Evaluation of transvaginal peritoneal surgery in young female patients
Background The transvaginal approach is being used for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and reports of the clinical use of transvaginal NOTES have increased rapidly. However, hasty use of a transvaginal route may cause unexpected complications. Infertility or dyspareunia afte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2013-07, Vol.27 (7), p.2619-2624 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2624 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2619 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Tanaka, Masaaki Sagawa, Tetsuya Yamazaki, Rena Myojo, Subaru Dohi, Satoshi Inoue, Masaki |
description | Background
The transvaginal approach is being used for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and reports of the clinical use of transvaginal NOTES have increased rapidly. However, hasty use of a transvaginal route may cause unexpected complications. Infertility or dyspareunia after transvaginal NOTES in young women is one of the most important issues to be resolved. The purpose of this study was to assess long-term complications, including infertility and dyspareunia, after transvaginal peritoneal surgery.
Methods
An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 73 young patients who had undergone ovarian cystectomy using a transvaginal approach from 2003 to 2011. The questionnaire contained 15 questions; 6 dealt with fertility, and 8 dealt with discomfort after surgery. A 5-point scale was used to evaluate patients’ overall satisfaction with surgery.
Results
Forty-four (60 %) questionnaires were returned. The patients’ mean age was 33.0 years, and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 16.5 months. Of responders younger than age 40 years, 24 did not use contraception, and 9 (38 %) conceived. The pregnancy rate among women younger than age 30 years was 60 %. Two (5 %) women reported temporary dyspareunia 1 month after surgery, but none developed permanent dyspareunia. The average patient satisfaction score was 4.12.
Conclusions
There was no evidence to suggest that transvaginal peritoneal surgery causes infertility or dyspareunia. The majority of patients gave a high evaluation to vaginal ovarian cystectomy, suggesting the usability of a transvaginal approach for intraperitoneal surgery in young premenopausal women. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-012-2749-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1367507457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2993328891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-c030b93f71e20c15f0b32b9592bbdba9c21092b329a0c379b7f66a0555793b6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OJldfLdHKW0KhS86Dkk22zZsputyW6h_97UrSKCp5lhnnlDHoSuMdxjAPkQAZhgOWCSE8lULk_QGDOaJoKnp2gMikLaKDZCFzFuIOEK83M0IpROFQgxRov5ztS96arWZ22ZdcH4uDPryps627pQda13qY19WLuwzyqf7dver7PSNaZ22TZdOt_FS3RWmjq6q2OdoPfF_G32nC9fn15mj8u8YFx1eQEUrKKlxI5AgXkJlhKruCLWrqxRBcGQekqUgYJKZWUphAHOuVTUioJO0N2Quw3tR-9ip5sqFq6ujXdtHzWmQnKQjMuE3v5BN20f0r--KMGZIFORKDxQRWhjDK7U21A1Juw1Bn2QrAfJOknWB8n6kHxzTO5t41Y_F99WE0AGIKaVT-J-Pf1v6if2QoZD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1366546286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of transvaginal peritoneal surgery in young female patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Tanaka, Masaaki ; Sagawa, Tetsuya ; Yamazaki, Rena ; Myojo, Subaru ; Dohi, Satoshi ; Inoue, Masaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Masaaki ; Sagawa, Tetsuya ; Yamazaki, Rena ; Myojo, Subaru ; Dohi, Satoshi ; Inoue, Masaki</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The transvaginal approach is being used for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and reports of the clinical use of transvaginal NOTES have increased rapidly. However, hasty use of a transvaginal route may cause unexpected complications. Infertility or dyspareunia after transvaginal NOTES in young women is one of the most important issues to be resolved. The purpose of this study was to assess long-term complications, including infertility and dyspareunia, after transvaginal peritoneal surgery.
Methods
An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 73 young patients who had undergone ovarian cystectomy using a transvaginal approach from 2003 to 2011. The questionnaire contained 15 questions; 6 dealt with fertility, and 8 dealt with discomfort after surgery. A 5-point scale was used to evaluate patients’ overall satisfaction with surgery.
Results
Forty-four (60 %) questionnaires were returned. The patients’ mean age was 33.0 years, and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 16.5 months. Of responders younger than age 40 years, 24 did not use contraception, and 9 (38 %) conceived. The pregnancy rate among women younger than age 30 years was 60 %. Two (5 %) women reported temporary dyspareunia 1 month after surgery, but none developed permanent dyspareunia. The average patient satisfaction score was 4.12.
Conclusions
There was no evidence to suggest that transvaginal peritoneal surgery causes infertility or dyspareunia. The majority of patients gave a high evaluation to vaginal ovarian cystectomy, suggesting the usability of a transvaginal approach for intraperitoneal surgery in young premenopausal women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2749-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23389066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adult ; Cysts ; Dyspareunia - etiology ; Endoluminal Surgery ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Fertility ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Infertility ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - adverse effects ; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods ; Ovarian Cysts - surgery ; Ovaries ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Proctology ; Questionnaires ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Urological surgery ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2013-07, Vol.27 (7), p.2619-2624</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-c030b93f71e20c15f0b32b9592bbdba9c21092b329a0c379b7f66a0555793b6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-c030b93f71e20c15f0b32b9592bbdba9c21092b329a0c379b7f66a0555793b6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-012-2749-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-012-2749-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23389066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagawa, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Rena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myojo, Subaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohi, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Masaki</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of transvaginal peritoneal surgery in young female patients</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
The transvaginal approach is being used for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and reports of the clinical use of transvaginal NOTES have increased rapidly. However, hasty use of a transvaginal route may cause unexpected complications. Infertility or dyspareunia after transvaginal NOTES in young women is one of the most important issues to be resolved. The purpose of this study was to assess long-term complications, including infertility and dyspareunia, after transvaginal peritoneal surgery.
Methods
An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 73 young patients who had undergone ovarian cystectomy using a transvaginal approach from 2003 to 2011. The questionnaire contained 15 questions; 6 dealt with fertility, and 8 dealt with discomfort after surgery. A 5-point scale was used to evaluate patients’ overall satisfaction with surgery.
Results
Forty-four (60 %) questionnaires were returned. The patients’ mean age was 33.0 years, and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 16.5 months. Of responders younger than age 40 years, 24 did not use contraception, and 9 (38 %) conceived. The pregnancy rate among women younger than age 30 years was 60 %. Two (5 %) women reported temporary dyspareunia 1 month after surgery, but none developed permanent dyspareunia. The average patient satisfaction score was 4.12.
Conclusions
There was no evidence to suggest that transvaginal peritoneal surgery causes infertility or dyspareunia. The majority of patients gave a high evaluation to vaginal ovarian cystectomy, suggesting the usability of a transvaginal approach for intraperitoneal surgery in young premenopausal women.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>Dyspareunia - etiology</subject><subject>Endoluminal Surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - adverse effects</subject><subject>Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Ovarian Cysts - surgery</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZ8OJldfLdHKW0KhS86Dkk22zZsputyW6h_97UrSKCp5lhnnlDHoSuMdxjAPkQAZhgOWCSE8lULk_QGDOaJoKnp2gMikLaKDZCFzFuIOEK83M0IpROFQgxRov5ztS96arWZ22ZdcH4uDPryps627pQda13qY19WLuwzyqf7dver7PSNaZ22TZdOt_FS3RWmjq6q2OdoPfF_G32nC9fn15mj8u8YFx1eQEUrKKlxI5AgXkJlhKruCLWrqxRBcGQekqUgYJKZWUphAHOuVTUioJO0N2Quw3tR-9ip5sqFq6ujXdtHzWmQnKQjMuE3v5BN20f0r--KMGZIFORKDxQRWhjDK7U21A1Juw1Bn2QrAfJOknWB8n6kHxzTO5t41Y_F99WE0AGIKaVT-J-Pf1v6if2QoZD</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Tanaka, Masaaki</creator><creator>Sagawa, Tetsuya</creator><creator>Yamazaki, Rena</creator><creator>Myojo, Subaru</creator><creator>Dohi, Satoshi</creator><creator>Inoue, Masaki</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of transvaginal peritoneal surgery in young female patients</title><author>Tanaka, Masaaki ; Sagawa, Tetsuya ; Yamazaki, Rena ; Myojo, Subaru ; Dohi, Satoshi ; Inoue, Masaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-c030b93f71e20c15f0b32b9592bbdba9c21092b329a0c379b7f66a0555793b6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>Dyspareunia - etiology</topic><topic>Endoluminal Surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - adverse effects</topic><topic>Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Ovarian Cysts - surgery</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagawa, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Rena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myojo, Subaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohi, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Masaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanaka, Masaaki</au><au>Sagawa, Tetsuya</au><au>Yamazaki, Rena</au><au>Myojo, Subaru</au><au>Dohi, Satoshi</au><au>Inoue, Masaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of transvaginal peritoneal surgery in young female patients</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2619</spage><epage>2624</epage><pages>2619-2624</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
The transvaginal approach is being used for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and reports of the clinical use of transvaginal NOTES have increased rapidly. However, hasty use of a transvaginal route may cause unexpected complications. Infertility or dyspareunia after transvaginal NOTES in young women is one of the most important issues to be resolved. The purpose of this study was to assess long-term complications, including infertility and dyspareunia, after transvaginal peritoneal surgery.
Methods
An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 73 young patients who had undergone ovarian cystectomy using a transvaginal approach from 2003 to 2011. The questionnaire contained 15 questions; 6 dealt with fertility, and 8 dealt with discomfort after surgery. A 5-point scale was used to evaluate patients’ overall satisfaction with surgery.
Results
Forty-four (60 %) questionnaires were returned. The patients’ mean age was 33.0 years, and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 16.5 months. Of responders younger than age 40 years, 24 did not use contraception, and 9 (38 %) conceived. The pregnancy rate among women younger than age 30 years was 60 %. Two (5 %) women reported temporary dyspareunia 1 month after surgery, but none developed permanent dyspareunia. The average patient satisfaction score was 4.12.
Conclusions
There was no evidence to suggest that transvaginal peritoneal surgery causes infertility or dyspareunia. The majority of patients gave a high evaluation to vaginal ovarian cystectomy, suggesting the usability of a transvaginal approach for intraperitoneal surgery in young premenopausal women.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23389066</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-012-2749-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2013-07, Vol.27 (7), p.2619-2624 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1367507457 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Adult Cysts Dyspareunia - etiology Endoluminal Surgery Endoscopy Female Fertility Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Humans Infertility Laparoscopy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - adverse effects Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods Ovarian Cysts - surgery Ovaries Patient Satisfaction Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate Proctology Questionnaires Surgery Surveys and Questionnaires Ultrasonic imaging Urological surgery Vagina |
title | Evaluation of transvaginal peritoneal surgery in young female patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T23%3A29%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20transvaginal%20peritoneal%20surgery%20in%20young%20female%20patients&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Tanaka,%20Masaaki&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2619&rft.epage=2624&rft.pages=2619-2624&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-012-2749-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2993328891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1366546286&rft_id=info:pmid/23389066&rfr_iscdi=true |