Home-range size of coyotes: a critical review [Inconsistencies in telemetry studies]
Inconsistencies were found in most experimental designs used in telemetry studies of coyotes (Canis latrans). Methods reported in the literature were assessed relative to their ability to produce reliable estimates of home-range size. Relocations collected sequentially over set blocks of time were s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 1984, Vol.48 (1), p.127-139 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 139 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 127 |
| container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | LAUNDRE, J. W KELLER, B. L |
| description | Inconsistencies were found in most experimental designs used in telemetry studies of coyotes (Canis latrans). Methods reported in the literature were assessed relative to their ability to produce reliable estimates of home-range size. Relocations collected sequentially over set blocks of time were superior to those collected sporadically once or twice a day. A four-season division of the year (breeding, 1 Jan-15 Mar; gestation, 16 Mar-30 Apr; pup rearing, 1 May-31 Aug; dispersal, 1 Sep-31 Dec) best represented behavioral changes in coyotes that may affect home-range size. The number of sporadically collected relocations needed to adequately delineate home ranges was tentatively established to be about 100. Four to five 24-hour samples of sequential relocations seemed adequate to delineate home ranges of males and females in the pup-rearing season. Review of existing data indicated that most home-range estimates were derived from data bases too small for valid analysis. Analysis of remaining data indicated no evidence of difference among home ranges of coyotes from four different geographical areas. Future studies should concern delineating patterns of home-range use and correlating these patterns to vegetal, physical, and faunal characteristics of the home-range area. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3808460 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13827354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3808460</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3808460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-b5d1ba4c2ebac7d4da6ee8c93362e7767a42916467cbd1e0013c0073fb6dd38b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUR4MoOKf4DSQPok_VpEmT1DcZ_hkIPjhBEClpeiuRrpm5mTI_vZUNffPpwuVw4HcIOeTsLBdMnwvDjFRsi4x4KXSWG663yYixPM8KyZ92yR7iG2OCc6NGZHYb5pBF278CRf8FNLTUhVVIgBfUUhd98s52NMKHh0_6PO1d6NFjgt55QOp7mqCDOaS4opiWzfB82Sc7re0QDjZ3TB6vr2aT2-zu_mY6ubzLnBQsZXXR8NpKl0NtnW5kYxWAcaUQKgetlbYyL7mSSru64cAYF44xLdpaNY0wtRiTk7V3EcP7EjBVc48Ous72EJZYcWFyLQo5gKdr0MWAGKGtFtHPbVxVnFU_1apNtYE83igtDrvboYzz-IuXSmnDzR_2hinEf2xHa6y1obKvcTA9PvDSFMMWLXUhvgEGDYBX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13827354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Home-range size of coyotes: a critical review [Inconsistencies in telemetry studies]</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>LAUNDRE, J. W ; KELLER, B. L</creator><creatorcontrib>LAUNDRE, J. W ; KELLER, B. L ; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USA)</creatorcontrib><description>Inconsistencies were found in most experimental designs used in telemetry studies of coyotes (Canis latrans). Methods reported in the literature were assessed relative to their ability to produce reliable estimates of home-range size. Relocations collected sequentially over set blocks of time were superior to those collected sporadically once or twice a day. A four-season division of the year (breeding, 1 Jan-15 Mar; gestation, 16 Mar-30 Apr; pup rearing, 1 May-31 Aug; dispersal, 1 Sep-31 Dec) best represented behavioral changes in coyotes that may affect home-range size. The number of sporadically collected relocations needed to adequately delineate home ranges was tentatively established to be about 100. Four to five 24-hour samples of sequential relocations seemed adequate to delineate home ranges of males and females in the pup-rearing season. Review of existing data indicated that most home-range estimates were derived from data bases too small for valid analysis. Analysis of remaining data indicated no evidence of difference among home ranges of coyotes from four different geographical areas. Future studies should concern delineating patterns of home-range use and correlating these patterns to vegetal, physical, and faunal characteristics of the home-range area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3808460</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Animal ethology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breeding seasons ; Canis latrans ; Data ranges ; Estimation methods ; Female animals ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Male animals ; Mammalia ; Mammals ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Pups ; Range management ; Telemetry ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 1984, Vol.48 (1), p.127-139</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1984 The Wildlife Society, Inc.</rights><rights>1984 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-b5d1ba4c2ebac7d4da6ee8c93362e7767a42916467cbd1e0013c0073fb6dd38b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3808460$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3808460$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,4028,27932,27933,27934,58026,58259</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9667818$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LAUNDRE, J. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLER, B. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USA)</creatorcontrib><title>Home-range size of coyotes: a critical review [Inconsistencies in telemetry studies]</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Inconsistencies were found in most experimental designs used in telemetry studies of coyotes (Canis latrans). Methods reported in the literature were assessed relative to their ability to produce reliable estimates of home-range size. Relocations collected sequentially over set blocks of time were superior to those collected sporadically once or twice a day. A four-season division of the year (breeding, 1 Jan-15 Mar; gestation, 16 Mar-30 Apr; pup rearing, 1 May-31 Aug; dispersal, 1 Sep-31 Dec) best represented behavioral changes in coyotes that may affect home-range size. The number of sporadically collected relocations needed to adequately delineate home ranges was tentatively established to be about 100. Four to five 24-hour samples of sequential relocations seemed adequate to delineate home ranges of males and females in the pup-rearing season. Review of existing data indicated that most home-range estimates were derived from data bases too small for valid analysis. Analysis of remaining data indicated no evidence of difference among home ranges of coyotes from four different geographical areas. Future studies should concern delineating patterns of home-range use and correlating these patterns to vegetal, physical, and faunal characteristics of the home-range area.</description><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Canis latrans</subject><subject>Data ranges</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Pups</subject><subject>Range management</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUR4MoOKf4DSQPok_VpEmT1DcZ_hkIPjhBEClpeiuRrpm5mTI_vZUNffPpwuVw4HcIOeTsLBdMnwvDjFRsi4x4KXSWG663yYixPM8KyZ92yR7iG2OCc6NGZHYb5pBF278CRf8FNLTUhVVIgBfUUhd98s52NMKHh0_6PO1d6NFjgt55QOp7mqCDOaS4opiWzfB82Sc7re0QDjZ3TB6vr2aT2-zu_mY6ubzLnBQsZXXR8NpKl0NtnW5kYxWAcaUQKgetlbYyL7mSSru64cAYF44xLdpaNY0wtRiTk7V3EcP7EjBVc48Ous72EJZYcWFyLQo5gKdr0MWAGKGtFtHPbVxVnFU_1apNtYE83igtDrvboYzz-IuXSmnDzR_2hinEf2xHa6y1obKvcTA9PvDSFMMWLXUhvgEGDYBX</recordid><startdate>1984</startdate><enddate>1984</enddate><creator>LAUNDRE, J. W</creator><creator>KELLER, B. L</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1984</creationdate><title>Home-range size of coyotes: a critical review [Inconsistencies in telemetry studies]</title><author>LAUNDRE, J. W ; KELLER, B. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-b5d1ba4c2ebac7d4da6ee8c93362e7767a42916467cbd1e0013c0073fb6dd38b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Canis latrans</topic><topic>Data ranges</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Pups</topic><topic>Range management</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LAUNDRE, J. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLER, B. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USA)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LAUNDRE, J. W</au><au>KELLER, B. L</au><aucorp>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USA)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Home-range size of coyotes: a critical review [Inconsistencies in telemetry studies]</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>1984</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>127-139</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Inconsistencies were found in most experimental designs used in telemetry studies of coyotes (Canis latrans). Methods reported in the literature were assessed relative to their ability to produce reliable estimates of home-range size. Relocations collected sequentially over set blocks of time were superior to those collected sporadically once or twice a day. A four-season division of the year (breeding, 1 Jan-15 Mar; gestation, 16 Mar-30 Apr; pup rearing, 1 May-31 Aug; dispersal, 1 Sep-31 Dec) best represented behavioral changes in coyotes that may affect home-range size. The number of sporadically collected relocations needed to adequately delineate home ranges was tentatively established to be about 100. Four to five 24-hour samples of sequential relocations seemed adequate to delineate home ranges of males and females in the pup-rearing season. Review of existing data indicated that most home-range estimates were derived from data bases too small for valid analysis. Analysis of remaining data indicated no evidence of difference among home ranges of coyotes from four different geographical areas. Future studies should concern delineating patterns of home-range use and correlating these patterns to vegetal, physical, and faunal characteristics of the home-range area.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3808460</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
| ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 1984, Vol.48 (1), p.127-139 |
| issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13827354 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Animal ethology Biological and medical sciences Breeding seasons Canis latrans Data ranges Estimation methods Female animals Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Male animals Mammalia Mammals Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Pups Range management Telemetry Vertebrata |
| title | Home-range size of coyotes: a critical review [Inconsistencies in telemetry studies] |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T06%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Home-range%20size%20of%20coyotes:%20a%20critical%20review%20%5BInconsistencies%20in%20telemetry%20studies%5D&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=LAUNDRE,%20J.%20W&rft.aucorp=U.S.%20Fish%20and%20Wildlife%20Service%20(USA)&rft.date=1984&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=127-139&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3808460&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3808460%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13827354&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3808460&rfr_iscdi=true |