Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies
Aim ‘Predict, resect and discard’ strategies for diminutive and small colonic polyps are considered to be cost effective for treating colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the histological features of colonic polyps resected by endoscopic procedures or surgery...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Colorectal disease 2013-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e295-e300 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e300 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e295 |
container_title | Colorectal disease |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Sakamoto, T. Matsuda, T. Nakajima, T. Saito, Y. |
description | Aim
‘Predict, resect and discard’ strategies for diminutive and small colonic polyps are considered to be cost effective for treating colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the histological features of colonic polyps resected by endoscopic procedures or surgery using an updated database.
Method
We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps, less than 20 mm in size, which were removed by endoscopy from January 2009 to November 2011 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) in Tokyo, Japan.
Results
Less than 1% of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) were classified as mucosal high‐grade neoplasia (Category 4), and no submucosal invasion by carcinoma (Category 5) lesions were noted. However, 3% of small polyps (6–9 mm) were classified as Category 5; of these, 6% were submucosal deep invasive cancers. Morphologically, depressed components were observed more frequently in carcinomas than in adenomas in both small and large polyps (10–20 mm).
Conclusion
In light of the ‘predict, resect and discard’ strategies for small polyps, we should pay attention to the possible clinical malignancy of small and large polyps. We recommend that these strategies should be applied selectively and that they should be informed by accurate endoscopic evaluations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/codi.12210 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1372077165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1372077165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-63c6fd9f065b26bab448e45c36f5224e3255616d67aab73c2cadda9cdeb1a5833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9vEzEQxS1ERUvLhQ-AfCtCbOs_a3vDDQVIKkXtBdqj5bVnW4MTL7YXyLfHadoeO5cZPf3e0-gh9JaSM1rn3EbnzyhjlLxAR7SVvKGcdi_vb9Z0M0oO0eucfxJCpaLdK3TIuGCqVd0RWs-D33gbR1PuYoi33pqABzBlSpBxHLCtagJbqjzGsB3zJwx_TJhM8XGzA8od4NMxgfO2fMTVVWFsNg47n61J7hTnkkyBWw_5BB0MJmR487CP0Y9vX7_Pl83qanEx_7xqbMs5aSS3cnCzgUjRM9mbvm07aIXlchCMtcCZEJJKJ5UxveKWWeOcmVkHPTWi4_wYvd_njin-niAXva7PQAhmA3HKmnLFiFJUiop-2KM2xZwTDHpMfm3SVlOid_XqXb36vt4Kv3vInfo1uCf0sc8K0D3w1wfYPhOl51dfLh5Dm73H5wL_njwm_dJScSX0zeVCXy8X1zerpdSX_D8lQZX6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1372077165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Sakamoto, T. ; Matsuda, T. ; Nakajima, T. ; Saito, Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, T. ; Matsuda, T. ; Nakajima, T. ; Saito, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
‘Predict, resect and discard’ strategies for diminutive and small colonic polyps are considered to be cost effective for treating colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the histological features of colonic polyps resected by endoscopic procedures or surgery using an updated database.
Method
We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps, less than 20 mm in size, which were removed by endoscopy from January 2009 to November 2011 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) in Tokyo, Japan.
Results
Less than 1% of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) were classified as mucosal high‐grade neoplasia (Category 4), and no submucosal invasion by carcinoma (Category 5) lesions were noted. However, 3% of small polyps (6–9 mm) were classified as Category 5; of these, 6% were submucosal deep invasive cancers. Morphologically, depressed components were observed more frequently in carcinomas than in adenomas in both small and large polyps (10–20 mm).
Conclusion
In light of the ‘predict, resect and discard’ strategies for small polyps, we should pay attention to the possible clinical malignancy of small and large polyps. We recommend that these strategies should be applied selectively and that they should be informed by accurate endoscopic evaluations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-8910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-1318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/codi.12210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23527478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenoma - pathology ; Adenoma - surgery ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Carcinoma - surgery ; Colonic Polyps - pathology ; Colonic Polyps - surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Discard ; endoscopic resection ; Humans ; Intestinal Polyps - pathology ; Intestinal Polyps - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; small colonic polyps</subject><ispartof>Colorectal disease, 2013-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e295-e300</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland</rights><rights>2013 The Authors Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-63c6fd9f065b26bab448e45c36f5224e3255616d67aab73c2cadda9cdeb1a5833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-63c6fd9f065b26bab448e45c36f5224e3255616d67aab73c2cadda9cdeb1a5833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcodi.12210$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcodi.12210$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23527478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies</title><title>Colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>Aim
‘Predict, resect and discard’ strategies for diminutive and small colonic polyps are considered to be cost effective for treating colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the histological features of colonic polyps resected by endoscopic procedures or surgery using an updated database.
Method
We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps, less than 20 mm in size, which were removed by endoscopy from January 2009 to November 2011 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) in Tokyo, Japan.
Results
Less than 1% of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) were classified as mucosal high‐grade neoplasia (Category 4), and no submucosal invasion by carcinoma (Category 5) lesions were noted. However, 3% of small polyps (6–9 mm) were classified as Category 5; of these, 6% were submucosal deep invasive cancers. Morphologically, depressed components were observed more frequently in carcinomas than in adenomas in both small and large polyps (10–20 mm).
Conclusion
In light of the ‘predict, resect and discard’ strategies for small polyps, we should pay attention to the possible clinical malignancy of small and large polyps. We recommend that these strategies should be applied selectively and that they should be informed by accurate endoscopic evaluations.</description><subject>Adenoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenoma - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - pathology</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Discard</subject><subject>endoscopic resection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Polyps - pathology</subject><subject>Intestinal Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>small colonic polyps</subject><issn>1462-8910</issn><issn>1463-1318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9vEzEQxS1ERUvLhQ-AfCtCbOs_a3vDDQVIKkXtBdqj5bVnW4MTL7YXyLfHadoeO5cZPf3e0-gh9JaSM1rn3EbnzyhjlLxAR7SVvKGcdi_vb9Z0M0oO0eucfxJCpaLdK3TIuGCqVd0RWs-D33gbR1PuYoi33pqABzBlSpBxHLCtagJbqjzGsB3zJwx_TJhM8XGzA8od4NMxgfO2fMTVVWFsNg47n61J7hTnkkyBWw_5BB0MJmR487CP0Y9vX7_Pl83qanEx_7xqbMs5aSS3cnCzgUjRM9mbvm07aIXlchCMtcCZEJJKJ5UxveKWWeOcmVkHPTWi4_wYvd_njin-niAXva7PQAhmA3HKmnLFiFJUiop-2KM2xZwTDHpMfm3SVlOid_XqXb36vt4Kv3vInfo1uCf0sc8K0D3w1wfYPhOl51dfLh5Dm73H5wL_njwm_dJScSX0zeVCXy8X1zerpdSX_D8lQZX6</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Sakamoto, T.</creator><creator>Matsuda, T.</creator><creator>Nakajima, T.</creator><creator>Saito, Y.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies</title><author>Sakamoto, T. ; Matsuda, T. ; Nakajima, T. ; Saito, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-63c6fd9f065b26bab448e45c36f5224e3255616d67aab73c2cadda9cdeb1a5833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenoma - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - pathology</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Discard</topic><topic>endoscopic resection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Polyps - pathology</topic><topic>Intestinal Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>small colonic polyps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakamoto, T.</au><au>Matsuda, T.</au><au>Nakajima, T.</au><au>Saito, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies</atitle><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e295</spage><epage>e300</epage><pages>e295-e300</pages><issn>1462-8910</issn><eissn>1463-1318</eissn><abstract>Aim
‘Predict, resect and discard’ strategies for diminutive and small colonic polyps are considered to be cost effective for treating colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the histological features of colonic polyps resected by endoscopic procedures or surgery using an updated database.
Method
We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps, less than 20 mm in size, which were removed by endoscopy from January 2009 to November 2011 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) in Tokyo, Japan.
Results
Less than 1% of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) were classified as mucosal high‐grade neoplasia (Category 4), and no submucosal invasion by carcinoma (Category 5) lesions were noted. However, 3% of small polyps (6–9 mm) were classified as Category 5; of these, 6% were submucosal deep invasive cancers. Morphologically, depressed components were observed more frequently in carcinomas than in adenomas in both small and large polyps (10–20 mm).
Conclusion
In light of the ‘predict, resect and discard’ strategies for small polyps, we should pay attention to the possible clinical malignancy of small and large polyps. We recommend that these strategies should be applied selectively and that they should be informed by accurate endoscopic evaluations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23527478</pmid><doi>10.1111/codi.12210</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1462-8910 |
ispartof | Colorectal disease, 2013-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e295-e300 |
issn | 1462-8910 1463-1318 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1372077165 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adenoma - pathology Adenoma - surgery Carcinoma - pathology Carcinoma - surgery Colonic Polyps - pathology Colonic Polyps - surgery Colonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery Discard endoscopic resection Humans Intestinal Polyps - pathology Intestinal Polyps - surgery Retrospective Studies small colonic polyps |
title | Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T19%3A02%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinicopathological%20features%20of%20colorectal%20polyps:%20evaluation%20of%20the%20'predict,%20resect%20and%20discard'%20strategies&rft.jtitle=Colorectal%20disease&rft.au=Sakamoto,%20T.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e295&rft.epage=e300&rft.pages=e295-e300&rft.issn=1462-8910&rft.eissn=1463-1318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/codi.12210&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1372077165%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1372077165&rft_id=info:pmid/23527478&rfr_iscdi=true |