How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss

To explore patient perception of vision loss in glaucoma and, specifically, to test the hypothesis that patients do not recognize their impairment as a black tunnel effect or as black patches in their field of view. Clinic-based cross-sectional study. Fifty patients (age range, 52-82 years) with vis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2013-06, Vol.120 (6), p.1120-1126
Hauptverfasser: Crabb, David P, Smith, Nicholas D, Glen, Fiona C, Burton, Robyn, Garway-Heath, David F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1126
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1120
container_title Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
container_volume 120
creator Crabb, David P
Smith, Nicholas D
Glen, Fiona C
Burton, Robyn
Garway-Heath, David F
description To explore patient perception of vision loss in glaucoma and, specifically, to test the hypothesis that patients do not recognize their impairment as a black tunnel effect or as black patches in their field of view. Clinic-based cross-sectional study. Fifty patients (age range, 52-82 years) with visual acuity better than 20/30 and with a range of glaucomatous visual field (VF) defects in both eyes, excluding those with very advanced disease (perimetrically blind). Participants underwent monocular VF testing in both eyes using a Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA; 24-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard tests) and other tests of visual function. Participants took part in a recorded interview during which they were asked if they were aware of their VF loss; if so, there were encouraged to describe it in their own words. Participants were shown 6 images modified in a variety of ways on a computer monitor and were asked to select the image that most closely represented their perception of their VF loss. Forced choice of an image best representing glaucomatous vision impairment. Participants had a range of VF defect severity: average HFA mean deviation was -8.7 dB (standard deviation [SD], 5.8 dB) and -10.5 dB (SD, 7.1 dB) in the right and left eyes, respectively. Thirteen patients (26%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-40%) reported being completely unaware of their vision loss. None of the patients chose the images with a distinct black tunnel effect or black patches. Only 2 patients (4%; 95% CI, 0%-14%) chose the image with a tunnel effect with blurred edges. An image depicting blurred patches and another with missing patches was chosen by 54% (95% CI, 39%-68%) and 16% (95% CI, 7%-29%) of the patients, respectively. Content analysis of the transcripts from the recorded interviews indicated a frequent use of descriptors of visual symptoms associated with reported blur and missing features. Patients with glaucoma do not perceive their vision loss as a black tunnel effect or as black patches masking their field of view. These findings are important in the context of depicting the effects of glaucomatous vision loss and raising awareness for glaucoma detection. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365056035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1365056035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-b966e6e86c71f08964c3d099ba139b9390d2007d1a29ff1f81c40c5929e343f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1z8FLwzAYBfAgiJvT_0AkRy-t35ek2eJFZagTBl70XNI0cZ1pE5tW8b-34Dy9w_vx4BFygZAjoLze5yHuhp3OGSDLEXMQ_IjMsRAqE0vkM3Ka0h4ApOTihMwYF1PHcE7uNuGb1sEm-u71aEKrqQ_h4_aGRj00thtotL2xcWhCR4OjX00ataeusb6eZEpn5Nhpn-z5IRfk7fHhdb3Jti9Pz-v7bRYZ4pBVSkor7UqaJTpYKSkMr0GpSiNXleIKagawrFEz5Ry6FRoBplBMWS64k3xBrv52Yx8-R5uGsm2Ssd7rzoYxlchlAYUEXkz08kDHqrV1Gfum1f1P-f-a_wLN-lfo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1365056035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Crabb, David P ; Smith, Nicholas D ; Glen, Fiona C ; Burton, Robyn ; Garway-Heath, David F</creator><creatorcontrib>Crabb, David P ; Smith, Nicholas D ; Glen, Fiona C ; Burton, Robyn ; Garway-Heath, David F</creatorcontrib><description>To explore patient perception of vision loss in glaucoma and, specifically, to test the hypothesis that patients do not recognize their impairment as a black tunnel effect or as black patches in their field of view. Clinic-based cross-sectional study. Fifty patients (age range, 52-82 years) with visual acuity better than 20/30 and with a range of glaucomatous visual field (VF) defects in both eyes, excluding those with very advanced disease (perimetrically blind). Participants underwent monocular VF testing in both eyes using a Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA; 24-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard tests) and other tests of visual function. Participants took part in a recorded interview during which they were asked if they were aware of their VF loss; if so, there were encouraged to describe it in their own words. Participants were shown 6 images modified in a variety of ways on a computer monitor and were asked to select the image that most closely represented their perception of their VF loss. Forced choice of an image best representing glaucomatous vision impairment. Participants had a range of VF defect severity: average HFA mean deviation was -8.7 dB (standard deviation [SD], 5.8 dB) and -10.5 dB (SD, 7.1 dB) in the right and left eyes, respectively. Thirteen patients (26%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-40%) reported being completely unaware of their vision loss. None of the patients chose the images with a distinct black tunnel effect or black patches. Only 2 patients (4%; 95% CI, 0%-14%) chose the image with a tunnel effect with blurred edges. An image depicting blurred patches and another with missing patches was chosen by 54% (95% CI, 39%-68%) and 16% (95% CI, 7%-29%) of the patients, respectively. Content analysis of the transcripts from the recorded interviews indicated a frequent use of descriptors of visual symptoms associated with reported blur and missing features. Patients with glaucoma do not perceive their vision loss as a black tunnel effect or as black patches masking their field of view. These findings are important in the context of depicting the effects of glaucomatous vision loss and raising awareness for glaucoma detection. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23415421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Glaucoma - diagnosis ; Glaucoma - psychology ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure - physiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patients - psychology ; Scotoma - diagnosis ; Scotoma - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tonometry, Ocular ; Visual Acuity - physiology ; Visual Field Tests ; Visual Fields ; Visually Impaired Persons</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2013-06, Vol.120 (6), p.1120-1126</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23415421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crabb, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Nicholas D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glen, Fiona C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garway-Heath, David F</creatorcontrib><title>How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>To explore patient perception of vision loss in glaucoma and, specifically, to test the hypothesis that patients do not recognize their impairment as a black tunnel effect or as black patches in their field of view. Clinic-based cross-sectional study. Fifty patients (age range, 52-82 years) with visual acuity better than 20/30 and with a range of glaucomatous visual field (VF) defects in both eyes, excluding those with very advanced disease (perimetrically blind). Participants underwent monocular VF testing in both eyes using a Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA; 24-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard tests) and other tests of visual function. Participants took part in a recorded interview during which they were asked if they were aware of their VF loss; if so, there were encouraged to describe it in their own words. Participants were shown 6 images modified in a variety of ways on a computer monitor and were asked to select the image that most closely represented their perception of their VF loss. Forced choice of an image best representing glaucomatous vision impairment. Participants had a range of VF defect severity: average HFA mean deviation was -8.7 dB (standard deviation [SD], 5.8 dB) and -10.5 dB (SD, 7.1 dB) in the right and left eyes, respectively. Thirteen patients (26%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-40%) reported being completely unaware of their vision loss. None of the patients chose the images with a distinct black tunnel effect or black patches. Only 2 patients (4%; 95% CI, 0%-14%) chose the image with a tunnel effect with blurred edges. An image depicting blurred patches and another with missing patches was chosen by 54% (95% CI, 39%-68%) and 16% (95% CI, 7%-29%) of the patients, respectively. Content analysis of the transcripts from the recorded interviews indicated a frequent use of descriptors of visual symptoms associated with reported blur and missing features. Patients with glaucoma do not perceive their vision loss as a black tunnel effect or as black patches masking their field of view. These findings are important in the context of depicting the effects of glaucomatous vision loss and raising awareness for glaucoma detection. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glaucoma - psychology</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients - psychology</subject><subject>Scotoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Scotoma - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Field Tests</subject><subject>Visual Fields</subject><subject>Visually Impaired Persons</subject><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1z8FLwzAYBfAgiJvT_0AkRy-t35ek2eJFZagTBl70XNI0cZ1pE5tW8b-34Dy9w_vx4BFygZAjoLze5yHuhp3OGSDLEXMQ_IjMsRAqE0vkM3Ka0h4ApOTihMwYF1PHcE7uNuGb1sEm-u71aEKrqQ_h4_aGRj00thtotL2xcWhCR4OjX00ataeusb6eZEpn5Nhpn-z5IRfk7fHhdb3Jti9Pz-v7bRYZ4pBVSkor7UqaJTpYKSkMr0GpSiNXleIKagawrFEz5Ry6FRoBplBMWS64k3xBrv52Yx8-R5uGsm2Ssd7rzoYxlchlAYUEXkz08kDHqrV1Gfum1f1P-f-a_wLN-lfo</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Crabb, David P</creator><creator>Smith, Nicholas D</creator><creator>Glen, Fiona C</creator><creator>Burton, Robyn</creator><creator>Garway-Heath, David F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss</title><author>Crabb, David P ; Smith, Nicholas D ; Glen, Fiona C ; Burton, Robyn ; Garway-Heath, David F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-b966e6e86c71f08964c3d099ba139b9390d2007d1a29ff1f81c40c5929e343f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glaucoma - psychology</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients - psychology</topic><topic>Scotoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Scotoma - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Field Tests</topic><topic>Visual Fields</topic><topic>Visually Impaired Persons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crabb, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Nicholas D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glen, Fiona C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garway-Heath, David F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crabb, David P</au><au>Smith, Nicholas D</au><au>Glen, Fiona C</au><au>Burton, Robyn</au><au>Garway-Heath, David F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1120</spage><epage>1126</epage><pages>1120-1126</pages><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><abstract>To explore patient perception of vision loss in glaucoma and, specifically, to test the hypothesis that patients do not recognize their impairment as a black tunnel effect or as black patches in their field of view. Clinic-based cross-sectional study. Fifty patients (age range, 52-82 years) with visual acuity better than 20/30 and with a range of glaucomatous visual field (VF) defects in both eyes, excluding those with very advanced disease (perimetrically blind). Participants underwent monocular VF testing in both eyes using a Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA; 24-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard tests) and other tests of visual function. Participants took part in a recorded interview during which they were asked if they were aware of their VF loss; if so, there were encouraged to describe it in their own words. Participants were shown 6 images modified in a variety of ways on a computer monitor and were asked to select the image that most closely represented their perception of their VF loss. Forced choice of an image best representing glaucomatous vision impairment. Participants had a range of VF defect severity: average HFA mean deviation was -8.7 dB (standard deviation [SD], 5.8 dB) and -10.5 dB (SD, 7.1 dB) in the right and left eyes, respectively. Thirteen patients (26%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-40%) reported being completely unaware of their vision loss. None of the patients chose the images with a distinct black tunnel effect or black patches. Only 2 patients (4%; 95% CI, 0%-14%) chose the image with a tunnel effect with blurred edges. An image depicting blurred patches and another with missing patches was chosen by 54% (95% CI, 39%-68%) and 16% (95% CI, 7%-29%) of the patients, respectively. Content analysis of the transcripts from the recorded interviews indicated a frequent use of descriptors of visual symptoms associated with reported blur and missing features. Patients with glaucoma do not perceive their vision loss as a black tunnel effect or as black patches masking their field of view. These findings are important in the context of depicting the effects of glaucomatous vision loss and raising awareness for glaucoma detection. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>23415421</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.043</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1549-4713
ispartof Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2013-06, Vol.120 (6), p.1120-1126
issn 1549-4713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365056035
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Glaucoma - diagnosis
Glaucoma - psychology
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Intraocular Pressure - physiology
Male
Middle Aged
Patients - psychology
Scotoma - diagnosis
Scotoma - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tonometry, Ocular
Visual Acuity - physiology
Visual Field Tests
Visual Fields
Visually Impaired Persons
title How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A11%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20does%20glaucoma%20look?:%20patient%20perception%20of%20visual%20field%20loss&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Crabb,%20David%20P&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1120&rft.epage=1126&rft.pages=1120-1126&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1365056035%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1365056035&rft_id=info:pmid/23415421&rfr_iscdi=true