recapture may help clinicians who use systematic reviews to estimate search completeness and researchers who perform systematic reviews to develop more efficient literature search strategies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23312123</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.10.071</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0883-9441 |
| ispartof | Journal of critical care, 2013-08, Vol.28 (4), p.469-475 |
| issn | 0883-9441 1557-8615 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1400398890 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Bibliometrics Confidence intervals Critical Care Databases, Bibliographic Estimates Humans Intensive care Medicine Models, Statistical Population Regression analysis Retrospective Studies Review Literature as Topic Statistical modeling Systematic review Teaching rounds Teaching Rounds - organization & administration |
| title | Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A50%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capture-mark-recapture%20as%20a%20tool%20for%20estimating%20the%20number%20of%20articles%20available%20for%20systematic%20reviews%20in%20critical%20care%20medicine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Lane,%20Daniel,%20MSc&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=469&rft.epage=475&rft.pages=469-475&rft.issn=0883-9441&rft.eissn=1557-8615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.10.071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1400398890%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1399352409&rft_id=info:pmid/23312123&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0883944112004273&rfr_iscdi=true |