Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies

Aim ‘Predict, resect and discard’ strategies for diminutive and small colonic polyps are considered to be cost effective for treating colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the histological features of colonic polyps resected by endoscopic procedures or surgery...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Colorectal disease 2013-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e295-e300
Hauptverfasser: Sakamoto, T., Matsuda, T., Nakajima, T., Saito, Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e300
container_issue 6
container_start_page e295
container_title Colorectal disease
container_volume 15
creator Sakamoto, T.
Matsuda, T.
Nakajima, T.
Saito, Y.
description Aim ‘Predict, resect and discard’ strategies for diminutive and small colonic polyps are considered to be cost effective for treating colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the histological features of colonic polyps resected by endoscopic procedures or surgery using an updated database. Method We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps, less than 20 mm in size, which were removed by endoscopy from January 2009 to November 2011 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) in Tokyo, Japan. Results Less than 1% of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) were classified as mucosal high‐grade neoplasia (Category 4), and no submucosal invasion by carcinoma (Category 5) lesions were noted. However, 3% of small polyps (6–9 mm) were classified as Category 5; of these, 6% were submucosal deep invasive cancers. Morphologically, depressed components were observed more frequently in carcinomas than in adenomas in both small and large polyps (10–20 mm). Conclusion In light of the ‘predict, resect and discard’ strategies for small polyps, we should pay attention to the possible clinical malignancy of small and large polyps. We recommend that these strategies should be applied selectively and that they should be informed by accurate endoscopic evaluations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/codi.12210
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1372077165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1372077165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-63c6fd9f065b26bab448e45c36f5224e3255616d67aab73c2cadda9cdeb1a5833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9vEzEQxS1ERUvLhQ-AfCtCbOs_a3vDDQVIKkXtBdqj5bVnW4MTL7YXyLfHadoeO5cZPf3e0-gh9JaSM1rn3EbnzyhjlLxAR7SVvKGcdi_vb9Z0M0oO0eucfxJCpaLdK3TIuGCqVd0RWs-D33gbR1PuYoi33pqABzBlSpBxHLCtagJbqjzGsB3zJwx_TJhM8XGzA8od4NMxgfO2fMTVVWFsNg47n61J7hTnkkyBWw_5BB0MJmR487CP0Y9vX7_Pl83qanEx_7xqbMs5aSS3cnCzgUjRM9mbvm07aIXlchCMtcCZEJJKJ5UxveKWWeOcmVkHPTWi4_wYvd_njin-niAXva7PQAhmA3HKmnLFiFJUiop-2KM2xZwTDHpMfm3SVlOid_XqXb36vt4Kv3vInfo1uCf0sc8K0D3w1wfYPhOl51dfLh5Dm73H5wL_njwm_dJScSX0zeVCXy8X1zerpdSX_D8lQZX6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1372077165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Sakamoto, T. ; Matsuda, T. ; Nakajima, T. ; Saito, Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, T. ; Matsuda, T. ; Nakajima, T. ; Saito, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim ‘Predict, resect and discard’ strategies for diminutive and small colonic polyps are considered to be cost effective for treating colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the histological features of colonic polyps resected by endoscopic procedures or surgery using an updated database. Method We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps, less than 20 mm in size, which were removed by endoscopy from January 2009 to November 2011 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) in Tokyo, Japan. Results Less than 1% of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) were classified as mucosal high‐grade neoplasia (Category 4), and no submucosal invasion by carcinoma (Category 5) lesions were noted. However, 3% of small polyps (6–9 mm) were classified as Category 5; of these, 6% were submucosal deep invasive cancers. Morphologically, depressed components were observed more frequently in carcinomas than in adenomas in both small and large polyps (10–20 mm). Conclusion In light of the ‘predict, resect and discard’ strategies for small polyps, we should pay attention to the possible clinical malignancy of small and large polyps. We recommend that these strategies should be applied selectively and that they should be informed by accurate endoscopic evaluations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-8910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-1318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/codi.12210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23527478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenoma - pathology ; Adenoma - surgery ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Carcinoma - surgery ; Colonic Polyps - pathology ; Colonic Polyps - surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Discard ; endoscopic resection ; Humans ; Intestinal Polyps - pathology ; Intestinal Polyps - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; small colonic polyps</subject><ispartof>Colorectal disease, 2013-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e295-e300</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland</rights><rights>2013 The Authors Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-63c6fd9f065b26bab448e45c36f5224e3255616d67aab73c2cadda9cdeb1a5833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-63c6fd9f065b26bab448e45c36f5224e3255616d67aab73c2cadda9cdeb1a5833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcodi.12210$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcodi.12210$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23527478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies</title><title>Colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>Aim ‘Predict, resect and discard’ strategies for diminutive and small colonic polyps are considered to be cost effective for treating colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the histological features of colonic polyps resected by endoscopic procedures or surgery using an updated database. Method We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps, less than 20 mm in size, which were removed by endoscopy from January 2009 to November 2011 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) in Tokyo, Japan. Results Less than 1% of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) were classified as mucosal high‐grade neoplasia (Category 4), and no submucosal invasion by carcinoma (Category 5) lesions were noted. However, 3% of small polyps (6–9 mm) were classified as Category 5; of these, 6% were submucosal deep invasive cancers. Morphologically, depressed components were observed more frequently in carcinomas than in adenomas in both small and large polyps (10–20 mm). Conclusion In light of the ‘predict, resect and discard’ strategies for small polyps, we should pay attention to the possible clinical malignancy of small and large polyps. We recommend that these strategies should be applied selectively and that they should be informed by accurate endoscopic evaluations.</description><subject>Adenoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenoma - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - pathology</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Discard</subject><subject>endoscopic resection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Polyps - pathology</subject><subject>Intestinal Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>small colonic polyps</subject><issn>1462-8910</issn><issn>1463-1318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9vEzEQxS1ERUvLhQ-AfCtCbOs_a3vDDQVIKkXtBdqj5bVnW4MTL7YXyLfHadoeO5cZPf3e0-gh9JaSM1rn3EbnzyhjlLxAR7SVvKGcdi_vb9Z0M0oO0eucfxJCpaLdK3TIuGCqVd0RWs-D33gbR1PuYoi33pqABzBlSpBxHLCtagJbqjzGsB3zJwx_TJhM8XGzA8od4NMxgfO2fMTVVWFsNg47n61J7hTnkkyBWw_5BB0MJmR487CP0Y9vX7_Pl83qanEx_7xqbMs5aSS3cnCzgUjRM9mbvm07aIXlchCMtcCZEJJKJ5UxveKWWeOcmVkHPTWi4_wYvd_njin-niAXva7PQAhmA3HKmnLFiFJUiop-2KM2xZwTDHpMfm3SVlOid_XqXb36vt4Kv3vInfo1uCf0sc8K0D3w1wfYPhOl51dfLh5Dm73H5wL_njwm_dJScSX0zeVCXy8X1zerpdSX_D8lQZX6</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Sakamoto, T.</creator><creator>Matsuda, T.</creator><creator>Nakajima, T.</creator><creator>Saito, Y.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies</title><author>Sakamoto, T. ; Matsuda, T. ; Nakajima, T. ; Saito, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-63c6fd9f065b26bab448e45c36f5224e3255616d67aab73c2cadda9cdeb1a5833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenoma - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - pathology</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Discard</topic><topic>endoscopic resection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Polyps - pathology</topic><topic>Intestinal Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>small colonic polyps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakamoto, T.</au><au>Matsuda, T.</au><au>Nakajima, T.</au><au>Saito, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies</atitle><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e295</spage><epage>e300</epage><pages>e295-e300</pages><issn>1462-8910</issn><eissn>1463-1318</eissn><abstract>Aim ‘Predict, resect and discard’ strategies for diminutive and small colonic polyps are considered to be cost effective for treating colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the histological features of colonic polyps resected by endoscopic procedures or surgery using an updated database. Method We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps, less than 20 mm in size, which were removed by endoscopy from January 2009 to November 2011 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) in Tokyo, Japan. Results Less than 1% of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) were classified as mucosal high‐grade neoplasia (Category 4), and no submucosal invasion by carcinoma (Category 5) lesions were noted. However, 3% of small polyps (6–9 mm) were classified as Category 5; of these, 6% were submucosal deep invasive cancers. Morphologically, depressed components were observed more frequently in carcinomas than in adenomas in both small and large polyps (10–20 mm). Conclusion In light of the ‘predict, resect and discard’ strategies for small polyps, we should pay attention to the possible clinical malignancy of small and large polyps. We recommend that these strategies should be applied selectively and that they should be informed by accurate endoscopic evaluations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23527478</pmid><doi>10.1111/codi.12210</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-8910
ispartof Colorectal disease, 2013-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e295-e300
issn 1462-8910
1463-1318
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1372077165
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adenoma - pathology
Adenoma - surgery
Carcinoma - pathology
Carcinoma - surgery
Colonic Polyps - pathology
Colonic Polyps - surgery
Colonoscopy
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
Discard
endoscopic resection
Humans
Intestinal Polyps - pathology
Intestinal Polyps - surgery
Retrospective Studies
small colonic polyps
title Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T19%3A02%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinicopathological%20features%20of%20colorectal%20polyps:%20evaluation%20of%20the%20'predict,%20resect%20and%20discard'%20strategies&rft.jtitle=Colorectal%20disease&rft.au=Sakamoto,%20T.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e295&rft.epage=e300&rft.pages=e295-e300&rft.issn=1462-8910&rft.eissn=1463-1318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/codi.12210&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1372077165%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1372077165&rft_id=info:pmid/23527478&rfr_iscdi=true