Yield and Woody Biomass Traits of Novel Shrub Willow Hybrids at Two Contrasting Sites

Shrub willow has great potential as a dedicated bioenergy crop, but commercialization and adoption by growers and end-users will depend upon the identification and selection of high-yielding cultivars with biomass chemistry and quality amenable to conversion to biofuels and bioenergy. In this study,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioenergy research 2013-06, Vol.6 (2), p.533-546
Hauptverfasser: Serapiglia, Michelle J., Cameron, Kimberly D., Stipanovic, Arthur J., Abrahamson, Lawrence P., Volk, Timothy A., Smart, Lawrence B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 546
container_issue 2
container_start_page 533
container_title Bioenergy research
container_volume 6
creator Serapiglia, Michelle J.
Cameron, Kimberly D.
Stipanovic, Arthur J.
Abrahamson, Lawrence P.
Volk, Timothy A.
Smart, Lawrence B.
description Shrub willow has great potential as a dedicated bioenergy crop, but commercialization and adoption by growers and end-users will depend upon the identification and selection of high-yielding cultivars with biomass chemistry and quality amenable to conversion to biofuels and bioenergy. In this study, critical traits for biomass production were evaluated among new genotypes of shrub willow produced through hybrid breeding. This study assessed the variation in yield, pest and disease resistance, biomass composition, and wood density in shrub willow, as well as the impact of genotypic and environmental factors on these particular phenotypes. Analysis of clonal genotypes established on two contrasting sites in New York State, Tully and Belleville, showed statistical differences by site for all of the traits. The greatest yield was observed at Belleville, NY, for two cultivars, ‘Fish Creek’ (41 Mg ha −1 ) and ‘Onondaga’ (40 Mg ha −1 ). Yields of Salix eriocephala genotypes were lowest, and they displayed susceptibility to rust and beetle damage. Variation in cellulose content in the stem biomass was controlled by environmental factors, with the majority of the genotypes displaying greater cellulose content at Belleville compared with Tully. In contrast, wood density was significantly greater at Tully than Belleville, and cellulose content was correlated with wood density. There were no significant correlations between biomass yield and density or any of the composition traits. These trials demonstrate that new genotypes produce improved yield and pest and disease resistance, with diverse compositional traits that can be matched with conversion technologies.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12155-012-9272-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365160490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A712239388</galeid><sourcerecordid>A712239388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-33813cb8a091126cbe6d054a6ee4767f571eecdf073743b8b794b6bb07e49063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFLHDEYhodSQbv2B3gLePEya74kk0yOurQqSHvYFfEUkplv1sjsZJvMVvbfm2VLW0XJISE8z8f78RbFCdApUKrOEzCoqpICKzVTrKw-FUeguS6BCfb575uLw-JLSk-USiqoPiruHjz2LbFDS-5DaLfk0oeVTYksovVjIqEjP8Jv7Mn8MW4cufd9H57J9dZF3yZiR7J4DmQWhjHaNPphSeZ-xHRcHHS2T_j1zz0pFt-_LWbX5e3Pq5vZxW3ZCJBjyXkNvHG1pRqAycahbGklrEQUSqquUoDYtB1VXAnuaqe0cNI5qlBoKvmkONuPXcfwa4NpNCufGux7O2DYJANcVpAX1TSjp2_Qp7CJQw6XKZFjCMnrf9TS9mj80IW8V7Mbai4UMMY1r3fU9B0qnxZXvgkDdj7_vxJgLzQxpBSxM-voVzZuDVCzq8_s6zO5PrOrz1TZYXsnZXZYYvwv8IfSC7iAmbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1348134638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Yield and Woody Biomass Traits of Novel Shrub Willow Hybrids at Two Contrasting Sites</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Serapiglia, Michelle J. ; Cameron, Kimberly D. ; Stipanovic, Arthur J. ; Abrahamson, Lawrence P. ; Volk, Timothy A. ; Smart, Lawrence B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Serapiglia, Michelle J. ; Cameron, Kimberly D. ; Stipanovic, Arthur J. ; Abrahamson, Lawrence P. ; Volk, Timothy A. ; Smart, Lawrence B.</creatorcontrib><description>Shrub willow has great potential as a dedicated bioenergy crop, but commercialization and adoption by growers and end-users will depend upon the identification and selection of high-yielding cultivars with biomass chemistry and quality amenable to conversion to biofuels and bioenergy. In this study, critical traits for biomass production were evaluated among new genotypes of shrub willow produced through hybrid breeding. This study assessed the variation in yield, pest and disease resistance, biomass composition, and wood density in shrub willow, as well as the impact of genotypic and environmental factors on these particular phenotypes. Analysis of clonal genotypes established on two contrasting sites in New York State, Tully and Belleville, showed statistical differences by site for all of the traits. The greatest yield was observed at Belleville, NY, for two cultivars, ‘Fish Creek’ (41 Mg ha −1 ) and ‘Onondaga’ (40 Mg ha −1 ). Yields of Salix eriocephala genotypes were lowest, and they displayed susceptibility to rust and beetle damage. Variation in cellulose content in the stem biomass was controlled by environmental factors, with the majority of the genotypes displaying greater cellulose content at Belleville compared with Tully. In contrast, wood density was significantly greater at Tully than Belleville, and cellulose content was correlated with wood density. There were no significant correlations between biomass yield and density or any of the composition traits. These trials demonstrate that new genotypes produce improved yield and pest and disease resistance, with diverse compositional traits that can be matched with conversion technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-1234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12155-012-9272-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Alternative energy sources ; Analysis ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; Biomass ; Biomass energy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon sequestration ; Cellulose ; Crop diseases ; Cultivars ; Disease resistance ; Energy crops ; Environmental factors ; Environmental science ; Forestry ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Genotypes ; Hybrids ; Life Sciences ; Lignin ; Pests ; Phenotypes ; Plant Breeding/Biotechnology ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Sciences ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Salix eriocephala ; Shrinkage ; Studies ; Wood products ; Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><ispartof>Bioenergy research, 2013-06, Vol.6 (2), p.533-546</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-33813cb8a091126cbe6d054a6ee4767f571eecdf073743b8b794b6bb07e49063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-33813cb8a091126cbe6d054a6ee4767f571eecdf073743b8b794b6bb07e49063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12155-012-9272-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12155-012-9272-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Serapiglia, Michelle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Kimberly D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stipanovic, Arthur J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrahamson, Lawrence P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Lawrence B.</creatorcontrib><title>Yield and Woody Biomass Traits of Novel Shrub Willow Hybrids at Two Contrasting Sites</title><title>Bioenergy research</title><addtitle>Bioenerg. Res</addtitle><description>Shrub willow has great potential as a dedicated bioenergy crop, but commercialization and adoption by growers and end-users will depend upon the identification and selection of high-yielding cultivars with biomass chemistry and quality amenable to conversion to biofuels and bioenergy. In this study, critical traits for biomass production were evaluated among new genotypes of shrub willow produced through hybrid breeding. This study assessed the variation in yield, pest and disease resistance, biomass composition, and wood density in shrub willow, as well as the impact of genotypic and environmental factors on these particular phenotypes. Analysis of clonal genotypes established on two contrasting sites in New York State, Tully and Belleville, showed statistical differences by site for all of the traits. The greatest yield was observed at Belleville, NY, for two cultivars, ‘Fish Creek’ (41 Mg ha −1 ) and ‘Onondaga’ (40 Mg ha −1 ). Yields of Salix eriocephala genotypes were lowest, and they displayed susceptibility to rust and beetle damage. Variation in cellulose content in the stem biomass was controlled by environmental factors, with the majority of the genotypes displaying greater cellulose content at Belleville compared with Tully. In contrast, wood density was significantly greater at Tully than Belleville, and cellulose content was correlated with wood density. There were no significant correlations between biomass yield and density or any of the composition traits. These trials demonstrate that new genotypes produce improved yield and pest and disease resistance, with diverse compositional traits that can be matched with conversion technologies.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Crop diseases</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Disease resistance</subject><subject>Energy crops</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lignin</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Salix eriocephala</subject><subject>Shrinkage</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wood products</subject><subject>Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>1939-1234</issn><issn>1939-1242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFLHDEYhodSQbv2B3gLePEya74kk0yOurQqSHvYFfEUkplv1sjsZJvMVvbfm2VLW0XJISE8z8f78RbFCdApUKrOEzCoqpICKzVTrKw-FUeguS6BCfb575uLw-JLSk-USiqoPiruHjz2LbFDS-5DaLfk0oeVTYksovVjIqEjP8Jv7Mn8MW4cufd9H57J9dZF3yZiR7J4DmQWhjHaNPphSeZ-xHRcHHS2T_j1zz0pFt-_LWbX5e3Pq5vZxW3ZCJBjyXkNvHG1pRqAycahbGklrEQUSqquUoDYtB1VXAnuaqe0cNI5qlBoKvmkONuPXcfwa4NpNCufGux7O2DYJANcVpAX1TSjp2_Qp7CJQw6XKZFjCMnrf9TS9mj80IW8V7Mbai4UMMY1r3fU9B0qnxZXvgkDdj7_vxJgLzQxpBSxM-voVzZuDVCzq8_s6zO5PrOrz1TZYXsnZXZYYvwv8IfSC7iAmbA</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Serapiglia, Michelle J.</creator><creator>Cameron, Kimberly D.</creator><creator>Stipanovic, Arthur J.</creator><creator>Abrahamson, Lawrence P.</creator><creator>Volk, Timothy A.</creator><creator>Smart, Lawrence B.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Yield and Woody Biomass Traits of Novel Shrub Willow Hybrids at Two Contrasting Sites</title><author>Serapiglia, Michelle J. ; Cameron, Kimberly D. ; Stipanovic, Arthur J. ; Abrahamson, Lawrence P. ; Volk, Timothy A. ; Smart, Lawrence B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-33813cb8a091126cbe6d054a6ee4767f571eecdf073743b8b794b6bb07e49063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Crop diseases</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Disease resistance</topic><topic>Energy crops</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lignin</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Salix eriocephala</topic><topic>Shrinkage</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wood products</topic><topic>Wood Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Serapiglia, Michelle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Kimberly D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stipanovic, Arthur J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrahamson, Lawrence P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Lawrence B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioenergy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Serapiglia, Michelle J.</au><au>Cameron, Kimberly D.</au><au>Stipanovic, Arthur J.</au><au>Abrahamson, Lawrence P.</au><au>Volk, Timothy A.</au><au>Smart, Lawrence B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Yield and Woody Biomass Traits of Novel Shrub Willow Hybrids at Two Contrasting Sites</atitle><jtitle>Bioenergy research</jtitle><stitle>Bioenerg. Res</stitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>533-546</pages><issn>1939-1234</issn><eissn>1939-1242</eissn><abstract>Shrub willow has great potential as a dedicated bioenergy crop, but commercialization and adoption by growers and end-users will depend upon the identification and selection of high-yielding cultivars with biomass chemistry and quality amenable to conversion to biofuels and bioenergy. In this study, critical traits for biomass production were evaluated among new genotypes of shrub willow produced through hybrid breeding. This study assessed the variation in yield, pest and disease resistance, biomass composition, and wood density in shrub willow, as well as the impact of genotypic and environmental factors on these particular phenotypes. Analysis of clonal genotypes established on two contrasting sites in New York State, Tully and Belleville, showed statistical differences by site for all of the traits. The greatest yield was observed at Belleville, NY, for two cultivars, ‘Fish Creek’ (41 Mg ha −1 ) and ‘Onondaga’ (40 Mg ha −1 ). Yields of Salix eriocephala genotypes were lowest, and they displayed susceptibility to rust and beetle damage. Variation in cellulose content in the stem biomass was controlled by environmental factors, with the majority of the genotypes displaying greater cellulose content at Belleville compared with Tully. In contrast, wood density was significantly greater at Tully than Belleville, and cellulose content was correlated with wood density. There were no significant correlations between biomass yield and density or any of the composition traits. These trials demonstrate that new genotypes produce improved yield and pest and disease resistance, with diverse compositional traits that can be matched with conversion technologies.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s12155-012-9272-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1939-1234
ispartof Bioenergy research, 2013-06, Vol.6 (2), p.533-546
issn 1939-1234
1939-1242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365160490
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Agricultural production
Alternative energy sources
Analysis
Biodiesel fuels
Biofuels
Biomass
Biomass energy
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Carbon sequestration
Cellulose
Crop diseases
Cultivars
Disease resistance
Energy crops
Environmental factors
Environmental science
Forestry
Genotype & phenotype
Genotypes
Hybrids
Life Sciences
Lignin
Pests
Phenotypes
Plant Breeding/Biotechnology
Plant Ecology
Plant Genetics and Genomics
Plant Sciences
R&D
Research & development
Salix eriocephala
Shrinkage
Studies
Wood products
Wood Science & Technology
title Yield and Woody Biomass Traits of Novel Shrub Willow Hybrids at Two Contrasting Sites
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A50%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Yield%20and%20Woody%20Biomass%20Traits%20of%20Novel%20Shrub%20Willow%20Hybrids%20at%20Two%20Contrasting%20Sites&rft.jtitle=Bioenergy%20research&rft.au=Serapiglia,%20Michelle%20J.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=533-546&rft.issn=1939-1234&rft.eissn=1939-1242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12155-012-9272-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA712239388%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1348134638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A712239388&rfr_iscdi=true