Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton

Limitations in available field sampling methodology and substrata sampler design criteria, to reduce retrieval losses of periphyton, are discussed. The process of retrieving submerged substrates is defined as comprising two distinct operations—(1) in situ substrata encapsulation or containment and (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 1987, Vol.21 (4), p.395-402
Hauptverfasser: Lucey, William P., Austin, Alan, Deniseger, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 402
container_issue 4
container_start_page 395
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 21
creator Lucey, William P.
Austin, Alan
Deniseger, John
description Limitations in available field sampling methodology and substrata sampler design criteria, to reduce retrieval losses of periphyton, are discussed. The process of retrieving submerged substrates is defined as comprising two distinct operations—(1) in situ substrata encapsulation or containment and (2) subsequent withdrawal of contained surfaces through the water column. A cylindrical closing container which effects no appreciable water disturbance on closing is described. A minimal difference was found between water movement across sampling surfaces contained in the closing system compared with traditional open-type substrata exposure devices. Comparative community sampling studies between open and closing containers in an oligotrophic lake indicate the closing containment system to be an acceptable method for studying periphyton.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0043-1354(87)90186-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13802924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0043135487901862</els_id><sourcerecordid>13802924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-faa9039e034c61caa9396d0a2b8c47ce1bc1d938466501ad4e90eab33b2e85933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wEMOInpYzVd3k4sgxS8oeNFzmM3O1sg2WZOt0H_v1kqPnoaB532HeQg55-yGM17eMqZkweVMXenq2jCuy0IckAnXlSmEUvqQTPbIMTnJ-ZMxJoQ0EzKfx-CwHyiEhjaY_TLQ2FKgeV3nIcEA1MUwgA-YaBsTzbDqOx-WtMfk-4_NEMMpOWqhy3j2N6fk_fHhbf5cLF6fXub3i8JJLoeiBTBMGmRSuZK7cZOmbBiIWjtVOeS1442RWpXljHFoFBqGUEtZC9QzI-WUXO56-xS_1pgHu_LZYddBwLjOlkvNhBFqBNUOdCnmnLC1ffIrSBvLmd0as1sddqvD6sr-GrNijF389UN20LUJgvN5n62UFMpssbsdhuOv3x6Tzc7jaLHxCd1gm-j_v_MDr6F-2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13802924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lucey, William P. ; Austin, Alan ; Deniseger, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Lucey, William P. ; Austin, Alan ; Deniseger, John</creatorcontrib><description>Limitations in available field sampling methodology and substrata sampler design criteria, to reduce retrieval losses of periphyton, are discussed. The process of retrieving submerged substrates is defined as comprising two distinct operations—(1) in situ substrata encapsulation or containment and (2) subsequent withdrawal of contained surfaces through the water column. A cylindrical closing container which effects no appreciable water disturbance on closing is described. A minimal difference was found between water movement across sampling surfaces contained in the closing system compared with traditional open-type substrata exposure devices. Comparative community sampling studies between open and closing containers in an oligotrophic lake indicate the closing containment system to be an acceptable method for studying periphyton.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(87)90186-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Applied sciences ; artificial substrata ; design criteria ; Exact sciences and technology ; field sampling methodology ; Natural water pollution ; periphyton ; Pollution ; retrieval ; sample containment ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 1987, Vol.21 (4), p.395-402</ispartof><rights>1987</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0043135487901862$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7432492$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lucey, William P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deniseger, John</creatorcontrib><title>Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><description>Limitations in available field sampling methodology and substrata sampler design criteria, to reduce retrieval losses of periphyton, are discussed. The process of retrieving submerged substrates is defined as comprising two distinct operations—(1) in situ substrata encapsulation or containment and (2) subsequent withdrawal of contained surfaces through the water column. A cylindrical closing container which effects no appreciable water disturbance on closing is described. A minimal difference was found between water movement across sampling surfaces contained in the closing system compared with traditional open-type substrata exposure devices. Comparative community sampling studies between open and closing containers in an oligotrophic lake indicate the closing containment system to be an acceptable method for studying periphyton.</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>artificial substrata</subject><subject>design criteria</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>field sampling methodology</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>periphyton</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>retrieval</subject><subject>sample containment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wEMOInpYzVd3k4sgxS8oeNFzmM3O1sg2WZOt0H_v1kqPnoaB532HeQg55-yGM17eMqZkweVMXenq2jCuy0IckAnXlSmEUvqQTPbIMTnJ-ZMxJoQ0EzKfx-CwHyiEhjaY_TLQ2FKgeV3nIcEA1MUwgA-YaBsTzbDqOx-WtMfk-4_NEMMpOWqhy3j2N6fk_fHhbf5cLF6fXub3i8JJLoeiBTBMGmRSuZK7cZOmbBiIWjtVOeS1442RWpXljHFoFBqGUEtZC9QzI-WUXO56-xS_1pgHu_LZYddBwLjOlkvNhBFqBNUOdCnmnLC1ffIrSBvLmd0as1sddqvD6sr-GrNijF389UN20LUJgvN5n62UFMpssbsdhuOv3x6Tzc7jaLHxCd1gm-j_v_MDr6F-2A</recordid><startdate>1987</startdate><enddate>1987</enddate><creator>Lucey, William P.</creator><creator>Austin, Alan</creator><creator>Deniseger, John</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1987</creationdate><title>Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton</title><author>Lucey, William P. ; Austin, Alan ; Deniseger, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-faa9039e034c61caa9396d0a2b8c47ce1bc1d938466501ad4e90eab33b2e85933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>artificial substrata</topic><topic>design criteria</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>field sampling methodology</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>periphyton</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>retrieval</topic><topic>sample containment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lucey, William P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deniseger, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lucey, William P.</au><au>Austin, Alan</au><au>Deniseger, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><date>1987</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>402</epage><pages>395-402</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>Limitations in available field sampling methodology and substrata sampler design criteria, to reduce retrieval losses of periphyton, are discussed. The process of retrieving submerged substrates is defined as comprising two distinct operations—(1) in situ substrata encapsulation or containment and (2) subsequent withdrawal of contained surfaces through the water column. A cylindrical closing container which effects no appreciable water disturbance on closing is described. A minimal difference was found between water movement across sampling surfaces contained in the closing system compared with traditional open-type substrata exposure devices. Comparative community sampling studies between open and closing containers in an oligotrophic lake indicate the closing containment system to be an acceptable method for studying periphyton.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0043-1354(87)90186-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 1987, Vol.21 (4), p.395-402
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13802924
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Analysis methods
Applied sciences
artificial substrata
design criteria
Exact sciences and technology
field sampling methodology
Natural water pollution
periphyton
Pollution
retrieval
sample containment
Water treatment and pollution
title Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T13%3A09%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concept%20and%20design%20of%20a%20substrata%20container%20for%20sampling%20periphyton&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Lucey,%20William%20P.&rft.date=1987&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=402&rft.pages=395-402&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0043-1354(87)90186-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E13802924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13802924&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0043135487901862&rfr_iscdi=true