Maintenance-feeding effort affects instrumental performance
The effort required of rats to obtain food, employing standard maintenance-feeding procedures, can affect the effort subsequently expended in an instrumental-learning task. Rats received 43 food-rewarded runway trials followed by access to food (a) on the home-cage floor, or (b) from a hopper attach...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology Comparative and physiological psychology, 1982-08, Vol.34 (3), p.141-148 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 148 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Eisenberger, Robert Masterson, Fred A. Over, Susan |
description | The effort required of rats to obtain food, employing standard maintenance-feeding procedures, can affect the effort subsequently expended in an instrumental-learning task. Rats received 43 food-rewarded runway trials followed by access to food (a) on the home-cage floor, or (b) from a hopper attached to the home-cage's wiremesh front wall. Hopper feeding involved the greater effort since the rats had to gnaw the food pellets through the wire mesh. Following 9 or 27 days of maintenance feeding, the rats were returned to the runway for one rewarded trial and 16 extinction trials. The hopper-fed rats ran faster than floor-fed rats on the rewarded test trial. In extinction, long-term maintenance feeding produced faster subsequent running times by the hopper-fed rats than the floor-fed rats. Short-term maintenance feeding, on the other hand, produced slower running times by the hopper-fed rats than the floor-fed rats. The results are consistent with previous findings of transfer of effort across behaviours and suggest that the effort required for reinforcement in the maintenance environment can systematically influence the effectiveness of various experimental treatments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14640748208400882 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13703907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_14640748208400882</sage_id><sourcerecordid>13703907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-15609e7b55a87e00d7f325bd8abe05aa298d52a582a234b29a92ef40bba680d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtB8LZ1kmyaBL1I8QsqXvQcZncnZcs2W5Mt4r9313oQRecSmLzPy_AwdsphysHABc9nOejcCDA5gDFij42GXcal4PtsBEKLLLdWHbKjlFbQj9JyxC4fsQ4dBQwlZZ6oqsNyQt63sZug91R2aVKH1MXtmkKHzWRDsf9cD_ljduCxSXTy9Y7Zy-3N8_w-WzzdPcyvF1mZS9tlXM3Aki6UQqMJoNJeClVUBgsChSisqZRAZQQKmRfCohXkcygKnBmohByz813vJravW0qdW9eppKbBQO02OS41SAu6D579CK7abQz9bY4Lq83MKjnU8V2qjG1KkbzbxHqN8d1xcINM90tmz0x3TMIlfWv9B7jaAXX41PXWxqZyHb43bfSxt1cnJ__GPwD6oYYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297869532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maintenance-feeding effort affects instrumental performance</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Eisenberger, Robert ; Masterson, Fred A. ; Over, Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisenberger, Robert ; Masterson, Fred A. ; Over, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>The effort required of rats to obtain food, employing standard maintenance-feeding procedures, can affect the effort subsequently expended in an instrumental-learning task. Rats received 43 food-rewarded runway trials followed by access to food (a) on the home-cage floor, or (b) from a hopper attached to the home-cage's wiremesh front wall. Hopper feeding involved the greater effort since the rats had to gnaw the food pellets through the wire mesh. Following 9 or 27 days of maintenance feeding, the rats were returned to the runway for one rewarded trial and 16 extinction trials. The hopper-fed rats ran faster than floor-fed rats on the rewarded test trial. In extinction, long-term maintenance feeding produced faster subsequent running times by the hopper-fed rats than the floor-fed rats. Short-term maintenance feeding, on the other hand, produced slower running times by the hopper-fed rats than the floor-fed rats. The results are consistent with previous findings of transfer of effort across behaviours and suggest that the effort required for reinforcement in the maintenance environment can systematically influence the effectiveness of various experimental treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-1321</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14640748208400882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><ispartof>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology, 1982-08, Vol.34 (3), p.141-148</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Experimental Psychology Society 1982</rights><rights>1982 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-15609e7b55a87e00d7f325bd8abe05aa298d52a582a234b29a92ef40bba680d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-15609e7b55a87e00d7f325bd8abe05aa298d52a582a234b29a92ef40bba680d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14640748208400882$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14640748208400882$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27852,27907,27908,59628,60417</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisenberger, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masterson, Fred A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Over, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Maintenance-feeding effort affects instrumental performance</title><title>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology</title><description>The effort required of rats to obtain food, employing standard maintenance-feeding procedures, can affect the effort subsequently expended in an instrumental-learning task. Rats received 43 food-rewarded runway trials followed by access to food (a) on the home-cage floor, or (b) from a hopper attached to the home-cage's wiremesh front wall. Hopper feeding involved the greater effort since the rats had to gnaw the food pellets through the wire mesh. Following 9 or 27 days of maintenance feeding, the rats were returned to the runway for one rewarded trial and 16 extinction trials. The hopper-fed rats ran faster than floor-fed rats on the rewarded test trial. In extinction, long-term maintenance feeding produced faster subsequent running times by the hopper-fed rats than the floor-fed rats. Short-term maintenance feeding, on the other hand, produced slower running times by the hopper-fed rats than the floor-fed rats. The results are consistent with previous findings of transfer of effort across behaviours and suggest that the effort required for reinforcement in the maintenance environment can systematically influence the effectiveness of various experimental treatments.</description><issn>0272-4995</issn><issn>1464-1321</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtB8LZ1kmyaBL1I8QsqXvQcZncnZcs2W5Mt4r9313oQRecSmLzPy_AwdsphysHABc9nOejcCDA5gDFij42GXcal4PtsBEKLLLdWHbKjlFbQj9JyxC4fsQ4dBQwlZZ6oqsNyQt63sZug91R2aVKH1MXtmkKHzWRDsf9cD_ljduCxSXTy9Y7Zy-3N8_w-WzzdPcyvF1mZS9tlXM3Aki6UQqMJoNJeClVUBgsChSisqZRAZQQKmRfCohXkcygKnBmohByz813vJravW0qdW9eppKbBQO02OS41SAu6D579CK7abQz9bY4Lq83MKjnU8V2qjG1KkbzbxHqN8d1xcINM90tmz0x3TMIlfWv9B7jaAXX41PXWxqZyHb43bfSxt1cnJ__GPwD6oYYQ</recordid><startdate>198208</startdate><enddate>198208</enddate><creator>Eisenberger, Robert</creator><creator>Masterson, Fred A.</creator><creator>Over, Susan</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Academic Press for the Experimental Psychology Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198208</creationdate><title>Maintenance-feeding effort affects instrumental performance</title><author>Eisenberger, Robert ; Masterson, Fred A. ; Over, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-15609e7b55a87e00d7f325bd8abe05aa298d52a582a234b29a92ef40bba680d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisenberger, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masterson, Fred A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Over, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisenberger, Robert</au><au>Masterson, Fred A.</au><au>Over, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maintenance-feeding effort affects instrumental performance</atitle><jtitle>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology</jtitle><date>1982-08</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>141-148</pages><issn>0272-4995</issn><eissn>1464-1321</eissn><abstract>The effort required of rats to obtain food, employing standard maintenance-feeding procedures, can affect the effort subsequently expended in an instrumental-learning task. Rats received 43 food-rewarded runway trials followed by access to food (a) on the home-cage floor, or (b) from a hopper attached to the home-cage's wiremesh front wall. Hopper feeding involved the greater effort since the rats had to gnaw the food pellets through the wire mesh. Following 9 or 27 days of maintenance feeding, the rats were returned to the runway for one rewarded trial and 16 extinction trials. The hopper-fed rats ran faster than floor-fed rats on the rewarded test trial. In extinction, long-term maintenance feeding produced faster subsequent running times by the hopper-fed rats than the floor-fed rats. Short-term maintenance feeding, on the other hand, produced slower running times by the hopper-fed rats than the floor-fed rats. The results are consistent with previous findings of transfer of effort across behaviours and suggest that the effort required for reinforcement in the maintenance environment can systematically influence the effectiveness of various experimental treatments.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/14640748208400882</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-4995 |
ispartof | The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology, 1982-08, Vol.34 (3), p.141-148 |
issn | 0272-4995 1464-1321 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13703907 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
title | Maintenance-feeding effort affects instrumental performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A12%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maintenance-feeding%20effort%20affects%20instrumental%20performance&rft.jtitle=The%20Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20B,%20Comparative%20and%20physiological%20psychology&rft.au=Eisenberger,%20Robert&rft.date=1982-08&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=141-148&rft.issn=0272-4995&rft.eissn=1464-1321&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14640748208400882&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E13703907%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297869532&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1080_14640748208400882&rfr_iscdi=true |