Disturbance and Recovery in Intertidal Pools: Maintenance of Mosaic Patterns

The species composition of pools in the intertidal zone on the coast of Washington State varies greatly from pool to pool and from time to time. While assemblages change somewhat predictably from the low- to the high-intertidal zone (presumably owing to different stress tolerances of the species), t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological monographs 1984-03, Vol.54 (1), p.99-118
1. Verfasser: Dethier, Megan N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 118
container_issue 1
container_start_page 99
container_title Ecological monographs
container_volume 54
creator Dethier, Megan N.
description The species composition of pools in the intertidal zone on the coast of Washington State varies greatly from pool to pool and from time to time. While assemblages change somewhat predictably from the low- to the high-intertidal zone (presumably owing to different stress tolerances of the species), the variance among pools at a given tidal height cannot be ascribed to such physical factors. Some pools at each height are dominated by one species that monopolizes space on the rock or in the water column and modifies the pool environment. Each dominant species, once established, can spread rapidly through a pool (either by vegetative growth or by enhanced recruitment of its conspecifics) and is thus potentially self-perpetuating. When abundant, most dominants appear to prevent potential competitors from settling and surviving by monopolization of resources, abrasion of the substratum, and/or collection of sediment. Six such dominants were identified for Washington tidepools: from low to high pools, these are (1) the surfgrass Phyllospadix scouleri, (2) articulated coralline algae, (3) the mussel Mytilus californianus (exposed shores), (4) the cloning anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (more protected shores), (5) the red alga Rhodomela larix, and (6) the green alga Cladophora sp. Colonial diatoms also appear capable of dominating low pools in the absence of wave disturbance. However, each dominant monopolizes only 20-50% of the pools at any height. Disturbances, defined here as a loss of biomass exceeding 10% cover of a sessile species within 6 mo and caused by extrinsic forces, were observed frequently in regularly censused tidepools. Disturbance agents included waves, excessive heat, wave-driven logs or rocks, and unusual influxes of predators and herbivores. Severe disturbances (those affecting a large proportion of the organisms in a pool) tended to occur in high pools in the summer (due to heat stress) and low pools in the winter (due to wave damage). Overall, a disturbance occurred in every pool studied an average of every 1.6 yr. About half of the 231 observed disturbances affected one of the six dominant species. The frequencies of these disturbances ranged from one every 2-5 yr, and recovery of the species to its original level required 3 mo to > 2 yr. Some species (e.g., Rhodomela) were disturbed frequently bu recovered quickly because of rapid vegetative growth. However if asexual propagation was not possible, such as when the entire population of a
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1942457
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13838342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1942457</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1942457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3809-5b9863bcc5cb923ef1e7aae266d7366585aa080764f813b2407062518ac518af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10NtKAzEUBdAgCtYq_kJA0afR3C--Sa1aaLGIPg-ZNAMp00lNpkr_3tQWBaEEEk5YbA4bgHOMbghF8hZrRhiXB6CHOZeFRJgfgh5CmBRaYH4MTlKao82sdQ-MH3zqVrEyrXXQtDP46mz4dHENfQtHbedi52emgdMQmnQHJ8bnv_ZHhxpOQjLewqnpMmzTKTiqTZPc2e7tg_fH4dvguRi_PI0G9-PCUoV0wSutBK2s5bbShLoaO2mMI0LMJBWCK24MUkgKVitMK8KQRIJwrIzdXDXtg6tt7jKGj5VLXbnwybqmMa0Lq1RiqvJhJMOLf3AeVrHNu2WDEONKUprV9VbZGFKKri6X0S9MXJcYlZtOy12nWV7u8kyypqljLsKnX65l7pTqzPCWffnGrfellcPBBGvFOMNa_0XPUxfi3g2-AQmujJU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300458733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disturbance and Recovery in Intertidal Pools: Maintenance of Mosaic Patterns</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Dethier, Megan N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dethier, Megan N.</creatorcontrib><description>The species composition of pools in the intertidal zone on the coast of Washington State varies greatly from pool to pool and from time to time. While assemblages change somewhat predictably from the low- to the high-intertidal zone (presumably owing to different stress tolerances of the species), the variance among pools at a given tidal height cannot be ascribed to such physical factors. Some pools at each height are dominated by one species that monopolizes space on the rock or in the water column and modifies the pool environment. Each dominant species, once established, can spread rapidly through a pool (either by vegetative growth or by enhanced recruitment of its conspecifics) and is thus potentially self-perpetuating. When abundant, most dominants appear to prevent potential competitors from settling and surviving by monopolization of resources, abrasion of the substratum, and/or collection of sediment. Six such dominants were identified for Washington tidepools: from low to high pools, these are (1) the surfgrass Phyllospadix scouleri, (2) articulated coralline algae, (3) the mussel Mytilus californianus (exposed shores), (4) the cloning anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (more protected shores), (5) the red alga Rhodomela larix, and (6) the green alga Cladophora sp. Colonial diatoms also appear capable of dominating low pools in the absence of wave disturbance. However, each dominant monopolizes only 20-50% of the pools at any height. Disturbances, defined here as a loss of biomass exceeding 10% cover of a sessile species within 6 mo and caused by extrinsic forces, were observed frequently in regularly censused tidepools. Disturbance agents included waves, excessive heat, wave-driven logs or rocks, and unusual influxes of predators and herbivores. Severe disturbances (those affecting a large proportion of the organisms in a pool) tended to occur in high pools in the summer (due to heat stress) and low pools in the winter (due to wave damage). Overall, a disturbance occurred in every pool studied an average of every 1.6 yr. About half of the 231 observed disturbances affected one of the six dominant species. The frequencies of these disturbances ranged from one every 2-5 yr, and recovery of the species to its original level required 3 mo to &gt; 2 yr. Some species (e.g., Rhodomela) were disturbed frequently bu recovered quickly because of rapid vegetative growth. However if asexual propagation was not possible, such as when the entire population of a species was removed from a pool, the slowness and irregularity of recruitment of sexual propagules greatly impeded recovery. Experimental manipulations involving the total removal of dominant species from pools showed that such large disturbances often require &gt; 3 yr for recovery. The irregularity of planktonic recruitment can be compounded by the presence of herbivores, which can remove most settling organisms from the substratum, or by the absence of other organisms that are necessary for the settlement of a dominant (e.g., seed-attachment sites for Phyllospadix). The combination of high disturbance frequency and slow rates of recovery makes it impossible for any dominant to occupy all the pools in its tidal range at any one time. Disturbance is viewed in these habitats as the stochastic factor overlying other, more predictable, community-structuring factors such as tidal height, pool size, wave exposure, and levels of herbivory, predation, and competition. Thus combined deterministic processes and random events operate to produce a complex mosaic of species assemblages in pools in one region. None of the tidepool assemblages is @'stable@' over many generations; rather, they seem to exist in a dynamic state where disturbances are an integral structuring factor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1942457</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECMOAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: The Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Algae ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological taxonomies ; Brackish water ecosystems ; Coasts ; Diatoms ; Ecological disturbance ; Forest ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbivores ; Marine ; Marine ecology ; Mussels ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Ecological monographs, 1984-03, Vol.54 (1), p.99-118</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1984 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1984 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1984 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3809-5b9863bcc5cb923ef1e7aae266d7366585aa080764f813b2407062518ac518af3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1942457$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1942457$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=9729939$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dethier, Megan N.</creatorcontrib><title>Disturbance and Recovery in Intertidal Pools: Maintenance of Mosaic Patterns</title><title>Ecological monographs</title><description>The species composition of pools in the intertidal zone on the coast of Washington State varies greatly from pool to pool and from time to time. While assemblages change somewhat predictably from the low- to the high-intertidal zone (presumably owing to different stress tolerances of the species), the variance among pools at a given tidal height cannot be ascribed to such physical factors. Some pools at each height are dominated by one species that monopolizes space on the rock or in the water column and modifies the pool environment. Each dominant species, once established, can spread rapidly through a pool (either by vegetative growth or by enhanced recruitment of its conspecifics) and is thus potentially self-perpetuating. When abundant, most dominants appear to prevent potential competitors from settling and surviving by monopolization of resources, abrasion of the substratum, and/or collection of sediment. Six such dominants were identified for Washington tidepools: from low to high pools, these are (1) the surfgrass Phyllospadix scouleri, (2) articulated coralline algae, (3) the mussel Mytilus californianus (exposed shores), (4) the cloning anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (more protected shores), (5) the red alga Rhodomela larix, and (6) the green alga Cladophora sp. Colonial diatoms also appear capable of dominating low pools in the absence of wave disturbance. However, each dominant monopolizes only 20-50% of the pools at any height. Disturbances, defined here as a loss of biomass exceeding 10% cover of a sessile species within 6 mo and caused by extrinsic forces, were observed frequently in regularly censused tidepools. Disturbance agents included waves, excessive heat, wave-driven logs or rocks, and unusual influxes of predators and herbivores. Severe disturbances (those affecting a large proportion of the organisms in a pool) tended to occur in high pools in the summer (due to heat stress) and low pools in the winter (due to wave damage). Overall, a disturbance occurred in every pool studied an average of every 1.6 yr. About half of the 231 observed disturbances affected one of the six dominant species. The frequencies of these disturbances ranged from one every 2-5 yr, and recovery of the species to its original level required 3 mo to &gt; 2 yr. Some species (e.g., Rhodomela) were disturbed frequently bu recovered quickly because of rapid vegetative growth. However if asexual propagation was not possible, such as when the entire population of a species was removed from a pool, the slowness and irregularity of recruitment of sexual propagules greatly impeded recovery. Experimental manipulations involving the total removal of dominant species from pools showed that such large disturbances often require &gt; 3 yr for recovery. The irregularity of planktonic recruitment can be compounded by the presence of herbivores, which can remove most settling organisms from the substratum, or by the absence of other organisms that are necessary for the settlement of a dominant (e.g., seed-attachment sites for Phyllospadix). The combination of high disturbance frequency and slow rates of recovery makes it impossible for any dominant to occupy all the pools in its tidal range at any one time. Disturbance is viewed in these habitats as the stochastic factor overlying other, more predictable, community-structuring factors such as tidal height, pool size, wave exposure, and levels of herbivory, predation, and competition. Thus combined deterministic processes and random events operate to produce a complex mosaic of species assemblages in pools in one region. None of the tidepool assemblages is @'stable@' over many generations; rather, they seem to exist in a dynamic state where disturbances are an integral structuring factor.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Diatoms</subject><subject>Ecological disturbance</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Mussels</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0012-9615</issn><issn>1557-7015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10NtKAzEUBdAgCtYq_kJA0afR3C--Sa1aaLGIPg-ZNAMp00lNpkr_3tQWBaEEEk5YbA4bgHOMbghF8hZrRhiXB6CHOZeFRJgfgh5CmBRaYH4MTlKao82sdQ-MH3zqVrEyrXXQtDP46mz4dHENfQtHbedi52emgdMQmnQHJ8bnv_ZHhxpOQjLewqnpMmzTKTiqTZPc2e7tg_fH4dvguRi_PI0G9-PCUoV0wSutBK2s5bbShLoaO2mMI0LMJBWCK24MUkgKVitMK8KQRIJwrIzdXDXtg6tt7jKGj5VLXbnwybqmMa0Lq1RiqvJhJMOLf3AeVrHNu2WDEONKUprV9VbZGFKKri6X0S9MXJcYlZtOy12nWV7u8kyypqljLsKnX65l7pTqzPCWffnGrfellcPBBGvFOMNa_0XPUxfi3g2-AQmujJU</recordid><startdate>19840301</startdate><enddate>19840301</enddate><creator>Dethier, Megan N.</creator><general>The Ecological Society of America</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>Duke University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840301</creationdate><title>Disturbance and Recovery in Intertidal Pools: Maintenance of Mosaic Patterns</title><author>Dethier, Megan N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3809-5b9863bcc5cb923ef1e7aae266d7366585aa080764f813b2407062518ac518af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Diatoms</topic><topic>Ecological disturbance</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Mussels</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dethier, Megan N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecological monographs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dethier, Megan N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disturbance and Recovery in Intertidal Pools: Maintenance of Mosaic Patterns</atitle><jtitle>Ecological monographs</jtitle><date>1984-03-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>99-118</pages><issn>0012-9615</issn><eissn>1557-7015</eissn><coden>ECMOAQ</coden><abstract>The species composition of pools in the intertidal zone on the coast of Washington State varies greatly from pool to pool and from time to time. While assemblages change somewhat predictably from the low- to the high-intertidal zone (presumably owing to different stress tolerances of the species), the variance among pools at a given tidal height cannot be ascribed to such physical factors. Some pools at each height are dominated by one species that monopolizes space on the rock or in the water column and modifies the pool environment. Each dominant species, once established, can spread rapidly through a pool (either by vegetative growth or by enhanced recruitment of its conspecifics) and is thus potentially self-perpetuating. When abundant, most dominants appear to prevent potential competitors from settling and surviving by monopolization of resources, abrasion of the substratum, and/or collection of sediment. Six such dominants were identified for Washington tidepools: from low to high pools, these are (1) the surfgrass Phyllospadix scouleri, (2) articulated coralline algae, (3) the mussel Mytilus californianus (exposed shores), (4) the cloning anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (more protected shores), (5) the red alga Rhodomela larix, and (6) the green alga Cladophora sp. Colonial diatoms also appear capable of dominating low pools in the absence of wave disturbance. However, each dominant monopolizes only 20-50% of the pools at any height. Disturbances, defined here as a loss of biomass exceeding 10% cover of a sessile species within 6 mo and caused by extrinsic forces, were observed frequently in regularly censused tidepools. Disturbance agents included waves, excessive heat, wave-driven logs or rocks, and unusual influxes of predators and herbivores. Severe disturbances (those affecting a large proportion of the organisms in a pool) tended to occur in high pools in the summer (due to heat stress) and low pools in the winter (due to wave damage). Overall, a disturbance occurred in every pool studied an average of every 1.6 yr. About half of the 231 observed disturbances affected one of the six dominant species. The frequencies of these disturbances ranged from one every 2-5 yr, and recovery of the species to its original level required 3 mo to &gt; 2 yr. Some species (e.g., Rhodomela) were disturbed frequently bu recovered quickly because of rapid vegetative growth. However if asexual propagation was not possible, such as when the entire population of a species was removed from a pool, the slowness and irregularity of recruitment of sexual propagules greatly impeded recovery. Experimental manipulations involving the total removal of dominant species from pools showed that such large disturbances often require &gt; 3 yr for recovery. The irregularity of planktonic recruitment can be compounded by the presence of herbivores, which can remove most settling organisms from the substratum, or by the absence of other organisms that are necessary for the settlement of a dominant (e.g., seed-attachment sites for Phyllospadix). The combination of high disturbance frequency and slow rates of recovery makes it impossible for any dominant to occupy all the pools in its tidal range at any one time. Disturbance is viewed in these habitats as the stochastic factor overlying other, more predictable, community-structuring factors such as tidal height, pool size, wave exposure, and levels of herbivory, predation, and competition. Thus combined deterministic processes and random events operate to produce a complex mosaic of species assemblages in pools in one region. None of the tidepool assemblages is @'stable@' over many generations; rather, they seem to exist in a dynamic state where disturbances are an integral structuring factor.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>The Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1942457</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9615
ispartof Ecological monographs, 1984-03, Vol.54 (1), p.99-118
issn 0012-9615
1557-7015
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13838342
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Algae
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Biological taxonomies
Brackish water ecosystems
Coasts
Diatoms
Ecological disturbance
Forest ecology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Herbivores
Marine
Marine ecology
Mussels
Synecology
title Disturbance and Recovery in Intertidal Pools: Maintenance of Mosaic Patterns
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disturbance%20and%20Recovery%20in%20Intertidal%20Pools:%20Maintenance%20of%20Mosaic%20Patterns&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20monographs&rft.au=Dethier,%20Megan%20N.&rft.date=1984-03-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=99-118&rft.issn=0012-9615&rft.eissn=1557-7015&rft.coden=ECMOAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1942457&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1942457%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300458733&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1942457&rfr_iscdi=true