Potential consequences of discard reform for seabird communities

1. Upcoming reform of the European Union (EU) Common Fisheries Policy will be the biggest change in European fisheries management for a generation. A central plank of this reform is a proposed ban on discards, to aid the creation of economically and environmentally sustainable fisheries. This, toget...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 2013-06, Vol.50 (3), p.649-658
Hauptverfasser: Bicknell, Anthony W. J., Oro, Daniel, Camphuysen, Kees (C.J.), Votier, Stephen C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 658
container_issue 3
container_start_page 649
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 50
creator Bicknell, Anthony W. J.
Oro, Daniel
Camphuysen, Kees (C.J.)
Votier, Stephen C.
description 1. Upcoming reform of the European Union (EU) Common Fisheries Policy will be the biggest change in European fisheries management for a generation. A central plank of this reform is a proposed ban on discards, to aid the creation of economically and environmentally sustainable fisheries. This, together with a global trend for declining discards, may have unforeseen knock-on consequences for the large number of scavenging seabirds that consume this plentiful subsidy. 2. Discards have shaped many aspects of seabird foraging, distribution and population dynamics. Here, we review these effects and consider the potential for both negative and positive impacts of discard reforms for seabirds, with particular focus on the EU, and propose recommendations for ongoing research and conservation. 3. EU seabird scavengers are dominated by a relatively small number of large generalist taxa. Many of these occur at globally significant numbers within the EU, but may be able to buffer a decline in discards by switching to feed on alternative foods. 4. A discard ban may have negative consequences by creating a food shortage for scavenging birds. Some species may offset this by feeding more on other birds, with potentially negative population-level impacts, or by moving into novel environments. 5. Benefits of a discard ban may be a reduction in seabird bycatch in fishing gears, as well as a reduction in populations of large generalist species that currently dominate some seabird communities. 6. Synthesis and applications. Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy and global discard declines are essential components towards creating sustainable fisheries, but may have both detrimental and beneficial effects on seabird communities. The nature of these impacts is still poorly understood, highlighting the need for detailed long-term seabird monitoring, as well as building resilience into populations through policy measures that incorporate remedial action on major seabird conservation priorities. Research should focus on understanding how seabird foraging, in terms of functional responses and searching behaviour, is influenced by both changing discards and natural fish prey availability, and how they impact upon fitness. It is also essential to link individual-level responses with population-, community- and ecosystemlevel change. Understanding these links is fundamental to ongoing seabird management and conservation, and an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2664.12072
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1367490197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24031530</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24031530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5072-2f05765c9ac44faed7092764ae222277b60a3457b741d61e5e8d3e152ffc26fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKfPPgkFEXzplo8mad-UMb8YuAd9DlmaQEfbzKRF9t97Z-cEX7wPCVx-93DOQeiS4AmBmRImeEqFyCaEYkmP0OiwOUYjjClJ8wKTU3QW4xpjXHDGRuhu6TvbdpWuE-PbaD962xobE--SsopGhzIJ1vnQJPAk0epVBSvjm6Zvq66y8RydOF1He7H_x-j9Yf42e0oXr4_Ps_tFaji4SanDXApuCm2yzGlbSlxQKTJtKYyUK4E1y7hcyYyUglhu85JZwqlzhgq3YmN0O-huggeTsVMN-LN1rVvr-6ggrMwgXyEBvf6Drn0fWnAHFBeYyrygQE0HygQfI4RUm1A1OmwVwWrX6E6Sq11_6rtRuLjZ62popnZBt6aKhzMqmeQ4z4HjA_dZ1Xb7n6x6Wc5_9K-Gu3XsfPjVzTAjnGH2BaDFjK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1356027892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential consequences of discard reform for seabird communities</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bicknell, Anthony W. J. ; Oro, Daniel ; Camphuysen, Kees (C.J.) ; Votier, Stephen C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bicknell, Anthony W. J. ; Oro, Daniel ; Camphuysen, Kees (C.J.) ; Votier, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><description>1. Upcoming reform of the European Union (EU) Common Fisheries Policy will be the biggest change in European fisheries management for a generation. A central plank of this reform is a proposed ban on discards, to aid the creation of economically and environmentally sustainable fisheries. This, together with a global trend for declining discards, may have unforeseen knock-on consequences for the large number of scavenging seabirds that consume this plentiful subsidy. 2. Discards have shaped many aspects of seabird foraging, distribution and population dynamics. Here, we review these effects and consider the potential for both negative and positive impacts of discard reforms for seabirds, with particular focus on the EU, and propose recommendations for ongoing research and conservation. 3. EU seabird scavengers are dominated by a relatively small number of large generalist taxa. Many of these occur at globally significant numbers within the EU, but may be able to buffer a decline in discards by switching to feed on alternative foods. 4. A discard ban may have negative consequences by creating a food shortage for scavenging birds. Some species may offset this by feeding more on other birds, with potentially negative population-level impacts, or by moving into novel environments. 5. Benefits of a discard ban may be a reduction in seabird bycatch in fishing gears, as well as a reduction in populations of large generalist species that currently dominate some seabird communities. 6. Synthesis and applications. Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy and global discard declines are essential components towards creating sustainable fisheries, but may have both detrimental and beneficial effects on seabird communities. The nature of these impacts is still poorly understood, highlighting the need for detailed long-term seabird monitoring, as well as building resilience into populations through policy measures that incorporate remedial action on major seabird conservation priorities. Research should focus on understanding how seabird foraging, in terms of functional responses and searching behaviour, is influenced by both changing discards and natural fish prey availability, and how they impact upon fitness. It is also essential to link individual-level responses with population-, community- and ecosystemlevel change. Understanding these links is fundamental to ongoing seabird management and conservation, and an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12072</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Breeding ; Common fisheries policy ; Common Fisheries Policy reform ; discards ; Ecological sustainability ; ecosystem approach to management ; Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.) ; fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Fisheries science ; Foraging ; Foraging behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Marine ; Marine ecology ; Ocean fisheries ; Predation ; Reforms ; REVIEW ; Sea birds ; seabird populations ; Seas ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2013-06, Vol.50 (3), p.649-658</ispartof><rights>2013 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2013 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jun 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5072-2f05765c9ac44faed7092764ae222277b60a3457b741d61e5e8d3e152ffc26fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5072-2f05765c9ac44faed7092764ae222277b60a3457b741d61e5e8d3e152ffc26fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24031530$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24031530$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27375088$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bicknell, Anthony W. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oro, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camphuysen, Kees (C.J.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Votier, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><title>Potential consequences of discard reform for seabird communities</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Upcoming reform of the European Union (EU) Common Fisheries Policy will be the biggest change in European fisheries management for a generation. A central plank of this reform is a proposed ban on discards, to aid the creation of economically and environmentally sustainable fisheries. This, together with a global trend for declining discards, may have unforeseen knock-on consequences for the large number of scavenging seabirds that consume this plentiful subsidy. 2. Discards have shaped many aspects of seabird foraging, distribution and population dynamics. Here, we review these effects and consider the potential for both negative and positive impacts of discard reforms for seabirds, with particular focus on the EU, and propose recommendations for ongoing research and conservation. 3. EU seabird scavengers are dominated by a relatively small number of large generalist taxa. Many of these occur at globally significant numbers within the EU, but may be able to buffer a decline in discards by switching to feed on alternative foods. 4. A discard ban may have negative consequences by creating a food shortage for scavenging birds. Some species may offset this by feeding more on other birds, with potentially negative population-level impacts, or by moving into novel environments. 5. Benefits of a discard ban may be a reduction in seabird bycatch in fishing gears, as well as a reduction in populations of large generalist species that currently dominate some seabird communities. 6. Synthesis and applications. Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy and global discard declines are essential components towards creating sustainable fisheries, but may have both detrimental and beneficial effects on seabird communities. The nature of these impacts is still poorly understood, highlighting the need for detailed long-term seabird monitoring, as well as building resilience into populations through policy measures that incorporate remedial action on major seabird conservation priorities. Research should focus on understanding how seabird foraging, in terms of functional responses and searching behaviour, is influenced by both changing discards and natural fish prey availability, and how they impact upon fitness. It is also essential to link individual-level responses with population-, community- and ecosystemlevel change. Understanding these links is fundamental to ongoing seabird management and conservation, and an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Common fisheries policy</subject><subject>Common Fisheries Policy reform</subject><subject>discards</subject><subject>Ecological sustainability</subject><subject>ecosystem approach to management</subject><subject>Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)</subject><subject>fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fisheries science</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Ocean fisheries</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>REVIEW</subject><subject>Sea birds</subject><subject>seabird populations</subject><subject>Seas</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKfPPgkFEXzplo8mad-UMb8YuAd9DlmaQEfbzKRF9t97Z-cEX7wPCVx-93DOQeiS4AmBmRImeEqFyCaEYkmP0OiwOUYjjClJ8wKTU3QW4xpjXHDGRuhu6TvbdpWuE-PbaD962xobE--SsopGhzIJ1vnQJPAk0epVBSvjm6Zvq66y8RydOF1He7H_x-j9Yf42e0oXr4_Ps_tFaji4SanDXApuCm2yzGlbSlxQKTJtKYyUK4E1y7hcyYyUglhu85JZwqlzhgq3YmN0O-huggeTsVMN-LN1rVvr-6ggrMwgXyEBvf6Drn0fWnAHFBeYyrygQE0HygQfI4RUm1A1OmwVwWrX6E6Sq11_6rtRuLjZ62popnZBt6aKhzMqmeQ4z4HjA_dZ1Xb7n6x6Wc5_9K-Gu3XsfPjVzTAjnGH2BaDFjK0</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Bicknell, Anthony W. J.</creator><creator>Oro, Daniel</creator><creator>Camphuysen, Kees (C.J.)</creator><creator>Votier, Stephen C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Potential consequences of discard reform for seabird communities</title><author>Bicknell, Anthony W. J. ; Oro, Daniel ; Camphuysen, Kees (C.J.) ; Votier, Stephen C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5072-2f05765c9ac44faed7092764ae222277b60a3457b741d61e5e8d3e152ffc26fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Common fisheries policy</topic><topic>Common Fisheries Policy reform</topic><topic>discards</topic><topic>Ecological sustainability</topic><topic>ecosystem approach to management</topic><topic>Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)</topic><topic>fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fisheries science</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Ocean fisheries</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>REVIEW</topic><topic>Sea birds</topic><topic>seabird populations</topic><topic>Seas</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bicknell, Anthony W. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oro, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camphuysen, Kees (C.J.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Votier, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bicknell, Anthony W. J.</au><au>Oro, Daniel</au><au>Camphuysen, Kees (C.J.)</au><au>Votier, Stephen C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential consequences of discard reform for seabird communities</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>658</epage><pages>649-658</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. Upcoming reform of the European Union (EU) Common Fisheries Policy will be the biggest change in European fisheries management for a generation. A central plank of this reform is a proposed ban on discards, to aid the creation of economically and environmentally sustainable fisheries. This, together with a global trend for declining discards, may have unforeseen knock-on consequences for the large number of scavenging seabirds that consume this plentiful subsidy. 2. Discards have shaped many aspects of seabird foraging, distribution and population dynamics. Here, we review these effects and consider the potential for both negative and positive impacts of discard reforms for seabirds, with particular focus on the EU, and propose recommendations for ongoing research and conservation. 3. EU seabird scavengers are dominated by a relatively small number of large generalist taxa. Many of these occur at globally significant numbers within the EU, but may be able to buffer a decline in discards by switching to feed on alternative foods. 4. A discard ban may have negative consequences by creating a food shortage for scavenging birds. Some species may offset this by feeding more on other birds, with potentially negative population-level impacts, or by moving into novel environments. 5. Benefits of a discard ban may be a reduction in seabird bycatch in fishing gears, as well as a reduction in populations of large generalist species that currently dominate some seabird communities. 6. Synthesis and applications. Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy and global discard declines are essential components towards creating sustainable fisheries, but may have both detrimental and beneficial effects on seabird communities. The nature of these impacts is still poorly understood, highlighting the need for detailed long-term seabird monitoring, as well as building resilience into populations through policy measures that incorporate remedial action on major seabird conservation priorities. Research should focus on understanding how seabird foraging, in terms of functional responses and searching behaviour, is influenced by both changing discards and natural fish prey availability, and how they impact upon fitness. It is also essential to link individual-level responses with population-, community- and ecosystemlevel change. Understanding these links is fundamental to ongoing seabird management and conservation, and an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.12072</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2013-06, Vol.50 (3), p.649-658
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1367490197
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Breeding
Common fisheries policy
Common Fisheries Policy reform
discards
Ecological sustainability
ecosystem approach to management
Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)
fisheries
Fisheries management
Fisheries science
Foraging
Foraging behavior
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Marine
Marine ecology
Ocean fisheries
Predation
Reforms
REVIEW
Sea birds
seabird populations
Seas
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
Wildlife conservation
title Potential consequences of discard reform for seabird communities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A24%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20consequences%20of%20discard%20reform%20for%20seabird%20communities&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Bicknell,%20Anthony%20W.%20J.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=658&rft.pages=649-658&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12072&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24031530%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1356027892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24031530&rfr_iscdi=true