Convective drying of particulate solids – Packed vs. fluid bed operation

The paper addresses results for the case of convective drying of particulate solids in a packed and in a fluid bed, analyzing agreement between the numerical results and the results of corresponding experimental investigation, as well as the differences between packed and fluid bed operation. In the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of heat and mass transfer 2013-04, Vol.59, p.66-74
Hauptverfasser: Stakic, Milan, Stefanovic, Predrag, Cvetinovic, Dejan, Skobalj, Predrag
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 74
container_issue
container_start_page 66
container_title International journal of heat and mass transfer
container_volume 59
creator Stakic, Milan
Stefanovic, Predrag
Cvetinovic, Dejan
Skobalj, Predrag
description The paper addresses results for the case of convective drying of particulate solids in a packed and in a fluid bed, analyzing agreement between the numerical results and the results of corresponding experimental investigation, as well as the differences between packed and fluid bed operation. In the fluid bed simulation model of unsteady simultaneous one-dimensional heat and mass transfer between solids, gas phase and bubble phase during drying process, based on two-phase bubbling model, it is assumed that the gas–solid interface is at thermodynamic equilibrium. The basic idea is to calculate heat and mass transfer between gas and particles (i.e., the drying process) in suspension phase as for a packed bed of particles, where the drying rate (evaporated moisture flux) of the specific product is calculated by applying the concept of a “drying coefficient”. Mixing of the particles (i.e., the impact onto the heat and mass transfer coefficients) in the case of fluid bed is taken into account by means of the diffusion term in the differential equations, using an effective particle diffusion coefficient. Model validation was done on the basis of the experimental data obtained with narrow fraction of poppy seeds characterized by mean equivalent particle diameter (dS,d=0.75mm), re-wetted with required (calculated) amount of water up to the initial moisture content (X0=0.54) for all experiments. Comparison of the drying kinetics, both experimental and numerical, has shown that higher gas (drying agent) temperatures, as well as velocities (flow-rates), induce faster drying. This effect is more pronounced for deeper beds, because of the larger amount of wet material to be dried using the same drying agent capacity. Bed temperature differences along the bed height are significant inside the packed bed, while in the fluid bed, for the same drying conditions, are almost negligible due to mixing of particles. Residence time is shorter in the case of a fluid bed drying compared to a packed bed drying.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.11.078
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365118663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0017931012009416</els_id><sourcerecordid>1365118663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-be2663d17de24ff1ce2d40d210beeaf1613cfcabbf73a906608f77da3039aa8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD152k-CJ2zx2oIpXVQkWsLYcewwuaRzsJFJ3_AN_yJfgquzYsBpdzdUZzSFkBiwFBvnlJrWbN5T9VobQe9kGgz7NGGQpQMqK8ohMoCyqJIOyOiYTxqBIKg7slJyFsNlHNs8nZLV07YiqtyNS7Xe2faXO0E763qqhkT3S4BqrA_3-_KJPUr2jpmNIqWkGq2kdk-vQy9669pycGNkEvPidU_Jye_O8vE_Wj3cPy-t1onix6JMaszznGgqN2dwYUJjpOdMZsBpRGsiBK6NkXZuCy4rlOStNUWjJGa-kLJFPyezA7bz7GDD0YmuDwqaRLbohCOD5AqCMR2L16lBV3oXg0YjO2630OwFM7DWKjfirUew1CgARNUbE6oDA-NJo4zYoi61CbX30JrSz_4f9ACOdilk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1365118663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Convective drying of particulate solids – Packed vs. fluid bed operation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Stakic, Milan ; Stefanovic, Predrag ; Cvetinovic, Dejan ; Skobalj, Predrag</creator><creatorcontrib>Stakic, Milan ; Stefanovic, Predrag ; Cvetinovic, Dejan ; Skobalj, Predrag</creatorcontrib><description>The paper addresses results for the case of convective drying of particulate solids in a packed and in a fluid bed, analyzing agreement between the numerical results and the results of corresponding experimental investigation, as well as the differences between packed and fluid bed operation. In the fluid bed simulation model of unsteady simultaneous one-dimensional heat and mass transfer between solids, gas phase and bubble phase during drying process, based on two-phase bubbling model, it is assumed that the gas–solid interface is at thermodynamic equilibrium. The basic idea is to calculate heat and mass transfer between gas and particles (i.e., the drying process) in suspension phase as for a packed bed of particles, where the drying rate (evaporated moisture flux) of the specific product is calculated by applying the concept of a “drying coefficient”. Mixing of the particles (i.e., the impact onto the heat and mass transfer coefficients) in the case of fluid bed is taken into account by means of the diffusion term in the differential equations, using an effective particle diffusion coefficient. Model validation was done on the basis of the experimental data obtained with narrow fraction of poppy seeds characterized by mean equivalent particle diameter (dS,d=0.75mm), re-wetted with required (calculated) amount of water up to the initial moisture content (X0=0.54) for all experiments. Comparison of the drying kinetics, both experimental and numerical, has shown that higher gas (drying agent) temperatures, as well as velocities (flow-rates), induce faster drying. This effect is more pronounced for deeper beds, because of the larger amount of wet material to be dried using the same drying agent capacity. Bed temperature differences along the bed height are significant inside the packed bed, while in the fluid bed, for the same drying conditions, are almost negligible due to mixing of particles. Residence time is shorter in the case of a fluid bed drying compared to a packed bed drying.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.11.078</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computational fluid dynamics ; Convective drying ; Desiccants ; Drying ; Drying coefficient ; Drying kinetics ; Fine-grained hygroscopic materials ; Fluid flow ; Fluids ; Heat and mass transfer ; Mass transfer ; Mathematical models ; Modeling</subject><ispartof>International journal of heat and mass transfer, 2013-04, Vol.59, p.66-74</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-be2663d17de24ff1ce2d40d210beeaf1613cfcabbf73a906608f77da3039aa8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-be2663d17de24ff1ce2d40d210beeaf1613cfcabbf73a906608f77da3039aa8e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.11.078$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stakic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanovic, Predrag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cvetinovic, Dejan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skobalj, Predrag</creatorcontrib><title>Convective drying of particulate solids – Packed vs. fluid bed operation</title><title>International journal of heat and mass transfer</title><description>The paper addresses results for the case of convective drying of particulate solids in a packed and in a fluid bed, analyzing agreement between the numerical results and the results of corresponding experimental investigation, as well as the differences between packed and fluid bed operation. In the fluid bed simulation model of unsteady simultaneous one-dimensional heat and mass transfer between solids, gas phase and bubble phase during drying process, based on two-phase bubbling model, it is assumed that the gas–solid interface is at thermodynamic equilibrium. The basic idea is to calculate heat and mass transfer between gas and particles (i.e., the drying process) in suspension phase as for a packed bed of particles, where the drying rate (evaporated moisture flux) of the specific product is calculated by applying the concept of a “drying coefficient”. Mixing of the particles (i.e., the impact onto the heat and mass transfer coefficients) in the case of fluid bed is taken into account by means of the diffusion term in the differential equations, using an effective particle diffusion coefficient. Model validation was done on the basis of the experimental data obtained with narrow fraction of poppy seeds characterized by mean equivalent particle diameter (dS,d=0.75mm), re-wetted with required (calculated) amount of water up to the initial moisture content (X0=0.54) for all experiments. Comparison of the drying kinetics, both experimental and numerical, has shown that higher gas (drying agent) temperatures, as well as velocities (flow-rates), induce faster drying. This effect is more pronounced for deeper beds, because of the larger amount of wet material to be dried using the same drying agent capacity. Bed temperature differences along the bed height are significant inside the packed bed, while in the fluid bed, for the same drying conditions, are almost negligible due to mixing of particles. Residence time is shorter in the case of a fluid bed drying compared to a packed bed drying.</description><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Convective drying</subject><subject>Desiccants</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Drying coefficient</subject><subject>Drying kinetics</subject><subject>Fine-grained hygroscopic materials</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>Heat and mass transfer</subject><subject>Mass transfer</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><issn>0017-9310</issn><issn>1879-2189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD152k-CJ2zx2oIpXVQkWsLYcewwuaRzsJFJ3_AN_yJfgquzYsBpdzdUZzSFkBiwFBvnlJrWbN5T9VobQe9kGgz7NGGQpQMqK8ohMoCyqJIOyOiYTxqBIKg7slJyFsNlHNs8nZLV07YiqtyNS7Xe2faXO0E763qqhkT3S4BqrA_3-_KJPUr2jpmNIqWkGq2kdk-vQy9669pycGNkEvPidU_Jye_O8vE_Wj3cPy-t1onix6JMaszznGgqN2dwYUJjpOdMZsBpRGsiBK6NkXZuCy4rlOStNUWjJGa-kLJFPyezA7bz7GDD0YmuDwqaRLbohCOD5AqCMR2L16lBV3oXg0YjO2630OwFM7DWKjfirUew1CgARNUbE6oDA-NJo4zYoi61CbX30JrSz_4f9ACOdilk</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Stakic, Milan</creator><creator>Stefanovic, Predrag</creator><creator>Cvetinovic, Dejan</creator><creator>Skobalj, Predrag</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Convective drying of particulate solids – Packed vs. fluid bed operation</title><author>Stakic, Milan ; Stefanovic, Predrag ; Cvetinovic, Dejan ; Skobalj, Predrag</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-be2663d17de24ff1ce2d40d210beeaf1613cfcabbf73a906608f77da3039aa8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Convective drying</topic><topic>Desiccants</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Drying coefficient</topic><topic>Drying kinetics</topic><topic>Fine-grained hygroscopic materials</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>Heat and mass transfer</topic><topic>Mass transfer</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stakic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanovic, Predrag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cvetinovic, Dejan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skobalj, Predrag</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>International journal of heat and mass transfer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stakic, Milan</au><au>Stefanovic, Predrag</au><au>Cvetinovic, Dejan</au><au>Skobalj, Predrag</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Convective drying of particulate solids – Packed vs. fluid bed operation</atitle><jtitle>International journal of heat and mass transfer</jtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>66</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>66-74</pages><issn>0017-9310</issn><eissn>1879-2189</eissn><abstract>The paper addresses results for the case of convective drying of particulate solids in a packed and in a fluid bed, analyzing agreement between the numerical results and the results of corresponding experimental investigation, as well as the differences between packed and fluid bed operation. In the fluid bed simulation model of unsteady simultaneous one-dimensional heat and mass transfer between solids, gas phase and bubble phase during drying process, based on two-phase bubbling model, it is assumed that the gas–solid interface is at thermodynamic equilibrium. The basic idea is to calculate heat and mass transfer between gas and particles (i.e., the drying process) in suspension phase as for a packed bed of particles, where the drying rate (evaporated moisture flux) of the specific product is calculated by applying the concept of a “drying coefficient”. Mixing of the particles (i.e., the impact onto the heat and mass transfer coefficients) in the case of fluid bed is taken into account by means of the diffusion term in the differential equations, using an effective particle diffusion coefficient. Model validation was done on the basis of the experimental data obtained with narrow fraction of poppy seeds characterized by mean equivalent particle diameter (dS,d=0.75mm), re-wetted with required (calculated) amount of water up to the initial moisture content (X0=0.54) for all experiments. Comparison of the drying kinetics, both experimental and numerical, has shown that higher gas (drying agent) temperatures, as well as velocities (flow-rates), induce faster drying. This effect is more pronounced for deeper beds, because of the larger amount of wet material to be dried using the same drying agent capacity. Bed temperature differences along the bed height are significant inside the packed bed, while in the fluid bed, for the same drying conditions, are almost negligible due to mixing of particles. Residence time is shorter in the case of a fluid bed drying compared to a packed bed drying.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.11.078</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-9310
ispartof International journal of heat and mass transfer, 2013-04, Vol.59, p.66-74
issn 0017-9310
1879-2189
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365118663
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Computational fluid dynamics
Convective drying
Desiccants
Drying
Drying coefficient
Drying kinetics
Fine-grained hygroscopic materials
Fluid flow
Fluids
Heat and mass transfer
Mass transfer
Mathematical models
Modeling
title Convective drying of particulate solids – Packed vs. fluid bed operation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A37%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Convective%20drying%20of%20particulate%20solids%20%E2%80%93%20Packed%20vs.%20fluid%20bed%20operation&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20heat%20and%20mass%20transfer&rft.au=Stakic,%20Milan&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=66&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=66-74&rft.issn=0017-9310&rft.eissn=1879-2189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.11.078&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1365118663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1365118663&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0017931012009416&rfr_iscdi=true