Morphologic Differences in Intervertebral Foramina: A Radiographic Study of Cervical Spine Positions in Asymptomatic Men

Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate morphologic differences using plain film radiographs in cervical intervertebral foramina (IVF) for the following positions: neutral; flexion combined with lateral flexion to the right, rotation to the left (FLFR-RL); and flexion combine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2013-06, Vol.36 (5), p.327-332
Hauptverfasser: Sato, Tomonori, PhD, Masui, Kenji, PT
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 332
container_issue 5
container_start_page 327
container_title Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics
container_volume 36
creator Sato, Tomonori, PhD
Masui, Kenji, PT
description Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate morphologic differences using plain film radiographs in cervical intervertebral foramina (IVF) for the following positions: neutral; flexion combined with lateral flexion to the right, rotation to the left (FLFR-RL); and flexion combined with lateral flexion to the right, rotation to the right (FLFR-RR.) Methods Fifteen participants (male; age, 22-29 years) with no history of neck pain were recruited to participate in this study. Radiographs were taken with participants standing and their cervical spines positioned in neutral, in FLFR-RL, and in FLFR-RR. Foraminal height and width were measured at levels C5/6 and C6/7 by a radiologist. Differences in IVF sizes between positions were analyzed. Results The FLFR-RL position (flexion with contralateral rotation and lateral flexion) increased IVF height at C5/6 by 2.40 mm (24 %; P < .01) and C6/7 by 2.64 mm (26%; P < .01) compared with the neutral position. However, no significant increase in foraminal width was observed compared with the neutral position ( P > .05), and no significant difference in foraminal height and width increase was observed between FLFR-RL and FLFR-RR. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the cervical FLFR-RL position increases the height of the cervical IVF as measured on radiographs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399056328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161475413000651</els_id><sourcerecordid>1399056328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a2fa8da66c1206e69b6a829e6da3e1c7810604908609a0eefdcc5bf80cb8d7683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURS0EokPhB1igLNkkPNsTj4MQ0mhooVIrEANry3FeWofEDnZSdf4ehyksuujKm3Ovns8l5DWFggIV77qiG8apYEB5AWUBIJ6QFS05y0UpxVOyShDN15tyfUJexNgBQMUr-ZycML4RlQC2IndXPow3vvfX1mSfbNtiQGcwZtZlF27CcIthwjroPjv3QQ_W6ffZNvuuG-uvgx5vUmw_zc0h8222S7g1Cd2P1mH2zUc7We_-lm3jIR3rBz2lxBW6l-RZq_uIr-7fU_Lz_OzH7kt--fXzxW57mZs1pVOuWatlo4UwlIFAUdVCS1ahaDRHajaSgoB1BVJApQGxbYwp61aCqWWzEZKfkrfH3jH43zPGSQ02Gux77dDPUVFeVVAKzhaUHVETfIwBWzUGO-hwUBTUYlx1ajGuFuMKSpWMp9Cb-_65HrD5H_mnOAEfjgCmX95aDCoauzhubEAzqcbbx_s_Poib3rrF8i88YOz8HFzyp6iKTIHaL5svk1Oe5hYl5X8Asa-ong</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1399056328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morphologic Differences in Intervertebral Foramina: A Radiographic Study of Cervical Spine Positions in Asymptomatic Men</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sato, Tomonori, PhD ; Masui, Kenji, PT</creator><creatorcontrib>Sato, Tomonori, PhD ; Masui, Kenji, PT</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate morphologic differences using plain film radiographs in cervical intervertebral foramina (IVF) for the following positions: neutral; flexion combined with lateral flexion to the right, rotation to the left (FLFR-RL); and flexion combined with lateral flexion to the right, rotation to the right (FLFR-RR.) Methods Fifteen participants (male; age, 22-29 years) with no history of neck pain were recruited to participate in this study. Radiographs were taken with participants standing and their cervical spines positioned in neutral, in FLFR-RL, and in FLFR-RR. Foraminal height and width were measured at levels C5/6 and C6/7 by a radiologist. Differences in IVF sizes between positions were analyzed. Results The FLFR-RL position (flexion with contralateral rotation and lateral flexion) increased IVF height at C5/6 by 2.40 mm (24 %; P &lt; .01) and C6/7 by 2.64 mm (26%; P &lt; .01) compared with the neutral position. However, no significant increase in foraminal width was observed compared with the neutral position ( P &gt; .05), and no significant difference in foraminal height and width increase was observed between FLFR-RL and FLFR-RR. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the cervical FLFR-RL position increases the height of the cervical IVF as measured on radiographs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-4754</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23769602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cervical Vertebrae ; Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Cervical Vertebrae - physiology ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Male ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Posture ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Reference Values ; Rotation ; Spinal Cord - diagnostic imaging ; Spinal Cord - physiology ; Spine Radiculopathy ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2013-06, Vol.36 (5), p.327-332</ispartof><rights>National University of Health Sciences</rights><rights>2013 National University of Health Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a2fa8da66c1206e69b6a829e6da3e1c7810604908609a0eefdcc5bf80cb8d7683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a2fa8da66c1206e69b6a829e6da3e1c7810604908609a0eefdcc5bf80cb8d7683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475413000651$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23769602$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sato, Tomonori, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masui, Kenji, PT</creatorcontrib><title>Morphologic Differences in Intervertebral Foramina: A Radiographic Study of Cervical Spine Positions in Asymptomatic Men</title><title>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate morphologic differences using plain film radiographs in cervical intervertebral foramina (IVF) for the following positions: neutral; flexion combined with lateral flexion to the right, rotation to the left (FLFR-RL); and flexion combined with lateral flexion to the right, rotation to the right (FLFR-RR.) Methods Fifteen participants (male; age, 22-29 years) with no history of neck pain were recruited to participate in this study. Radiographs were taken with participants standing and their cervical spines positioned in neutral, in FLFR-RL, and in FLFR-RR. Foraminal height and width were measured at levels C5/6 and C6/7 by a radiologist. Differences in IVF sizes between positions were analyzed. Results The FLFR-RL position (flexion with contralateral rotation and lateral flexion) increased IVF height at C5/6 by 2.40 mm (24 %; P &lt; .01) and C6/7 by 2.64 mm (26%; P &lt; .01) compared with the neutral position. However, no significant increase in foraminal width was observed compared with the neutral position ( P &gt; .05), and no significant difference in foraminal height and width increase was observed between FLFR-RL and FLFR-RR. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the cervical FLFR-RL position increases the height of the cervical IVF as measured on radiographs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - physiology</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Spinal Cord - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spinal Cord - physiology</subject><subject>Spine Radiculopathy</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0161-4754</issn><issn>1532-6586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURS0EokPhB1igLNkkPNsTj4MQ0mhooVIrEANry3FeWofEDnZSdf4ehyksuujKm3Ovns8l5DWFggIV77qiG8apYEB5AWUBIJ6QFS05y0UpxVOyShDN15tyfUJexNgBQMUr-ZycML4RlQC2IndXPow3vvfX1mSfbNtiQGcwZtZlF27CcIthwjroPjv3QQ_W6ffZNvuuG-uvgx5vUmw_zc0h8222S7g1Cd2P1mH2zUc7We_-lm3jIR3rBz2lxBW6l-RZq_uIr-7fU_Lz_OzH7kt--fXzxW57mZs1pVOuWatlo4UwlIFAUdVCS1ahaDRHajaSgoB1BVJApQGxbYwp61aCqWWzEZKfkrfH3jH43zPGSQ02Gux77dDPUVFeVVAKzhaUHVETfIwBWzUGO-hwUBTUYlx1ajGuFuMKSpWMp9Cb-_65HrD5H_mnOAEfjgCmX95aDCoauzhubEAzqcbbx_s_Poib3rrF8i88YOz8HFzyp6iKTIHaL5svk1Oe5hYl5X8Asa-ong</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Sato, Tomonori, PhD</creator><creator>Masui, Kenji, PT</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Morphologic Differences in Intervertebral Foramina: A Radiographic Study of Cervical Spine Positions in Asymptomatic Men</title><author>Sato, Tomonori, PhD ; Masui, Kenji, PT</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a2fa8da66c1206e69b6a829e6da3e1c7810604908609a0eefdcc5bf80cb8d7683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - physiology</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Spinal Cord - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spinal Cord - physiology</topic><topic>Spine Radiculopathy</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sato, Tomonori, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masui, Kenji, PT</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sato, Tomonori, PhD</au><au>Masui, Kenji, PT</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morphologic Differences in Intervertebral Foramina: A Radiographic Study of Cervical Spine Positions in Asymptomatic Men</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Manipulative Physiol Ther</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>327-332</pages><issn>0161-4754</issn><eissn>1532-6586</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate morphologic differences using plain film radiographs in cervical intervertebral foramina (IVF) for the following positions: neutral; flexion combined with lateral flexion to the right, rotation to the left (FLFR-RL); and flexion combined with lateral flexion to the right, rotation to the right (FLFR-RR.) Methods Fifteen participants (male; age, 22-29 years) with no history of neck pain were recruited to participate in this study. Radiographs were taken with participants standing and their cervical spines positioned in neutral, in FLFR-RL, and in FLFR-RR. Foraminal height and width were measured at levels C5/6 and C6/7 by a radiologist. Differences in IVF sizes between positions were analyzed. Results The FLFR-RL position (flexion with contralateral rotation and lateral flexion) increased IVF height at C5/6 by 2.40 mm (24 %; P &lt; .01) and C6/7 by 2.64 mm (26%; P &lt; .01) compared with the neutral position. However, no significant increase in foraminal width was observed compared with the neutral position ( P &gt; .05), and no significant difference in foraminal height and width increase was observed between FLFR-RL and FLFR-RR. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the cervical FLFR-RL position increases the height of the cervical IVF as measured on radiographs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>23769602</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.006</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-4754
ispartof Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 2013-06, Vol.36 (5), p.327-332
issn 0161-4754
1532-6586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399056328
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cervical Vertebrae
Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Cervical Vertebrae - physiology
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Male
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Posture
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Reference Values
Rotation
Spinal Cord - diagnostic imaging
Spinal Cord - physiology
Spine Radiculopathy
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Young Adult
title Morphologic Differences in Intervertebral Foramina: A Radiographic Study of Cervical Spine Positions in Asymptomatic Men
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T05%3A21%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morphologic%20Differences%20in%20Intervertebral%20Foramina:%20A%20Radiographic%20Study%20of%20Cervical%20Spine%20Positions%20in%20Asymptomatic%20Men&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manipulative%20and%20physiological%20therapeutics&rft.au=Sato,%20Tomonori,%20PhD&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=327-332&rft.issn=0161-4754&rft.eissn=1532-6586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1399056328%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1399056328&rft_id=info:pmid/23769602&rft_els_id=S0161475413000651&rfr_iscdi=true