The conditioned reinforcing strength of redundant stimuli
In a test of the uncertainty reduction and conditioned reinforcement hypotheses, the effects of three procedures on right keypecking (observing) behavior of pigeons were compared in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, a test of the delay-reduction hypothesis under the Redundant S super(+) and S super(-):...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Psychological record 1984-04, Vol.34 (2), p.283-295 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 295 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 283 |
| container_title | The Psychological record |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | MYERS, A. M CROSSMAN, E. K GHEZZI, P. M |
| description | In a test of the uncertainty reduction and conditioned reinforcement hypotheses, the effects of three procedures on right keypecking (observing) behavior of pigeons were compared in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, a test of the delay-reduction hypothesis under the Redundant S super(+) and S super(-): Correlated procedure (from Experiment 1) was performed. In this case, a righ keypeck produced the "redundant" stimulus change only during the last 5 s of any component; at other times the right key remained white. The results of both experiments support the view that, of several copresent stimuli, the stimulus that is both nonredundant and correlated with positive reinforcement is the stronger conditioned reinforcer. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF03394871 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13931369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>13931369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c208t-f3c03f2e50a78cf78852293e5c54449c7ba8a0656b37f04c078e21212b72c80f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFLAzEUhIMoWKsXf8GC4kFYfcnb3WSPWqwKBS_1vGSzSZuyTWqye_Dfm9KiIO_wYPhmGIaQawoPFIA_Ps8BsS4EpydkwmiFORYlOyUTSHrOasRzchHjBgBoAXxC6uVaZ8q7zg7WO91lQVtnfFDWrbI4BO1WwzrzJund6DrphqTa7djbS3JmZB_11fFPyef8ZTl7yxcfr--zp0WuGIghN6gADdMlSC6U4UKULPXQpSqLoqgVb6WQUJVVi9xAoYALzWi6ljMlwOCU3B1yd8F_jToOzdZGpfteOu3H2FCskWJVJ_DmH7jxY3CpW2JgH1kiS9T9gVLBxxi0aXbBbmX4big0-w2bvw0TfHuMlFHJ3gTplI2_DlGjqDjiD-uObiU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301212532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The conditioned reinforcing strength of redundant stimuli</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>MYERS, A. M ; CROSSMAN, E. K ; GHEZZI, P. M</creator><creatorcontrib>MYERS, A. M ; CROSSMAN, E. K ; GHEZZI, P. M</creatorcontrib><description>In a test of the uncertainty reduction and conditioned reinforcement hypotheses, the effects of three procedures on right keypecking (observing) behavior of pigeons were compared in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, a test of the delay-reduction hypothesis under the Redundant S super(+) and S super(-): Correlated procedure (from Experiment 1) was performed. In this case, a righ keypeck produced the "redundant" stimulus change only during the last 5 s of any component; at other times the right key remained white. The results of both experiments support the view that, of several copresent stimuli, the stimulus that is both nonredundant and correlated with positive reinforcement is the stronger conditioned reinforcer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-3452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03394871</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PYRCAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gambier, OH: Kenyon College</publisher><subject>Animal ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conditioning ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Learning. Memory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>The Psychological record, 1984-04, Vol.34 (2), p.283-295</ispartof><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c208t-f3c03f2e50a78cf78852293e5c54449c7ba8a0656b37f04c078e21212b72c80f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8938673$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MYERS, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CROSSMAN, E. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GHEZZI, P. M</creatorcontrib><title>The conditioned reinforcing strength of redundant stimuli</title><title>The Psychological record</title><description>In a test of the uncertainty reduction and conditioned reinforcement hypotheses, the effects of three procedures on right keypecking (observing) behavior of pigeons were compared in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, a test of the delay-reduction hypothesis under the Redundant S super(+) and S super(-): Correlated procedure (from Experiment 1) was performed. In this case, a righ keypeck produced the "redundant" stimulus change only during the last 5 s of any component; at other times the right key remained white. The results of both experiments support the view that, of several copresent stimuli, the stimulus that is both nonredundant and correlated with positive reinforcement is the stronger conditioned reinforcer.</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0033-2933</issn><issn>2163-3452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEFLAzEUhIMoWKsXf8GC4kFYfcnb3WSPWqwKBS_1vGSzSZuyTWqye_Dfm9KiIO_wYPhmGIaQawoPFIA_Ps8BsS4EpydkwmiFORYlOyUTSHrOasRzchHjBgBoAXxC6uVaZ8q7zg7WO91lQVtnfFDWrbI4BO1WwzrzJund6DrphqTa7djbS3JmZB_11fFPyef8ZTl7yxcfr--zp0WuGIghN6gADdMlSC6U4UKULPXQpSqLoqgVb6WQUJVVi9xAoYALzWi6ljMlwOCU3B1yd8F_jToOzdZGpfteOu3H2FCskWJVJ_DmH7jxY3CpW2JgH1kiS9T9gVLBxxi0aXbBbmX4big0-w2bvw0TfHuMlFHJ3gTplI2_DlGjqDjiD-uObiU</recordid><startdate>19840401</startdate><enddate>19840401</enddate><creator>MYERS, A. M</creator><creator>CROSSMAN, E. K</creator><creator>GHEZZI, P. M</creator><general>Kenyon College</general><general>Denison University, etc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADABO</scope><scope>BEAJS</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDPSG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PEXHY</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>~P9</scope><scope>7QG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840401</creationdate><title>The conditioned reinforcing strength of redundant stimuli</title><author>MYERS, A. M ; CROSSMAN, E. K ; GHEZZI, P. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c208t-f3c03f2e50a78cf78852293e5c54449c7ba8a0656b37f04c078e21212b72c80f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MYERS, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CROSSMAN, E. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GHEZZI, P. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Psychological record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MYERS, A. M</au><au>CROSSMAN, E. K</au><au>GHEZZI, P. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The conditioned reinforcing strength of redundant stimuli</atitle><jtitle>The Psychological record</jtitle><date>1984-04-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>283-295</pages><issn>0033-2933</issn><eissn>2163-3452</eissn><coden>PYRCAI</coden><abstract>In a test of the uncertainty reduction and conditioned reinforcement hypotheses, the effects of three procedures on right keypecking (observing) behavior of pigeons were compared in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, a test of the delay-reduction hypothesis under the Redundant S super(+) and S super(-): Correlated procedure (from Experiment 1) was performed. In this case, a righ keypeck produced the "redundant" stimulus change only during the last 5 s of any component; at other times the right key remained white. The results of both experiments support the view that, of several copresent stimuli, the stimulus that is both nonredundant and correlated with positive reinforcement is the stronger conditioned reinforcer.</abstract><cop>Gambier, OH</cop><pub>Kenyon College</pub><doi>10.1007/BF03394871</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-2933 |
| ispartof | The Psychological record, 1984-04, Vol.34 (2), p.283-295 |
| issn | 0033-2933 2163-3452 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13931369 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Animal Biological and medical sciences Conditioning Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Learning. Memory Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology |
| title | The conditioned reinforcing strength of redundant stimuli |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A43%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20conditioned%20reinforcing%20strength%20of%20redundant%20stimuli&rft.jtitle=The%20Psychological%20record&rft.au=MYERS,%20A.%20M&rft.date=1984-04-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=283-295&rft.issn=0033-2933&rft.eissn=2163-3452&rft.coden=PYRCAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03394871&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E13931369%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301212532&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |