Bite force measurements with hard and soft bite surfaces
Summary Bite force has been measured by different methods and over a wide variety of designs. In several instruments, the fact that bite surface has been manufactured with stiff materials might interfere in obtaining reliable data, by a more prompt activation of inhibitory reflex mechanisms. The pur...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral rehabilitation 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.563-568 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 568 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 563 |
| container_title | Journal of oral rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Serra, C. M. Manns, A. E. |
| description | Summary
Bite force has been measured by different methods and over a wide variety of designs. In several instruments, the fact that bite surface has been manufactured with stiff materials might interfere in obtaining reliable data, by a more prompt activation of inhibitory reflex mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum voluntary bite force measured by a digital occlusal force gauge (GM10 Nagano Keiki, Japan) between different opponent teeth, employing semi‐hard or soft bite surfaces. A sample of 34 young adults with complete natural dentition was studied. The original semi‐hard bite surface was exchanged by a soft one, made of leather and rubber. Maximum voluntary bite force recordings were made for each tooth group and for both bite surfaces. Statistical analyses (Student's t‐test) revealed significant differences, with higher scores while using the soft surface across sexes and tooth groups (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/joor.12068 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399925827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1399925827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4008-35b6d8eba15646b2370b7297ba19008c18f542a6a38907cdde2aa84e2074f1f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK1e_AGSowip-5Hsx9EWrUqxVRTFy7JJJjQ1aepuQu2_NzVtj85lYOaZd-BB6JzgPmnqel6Wtk8o5vIAdQnjoU9lQA9RFzMc-kTSjw46cW6OMZYsFMeoQxlXFFPVRXKQVeClpY3BK8C42kIBi8p5q6yaeTNjE88sEs-VaeVFG7QhUhODO0VHqckdnG17D73d3b4O7_3xZPQwvBn7cdC881kY8URCZEjIAx5RJnAkqBLNQDX7mMg0DKjhhkmFRZwkQI2RAVAsgpSknPXQZZu7tOV3Da7SReZiyHOzgLJ2mjClFA0lFQ161aKxLZ2zkOqlzQpj15pgvTGlN6b0n6kGvtjm1lEByR7dqWkA0gKrLIf1P1H6cTJ52YX67U3mKvjZ3xj7pblgItTvTyM9UIPh53T6rDn7Bd1wgWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1399925827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bite force measurements with hard and soft bite surfaces</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Serra, C. M. ; Manns, A. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Serra, C. M. ; Manns, A. E.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Bite force has been measured by different methods and over a wide variety of designs. In several instruments, the fact that bite surface has been manufactured with stiff materials might interfere in obtaining reliable data, by a more prompt activation of inhibitory reflex mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum voluntary bite force measured by a digital occlusal force gauge (GM10 Nagano Keiki, Japan) between different opponent teeth, employing semi‐hard or soft bite surfaces. A sample of 34 young adults with complete natural dentition was studied. The original semi‐hard bite surface was exchanged by a soft one, made of leather and rubber. Maximum voluntary bite force recordings were made for each tooth group and for both bite surfaces. Statistical analyses (Student's t‐test) revealed significant differences, with higher scores while using the soft surface across sexes and tooth groups (P < 0·05). Differential activation of periodontal mechanoreceptors of a specific tooth group is mainly conditioned by the hardness of the bite surface; a soft surface induces greater activation of elevator musculature, while a hard one induces inhibition more promptly. Thus, soft bite surfaces are recommended for higher reliability in maximum voluntary bite force recordings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-182X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joor.12068</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23692029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Bite Force ; dental occlusion ; Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation ; Dental Stress Analysis - methods ; Dentistry ; Female ; GM10 bite force meter ; Hardness ; Humans ; Male ; occlusal force ; Reproducibility of Results ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.563-568</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4008-35b6d8eba15646b2370b7297ba19008c18f542a6a38907cdde2aa84e2074f1f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4008-35b6d8eba15646b2370b7297ba19008c18f542a6a38907cdde2aa84e2074f1f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjoor.12068$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjoor.12068$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23692029$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Serra, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manns, A. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Bite force measurements with hard and soft bite surfaces</title><title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><description>Summary
Bite force has been measured by different methods and over a wide variety of designs. In several instruments, the fact that bite surface has been manufactured with stiff materials might interfere in obtaining reliable data, by a more prompt activation of inhibitory reflex mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum voluntary bite force measured by a digital occlusal force gauge (GM10 Nagano Keiki, Japan) between different opponent teeth, employing semi‐hard or soft bite surfaces. A sample of 34 young adults with complete natural dentition was studied. The original semi‐hard bite surface was exchanged by a soft one, made of leather and rubber. Maximum voluntary bite force recordings were made for each tooth group and for both bite surfaces. Statistical analyses (Student's t‐test) revealed significant differences, with higher scores while using the soft surface across sexes and tooth groups (P < 0·05). Differential activation of periodontal mechanoreceptors of a specific tooth group is mainly conditioned by the hardness of the bite surface; a soft surface induces greater activation of elevator musculature, while a hard one induces inhibition more promptly. Thus, soft bite surfaces are recommended for higher reliability in maximum voluntary bite force recordings.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Bite Force</subject><subject>dental occlusion</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>GM10 bite force meter</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>occlusal force</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0305-182X</issn><issn>1365-2842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK1e_AGSowip-5Hsx9EWrUqxVRTFy7JJJjQ1aepuQu2_NzVtj85lYOaZd-BB6JzgPmnqel6Wtk8o5vIAdQnjoU9lQA9RFzMc-kTSjw46cW6OMZYsFMeoQxlXFFPVRXKQVeClpY3BK8C42kIBi8p5q6yaeTNjE88sEs-VaeVFG7QhUhODO0VHqckdnG17D73d3b4O7_3xZPQwvBn7cdC881kY8URCZEjIAx5RJnAkqBLNQDX7mMg0DKjhhkmFRZwkQI2RAVAsgpSknPXQZZu7tOV3Da7SReZiyHOzgLJ2mjClFA0lFQ161aKxLZ2zkOqlzQpj15pgvTGlN6b0n6kGvtjm1lEByR7dqWkA0gKrLIf1P1H6cTJ52YX67U3mKvjZ3xj7pblgItTvTyM9UIPh53T6rDn7Bd1wgWw</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>Serra, C. M.</creator><creator>Manns, A. E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Bite force measurements with hard and soft bite surfaces</title><author>Serra, C. M. ; Manns, A. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4008-35b6d8eba15646b2370b7297ba19008c18f542a6a38907cdde2aa84e2074f1f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Bite Force</topic><topic>dental occlusion</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>GM10 bite force meter</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>occlusal force</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Serra, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manns, A. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Serra, C. M.</au><au>Manns, A. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bite force measurements with hard and soft bite surfaces</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>563-568</pages><issn>0305-182X</issn><eissn>1365-2842</eissn><abstract>Summary
Bite force has been measured by different methods and over a wide variety of designs. In several instruments, the fact that bite surface has been manufactured with stiff materials might interfere in obtaining reliable data, by a more prompt activation of inhibitory reflex mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum voluntary bite force measured by a digital occlusal force gauge (GM10 Nagano Keiki, Japan) between different opponent teeth, employing semi‐hard or soft bite surfaces. A sample of 34 young adults with complete natural dentition was studied. The original semi‐hard bite surface was exchanged by a soft one, made of leather and rubber. Maximum voluntary bite force recordings were made for each tooth group and for both bite surfaces. Statistical analyses (Student's t‐test) revealed significant differences, with higher scores while using the soft surface across sexes and tooth groups (P < 0·05). Differential activation of periodontal mechanoreceptors of a specific tooth group is mainly conditioned by the hardness of the bite surface; a soft surface induces greater activation of elevator musculature, while a hard one induces inhibition more promptly. Thus, soft bite surfaces are recommended for higher reliability in maximum voluntary bite force recordings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23692029</pmid><doi>10.1111/joor.12068</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-182X |
| ispartof | Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2013-08, Vol.40 (8), p.563-568 |
| issn | 0305-182X 1365-2842 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399925827 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Bite Force dental occlusion Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation Dental Stress Analysis - methods Dentistry Female GM10 bite force meter Hardness Humans Male occlusal force Reproducibility of Results Young Adult |
| title | Bite force measurements with hard and soft bite surfaces |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A08%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bite%20force%20measurements%20with%20hard%20and%20soft%20bite%20surfaces&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Serra,%20C.%20M.&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=563-568&rft.issn=0305-182X&rft.eissn=1365-2842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joor.12068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1399925827%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1399925827&rft_id=info:pmid/23692029&rfr_iscdi=true |