Do Continuing Education Mandates Matter? An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between CE Regulations and Disciplinary Actions
Do CE mandates reduce professional misconduct? A nationwide study compared the disciplinary action rates of 92,478 psychologists in jurisdictions that were operating under (a) general CE mandates, (b) specific ethics mandates, and (c) no CE mandates. Results indicated that, although CE mandates were...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Professional psychology, research and practice research and practice, 2013-04, Vol.44 (2), p.99-104 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 104 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 99 |
| container_title | Professional psychology, research and practice |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Neimeyer, Greg J. Taylor, Jennifer M. Orwig, Janet Pippin |
| description | Do CE mandates reduce professional misconduct? A nationwide study compared the disciplinary action rates of 92,478 psychologists in jurisdictions that were operating under (a) general CE mandates, (b) specific ethics mandates, and (c) no CE mandates. Results indicated that, although CE mandates were clearly being enforced, neither the presence of mandates nor the number of CE credits that were mandated were associated with disciplinary action rates. Possible interpretations and qualifications of these findings are discussed, and directions for future research are outlined in support of the field's continuing movements in relation to professional competence and accountability. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0030458 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1373492178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1122563677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-705a71164fc02811972bf9ea1ccf45d7cac35352b03e1b736062de18d8b5b8ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rHDEMhk1JoZttoT_B0EsJbGJb4_HMqWx2N20gpdCPs_F4NBuHiT2xPaR77D-vm6QUeshJQnr06hUi5C1np5yBOjOMAatk84IseAvtioOAI7JgCuRKMdG8Iscp3bBCAcgF-bUNdBN8dn52fk93_WxNdsHTz8b3JmMqSc4YP9C1p7uf0xiiySEe6Lc89wcaBpqvkX7F8WEqXbuJnmO-R_R0syv1_fzUoUWPbl2ybhqdN0VhbR8ar8nLwYwJ3zzFJflxsfu--bS6-vLxcrO-WhmQPBfv0ijO62qw5QrOWyW6oUXDrR0q2StrLEiQomOAvFNQs1r0yJu-6WTXoIElef-oO8VwN2PK-ra4wXE0HsOcNAcFVSu4agr67j_0JszRF3eFqlTdSFWLZykuhKyhVurfWhtDShEHPUV3W-7XnOk_H9N_P1bQk0fUTEZP6WBNzM6OmOwcI_pcJoOuKi1028Jv1XOW_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1122563677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Continuing Education Mandates Matter? An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between CE Regulations and Disciplinary Actions</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Neimeyer, Greg J. ; Taylor, Jennifer M. ; Orwig, Janet Pippin</creator><contributor>Brown, Ronald T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Neimeyer, Greg J. ; Taylor, Jennifer M. ; Orwig, Janet Pippin ; Brown, Ronald T</creatorcontrib><description>Do CE mandates reduce professional misconduct? A nationwide study compared the disciplinary action rates of 92,478 psychologists in jurisdictions that were operating under (a) general CE mandates, (b) specific ethics mandates, and (c) no CE mandates. Results indicated that, although CE mandates were clearly being enforced, neither the presence of mandates nor the number of CE credits that were mandated were associated with disciplinary action rates. Possible interpretations and qualifications of these findings are discussed, and directions for future research are outlined in support of the field's continuing movements in relation to professional competence and accountability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0030458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Continuing Education ; Credit ; Disciplinary procedures ; Ethics ; Human ; Professional Development ; Professional Ethics ; Professional misconduct ; Psychologists</subject><ispartof>Professional psychology, research and practice, 2013-04, Vol.44 (2), p.99-104</ispartof><rights>2012 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2012, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-705a71164fc02811972bf9ea1ccf45d7cac35352b03e1b736062de18d8b5b8ea3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Brown, Ronald T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Neimeyer, Greg J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orwig, Janet Pippin</creatorcontrib><title>Do Continuing Education Mandates Matter? An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between CE Regulations and Disciplinary Actions</title><title>Professional psychology, research and practice</title><description>Do CE mandates reduce professional misconduct? A nationwide study compared the disciplinary action rates of 92,478 psychologists in jurisdictions that were operating under (a) general CE mandates, (b) specific ethics mandates, and (c) no CE mandates. Results indicated that, although CE mandates were clearly being enforced, neither the presence of mandates nor the number of CE credits that were mandated were associated with disciplinary action rates. Possible interpretations and qualifications of these findings are discussed, and directions for future research are outlined in support of the field's continuing movements in relation to professional competence and accountability.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Continuing Education</subject><subject>Credit</subject><subject>Disciplinary procedures</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Professional Development</subject><subject>Professional Ethics</subject><subject>Professional misconduct</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><issn>0735-7028</issn><issn>1939-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rHDEMhk1JoZttoT_B0EsJbGJb4_HMqWx2N20gpdCPs_F4NBuHiT2xPaR77D-vm6QUeshJQnr06hUi5C1np5yBOjOMAatk84IseAvtioOAI7JgCuRKMdG8Iscp3bBCAcgF-bUNdBN8dn52fk93_WxNdsHTz8b3JmMqSc4YP9C1p7uf0xiiySEe6Lc89wcaBpqvkX7F8WEqXbuJnmO-R_R0syv1_fzUoUWPbl2ybhqdN0VhbR8ar8nLwYwJ3zzFJflxsfu--bS6-vLxcrO-WhmQPBfv0ijO62qw5QrOWyW6oUXDrR0q2StrLEiQomOAvFNQs1r0yJu-6WTXoIElef-oO8VwN2PK-ra4wXE0HsOcNAcFVSu4agr67j_0JszRF3eFqlTdSFWLZykuhKyhVurfWhtDShEHPUV3W-7XnOk_H9N_P1bQk0fUTEZP6WBNzM6OmOwcI_pcJoOuKi1028Jv1XOW_A</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Neimeyer, Greg J.</creator><creator>Taylor, Jennifer M.</creator><creator>Orwig, Janet Pippin</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Do Continuing Education Mandates Matter? An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between CE Regulations and Disciplinary Actions</title><author>Neimeyer, Greg J. ; Taylor, Jennifer M. ; Orwig, Janet Pippin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-705a71164fc02811972bf9ea1ccf45d7cac35352b03e1b736062de18d8b5b8ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Continuing Education</topic><topic>Credit</topic><topic>Disciplinary procedures</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Professional Development</topic><topic>Professional Ethics</topic><topic>Professional misconduct</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neimeyer, Greg J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orwig, Janet Pippin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neimeyer, Greg J.</au><au>Taylor, Jennifer M.</au><au>Orwig, Janet Pippin</au><au>Brown, Ronald T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Continuing Education Mandates Matter? An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between CE Regulations and Disciplinary Actions</atitle><jtitle>Professional psychology, research and practice</jtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>99-104</pages><issn>0735-7028</issn><eissn>1939-1323</eissn><abstract>Do CE mandates reduce professional misconduct? A nationwide study compared the disciplinary action rates of 92,478 psychologists in jurisdictions that were operating under (a) general CE mandates, (b) specific ethics mandates, and (c) no CE mandates. Results indicated that, although CE mandates were clearly being enforced, neither the presence of mandates nor the number of CE credits that were mandated were associated with disciplinary action rates. Possible interpretations and qualifications of these findings are discussed, and directions for future research are outlined in support of the field's continuing movements in relation to professional competence and accountability.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/a0030458</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0735-7028 |
| ispartof | Professional psychology, research and practice, 2013-04, Vol.44 (2), p.99-104 |
| issn | 0735-7028 1939-1323 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1373492178 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Accountability Continuing Education Credit Disciplinary procedures Ethics Human Professional Development Professional Ethics Professional misconduct Psychologists |
| title | Do Continuing Education Mandates Matter? An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between CE Regulations and Disciplinary Actions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A24%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Continuing%20Education%20Mandates%20Matter?%20An%20Exploratory%20Study%20of%20the%20Relationship%20Between%20CE%20Regulations%20and%20Disciplinary%20Actions&rft.jtitle=Professional%20psychology,%20research%20and%20practice&rft.au=Neimeyer,%20Greg%20J.&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=99-104&rft.issn=0735-7028&rft.eissn=1939-1323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0030458&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1122563677%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1122563677&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |