Attractiveness of women’s body: body mass index, waist–hip ratio, and their relative importance
Body mass index and waist-hip ratio are related to human health and both play a role in mate choice. However, previous research is inconsistent as to what body mass index and waist-hip ratio values are preferred in women and what the relative importance of body mass index and waist-hip ratio for att...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral ecology 2013-07, Vol.24 (4), p.914-925 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 925 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 914 |
container_title | Behavioral ecology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Koscinski, Krzysztof |
description | Body mass index and waist-hip ratio are related to human health and both play a role in mate choice. However, previous research is inconsistent as to what body mass index and waist-hip ratio values are preferred in women and what the relative importance of body mass index and waist-hip ratio for attractiveness is. Here, we made several methodological refinements to obtain reliable estimations. Participants (Poles) indicated the most attractive woman from a set of digitally manipulated high-quality silhouettes varying orthogonally in body mass index and waist-hip ratio and viewed from behind to exclude effects of the breast size. Then, each participant chose the more attractive silhouette from pairs in which one figure deviated from his/her ideal in body mass index and the other in waist-hip ratio. Both sexes preferred underweight women (body mass index = 17.3) with accentuated waist (waist-hip ratio = 0.66 for female and 0.70 for male judges). These represent preferences for unhealthy body mass and healthy body shape. Furthermore, body mass index proved twice as important for attractiveness as waist-hip ratio, even though literature data indicate that waist-hip ratio is at least as important for health as body mass index. We discuss the obtained pattern of preferences from the perspective of evolutionary psychology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/beheco/art016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399914758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1399914758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-554e8a4dd214eb3ba498cc89cee7a96eadc71301cadbbe0d62658d8518f8fdf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkL9OwzAYxC0EEqUwsntkaKidOInNVlX8kyqxwBx9sb-oRkkcbJfSre_AxOv1SWgpy91Jd7rhR8g1Z7ecqWxa4xK1m4KPjBcnZMRFkSdlWqrTfWYiT9JUqHNyEcI7Y4wrUYyInsXoQUf7iT2GQF1D167Dfrf9CbR2ZnP3p7SDfWl7g18TugYb4m77vbQD9RCtm1DoDY1LtJ56bOHwRm03OB-h13hJzhpoA179-5i8Pdy_zp-Sxcvj83y2SDSXeUzyXKAEYUzKBdZZDUJJraXSiCWoAsHokmeMazB1jcwUaZFLI3MuG9mYJsvG5Ob4O3j3scIQq84GjW0LPbpVqHimlOKizOV-mhyn2rsQPDbV4G0HflNxVh1gVkeY1RFm9gsLam4q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1399914758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attractiveness of women’s body: body mass index, waist–hip ratio, and their relative importance</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Koscinski, Krzysztof</creator><creatorcontrib>Koscinski, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><description>Body mass index and waist-hip ratio are related to human health and both play a role in mate choice. However, previous research is inconsistent as to what body mass index and waist-hip ratio values are preferred in women and what the relative importance of body mass index and waist-hip ratio for attractiveness is. Here, we made several methodological refinements to obtain reliable estimations. Participants (Poles) indicated the most attractive woman from a set of digitally manipulated high-quality silhouettes varying orthogonally in body mass index and waist-hip ratio and viewed from behind to exclude effects of the breast size. Then, each participant chose the more attractive silhouette from pairs in which one figure deviated from his/her ideal in body mass index and the other in waist-hip ratio. Both sexes preferred underweight women (body mass index = 17.3) with accentuated waist (waist-hip ratio = 0.66 for female and 0.70 for male judges). These represent preferences for unhealthy body mass and healthy body shape. Furthermore, body mass index proved twice as important for attractiveness as waist-hip ratio, even though literature data indicate that waist-hip ratio is at least as important for health as body mass index. We discuss the obtained pattern of preferences from the perspective of evolutionary psychology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-2249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/beheco/art016</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Behavioral ecology, 2013-07, Vol.24 (4), p.914-925</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-554e8a4dd214eb3ba498cc89cee7a96eadc71301cadbbe0d62658d8518f8fdf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-554e8a4dd214eb3ba498cc89cee7a96eadc71301cadbbe0d62658d8518f8fdf33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koscinski, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><title>Attractiveness of women’s body: body mass index, waist–hip ratio, and their relative importance</title><title>Behavioral ecology</title><description>Body mass index and waist-hip ratio are related to human health and both play a role in mate choice. However, previous research is inconsistent as to what body mass index and waist-hip ratio values are preferred in women and what the relative importance of body mass index and waist-hip ratio for attractiveness is. Here, we made several methodological refinements to obtain reliable estimations. Participants (Poles) indicated the most attractive woman from a set of digitally manipulated high-quality silhouettes varying orthogonally in body mass index and waist-hip ratio and viewed from behind to exclude effects of the breast size. Then, each participant chose the more attractive silhouette from pairs in which one figure deviated from his/her ideal in body mass index and the other in waist-hip ratio. Both sexes preferred underweight women (body mass index = 17.3) with accentuated waist (waist-hip ratio = 0.66 for female and 0.70 for male judges). These represent preferences for unhealthy body mass and healthy body shape. Furthermore, body mass index proved twice as important for attractiveness as waist-hip ratio, even though literature data indicate that waist-hip ratio is at least as important for health as body mass index. We discuss the obtained pattern of preferences from the perspective of evolutionary psychology.</description><issn>1045-2249</issn><issn>1465-7279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkL9OwzAYxC0EEqUwsntkaKidOInNVlX8kyqxwBx9sb-oRkkcbJfSre_AxOv1SWgpy91Jd7rhR8g1Z7ecqWxa4xK1m4KPjBcnZMRFkSdlWqrTfWYiT9JUqHNyEcI7Y4wrUYyInsXoQUf7iT2GQF1D167Dfrf9CbR2ZnP3p7SDfWl7g18TugYb4m77vbQD9RCtm1DoDY1LtJ56bOHwRm03OB-h13hJzhpoA179-5i8Pdy_zp-Sxcvj83y2SDSXeUzyXKAEYUzKBdZZDUJJraXSiCWoAsHokmeMazB1jcwUaZFLI3MuG9mYJsvG5Ob4O3j3scIQq84GjW0LPbpVqHimlOKizOV-mhyn2rsQPDbV4G0HflNxVh1gVkeY1RFm9gsLam4q</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Koscinski, Krzysztof</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>Attractiveness of women’s body: body mass index, waist–hip ratio, and their relative importance</title><author>Koscinski, Krzysztof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-554e8a4dd214eb3ba498cc89cee7a96eadc71301cadbbe0d62658d8518f8fdf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koscinski, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koscinski, Krzysztof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attractiveness of women’s body: body mass index, waist–hip ratio, and their relative importance</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology</jtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>914</spage><epage>925</epage><pages>914-925</pages><issn>1045-2249</issn><eissn>1465-7279</eissn><abstract>Body mass index and waist-hip ratio are related to human health and both play a role in mate choice. However, previous research is inconsistent as to what body mass index and waist-hip ratio values are preferred in women and what the relative importance of body mass index and waist-hip ratio for attractiveness is. Here, we made several methodological refinements to obtain reliable estimations. Participants (Poles) indicated the most attractive woman from a set of digitally manipulated high-quality silhouettes varying orthogonally in body mass index and waist-hip ratio and viewed from behind to exclude effects of the breast size. Then, each participant chose the more attractive silhouette from pairs in which one figure deviated from his/her ideal in body mass index and the other in waist-hip ratio. Both sexes preferred underweight women (body mass index = 17.3) with accentuated waist (waist-hip ratio = 0.66 for female and 0.70 for male judges). These represent preferences for unhealthy body mass and healthy body shape. Furthermore, body mass index proved twice as important for attractiveness as waist-hip ratio, even though literature data indicate that waist-hip ratio is at least as important for health as body mass index. We discuss the obtained pattern of preferences from the perspective of evolutionary psychology.</abstract><doi>10.1093/beheco/art016</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-2249 |
ispartof | Behavioral ecology, 2013-07, Vol.24 (4), p.914-925 |
issn | 1045-2249 1465-7279 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399914758 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Attractiveness of women’s body: body mass index, waist–hip ratio, and their relative importance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A49%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attractiveness%20of%20women%E2%80%99s%20body:%20body%20mass%20index,%20waist%E2%80%93hip%20ratio,%20and%20their%20relative%20importance&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology&rft.au=Koscinski,%20Krzysztof&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=914&rft.epage=925&rft.pages=914-925&rft.issn=1045-2249&rft.eissn=1465-7279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/beheco/art016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1399914758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1399914758&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |