Changes in tibial bone density measured from standard radiographs in cemented and uncemented total knee replacements after ten years' follow-up

Stress shielding resulting in diminished bone density following total knee replacement (TKR) may increase the risk of migration and loosening of the prosthesis. This retrospective study was designed to quantify the effects of the method of fixation on peri-prosthetic tibial bone density beneath ceme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The bone & joint journal 2013-07, Vol.95-B (7), p.911-916
Hauptverfasser: Small, S R, Ritter, M A, Merchun, J G, Davis, K E, Rogge, R D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 916
container_issue 7
container_start_page 911
container_title The bone & joint journal
container_volume 95-B
creator Small, S R
Ritter, M A
Merchun, J G
Davis, K E
Rogge, R D
description Stress shielding resulting in diminished bone density following total knee replacement (TKR) may increase the risk of migration and loosening of the prosthesis. This retrospective study was designed to quantify the effects of the method of fixation on peri-prosthetic tibial bone density beneath cemented and uncemented tibial components of similar design and with similar long-term survival rates. Standard radiographs taken between two months and 15 years post-operatively were digitised from a matched group of TKRs using cemented (n = 67) and uncemented (n = 67) AGC tibial prostheses. Digital radiograph densitometry was used to quantify changes in bone density over time. Age, length of follow-up, gender, body mass index and alignment each significantly influenced the long-term pattern of peri-prosthetic bone density. Similar long-term changes in density irrespective of the method of fixation correlated well with the high rate of survival of this TKR at 20 years, and suggest that cemented and uncemented fixation are both equally viable.
doi_str_mv 10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.30537
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1381096869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1381096869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5e8425430fee485cdbc3aeead4f592716be9add9ef7144ed351f4daf945614463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UctO3TAQtVArQJQ_QMg7usmtHdtJvIQr-pCQuikSO2sSjyFtYgfbEb1f0V-u4QKzmdc5Z6Q5hJxxtuGC1V-YYLxqavZ3o1XfbgRToj0gxzWTupKSdR_eaqHlETlN6Tcr0THOJT8kR7XouKxlfUz-bR_A32Oio6d57EeYaB88Uos-jXlHZ4S0RrTUxTDTlMFbiJZGsGO4j7A8vDAHnNHngipruvr3NodcBP94RBpxmWC_SBRcxkgzerpDiOmCujBN4alal0_ko4Mp4elrPiG3X69_bb9XNz-__dhe3lSDaEWuFHayVlIwhyg7Ndh-EIAIVjql65Y3PWqwVqNruZRoheJOWnBaqqYMGnFCPu91lxgeV0zZzGMacJrAY1iT4eVDTDddowtU7qFDDClFdGaJ4wxxZzgzz26YZzdMcePOaHXVmhc3Cu389cLaz2jfSW-_F_8B8SuIhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1381096869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in tibial bone density measured from standard radiographs in cemented and uncemented total knee replacements after ten years' follow-up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Small, S R ; Ritter, M A ; Merchun, J G ; Davis, K E ; Rogge, R D</creator><creatorcontrib>Small, S R ; Ritter, M A ; Merchun, J G ; Davis, K E ; Rogge, R D</creatorcontrib><description>Stress shielding resulting in diminished bone density following total knee replacement (TKR) may increase the risk of migration and loosening of the prosthesis. This retrospective study was designed to quantify the effects of the method of fixation on peri-prosthetic tibial bone density beneath cemented and uncemented tibial components of similar design and with similar long-term survival rates. Standard radiographs taken between two months and 15 years post-operatively were digitised from a matched group of TKRs using cemented (n = 67) and uncemented (n = 67) AGC tibial prostheses. Digital radiograph densitometry was used to quantify changes in bone density over time. Age, length of follow-up, gender, body mass index and alignment each significantly influenced the long-term pattern of peri-prosthetic bone density. Similar long-term changes in density irrespective of the method of fixation correlated well with the high rate of survival of this TKR at 20 years, and suggest that cemented and uncemented fixation are both equally viable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-4394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-4408</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.30537</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23814242</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Bone Cements - adverse effects ; Bone Density ; Cementation - adverse effects ; Cementation - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis Design - adverse effects ; Prosthesis Failure ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Tibia - diagnostic imaging ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The bone &amp; joint journal, 2013-07, Vol.95-B (7), p.911-916</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5e8425430fee485cdbc3aeead4f592716be9add9ef7144ed351f4daf945614463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5e8425430fee485cdbc3aeead4f592716be9add9ef7144ed351f4daf945614463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23814242$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Small, S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merchun, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, K E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogge, R D</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in tibial bone density measured from standard radiographs in cemented and uncemented total knee replacements after ten years' follow-up</title><title>The bone &amp; joint journal</title><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><description>Stress shielding resulting in diminished bone density following total knee replacement (TKR) may increase the risk of migration and loosening of the prosthesis. This retrospective study was designed to quantify the effects of the method of fixation on peri-prosthetic tibial bone density beneath cemented and uncemented tibial components of similar design and with similar long-term survival rates. Standard radiographs taken between two months and 15 years post-operatively were digitised from a matched group of TKRs using cemented (n = 67) and uncemented (n = 67) AGC tibial prostheses. Digital radiograph densitometry was used to quantify changes in bone density over time. Age, length of follow-up, gender, body mass index and alignment each significantly influenced the long-term pattern of peri-prosthetic bone density. Similar long-term changes in density irrespective of the method of fixation correlated well with the high rate of survival of this TKR at 20 years, and suggest that cemented and uncemented fixation are both equally viable.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Bone Cements - adverse effects</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Cementation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cementation - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2049-4394</issn><issn>2049-4408</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UctO3TAQtVArQJQ_QMg7usmtHdtJvIQr-pCQuikSO2sSjyFtYgfbEb1f0V-u4QKzmdc5Z6Q5hJxxtuGC1V-YYLxqavZ3o1XfbgRToj0gxzWTupKSdR_eaqHlETlN6Tcr0THOJT8kR7XouKxlfUz-bR_A32Oio6d57EeYaB88Uos-jXlHZ4S0RrTUxTDTlMFbiJZGsGO4j7A8vDAHnNHngipruvr3NodcBP94RBpxmWC_SBRcxkgzerpDiOmCujBN4alal0_ko4Mp4elrPiG3X69_bb9XNz-__dhe3lSDaEWuFHayVlIwhyg7Ndh-EIAIVjql65Y3PWqwVqNruZRoheJOWnBaqqYMGnFCPu91lxgeV0zZzGMacJrAY1iT4eVDTDddowtU7qFDDClFdGaJ4wxxZzgzz26YZzdMcePOaHXVmhc3Cu389cLaz2jfSW-_F_8B8SuIhw</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Small, S R</creator><creator>Ritter, M A</creator><creator>Merchun, J G</creator><creator>Davis, K E</creator><creator>Rogge, R D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Changes in tibial bone density measured from standard radiographs in cemented and uncemented total knee replacements after ten years' follow-up</title><author>Small, S R ; Ritter, M A ; Merchun, J G ; Davis, K E ; Rogge, R D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5e8425430fee485cdbc3aeead4f592716be9add9ef7144ed351f4daf945614463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Bone Cements - adverse effects</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Cementation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cementation - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Small, S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merchun, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, K E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogge, R D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The bone &amp; joint journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Small, S R</au><au>Ritter, M A</au><au>Merchun, J G</au><au>Davis, K E</au><au>Rogge, R D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in tibial bone density measured from standard radiographs in cemented and uncemented total knee replacements after ten years' follow-up</atitle><jtitle>The bone &amp; joint journal</jtitle><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>95-B</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>911</spage><epage>916</epage><pages>911-916</pages><issn>2049-4394</issn><eissn>2049-4408</eissn><abstract>Stress shielding resulting in diminished bone density following total knee replacement (TKR) may increase the risk of migration and loosening of the prosthesis. This retrospective study was designed to quantify the effects of the method of fixation on peri-prosthetic tibial bone density beneath cemented and uncemented tibial components of similar design and with similar long-term survival rates. Standard radiographs taken between two months and 15 years post-operatively were digitised from a matched group of TKRs using cemented (n = 67) and uncemented (n = 67) AGC tibial prostheses. Digital radiograph densitometry was used to quantify changes in bone density over time. Age, length of follow-up, gender, body mass index and alignment each significantly influenced the long-term pattern of peri-prosthetic bone density. Similar long-term changes in density irrespective of the method of fixation correlated well with the high rate of survival of this TKR at 20 years, and suggest that cemented and uncemented fixation are both equally viable.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>23814242</pmid><doi>10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.30537</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-4394
ispartof The bone & joint journal, 2013-07, Vol.95-B (7), p.911-916
issn 2049-4394
2049-4408
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1381096869
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Bone Cements - adverse effects
Bone Density
Cementation - adverse effects
Cementation - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging
Knee Joint - surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis Design - adverse effects
Prosthesis Failure
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Tibia - diagnostic imaging
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Changes in tibial bone density measured from standard radiographs in cemented and uncemented total knee replacements after ten years' follow-up
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A20%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20tibial%20bone%20density%20measured%20from%20standard%20radiographs%20in%20cemented%20and%20uncemented%20total%20knee%20replacements%20after%20ten%20years'%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=The%20bone%20&%20joint%20journal&rft.au=Small,%20S%20R&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=95-B&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=911&rft.epage=916&rft.pages=911-916&rft.issn=2049-4394&rft.eissn=2049-4408&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.30537&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1381096869%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1381096869&rft_id=info:pmid/23814242&rfr_iscdi=true