Public use and evaluation of reclaimed water

Methods used in a survey in California of public attitudes towards the use of reclaimed water are described and results of the studies are tabulated and discussed (see also Water Pollution Abstracts, 1972, 45, Abstr. No. 1365). More than 50 per cent of those interviewed did not recommend the use of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1974-01, Vol.66, p.294-297
Hauptverfasser: Bruvold, W H, Ongerth, HJ
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 297
container_issue
container_start_page 294
container_title Journal of the American Water Resources Association
container_volume 66
creator Bruvold, W H
Ongerth, HJ
description Methods used in a survey in California of public attitudes towards the use of reclaimed water are described and results of the studies are tabulated and discussed (see also Water Pollution Abstracts, 1972, 45, Abstr. No. 1365). More than 50 per cent of those interviewed did not recommend the use of reclaimed water for purposes involving personal contact, but there was no significant opposition to the various low-contact uses of such water at present practised in California. The public did not favour a low degree of sewage treatment and discharge to the environment without further beneficial use.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13964156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>13964156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_139641563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NLA01jUxN4ngYOAqLs4yMDA0NbQw5mTQCShNyslMVigtTlVIzEtRSC1LzClNLMnMz1PIT1MoSk3OSczMTU1RKE8sSS3iYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMam6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcXxhsaWZiaGpmbGRCsEAIjtNEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13964156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public use and evaluation of reclaimed water</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Bruvold, W H ; Ongerth, HJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruvold, W H ; Ongerth, HJ</creatorcontrib><description>Methods used in a survey in California of public attitudes towards the use of reclaimed water are described and results of the studies are tabulated and discussed (see also Water Pollution Abstracts, 1972, 45, Abstr. No. 1365). More than 50 per cent of those interviewed did not recommend the use of reclaimed water for purposes involving personal contact, but there was no significant opposition to the various low-contact uses of such water at present practised in California. The public did not favour a low degree of sewage treatment and discharge to the environment without further beneficial use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-474X</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1974-01, Vol.66, p.294-297</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruvold, W H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongerth, HJ</creatorcontrib><title>Public use and evaluation of reclaimed water</title><title>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><description>Methods used in a survey in California of public attitudes towards the use of reclaimed water are described and results of the studies are tabulated and discussed (see also Water Pollution Abstracts, 1972, 45, Abstr. No. 1365). More than 50 per cent of those interviewed did not recommend the use of reclaimed water for purposes involving personal contact, but there was no significant opposition to the various low-contact uses of such water at present practised in California. The public did not favour a low degree of sewage treatment and discharge to the environment without further beneficial use.</description><issn>1093-474X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0NLA01jUxN4ngYOAqLs4yMDA0NbQw5mTQCShNyslMVigtTlVIzEtRSC1LzClNLMnMz1PIT1MoSk3OSczMTU1RKE8sSS3iYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMam6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcXxhsaWZiaGpmbGRCsEAIjtNEw</recordid><startdate>19740101</startdate><enddate>19740101</enddate><creator>Bruvold, W H</creator><creator>Ongerth, HJ</creator><scope>7QH</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19740101</creationdate><title>Public use and evaluation of reclaimed water</title><author>Bruvold, W H ; Ongerth, HJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_139641563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruvold, W H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongerth, HJ</creatorcontrib><collection>Aqualine</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruvold, W H</au><au>Ongerth, HJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public use and evaluation of reclaimed water</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle><date>1974-01-01</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>66</volume><spage>294</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>294-297</pages><issn>1093-474X</issn><abstract>Methods used in a survey in California of public attitudes towards the use of reclaimed water are described and results of the studies are tabulated and discussed (see also Water Pollution Abstracts, 1972, 45, Abstr. No. 1365). More than 50 per cent of those interviewed did not recommend the use of reclaimed water for purposes involving personal contact, but there was no significant opposition to the various low-contact uses of such water at present practised in California. The public did not favour a low degree of sewage treatment and discharge to the environment without further beneficial use.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1093-474X
ispartof Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1974-01, Vol.66, p.294-297
issn 1093-474X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13964156
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Public use and evaluation of reclaimed water
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A18%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20use%20and%20evaluation%20of%20reclaimed%20water&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Water%20Resources%20Association&rft.au=Bruvold,%20W%20H&rft.date=1974-01-01&rft.volume=66&rft.spage=294&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=294-297&rft.issn=1093-474X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E13964156%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13964156&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true