Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton
Limitations in available field sampling methodology and substrata sampler design criteria, to reduce retrieval losses of periphyton, are discussed. The process of retrieving submerged substrates is defined as comprising two distinct operations—(1) in situ substrata encapsulation or containment and (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 1987, Vol.21 (4), p.395-402 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 402 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 395 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Lucey, William P. Austin, Alan Deniseger, John |
description | Limitations in available field sampling methodology and substrata sampler design criteria, to reduce retrieval losses of periphyton, are discussed. The process of retrieving submerged substrates is defined as comprising two distinct operations—(1)
in situ substrata encapsulation or containment and (2) subsequent withdrawal of contained surfaces through the water column. A cylindrical closing container which effects no appreciable water disturbance on closing is described. A minimal difference was found between water movement across sampling surfaces contained in the closing system compared with traditional open-type substrata exposure devices. Comparative community sampling studies between open and closing containers in an oligotrophic lake indicate the closing containment system to be an acceptable method for studying periphyton. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0043-1354(87)90186-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13802924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0043135487901862</els_id><sourcerecordid>13802924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-faa9039e034c61caa9396d0a2b8c47ce1bc1d938466501ad4e90eab33b2e85933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wEMOInpYzVd3k4sgxS8oeNFzmM3O1sg2WZOt0H_v1kqPnoaB532HeQg55-yGM17eMqZkweVMXenq2jCuy0IckAnXlSmEUvqQTPbIMTnJ-ZMxJoQ0EzKfx-CwHyiEhjaY_TLQ2FKgeV3nIcEA1MUwgA-YaBsTzbDqOx-WtMfk-4_NEMMpOWqhy3j2N6fk_fHhbf5cLF6fXub3i8JJLoeiBTBMGmRSuZK7cZOmbBiIWjtVOeS1442RWpXljHFoFBqGUEtZC9QzI-WUXO56-xS_1pgHu_LZYddBwLjOlkvNhBFqBNUOdCnmnLC1ffIrSBvLmd0as1sddqvD6sr-GrNijF389UN20LUJgvN5n62UFMpssbsdhuOv3x6Tzc7jaLHxCd1gm-j_v_MDr6F-2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13802924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lucey, William P. ; Austin, Alan ; Deniseger, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Lucey, William P. ; Austin, Alan ; Deniseger, John</creatorcontrib><description>Limitations in available field sampling methodology and substrata sampler design criteria, to reduce retrieval losses of periphyton, are discussed. The process of retrieving submerged substrates is defined as comprising two distinct operations—(1)
in situ substrata encapsulation or containment and (2) subsequent withdrawal of contained surfaces through the water column. A cylindrical closing container which effects no appreciable water disturbance on closing is described. A minimal difference was found between water movement across sampling surfaces contained in the closing system compared with traditional open-type substrata exposure devices. Comparative community sampling studies between open and closing containers in an oligotrophic lake indicate the closing containment system to be an acceptable method for studying periphyton.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(87)90186-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Applied sciences ; artificial substrata ; design criteria ; Exact sciences and technology ; field sampling methodology ; Natural water pollution ; periphyton ; Pollution ; retrieval ; sample containment ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 1987, Vol.21 (4), p.395-402</ispartof><rights>1987</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0043135487901862$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7432492$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lucey, William P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deniseger, John</creatorcontrib><title>Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><description>Limitations in available field sampling methodology and substrata sampler design criteria, to reduce retrieval losses of periphyton, are discussed. The process of retrieving submerged substrates is defined as comprising two distinct operations—(1)
in situ substrata encapsulation or containment and (2) subsequent withdrawal of contained surfaces through the water column. A cylindrical closing container which effects no appreciable water disturbance on closing is described. A minimal difference was found between water movement across sampling surfaces contained in the closing system compared with traditional open-type substrata exposure devices. Comparative community sampling studies between open and closing containers in an oligotrophic lake indicate the closing containment system to be an acceptable method for studying periphyton.</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>artificial substrata</subject><subject>design criteria</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>field sampling methodology</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>periphyton</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>retrieval</subject><subject>sample containment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wEMOInpYzVd3k4sgxS8oeNFzmM3O1sg2WZOt0H_v1kqPnoaB532HeQg55-yGM17eMqZkweVMXenq2jCuy0IckAnXlSmEUvqQTPbIMTnJ-ZMxJoQ0EzKfx-CwHyiEhjaY_TLQ2FKgeV3nIcEA1MUwgA-YaBsTzbDqOx-WtMfk-4_NEMMpOWqhy3j2N6fk_fHhbf5cLF6fXub3i8JJLoeiBTBMGmRSuZK7cZOmbBiIWjtVOeS1442RWpXljHFoFBqGUEtZC9QzI-WUXO56-xS_1pgHu_LZYddBwLjOlkvNhBFqBNUOdCnmnLC1ffIrSBvLmd0as1sddqvD6sr-GrNijF389UN20LUJgvN5n62UFMpssbsdhuOv3x6Tzc7jaLHxCd1gm-j_v_MDr6F-2A</recordid><startdate>1987</startdate><enddate>1987</enddate><creator>Lucey, William P.</creator><creator>Austin, Alan</creator><creator>Deniseger, John</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1987</creationdate><title>Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton</title><author>Lucey, William P. ; Austin, Alan ; Deniseger, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-faa9039e034c61caa9396d0a2b8c47ce1bc1d938466501ad4e90eab33b2e85933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>artificial substrata</topic><topic>design criteria</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>field sampling methodology</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>periphyton</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>retrieval</topic><topic>sample containment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lucey, William P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deniseger, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lucey, William P.</au><au>Austin, Alan</au><au>Deniseger, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><date>1987</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>402</epage><pages>395-402</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>Limitations in available field sampling methodology and substrata sampler design criteria, to reduce retrieval losses of periphyton, are discussed. The process of retrieving submerged substrates is defined as comprising two distinct operations—(1)
in situ substrata encapsulation or containment and (2) subsequent withdrawal of contained surfaces through the water column. A cylindrical closing container which effects no appreciable water disturbance on closing is described. A minimal difference was found between water movement across sampling surfaces contained in the closing system compared with traditional open-type substrata exposure devices. Comparative community sampling studies between open and closing containers in an oligotrophic lake indicate the closing containment system to be an acceptable method for studying periphyton.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0043-1354(87)90186-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 1987, Vol.21 (4), p.395-402 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13802924 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Analysis methods Applied sciences artificial substrata design criteria Exact sciences and technology field sampling methodology Natural water pollution periphyton Pollution retrieval sample containment Water treatment and pollution |
title | Concept and design of a substrata container for sampling periphyton |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T13%3A09%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concept%20and%20design%20of%20a%20substrata%20container%20for%20sampling%20periphyton&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Lucey,%20William%20P.&rft.date=1987&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=402&rft.pages=395-402&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0043-1354(87)90186-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E13802924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13802924&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0043135487901862&rfr_iscdi=true |