The Universal Basic Income: Why Utopian Thinking Matters, and How Sociologists Can Contribute to It

Utopian thinking consists of formulating proposals for radical reforms, justifying them on the basis of normative principles combined with the best possible scientific analysis of the root causes of the problems the proposals are meant to address, and subjecting these proposals to unindulgent critic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Politics & society 2013-06, Vol.41 (2), p.171-182
1. Verfasser: Van Parijs, Philippe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 182
container_issue 2
container_start_page 171
container_title Politics & society
container_volume 41
creator Van Parijs, Philippe
description Utopian thinking consists of formulating proposals for radical reforms, justifying them on the basis of normative principles combined with the best possible scientific analysis of the root causes of the problems the proposals are meant to address, and subjecting these proposals to unindulgent critical scrutiny. Such utopian thinking is indispensable, and contributing to it is part of sociology’s core business. This article illustrates these claims by considering one particular utopian proposal: an unconditional basic income paid to every member of society on an individual basis, without means test or work requirement. It summarizes the main arguments that support this proposal, mentions a number of contexts in which it is being taken seriously, and sketches a number of ways in which sociological insights and research are crucially relevant to the discussion of the economic and political sustainability of an unconditional basic income.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0032329213483106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1373427924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0032329213483106</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1373424604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-ee016d803d8c7d933ccce3f8faa117220a7ee38dc6c5e93c3be7a732692daf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb1PwzAQxS0EEqWwI6aMLIGzz7GdESoKlSqxlNkyzgVS5aPYDRL_Pa7KhITodMP7vbvTe4xdcrjhXOtbABQoSsFRGuSgjtiEF4XIdcHlMZvs5Hynn7KzGNcAIJUqJuxq9U7ZS998Uoiuze5dbHy26P3Q0Tk7qV0b6eJnTtlq_rCaPeXL58fF7G6Ze1RqmxMBV5UBrIzXVYnovSesTe1cekwIcJoITeWVL6hEj6-knUahSlG5GnHKrvdrN2H4GClubddET23rehrGaDlqlEKXQh6ISgWHoEpLo0Vy_I8WmO6DNgmFPerDEGOg2m5C07nwZTnYXQ32dw3Jku8t0b2RXQ9j6FOYf_PfiCqDQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1353279078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Universal Basic Income: Why Utopian Thinking Matters, and How Sociologists Can Contribute to It</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Van Parijs, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Parijs, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>Utopian thinking consists of formulating proposals for radical reforms, justifying them on the basis of normative principles combined with the best possible scientific analysis of the root causes of the problems the proposals are meant to address, and subjecting these proposals to unindulgent critical scrutiny. Such utopian thinking is indispensable, and contributing to it is part of sociology’s core business. This article illustrates these claims by considering one particular utopian proposal: an unconditional basic income paid to every member of society on an individual basis, without means test or work requirement. It summarizes the main arguments that support this proposal, mentions a number of contexts in which it is being taken seriously, and sketches a number of ways in which sociological insights and research are crucially relevant to the discussion of the economic and political sustainability of an unconditional basic income.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0032329213483106</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSOCEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Economic sociology ; Income ; Income distribution ; Income Maintenance Programs ; Job Requirements ; Minimum income ; Radicalism ; Reform ; Sociological Research ; Sociologists ; Sociology ; Sustainability ; Utopias</subject><ispartof>Politics &amp; society, 2013-06, Vol.41 (2), p.171-182</ispartof><rights>2013 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0032329213483106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329213483106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,33774,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Parijs, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>The Universal Basic Income: Why Utopian Thinking Matters, and How Sociologists Can Contribute to It</title><title>Politics &amp; society</title><description>Utopian thinking consists of formulating proposals for radical reforms, justifying them on the basis of normative principles combined with the best possible scientific analysis of the root causes of the problems the proposals are meant to address, and subjecting these proposals to unindulgent critical scrutiny. Such utopian thinking is indispensable, and contributing to it is part of sociology’s core business. This article illustrates these claims by considering one particular utopian proposal: an unconditional basic income paid to every member of society on an individual basis, without means test or work requirement. It summarizes the main arguments that support this proposal, mentions a number of contexts in which it is being taken seriously, and sketches a number of ways in which sociological insights and research are crucially relevant to the discussion of the economic and political sustainability of an unconditional basic income.</description><subject>Economic sociology</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Income Maintenance Programs</subject><subject>Job Requirements</subject><subject>Minimum income</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Sociological Research</subject><subject>Sociologists</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Utopias</subject><issn>0032-3292</issn><issn>1552-7514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkb1PwzAQxS0EEqWwI6aMLIGzz7GdESoKlSqxlNkyzgVS5aPYDRL_Pa7KhITodMP7vbvTe4xdcrjhXOtbABQoSsFRGuSgjtiEF4XIdcHlMZvs5Hynn7KzGNcAIJUqJuxq9U7ZS998Uoiuze5dbHy26P3Q0Tk7qV0b6eJnTtlq_rCaPeXL58fF7G6Ze1RqmxMBV5UBrIzXVYnovSesTe1cekwIcJoITeWVL6hEj6-knUahSlG5GnHKrvdrN2H4GClubddET23rehrGaDlqlEKXQh6ISgWHoEpLo0Vy_I8WmO6DNgmFPerDEGOg2m5C07nwZTnYXQ32dw3Jku8t0b2RXQ9j6FOYf_PfiCqDQg</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Van Parijs, Philippe</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>The Universal Basic Income</title><author>Van Parijs, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-ee016d803d8c7d933ccce3f8faa117220a7ee38dc6c5e93c3be7a732692daf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Economic sociology</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Income Maintenance Programs</topic><topic>Job Requirements</topic><topic>Minimum income</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Sociological Research</topic><topic>Sociologists</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Utopias</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Parijs, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Politics &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Parijs, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Universal Basic Income: Why Utopian Thinking Matters, and How Sociologists Can Contribute to It</atitle><jtitle>Politics &amp; society</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>171-182</pages><issn>0032-3292</issn><eissn>1552-7514</eissn><coden>PSOCEX</coden><abstract>Utopian thinking consists of formulating proposals for radical reforms, justifying them on the basis of normative principles combined with the best possible scientific analysis of the root causes of the problems the proposals are meant to address, and subjecting these proposals to unindulgent critical scrutiny. Such utopian thinking is indispensable, and contributing to it is part of sociology’s core business. This article illustrates these claims by considering one particular utopian proposal: an unconditional basic income paid to every member of society on an individual basis, without means test or work requirement. It summarizes the main arguments that support this proposal, mentions a number of contexts in which it is being taken seriously, and sketches a number of ways in which sociological insights and research are crucially relevant to the discussion of the economic and political sustainability of an unconditional basic income.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0032329213483106</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-3292
ispartof Politics & society, 2013-06, Vol.41 (2), p.171-182
issn 0032-3292
1552-7514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1373427924
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Economic sociology
Income
Income distribution
Income Maintenance Programs
Job Requirements
Minimum income
Radicalism
Reform
Sociological Research
Sociologists
Sociology
Sustainability
Utopias
title The Universal Basic Income: Why Utopian Thinking Matters, and How Sociologists Can Contribute to It
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T08%3A44%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Universal%20Basic%20Income:%20Why%20Utopian%20Thinking%20Matters,%20and%20How%20Sociologists%20Can%20Contribute%20to%20It&rft.jtitle=Politics%20&%20society&rft.au=Van%20Parijs,%20Philippe&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=171-182&rft.issn=0032-3292&rft.eissn=1552-7514&rft.coden=PSOCEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0032329213483106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1373424604%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1353279078&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0032329213483106&rfr_iscdi=true