Lack of prognostic significance of conventional peritoneal cytology in colorectal and gastric cancers: Results of EVOCAPE 2 multicentre prospective study

Abstract Aim In digestive cancers, the prognostic significance of intraperitoneal free cancer cells remains unclear (IPCC). The main objective of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of IPCC in colorectal and gastric adenocarcinoma. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the predi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of surgical oncology 2013-07, Vol.39 (7), p.707-714
Hauptverfasser: Cotte, E, Peyrat, P, Piaton, E, Chapuis, F, Rivoire, M, Glehen, O, Arvieux, C, Mabrut, J.-Y, Chipponi, J, Gilly, F.-N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 714
container_issue 7
container_start_page 707
container_title European journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 39
creator Cotte, E
Peyrat, P
Piaton, E
Chapuis, F
Rivoire, M
Glehen, O
Arvieux, C
Mabrut, J.-Y
Chipponi, J
Gilly, F.-N
description Abstract Aim In digestive cancers, the prognostic significance of intraperitoneal free cancer cells remains unclear (IPCC). The main objective of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of IPCC in colorectal and gastric adenocarcinoma. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the predictive significance of IPCC for the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and to evaluate the prevalence of synchronous PC and IPCC. Methods This was a prospective multicentre study. All patients undergoing surgery for a digestive tract cancer had peritoneal cytology taken. Patients with gastric and colorectal cancer with no residual tumour after surgery and no evidence of PC were followed-up for 2 years. The primary end point was overall survival. Results Between 2002 and 2007, 1364 patients were enrolled and 956 were followed-up over 2 years. Prevalence of IPCC was 5.7% in colon cancer, 0.6% in rectal cancer and 19.5% in gastric cancer. The overall 2-year survival rate for patients with IPCC was 34.7% versus 86.8% for patients with negative cytology ( p < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, IPCC was not an independent prognostic factor. No relationship between cytology and recurrence was found. Conclusion The presence of IPCC was not an independent prognostic and didn't add any additional prognostic information to the usual prognostic factors related to the tumour (pTNM and differentiation). Moreover the presence of IPCC detected with this method didn't appear to predict development of PC. Peritoneal cytology using conventional staining doesn't seem to be a useful tool for the staging of colorectal and gastric cancers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1367883308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0748798313003314</els_id><sourcerecordid>1367883308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-66b9ec9a1d4d2b6b267f08126baa0f729087ff3093f087d9711b8cc9f3a7c4403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIjl56Nh-9nW4RYRlGVxhY8esa0unqIb09yZikB_qn-G-tdlYPHoSChMpbT1J5i5CXnK0549XVsIYhhbVgXK4ZhuCPyIpfS1EIfq0ekxVTZV2oppYX5FlKA2Oskap5Si6ErBhv6nJFfu6Mvaehp8cY9j6k7CxNbu9d76zxFpYjG_wJfHbBm5EeIbocPODWzjmMYT9T51Ezhgg2Y9r4ju5NyhFRvxkxvaGfIU1jTgtu-_1uc_NpSwU9YMpZREdY7k9HBLgT0JSnbn5OnvRmTPDiYb0k395vv25ui93dh4-bm11hS6VyUVVtA7YxvCs70VatqFTPai6q1hjWK9GwWvW9xM4xrbpGcd7W1ja9NMqWJZOX5PWZiy_4MUHK-uCShXE0HsKUNJeVqmspWY1ScZZafGyK0OtjdAcTZ82ZXizRg14s0YslmmEIjkWvHvhTe4Dub8kfD1Dw9iwA7PLkIOpkHeC_dW75Ud0F93_-u3_K7eg8ujfewwxpCFNE37APnYRm-ssyFMtMcMmYlLyUvwDcnLTa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1367883308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lack of prognostic significance of conventional peritoneal cytology in colorectal and gastric cancers: Results of EVOCAPE 2 multicentre prospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Cotte, E ; Peyrat, P ; Piaton, E ; Chapuis, F ; Rivoire, M ; Glehen, O ; Arvieux, C ; Mabrut, J.-Y ; Chipponi, J ; Gilly, F.-N</creator><creatorcontrib>Cotte, E ; Peyrat, P ; Piaton, E ; Chapuis, F ; Rivoire, M ; Glehen, O ; Arvieux, C ; Mabrut, J.-Y ; Chipponi, J ; Gilly, F.-N ; the EVOCAPE group ; EVOCAPE group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Aim In digestive cancers, the prognostic significance of intraperitoneal free cancer cells remains unclear (IPCC). The main objective of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of IPCC in colorectal and gastric adenocarcinoma. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the predictive significance of IPCC for the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and to evaluate the prevalence of synchronous PC and IPCC. Methods This was a prospective multicentre study. All patients undergoing surgery for a digestive tract cancer had peritoneal cytology taken. Patients with gastric and colorectal cancer with no residual tumour after surgery and no evidence of PC were followed-up for 2 years. The primary end point was overall survival. Results Between 2002 and 2007, 1364 patients were enrolled and 956 were followed-up over 2 years. Prevalence of IPCC was 5.7% in colon cancer, 0.6% in rectal cancer and 19.5% in gastric cancer. The overall 2-year survival rate for patients with IPCC was 34.7% versus 86.8% for patients with negative cytology ( p &lt; 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, IPCC was not an independent prognostic factor. No relationship between cytology and recurrence was found. Conclusion The presence of IPCC was not an independent prognostic and didn't add any additional prognostic information to the usual prognostic factors related to the tumour (pTNM and differentiation). Moreover the presence of IPCC detected with this method didn't appear to predict development of PC. Peritoneal cytology using conventional staining doesn't seem to be a useful tool for the staging of colorectal and gastric cancers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23601984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Confidence Intervals ; Cytodiagnosis ; Cytology ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; France ; Gastric cancer ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neoplastic Cells, Circulating - pathology ; Peritoneal carcinomatosis ; Peritoneal Lavage ; Peritoneum - cytology ; Peritoneum - pathology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Prognostic ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Stomach Neoplasms - mortality ; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgery ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of surgical oncology, 2013-07, Vol.39 (7), p.707-714</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-66b9ec9a1d4d2b6b267f08126baa0f729087ff3093f087d9711b8cc9f3a7c4403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-66b9ec9a1d4d2b6b267f08126baa0f729087ff3093f087d9711b8cc9f3a7c4403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23601984$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cotte, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyrat, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piaton, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapuis, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivoire, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glehen, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arvieux, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mabrut, J.-Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipponi, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilly, F.-N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the EVOCAPE group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EVOCAPE group</creatorcontrib><title>Lack of prognostic significance of conventional peritoneal cytology in colorectal and gastric cancers: Results of EVOCAPE 2 multicentre prospective study</title><title>European journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Aim In digestive cancers, the prognostic significance of intraperitoneal free cancer cells remains unclear (IPCC). The main objective of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of IPCC in colorectal and gastric adenocarcinoma. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the predictive significance of IPCC for the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and to evaluate the prevalence of synchronous PC and IPCC. Methods This was a prospective multicentre study. All patients undergoing surgery for a digestive tract cancer had peritoneal cytology taken. Patients with gastric and colorectal cancer with no residual tumour after surgery and no evidence of PC were followed-up for 2 years. The primary end point was overall survival. Results Between 2002 and 2007, 1364 patients were enrolled and 956 were followed-up over 2 years. Prevalence of IPCC was 5.7% in colon cancer, 0.6% in rectal cancer and 19.5% in gastric cancer. The overall 2-year survival rate for patients with IPCC was 34.7% versus 86.8% for patients with negative cytology ( p &lt; 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, IPCC was not an independent prognostic factor. No relationship between cytology and recurrence was found. Conclusion The presence of IPCC was not an independent prognostic and didn't add any additional prognostic information to the usual prognostic factors related to the tumour (pTNM and differentiation). Moreover the presence of IPCC detected with this method didn't appear to predict development of PC. Peritoneal cytology using conventional staining doesn't seem to be a useful tool for the staging of colorectal and gastric cancers.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Cytodiagnosis</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neoplastic Cells, Circulating - pathology</subject><subject>Peritoneal carcinomatosis</subject><subject>Peritoneal Lavage</subject><subject>Peritoneum - cytology</subject><subject>Peritoneum - pathology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prognostic</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0748-7983</issn><issn>1532-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIjl56Nh-9nW4RYRlGVxhY8esa0unqIb09yZikB_qn-G-tdlYPHoSChMpbT1J5i5CXnK0549XVsIYhhbVgXK4ZhuCPyIpfS1EIfq0ekxVTZV2oppYX5FlKA2Oskap5Si6ErBhv6nJFfu6Mvaehp8cY9j6k7CxNbu9d76zxFpYjG_wJfHbBm5EeIbocPODWzjmMYT9T51Ezhgg2Y9r4ju5NyhFRvxkxvaGfIU1jTgtu-_1uc_NpSwU9YMpZREdY7k9HBLgT0JSnbn5OnvRmTPDiYb0k395vv25ui93dh4-bm11hS6VyUVVtA7YxvCs70VatqFTPai6q1hjWK9GwWvW9xM4xrbpGcd7W1ja9NMqWJZOX5PWZiy_4MUHK-uCShXE0HsKUNJeVqmspWY1ScZZafGyK0OtjdAcTZ82ZXizRg14s0YslmmEIjkWvHvhTe4Dub8kfD1Dw9iwA7PLkIOpkHeC_dW75Ud0F93_-u3_K7eg8ujfewwxpCFNE37APnYRm-ssyFMtMcMmYlLyUvwDcnLTa</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Cotte, E</creator><creator>Peyrat, P</creator><creator>Piaton, E</creator><creator>Chapuis, F</creator><creator>Rivoire, M</creator><creator>Glehen, O</creator><creator>Arvieux, C</creator><creator>Mabrut, J.-Y</creator><creator>Chipponi, J</creator><creator>Gilly, F.-N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Lack of prognostic significance of conventional peritoneal cytology in colorectal and gastric cancers: Results of EVOCAPE 2 multicentre prospective study</title><author>Cotte, E ; Peyrat, P ; Piaton, E ; Chapuis, F ; Rivoire, M ; Glehen, O ; Arvieux, C ; Mabrut, J.-Y ; Chipponi, J ; Gilly, F.-N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-66b9ec9a1d4d2b6b267f08126baa0f729087ff3093f087d9711b8cc9f3a7c4403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Cytodiagnosis</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neoplastic Cells, Circulating - pathology</topic><topic>Peritoneal carcinomatosis</topic><topic>Peritoneal Lavage</topic><topic>Peritoneum - cytology</topic><topic>Peritoneum - pathology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prognostic</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cotte, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyrat, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piaton, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapuis, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivoire, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glehen, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arvieux, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mabrut, J.-Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipponi, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilly, F.-N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the EVOCAPE group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EVOCAPE group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cotte, E</au><au>Peyrat, P</au><au>Piaton, E</au><au>Chapuis, F</au><au>Rivoire, M</au><au>Glehen, O</au><au>Arvieux, C</au><au>Mabrut, J.-Y</au><au>Chipponi, J</au><au>Gilly, F.-N</au><aucorp>the EVOCAPE group</aucorp><aucorp>EVOCAPE group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lack of prognostic significance of conventional peritoneal cytology in colorectal and gastric cancers: Results of EVOCAPE 2 multicentre prospective study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>714</epage><pages>707-714</pages><issn>0748-7983</issn><eissn>1532-2157</eissn><abstract>Abstract Aim In digestive cancers, the prognostic significance of intraperitoneal free cancer cells remains unclear (IPCC). The main objective of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of IPCC in colorectal and gastric adenocarcinoma. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the predictive significance of IPCC for the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and to evaluate the prevalence of synchronous PC and IPCC. Methods This was a prospective multicentre study. All patients undergoing surgery for a digestive tract cancer had peritoneal cytology taken. Patients with gastric and colorectal cancer with no residual tumour after surgery and no evidence of PC were followed-up for 2 years. The primary end point was overall survival. Results Between 2002 and 2007, 1364 patients were enrolled and 956 were followed-up over 2 years. Prevalence of IPCC was 5.7% in colon cancer, 0.6% in rectal cancer and 19.5% in gastric cancer. The overall 2-year survival rate for patients with IPCC was 34.7% versus 86.8% for patients with negative cytology ( p &lt; 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, IPCC was not an independent prognostic factor. No relationship between cytology and recurrence was found. Conclusion The presence of IPCC was not an independent prognostic and didn't add any additional prognostic information to the usual prognostic factors related to the tumour (pTNM and differentiation). Moreover the presence of IPCC detected with this method didn't appear to predict development of PC. Peritoneal cytology using conventional staining doesn't seem to be a useful tool for the staging of colorectal and gastric cancers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23601984</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.021</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-7983
ispartof European journal of surgical oncology, 2013-07, Vol.39 (7), p.707-714
issn 0748-7983
1532-2157
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1367883308
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adenocarcinoma - mortality
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
Confidence Intervals
Cytodiagnosis
Cytology
Disease-Free Survival
Female
France
Gastric cancer
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplastic Cells, Circulating - pathology
Peritoneal carcinomatosis
Peritoneal Lavage
Peritoneum - cytology
Peritoneum - pathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Prognostic
Proportional Hazards Models
Prospective Studies
Statistics, Nonparametric
Stomach Neoplasms - mortality
Stomach Neoplasms - pathology
Stomach Neoplasms - surgery
Surgery
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
Young Adult
title Lack of prognostic significance of conventional peritoneal cytology in colorectal and gastric cancers: Results of EVOCAPE 2 multicentre prospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T01%3A41%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lack%20of%20prognostic%20significance%20of%20conventional%20peritoneal%20cytology%20in%20colorectal%20and%20gastric%20cancers:%20Results%20of%20EVOCAPE%202%20multicentre%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Cotte,%20E&rft.aucorp=the%20EVOCAPE%20group&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=714&rft.pages=707-714&rft.issn=0748-7983&rft.eissn=1532-2157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1367883308%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1367883308&rft_id=info:pmid/23601984&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0748798313003314&rfr_iscdi=true