Prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica in Antimicrobial-Free and Conventional Antimicrobial Use Swine Production
Swine are the primary reservoir for foodborne illness associated with Yersinia enterocolitica. The use of antimicrobials in animal agriculture has been hypothesized as having a potential role in the increase in prevalence of zoonotic pathogens. The objective of this study was to compare the frequenc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Foodborne pathogens and disease 2013-06, Vol.10 (6), p.514-519 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 519 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 514 |
container_title | Foodborne pathogens and disease |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | FUNK, Julie A ABLEY, Melanie J BOWMAN, Andrew S GEBREYES, Wondwossen A MORGAN MORROW, William E TADESSE, Daniel A |
description | Swine are the primary reservoir for foodborne illness associated with Yersinia enterocolitica. The use of antimicrobials in animal agriculture has been hypothesized as having a potential role in the increase in prevalence of zoonotic pathogens. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of Y. enterocolitica fecal shedding in swine reared on farms with conventional antimicrobial use policies to farms that were antimicrobial free (ABF). Swine farms were selected from three regions in the United States. In each region, farms were categorized based on antimicrobial use policy. Fecal samples were collected from pigs on-farm within 48 h of harvest. The overall proportion of Y. enterocolitica and ail-harboring Y. enterocolitica-positive pigs was 10.9% and 4.0%, respectively. There were increased odds (odds ratio [OR] 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.46-13.28) for a pig to be Y. enterocolitica positive if it was reared on an ABF farm as compared to a conventional farm. There was no significant association between farm antimicrobial use policy and isolation of an ail-harboring Y. enterocolitica from an individual pig (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.90-3.61). The association of antimicrobial use policy with Y. enterocolitica shedding in feces should be interpreted cautiously, as antimicrobial use cannot be separated from other management factors (e.g., confinement or outdoor housing), which may be associated with risk of Y. enterocolitica in swine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/fpd.2012.1354 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1367883040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1367883040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-e33c7087ccc195aa144c8da679ebcd49906513cf564f1fa8673f86d61ac4d4423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpV0E2LFDEQgOEgivuhR6-Si-Clx3wnfVyGXVdYcEH34Kmpqa5ApCcZk54V_73d7Kh4qjo8FMXL2BspNlKE_kM8jBslpNpIbc0zdi6tdZ2Xyj5fd207LY08YxetfRdC9cr6l-xMaSdNEOqclftKjzBRRuIl8m9UW8oJOOWZasEypTkh8JT5VZ7TPmEtuwRTd1OJOOSRb0t-XHAqGab_DX9oxL_8TJn4fS3jEVf0ir2IMDV6fZqX7OHm-uv2trv7_PHT9uquQ-X7uSOt0YvgEVH2FkAag2EE53va4Wj6XjgrNUbrTJQRgvM6Bjc6CWhGY5S-ZO-f7h5q-XGkNg_71JCmCTKVYxukdj4ELYxYaPdEl79bqxSHQ017qL8GKYa18bA0HtbGw9p48W9Pp4-7PY1_9Z-oC3h3AtAQplghY2r_nLciCC31b6GVhdU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1367883040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica in Antimicrobial-Free and Conventional Antimicrobial Use Swine Production</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>FUNK, Julie A ; ABLEY, Melanie J ; BOWMAN, Andrew S ; GEBREYES, Wondwossen A ; MORGAN MORROW, William E ; TADESSE, Daniel A</creator><creatorcontrib>FUNK, Julie A ; ABLEY, Melanie J ; BOWMAN, Andrew S ; GEBREYES, Wondwossen A ; MORGAN MORROW, William E ; TADESSE, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><description>Swine are the primary reservoir for foodborne illness associated with Yersinia enterocolitica. The use of antimicrobials in animal agriculture has been hypothesized as having a potential role in the increase in prevalence of zoonotic pathogens. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of Y. enterocolitica fecal shedding in swine reared on farms with conventional antimicrobial use policies to farms that were antimicrobial free (ABF). Swine farms were selected from three regions in the United States. In each region, farms were categorized based on antimicrobial use policy. Fecal samples were collected from pigs on-farm within 48 h of harvest. The overall proportion of Y. enterocolitica and ail-harboring Y. enterocolitica-positive pigs was 10.9% and 4.0%, respectively. There were increased odds (odds ratio [OR] 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.46-13.28) for a pig to be Y. enterocolitica positive if it was reared on an ABF farm as compared to a conventional farm. There was no significant association between farm antimicrobial use policy and isolation of an ail-harboring Y. enterocolitica from an individual pig (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.90-3.61). The association of antimicrobial use policy with Y. enterocolitica shedding in feces should be interpreted cautiously, as antimicrobial use cannot be separated from other management factors (e.g., confinement or outdoor housing), which may be associated with risk of Y. enterocolitica in swine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-3141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-7125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1354</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23614802</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Larchmont, NY: Liebert</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage ; Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - genetics ; Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - metabolism ; Bacterial Shedding - drug effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers - metabolism ; Feces - microbiology ; Food industries ; Foodborne Diseases - prevention & control ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Humans ; Hygiene and safety ; Midwestern United States ; Molecular Typing ; North Carolina ; Serotyping ; Sus scrofa - microbiology ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates ; Yersinia enterocolitica - classification ; Yersinia enterocolitica - growth & development ; Yersinia enterocolitica - isolation & purification ; Yersinia enterocolitica - metabolism ; Yersinia Infections - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2013-06, Vol.10 (6), p.514-519</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-e33c7087ccc195aa144c8da679ebcd49906513cf564f1fa8673f86d61ac4d4423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27508031$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23614802$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FUNK, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ABLEY, Melanie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOWMAN, Andrew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEBREYES, Wondwossen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN MORROW, William E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TADESSE, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica in Antimicrobial-Free and Conventional Antimicrobial Use Swine Production</title><title>Foodborne pathogens and disease</title><addtitle>Foodborne Pathog Dis</addtitle><description>Swine are the primary reservoir for foodborne illness associated with Yersinia enterocolitica. The use of antimicrobials in animal agriculture has been hypothesized as having a potential role in the increase in prevalence of zoonotic pathogens. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of Y. enterocolitica fecal shedding in swine reared on farms with conventional antimicrobial use policies to farms that were antimicrobial free (ABF). Swine farms were selected from three regions in the United States. In each region, farms were categorized based on antimicrobial use policy. Fecal samples were collected from pigs on-farm within 48 h of harvest. The overall proportion of Y. enterocolitica and ail-harboring Y. enterocolitica-positive pigs was 10.9% and 4.0%, respectively. There were increased odds (odds ratio [OR] 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.46-13.28) for a pig to be Y. enterocolitica positive if it was reared on an ABF farm as compared to a conventional farm. There was no significant association between farm antimicrobial use policy and isolation of an ail-harboring Y. enterocolitica from an individual pig (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.90-3.61). The association of antimicrobial use policy with Y. enterocolitica shedding in feces should be interpreted cautiously, as antimicrobial use cannot be separated from other management factors (e.g., confinement or outdoor housing), which may be associated with risk of Y. enterocolitica in swine.</description><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Bacterial Shedding - drug effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers - metabolism</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Foodborne Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hygiene and safety</subject><subject>Midwestern United States</subject><subject>Molecular Typing</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Serotyping</subject><subject>Sus scrofa - microbiology</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Yersinia enterocolitica - classification</subject><subject>Yersinia enterocolitica - growth & development</subject><subject>Yersinia enterocolitica - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Yersinia enterocolitica - metabolism</subject><subject>Yersinia Infections - prevention & control</subject><issn>1535-3141</issn><issn>1556-7125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpV0E2LFDEQgOEgivuhR6-Si-Clx3wnfVyGXVdYcEH34Kmpqa5ApCcZk54V_73d7Kh4qjo8FMXL2BspNlKE_kM8jBslpNpIbc0zdi6tdZ2Xyj5fd207LY08YxetfRdC9cr6l-xMaSdNEOqclftKjzBRRuIl8m9UW8oJOOWZasEypTkh8JT5VZ7TPmEtuwRTd1OJOOSRb0t-XHAqGab_DX9oxL_8TJn4fS3jEVf0ir2IMDV6fZqX7OHm-uv2trv7_PHT9uquQ-X7uSOt0YvgEVH2FkAag2EE53va4Wj6XjgrNUbrTJQRgvM6Bjc6CWhGY5S-ZO-f7h5q-XGkNg_71JCmCTKVYxukdj4ELYxYaPdEl79bqxSHQ017qL8GKYa18bA0HtbGw9p48W9Pp4-7PY1_9Z-oC3h3AtAQplghY2r_nLciCC31b6GVhdU</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>FUNK, Julie A</creator><creator>ABLEY, Melanie J</creator><creator>BOWMAN, Andrew S</creator><creator>GEBREYES, Wondwossen A</creator><creator>MORGAN MORROW, William E</creator><creator>TADESSE, Daniel A</creator><general>Liebert</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica in Antimicrobial-Free and Conventional Antimicrobial Use Swine Production</title><author>FUNK, Julie A ; ABLEY, Melanie J ; BOWMAN, Andrew S ; GEBREYES, Wondwossen A ; MORGAN MORROW, William E ; TADESSE, Daniel A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-e33c7087ccc195aa144c8da679ebcd49906513cf564f1fa8673f86d61ac4d4423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Bacterial Shedding - drug effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers - metabolism</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Foodborne Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hygiene and safety</topic><topic>Midwestern United States</topic><topic>Molecular Typing</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Serotyping</topic><topic>Sus scrofa - microbiology</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Yersinia enterocolitica - classification</topic><topic>Yersinia enterocolitica - growth & development</topic><topic>Yersinia enterocolitica - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Yersinia enterocolitica - metabolism</topic><topic>Yersinia Infections - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FUNK, Julie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ABLEY, Melanie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOWMAN, Andrew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEBREYES, Wondwossen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN MORROW, William E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TADESSE, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foodborne pathogens and disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FUNK, Julie A</au><au>ABLEY, Melanie J</au><au>BOWMAN, Andrew S</au><au>GEBREYES, Wondwossen A</au><au>MORGAN MORROW, William E</au><au>TADESSE, Daniel A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica in Antimicrobial-Free and Conventional Antimicrobial Use Swine Production</atitle><jtitle>Foodborne pathogens and disease</jtitle><addtitle>Foodborne Pathog Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>514</spage><epage>519</epage><pages>514-519</pages><issn>1535-3141</issn><eissn>1556-7125</eissn><abstract>Swine are the primary reservoir for foodborne illness associated with Yersinia enterocolitica. The use of antimicrobials in animal agriculture has been hypothesized as having a potential role in the increase in prevalence of zoonotic pathogens. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of Y. enterocolitica fecal shedding in swine reared on farms with conventional antimicrobial use policies to farms that were antimicrobial free (ABF). Swine farms were selected from three regions in the United States. In each region, farms were categorized based on antimicrobial use policy. Fecal samples were collected from pigs on-farm within 48 h of harvest. The overall proportion of Y. enterocolitica and ail-harboring Y. enterocolitica-positive pigs was 10.9% and 4.0%, respectively. There were increased odds (odds ratio [OR] 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.46-13.28) for a pig to be Y. enterocolitica positive if it was reared on an ABF farm as compared to a conventional farm. There was no significant association between farm antimicrobial use policy and isolation of an ail-harboring Y. enterocolitica from an individual pig (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.90-3.61). The association of antimicrobial use policy with Y. enterocolitica shedding in feces should be interpreted cautiously, as antimicrobial use cannot be separated from other management factors (e.g., confinement or outdoor housing), which may be associated with risk of Y. enterocolitica in swine.</abstract><cop>Larchmont, NY</cop><pub>Liebert</pub><pmid>23614802</pmid><doi>10.1089/fpd.2012.1354</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1535-3141 |
ispartof | Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2013-06, Vol.10 (6), p.514-519 |
issn | 1535-3141 1556-7125 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1367883040 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animal Husbandry - methods Animal productions Animals Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - genetics Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - metabolism Bacterial Shedding - drug effects Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers - metabolism Feces - microbiology Food industries Foodborne Diseases - prevention & control Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Humans Hygiene and safety Midwestern United States Molecular Typing North Carolina Serotyping Sus scrofa - microbiology Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates Yersinia enterocolitica - classification Yersinia enterocolitica - growth & development Yersinia enterocolitica - isolation & purification Yersinia enterocolitica - metabolism Yersinia Infections - prevention & control |
title | Prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica in Antimicrobial-Free and Conventional Antimicrobial Use Swine Production |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T11%3A42%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20Yersinia%20enterocolitica%20in%20Antimicrobial-Free%20and%20Conventional%20Antimicrobial%20Use%20Swine%20Production&rft.jtitle=Foodborne%20pathogens%20and%20disease&rft.au=FUNK,%20Julie%20A&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=514&rft.epage=519&rft.pages=514-519&rft.issn=1535-3141&rft.eissn=1556-7125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/fpd.2012.1354&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1367883040%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1367883040&rft_id=info:pmid/23614802&rfr_iscdi=true |