Optical coherence tomography guided in-stent thrombus removal in patients with acute coronary syndromes

The persistence of thrombus inside stent struts is a frequent event in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and this phenomenon might be associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis. We sought to quantify by means of optical coher...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2013-06, Vol.29 (5), p.989-996
Hauptverfasser: Di Giorgio, Alessandro, Capodanno, Davide, Ramazzotti, Vito, Imola, Fabrizio, Mallus, Maria Teresa, Stazi, Filippo, Paoletti, Giulia, Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe, Tamburino, Corrado, Prati, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The persistence of thrombus inside stent struts is a frequent event in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and this phenomenon might be associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis. We sought to quantify by means of optical coherence tomography (OCT) the presence of in-stent thrombus after achievement of an optimal angiographic result in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. In addition, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of an OCT-guided strategy of in-stent thrombus removal. Eighty consecutive patients with ACS undergoing PCI were treated with two different strategies equally divided into two groups: angio-guided PCI, and OCT-guided PCI, in which additional OCT-driven in-stent balloon dilatation was adopted to reduce thrombus encroachment of the lumen. Overall in-stent thrombus area was 4.3 % with a maximal thrombus encroachment of 16.7 %. In the OCT-guided group, use of high pressure intra-stent dilatation led to a significant increase in stented area (9.6 ± 2.4 vs. 9.1 ± 2.49 mm 2 , p  = 0.002) and lumen area (9.2 ± 2.4 vs. 8.7 ± 2.3 mm 2 , p  
ISSN:1569-5794
1573-0743
1875-8312
DOI:10.1007/s10554-013-0191-0