Deriving knowledge representation guidelines by analyzing knowledge engineer behavior

Knowledge engineering research has focused on proposing knowledge acquisition techniques, developing and evaluating knowledge representation schemes and engineering tools, and testing and debugging knowledge-based systems. Few formal studies have been conducted on understanding the behaviors and rol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Decision Support Systems 2012-12, Vol.54 (1), p.304-315
Hauptverfasser: Chua, Cecil Eng Huang, Storey, Veda C., Chiang, Roger H.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 315
container_issue 1
container_start_page 304
container_title Decision Support Systems
container_volume 54
creator Chua, Cecil Eng Huang
Storey, Veda C.
Chiang, Roger H.L.
description Knowledge engineering research has focused on proposing knowledge acquisition techniques, developing and evaluating knowledge representation schemes and engineering tools, and testing and debugging knowledge-based systems. Few formal studies have been conducted on understanding the behaviors and roles of knowledge engineers. Applying the theory of mental models, this paper describes a think aloud verbal protocol study to determine an empirical basis for understanding: (1) how knowledge engineers extract domain knowledge from textual sources; and (2) the cognitive mechanisms by which they engage various knowledge representation schemes to represent that knowledge acquired. The results suggest that knowledge representation is not simply a translation of acquired knowledge to a knowledge representation. Instead, it is an iterative process of selective querying of acquired knowledge, and continuous refinement of a model leveraging, not only on acquired knowledge from domain experts, but also from the knowledge engineer. From the findings of empirical studies, a set of guidelines is derived to support the training and development of better knowledge representation schemes, representation processes, and knowledge engineering tools. ► We use protocol analysis to explore how knowledge engineers think. ► We find knowledge engineers perform 6 kinds of cognitive actions. ► We develop a flowchart illustrating the cognitive flow of knowledge engineers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365120847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167923612001492</els_id><sourcerecordid>2814146461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-7334962a3d35e9ebfdb3e07523ad9e894e8c5e8caa5401333606b7b672e06cd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVJoI6TH9DbQij0sltJs_pYeipJ2gQCucRnoZXGrpyN1pXWLs6vj4xDoT3kMMxhnneGeQj5xGjDKJNf143PueGU8YaKhoL-QGZMK6iF6tQJmRVG1R0H-ZGc5bymVILSckYW15jCLsRV9RTHPwP6FVYJNwkzxslOYYzVahs8DiFirvp9ZaMd9i__BjCuyhhT1eMvuwtjOienSztkvHjrc7L4cfN4dVvfP_y8u_p-XzvQeqoVQNtJbsGDwA77pe8BqRIcrO9Qdy1qJ0pZK1rKAEBS2ateKo5UOg8wJ1-Oezdp_L3FPJnnkB0Og404brNhIAXjVLeqoJf_oetxm8ozhWKCgeaHC3PCjpRLY84Jl2aTwrNNe8OoOYg2a1NEm4NoQ4Upokvm89tmm50dlslGF_LfIJeSt5qJwn07cliM7AImk13A6NCHhG4yfgzvXHkFNG6TeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1151382013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deriving knowledge representation guidelines by analyzing knowledge engineer behavior</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Chua, Cecil Eng Huang ; Storey, Veda C. ; Chiang, Roger H.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chua, Cecil Eng Huang ; Storey, Veda C. ; Chiang, Roger H.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge engineering research has focused on proposing knowledge acquisition techniques, developing and evaluating knowledge representation schemes and engineering tools, and testing and debugging knowledge-based systems. Few formal studies have been conducted on understanding the behaviors and roles of knowledge engineers. Applying the theory of mental models, this paper describes a think aloud verbal protocol study to determine an empirical basis for understanding: (1) how knowledge engineers extract domain knowledge from textual sources; and (2) the cognitive mechanisms by which they engage various knowledge representation schemes to represent that knowledge acquired. The results suggest that knowledge representation is not simply a translation of acquired knowledge to a knowledge representation. Instead, it is an iterative process of selective querying of acquired knowledge, and continuous refinement of a model leveraging, not only on acquired knowledge from domain experts, but also from the knowledge engineer. From the findings of empirical studies, a set of guidelines is derived to support the training and development of better knowledge representation schemes, representation processes, and knowledge engineering tools. ► We use protocol analysis to explore how knowledge engineers think. ► We find knowledge engineers perform 6 kinds of cognitive actions. ► We develop a flowchart illustrating the cognitive flow of knowledge engineers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-9236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5797</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.038</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DSSYDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Artificial intelligence ; Cognitive models ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Computer systems performance. Reliability ; Debugging ; Empirical analysis ; Engineers ; Exact sciences and technology ; Guidelines ; Information systems. Data bases ; Knowledge acquisition ; Knowledge base ; Knowledge engineering ; Knowledge management ; Knowledge representation ; Memory organisation. Data processing ; Organizational behavior ; Problem behavior graph ; Protocol analysis ; Representations ; Software ; Software engineering ; Studies ; Theory of mental models ; Translations</subject><ispartof>Decision Support Systems, 2012-12, Vol.54 (1), p.304-315</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Dec 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-7334962a3d35e9ebfdb3e07523ad9e894e8c5e8caa5401333606b7b672e06cd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-7334962a3d35e9ebfdb3e07523ad9e894e8c5e8caa5401333606b7b672e06cd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26624815$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chua, Cecil Eng Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storey, Veda C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Roger H.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Deriving knowledge representation guidelines by analyzing knowledge engineer behavior</title><title>Decision Support Systems</title><description>Knowledge engineering research has focused on proposing knowledge acquisition techniques, developing and evaluating knowledge representation schemes and engineering tools, and testing and debugging knowledge-based systems. Few formal studies have been conducted on understanding the behaviors and roles of knowledge engineers. Applying the theory of mental models, this paper describes a think aloud verbal protocol study to determine an empirical basis for understanding: (1) how knowledge engineers extract domain knowledge from textual sources; and (2) the cognitive mechanisms by which they engage various knowledge representation schemes to represent that knowledge acquired. The results suggest that knowledge representation is not simply a translation of acquired knowledge to a knowledge representation. Instead, it is an iterative process of selective querying of acquired knowledge, and continuous refinement of a model leveraging, not only on acquired knowledge from domain experts, but also from the knowledge engineer. From the findings of empirical studies, a set of guidelines is derived to support the training and development of better knowledge representation schemes, representation processes, and knowledge engineering tools. ► We use protocol analysis to explore how knowledge engineers think. ► We find knowledge engineers perform 6 kinds of cognitive actions. ► We develop a flowchart illustrating the cognitive flow of knowledge engineers.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Computer systems performance. Reliability</subject><subject>Debugging</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Information systems. Data bases</subject><subject>Knowledge acquisition</subject><subject>Knowledge base</subject><subject>Knowledge engineering</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Knowledge representation</subject><subject>Memory organisation. Data processing</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Problem behavior graph</subject><subject>Protocol analysis</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theory of mental models</subject><subject>Translations</subject><issn>0167-9236</issn><issn>1873-5797</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVJoI6TH9DbQij0sltJs_pYeipJ2gQCucRnoZXGrpyN1pXWLs6vj4xDoT3kMMxhnneGeQj5xGjDKJNf143PueGU8YaKhoL-QGZMK6iF6tQJmRVG1R0H-ZGc5bymVILSckYW15jCLsRV9RTHPwP6FVYJNwkzxslOYYzVahs8DiFirvp9ZaMd9i__BjCuyhhT1eMvuwtjOienSztkvHjrc7L4cfN4dVvfP_y8u_p-XzvQeqoVQNtJbsGDwA77pe8BqRIcrO9Qdy1qJ0pZK1rKAEBS2ateKo5UOg8wJ1-Oezdp_L3FPJnnkB0Og404brNhIAXjVLeqoJf_oetxm8ozhWKCgeaHC3PCjpRLY84Jl2aTwrNNe8OoOYg2a1NEm4NoQ4Upokvm89tmm50dlslGF_LfIJeSt5qJwn07cliM7AImk13A6NCHhG4yfgzvXHkFNG6TeQ</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Chua, Cecil Eng Huang</creator><creator>Storey, Veda C.</creator><creator>Chiang, Roger H.L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Deriving knowledge representation guidelines by analyzing knowledge engineer behavior</title><author>Chua, Cecil Eng Huang ; Storey, Veda C. ; Chiang, Roger H.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-7334962a3d35e9ebfdb3e07523ad9e894e8c5e8caa5401333606b7b672e06cd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Computer systems performance. Reliability</topic><topic>Debugging</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Information systems. Data bases</topic><topic>Knowledge acquisition</topic><topic>Knowledge base</topic><topic>Knowledge engineering</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Knowledge representation</topic><topic>Memory organisation. Data processing</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Problem behavior graph</topic><topic>Protocol analysis</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theory of mental models</topic><topic>Translations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chua, Cecil Eng Huang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storey, Veda C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Roger H.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Decision Support Systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chua, Cecil Eng Huang</au><au>Storey, Veda C.</au><au>Chiang, Roger H.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deriving knowledge representation guidelines by analyzing knowledge engineer behavior</atitle><jtitle>Decision Support Systems</jtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>304-315</pages><issn>0167-9236</issn><eissn>1873-5797</eissn><coden>DSSYDK</coden><abstract>Knowledge engineering research has focused on proposing knowledge acquisition techniques, developing and evaluating knowledge representation schemes and engineering tools, and testing and debugging knowledge-based systems. Few formal studies have been conducted on understanding the behaviors and roles of knowledge engineers. Applying the theory of mental models, this paper describes a think aloud verbal protocol study to determine an empirical basis for understanding: (1) how knowledge engineers extract domain knowledge from textual sources; and (2) the cognitive mechanisms by which they engage various knowledge representation schemes to represent that knowledge acquired. The results suggest that knowledge representation is not simply a translation of acquired knowledge to a knowledge representation. Instead, it is an iterative process of selective querying of acquired knowledge, and continuous refinement of a model leveraging, not only on acquired knowledge from domain experts, but also from the knowledge engineer. From the findings of empirical studies, a set of guidelines is derived to support the training and development of better knowledge representation schemes, representation processes, and knowledge engineering tools. ► We use protocol analysis to explore how knowledge engineers think. ► We find knowledge engineers perform 6 kinds of cognitive actions. ► We develop a flowchart illustrating the cognitive flow of knowledge engineers.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.038</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-9236
ispartof Decision Support Systems, 2012-12, Vol.54 (1), p.304-315
issn 0167-9236
1873-5797
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365120847
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Applied sciences
Artificial intelligence
Cognitive models
Computer science
control theory
systems
Computer systems performance. Reliability
Debugging
Empirical analysis
Engineers
Exact sciences and technology
Guidelines
Information systems. Data bases
Knowledge acquisition
Knowledge base
Knowledge engineering
Knowledge management
Knowledge representation
Memory organisation. Data processing
Organizational behavior
Problem behavior graph
Protocol analysis
Representations
Software
Software engineering
Studies
Theory of mental models
Translations
title Deriving knowledge representation guidelines by analyzing knowledge engineer behavior
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T12%3A02%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deriving%20knowledge%20representation%20guidelines%20by%20analyzing%20knowledge%20engineer%20behavior&rft.jtitle=Decision%20Support%20Systems&rft.au=Chua,%20Cecil%20Eng%20Huang&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=304-315&rft.issn=0167-9236&rft.eissn=1873-5797&rft.coden=DSSYDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2814146461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1151382013&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167923612001492&rfr_iscdi=true