Protective Mechanical Ventilation during General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery Improves Postoperative Pulmonary Function

BACKGROUND:The impact of intraoperative ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications is not defined. The authors aimed at determining the effectiveness of protective mechanical ventilation during open abdominal surgery on a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score as primary outcome and p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 2013-06, Vol.118 (6), p.1307-1321
Hauptverfasser: Severgnini, Paolo, Selmo, Gabriele, Lanza, Christian, Chiesa, Alessandro, Frigerio, Alice, Bacuzzi, Alessandro, Dionigi, Gianlorenzo, Novario, Raffaele, Gregoretti, Cesare, de Abreu, Marcelo Gama, Schultz, Marcus J, Jaber, Samir, Futier, Emmanuel, Chiaranda, Maurizio, Pelosi, Paolo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1321
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1307
container_title Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)
container_volume 118
creator Severgnini, Paolo
Selmo, Gabriele
Lanza, Christian
Chiesa, Alessandro
Frigerio, Alice
Bacuzzi, Alessandro
Dionigi, Gianlorenzo
Novario, Raffaele
Gregoretti, Cesare
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Schultz, Marcus J
Jaber, Samir
Futier, Emmanuel
Chiaranda, Maurizio
Pelosi, Paolo
description BACKGROUND:The impact of intraoperative ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications is not defined. The authors aimed at determining the effectiveness of protective mechanical ventilation during open abdominal surgery on a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score as primary outcome and postoperative pulmonary function. METHODS:Prospective randomized, open-label, clinical trial performed in 56 patients scheduled to undergo elective open abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h. Patients were assigned by envelopes to mechanical ventilation with tidal volume of 9 ml/kg ideal body weight and zero-positive end-expiratory pressure (standard ventilation strategy) or tidal volumes of 7 ml/kg ideal body weight, 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure, and recruitment maneuvers (protective ventilation strategy). Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, gas exchange, and pulmonary functional tests were measured preoperatively, as well as at days 1, 3, and 5 after surgery. RESULTS:Patients ventilated protectively showed better pulmonary functional tests up to day 5, fewer alterations on chest x-ray up to day 3 and higher arterial oxygenation in air at days 1, 3, and 5 (mmHg; mean ± SD)77.1 ± 13.0 versus 64.9 ± 11.3 (P = 0.0006), 80.5 ± 10.1 versus 69.7 ± 9.3 (P = 0.0002), and 82.1 ± 10.7 versus 78.5 ± 21.7 (P = 0.44) respectively. The modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score was lower in the protective ventilation strategy at days 1 and 3. The percentage of patients in hospital at day 28 after surgery was not different between groups (7 vs. 15% respectively, P = 0.42). CONCLUSION:A protective ventilation strategy during abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h improved respiratory function and reduced the modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score without affecting length of hospital stay.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829102de
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399054233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1399054233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498e-9700652bfc068ac8b42c00c360267645c2ac8e55820a08bb139836b94895485b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9vEzEQxS0EoiHwDRDyBYnLlrG93vUeo4qWSoFG4s91ZTuzjcFrB3u3FTc-Og4JIHHgYFme-b2Z50fIcwbnDLr29Wr9_hwMMIGCKd4x4Ft8QBZMclUx1sqHZAEAohLA-Rl5kvOX8mylUI_JGRey5gpgQX5sUpzQTu4O6Tu0Ox2c1Z5-xjA5rycXA93OyYVbeoUBU2mtAuZph9lpOsREb_YY6Mps4-hC6X6Y0y2m7_R63Kd4h5luYp7ivih_rdjMfoxBF-ByDvYw_il5NGif8dnpXpJPl28-Xryt1jdX1xerdWXrTmHVtQCN5Gaw0Chtlam5BbCiAd60TS0tL0WUUnHQoIxholOiMV2tOlkracSSvDrOLb6-zeUL_eiyRe91wDjnvgg6KKkIUdD6iNoUc0449PvkxmK6Z9Afsu9L9v2_2RfZi9OG2Yy4_SP6HXYBXp4AnUvIQ9LBuvyXa8v2w1kSdeTuo58w5a9-vsfU71D7afd_Dz8Bygygvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1399054233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Protective Mechanical Ventilation during General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery Improves Postoperative Pulmonary Function</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Severgnini, Paolo ; Selmo, Gabriele ; Lanza, Christian ; Chiesa, Alessandro ; Frigerio, Alice ; Bacuzzi, Alessandro ; Dionigi, Gianlorenzo ; Novario, Raffaele ; Gregoretti, Cesare ; de Abreu, Marcelo Gama ; Schultz, Marcus J ; Jaber, Samir ; Futier, Emmanuel ; Chiaranda, Maurizio ; Pelosi, Paolo</creator><creatorcontrib>Severgnini, Paolo ; Selmo, Gabriele ; Lanza, Christian ; Chiesa, Alessandro ; Frigerio, Alice ; Bacuzzi, Alessandro ; Dionigi, Gianlorenzo ; Novario, Raffaele ; Gregoretti, Cesare ; de Abreu, Marcelo Gama ; Schultz, Marcus J ; Jaber, Samir ; Futier, Emmanuel ; Chiaranda, Maurizio ; Pelosi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:The impact of intraoperative ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications is not defined. The authors aimed at determining the effectiveness of protective mechanical ventilation during open abdominal surgery on a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score as primary outcome and postoperative pulmonary function. METHODS:Prospective randomized, open-label, clinical trial performed in 56 patients scheduled to undergo elective open abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h. Patients were assigned by envelopes to mechanical ventilation with tidal volume of 9 ml/kg ideal body weight and zero-positive end-expiratory pressure (standard ventilation strategy) or tidal volumes of 7 ml/kg ideal body weight, 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure, and recruitment maneuvers (protective ventilation strategy). Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, gas exchange, and pulmonary functional tests were measured preoperatively, as well as at days 1, 3, and 5 after surgery. RESULTS:Patients ventilated protectively showed better pulmonary functional tests up to day 5, fewer alterations on chest x-ray up to day 3 and higher arterial oxygenation in air at days 1, 3, and 5 (mmHg; mean ± SD)77.1 ± 13.0 versus 64.9 ± 11.3 (P = 0.0006), 80.5 ± 10.1 versus 69.7 ± 9.3 (P = 0.0002), and 82.1 ± 10.7 versus 78.5 ± 21.7 (P = 0.44) respectively. The modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score was lower in the protective ventilation strategy at days 1 and 3. The percentage of patients in hospital at day 28 after surgery was not different between groups (7 vs. 15% respectively, P = 0.42). CONCLUSION:A protective ventilation strategy during abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h improved respiratory function and reduced the modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score without affecting length of hospital stay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829102de</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23542800</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANESAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen - surgery ; Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, General - methods ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intraoperative Care - methods ; Lung Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Respiration, Artificial - methods ; Respiratory Function Tests - methods ; Respiratory Function Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Tidal Volume ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2013-06, Vol.118 (6), p.1307-1321</ispartof><rights>2013 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498e-9700652bfc068ac8b42c00c360267645c2ac8e55820a08bb139836b94895485b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498e-9700652bfc068ac8b42c00c360267645c2ac8e55820a08bb139836b94895485b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27423742$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23542800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Severgnini, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selmo, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanza, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiesa, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frigerio, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacuzzi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionigi, Gianlorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novario, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregoretti, Cesare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Abreu, Marcelo Gama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Marcus J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaber, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Futier, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiaranda, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelosi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><title>Protective Mechanical Ventilation during General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery Improves Postoperative Pulmonary Function</title><title>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</title><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:The impact of intraoperative ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications is not defined. The authors aimed at determining the effectiveness of protective mechanical ventilation during open abdominal surgery on a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score as primary outcome and postoperative pulmonary function. METHODS:Prospective randomized, open-label, clinical trial performed in 56 patients scheduled to undergo elective open abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h. Patients were assigned by envelopes to mechanical ventilation with tidal volume of 9 ml/kg ideal body weight and zero-positive end-expiratory pressure (standard ventilation strategy) or tidal volumes of 7 ml/kg ideal body weight, 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure, and recruitment maneuvers (protective ventilation strategy). Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, gas exchange, and pulmonary functional tests were measured preoperatively, as well as at days 1, 3, and 5 after surgery. RESULTS:Patients ventilated protectively showed better pulmonary functional tests up to day 5, fewer alterations on chest x-ray up to day 3 and higher arterial oxygenation in air at days 1, 3, and 5 (mmHg; mean ± SD)77.1 ± 13.0 versus 64.9 ± 11.3 (P = 0.0006), 80.5 ± 10.1 versus 69.7 ± 9.3 (P = 0.0002), and 82.1 ± 10.7 versus 78.5 ± 21.7 (P = 0.44) respectively. The modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score was lower in the protective ventilation strategy at days 1 and 3. The percentage of patients in hospital at day 28 after surgery was not different between groups (7 vs. 15% respectively, P = 0.42). CONCLUSION:A protective ventilation strategy during abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h improved respiratory function and reduced the modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score without affecting length of hospital stay.</description><subject>Abdomen - surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Respiratory Function Tests - methods</subject><subject>Respiratory Function Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Tidal Volume</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0003-3022</issn><issn>1528-1175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9vEzEQxS0EoiHwDRDyBYnLlrG93vUeo4qWSoFG4s91ZTuzjcFrB3u3FTc-Og4JIHHgYFme-b2Z50fIcwbnDLr29Wr9_hwMMIGCKd4x4Ft8QBZMclUx1sqHZAEAohLA-Rl5kvOX8mylUI_JGRey5gpgQX5sUpzQTu4O6Tu0Ox2c1Z5-xjA5rycXA93OyYVbeoUBU2mtAuZph9lpOsREb_YY6Mps4-hC6X6Y0y2m7_R63Kd4h5luYp7ivih_rdjMfoxBF-ByDvYw_il5NGif8dnpXpJPl28-Xryt1jdX1xerdWXrTmHVtQCN5Gaw0Chtlam5BbCiAd60TS0tL0WUUnHQoIxholOiMV2tOlkracSSvDrOLb6-zeUL_eiyRe91wDjnvgg6KKkIUdD6iNoUc0449PvkxmK6Z9Afsu9L9v2_2RfZi9OG2Yy4_SP6HXYBXp4AnUvIQ9LBuvyXa8v2w1kSdeTuo58w5a9-vsfU71D7afd_Dz8Bygygvw</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Severgnini, Paolo</creator><creator>Selmo, Gabriele</creator><creator>Lanza, Christian</creator><creator>Chiesa, Alessandro</creator><creator>Frigerio, Alice</creator><creator>Bacuzzi, Alessandro</creator><creator>Dionigi, Gianlorenzo</creator><creator>Novario, Raffaele</creator><creator>Gregoretti, Cesare</creator><creator>de Abreu, Marcelo Gama</creator><creator>Schultz, Marcus J</creator><creator>Jaber, Samir</creator><creator>Futier, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Chiaranda, Maurizio</creator><creator>Pelosi, Paolo</creator><general>American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Protective Mechanical Ventilation during General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery Improves Postoperative Pulmonary Function</title><author>Severgnini, Paolo ; Selmo, Gabriele ; Lanza, Christian ; Chiesa, Alessandro ; Frigerio, Alice ; Bacuzzi, Alessandro ; Dionigi, Gianlorenzo ; Novario, Raffaele ; Gregoretti, Cesare ; de Abreu, Marcelo Gama ; Schultz, Marcus J ; Jaber, Samir ; Futier, Emmanuel ; Chiaranda, Maurizio ; Pelosi, Paolo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498e-9700652bfc068ac8b42c00c360267645c2ac8e55820a08bb139836b94895485b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abdomen - surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Respiratory Function Tests - methods</topic><topic>Respiratory Function Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Tidal Volume</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Severgnini, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selmo, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanza, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiesa, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frigerio, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacuzzi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionigi, Gianlorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novario, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregoretti, Cesare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Abreu, Marcelo Gama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Marcus J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaber, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Futier, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiaranda, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelosi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Severgnini, Paolo</au><au>Selmo, Gabriele</au><au>Lanza, Christian</au><au>Chiesa, Alessandro</au><au>Frigerio, Alice</au><au>Bacuzzi, Alessandro</au><au>Dionigi, Gianlorenzo</au><au>Novario, Raffaele</au><au>Gregoretti, Cesare</au><au>de Abreu, Marcelo Gama</au><au>Schultz, Marcus J</au><au>Jaber, Samir</au><au>Futier, Emmanuel</au><au>Chiaranda, Maurizio</au><au>Pelosi, Paolo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Protective Mechanical Ventilation during General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery Improves Postoperative Pulmonary Function</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1307</spage><epage>1321</epage><pages>1307-1321</pages><issn>0003-3022</issn><eissn>1528-1175</eissn><coden>ANESAV</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND:The impact of intraoperative ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications is not defined. The authors aimed at determining the effectiveness of protective mechanical ventilation during open abdominal surgery on a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score as primary outcome and postoperative pulmonary function. METHODS:Prospective randomized, open-label, clinical trial performed in 56 patients scheduled to undergo elective open abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h. Patients were assigned by envelopes to mechanical ventilation with tidal volume of 9 ml/kg ideal body weight and zero-positive end-expiratory pressure (standard ventilation strategy) or tidal volumes of 7 ml/kg ideal body weight, 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure, and recruitment maneuvers (protective ventilation strategy). Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, gas exchange, and pulmonary functional tests were measured preoperatively, as well as at days 1, 3, and 5 after surgery. RESULTS:Patients ventilated protectively showed better pulmonary functional tests up to day 5, fewer alterations on chest x-ray up to day 3 and higher arterial oxygenation in air at days 1, 3, and 5 (mmHg; mean ± SD)77.1 ± 13.0 versus 64.9 ± 11.3 (P = 0.0006), 80.5 ± 10.1 versus 69.7 ± 9.3 (P = 0.0002), and 82.1 ± 10.7 versus 78.5 ± 21.7 (P = 0.44) respectively. The modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score was lower in the protective ventilation strategy at days 1 and 3. The percentage of patients in hospital at day 28 after surgery was not different between groups (7 vs. 15% respectively, P = 0.42). CONCLUSION:A protective ventilation strategy during abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h improved respiratory function and reduced the modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score without affecting length of hospital stay.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc</pub><pmid>23542800</pmid><doi>10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829102de</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3022
ispartof Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 2013-06, Vol.118 (6), p.1307-1321
issn 0003-3022
1528-1175
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399054233
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Abdomen - surgery
Aged
Anesthesia
Anesthesia, General - methods
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intraoperative Care - methods
Lung Diseases - prevention & control
Male
Medical sciences
Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Respiration, Artificial - methods
Respiratory Function Tests - methods
Respiratory Function Tests - statistics & numerical data
Tidal Volume
Treatment Outcome
title Protective Mechanical Ventilation during General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery Improves Postoperative Pulmonary Function
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A54%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Protective%20Mechanical%20Ventilation%20during%20General%20Anesthesia%20for%20Open%20Abdominal%20Surgery%20Improves%20Postoperative%20Pulmonary%20Function&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=Severgnini,%20Paolo&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1307&rft.epage=1321&rft.pages=1307-1321&rft.issn=0003-3022&rft.eissn=1528-1175&rft.coden=ANESAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829102de&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1399054233%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1399054233&rft_id=info:pmid/23542800&rfr_iscdi=true