Diagnostic and therapeutic management of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults: Results from a Spanish registry of clinical practice
Abstract Background Eosinophilic oesophagitis has emerged as a common cause of oesophageal symptoms. Aims To document practice variation in care provided to eosinophilic oesophagitis patients in Spain and to assess adherence to available guidelines. Methods A prospective survey-based registry includ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Digestive and liver disease 2013-07, Vol.45 (7), p.562-568 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background Eosinophilic oesophagitis has emerged as a common cause of oesophageal symptoms. Aims To document practice variation in care provided to eosinophilic oesophagitis patients in Spain and to assess adherence to available guidelines. Methods A prospective survey-based registry including data from all patients receiving care from gastroenterologists and allergists throughout Spain was developed. Results Data from 705 patients (82% adults, male:female ratio 4.1:1) were collected from 26 Spanish hospitals. 42.7% received care in teaching hospitals. Adults presented dysphagia and food impaction more frequently; vomiting and weight loss predominated in children ( p < 0.01). A mean diagnostic delay of 54.7 and 28.04 months was documented for adults and children, respectively. Normal endoscopic exams were reported in 27.6% and directly related to the experience in managing the disease ( p < 0.05). Paediatric patients, non-teaching hospitals and greater experience in managing eosinophilic oesophagitis were associated with increased frequency in eosinophil count reports and with taking gastric and duodenal biopsies ( p < 0.001). Initial therapy consisted of topical steroids (61.7% of patients), proton pump inhibitors (52.4%), dietary modifications (51.26%) and endoscopic dilation (7.2%). Referrals to allergy units occurred more frequently in teaching hospitals ( p = 0.003) where food restrictions generally followed allergy test results ( p < 0.001). Conclusions Availability of facilities and the physician's experience constituted the most important factors in explaining differences in patient management. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1590-8658 1878-3562 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.dld.2013.01.013 |