Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development

Introduction: Few studies have examined the safety of midwife‐led care for low‐risk childbearing women. While most women have a low‐risk profile at the start of pregnancy, validated measures to detect patient safety risks for this population are needed. The increased interest of midwife‐led care for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of midwifery & women's health 2012-07, Vol.57 (4), p.386-395
Hauptverfasser: Martijn, Lucie, Jacobs, Annelies, Harmsen, Mirjam, Maassen, Irma, Wensing, Michel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 395
container_issue 4
container_start_page 386
container_title Journal of midwifery & women's health
container_volume 57
creator Martijn, Lucie
Jacobs, Annelies
Harmsen, Mirjam
Maassen, Irma
Wensing, Michel
description Introduction: Few studies have examined the safety of midwife‐led care for low‐risk childbearing women. While most women have a low‐risk profile at the start of pregnancy, validated measures to detect patient safety risks for this population are needed. The increased interest of midwife‐led care for childbearing women to substitute for other models of care requires careful evaluation of safety aspects. In this study, we developed and tested an instrument for safety assessment of midwifery care. Methods: A structured approach was followed for instrument development. First, we reviewed the literature on patient safety in general and obstetric and midwifery care in particular. We identified 5 domains of patient risk: organization, communication, patient‐related risk factors, clinical management, and outcomes. We then developed a prototype to assess patient records and, in an iterative process, reviewed the prototype with the help of a review team of midwives and safety experts. The instrument was pilot tested for content validity, reliability, and feasibility. Results: Trained reviewers with clinical midwifery expertise applied the instrument. We were able to reduce the original 100‐item screening instrument to 32 items and applied the instrument to patient records in a reliable manner. With regard to the validity of the instrument, review of the literature and the validation procedure produced good content validity. Discussion: A valid and feasible instrument to assess patient safety in low‐risk childbearing women is now available and can be used for quantitative analyses of patient records and to identify unsafe situations. Identification and analysis of patient safety incidents required clinical judgment and consultation with the panel of safety experts. The instrument allows us to draw conclusions about safety and to recommend steps for specific, domain‐based improvements. Studies on the use of the instrument for improving patient safety are recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00147.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364767599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1038589925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5797-84a30225943dd95940234e15c02a05f5a5ae0ba66c7b55e3d0835d75499862773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUmPEzEQhS0EYoaBv4AsceHSwVu120gcUAZmy2QWlkhcLKfbLTnTS7C7SfLvcU8POXCA8aGqJH_vlUoPIUzJhMb3bjWhIFjCCKWT-0IIFXKyfYIO9x9Ph5mliQLGD9CLEFYRkkSR5-iAMckklfwQXVybztmmw19Mabsddg2-dMXGldbv8NR4i8vW41m7SW5duMOLtrbNe3zWhM739aA7tr9s1a6H-SV6Vpoq2FcP_Qh9-_zp6_Q0mV2dnE0_zpIcpJJJJgwnjIESvChUbIRxYSnkhBkCJRgwlixNmuZyCWB5QTIOhQShVJYyKfkRejv6rn37s7eh07ULua0q09i2D5ryVMhUglL_RwnPIFOKwSNQxoELylhE3_yFrtreN_FmzYRQXEDE_kVFL5FKQsSwNhup3LcheFvqtXe18bsI6SFsvdJDpnrIdCz3YettlL5-WNAva1vshX_SjcCHEdi4yu4ebazPLxencYr6ZNS70NntXm_8nU4ll6AX8xP9_cfxzfnFnOs5_w2oxsHZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024670045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Martijn, Lucie ; Jacobs, Annelies ; Harmsen, Mirjam ; Maassen, Irma ; Wensing, Michel</creator><creatorcontrib>Martijn, Lucie ; Jacobs, Annelies ; Harmsen, Mirjam ; Maassen, Irma ; Wensing, Michel</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Few studies have examined the safety of midwife‐led care for low‐risk childbearing women. While most women have a low‐risk profile at the start of pregnancy, validated measures to detect patient safety risks for this population are needed. The increased interest of midwife‐led care for childbearing women to substitute for other models of care requires careful evaluation of safety aspects. In this study, we developed and tested an instrument for safety assessment of midwifery care. Methods: A structured approach was followed for instrument development. First, we reviewed the literature on patient safety in general and obstetric and midwifery care in particular. We identified 5 domains of patient risk: organization, communication, patient‐related risk factors, clinical management, and outcomes. We then developed a prototype to assess patient records and, in an iterative process, reviewed the prototype with the help of a review team of midwives and safety experts. The instrument was pilot tested for content validity, reliability, and feasibility. Results: Trained reviewers with clinical midwifery expertise applied the instrument. We were able to reduce the original 100‐item screening instrument to 32 items and applied the instrument to patient records in a reliable manner. With regard to the validity of the instrument, review of the literature and the validation procedure produced good content validity. Discussion: A valid and feasible instrument to assess patient safety in low‐risk childbearing women is now available and can be used for quantitative analyses of patient records and to identify unsafe situations. Identification and analysis of patient safety incidents required clinical judgment and consultation with the panel of safety experts. The instrument allows us to draw conclusions about safety and to recommend steps for specific, domain‐based improvements. Studies on the use of the instrument for improving patient safety are recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-2011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00147.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22727173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Child ; Childbearing ; Clinical decision making ; Communication ; Experts ; Feasibility ; Female ; Health care management ; Humans ; instrument ; Literature reviews ; low-risk pregnancy ; Medical screening ; Midwifery ; midwifery-led care ; Midwives ; Nursing ; Obstetrics ; Patient care ; Patient Safety ; Patients ; Perinatal Care ; Pregnancy ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk ; Risk Assessment ; Risk factors ; Safety ; safety incident ; Safety measures ; Teams ; Unsafe ; Validity ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of midwifery &amp; women's health, 2012-07, Vol.57 (4), p.386-395</ispartof><rights>2012 by the American College of Nurse‐Midwives</rights><rights>2012 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul/Aug 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jul/Aug 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5797-84a30225943dd95940234e15c02a05f5a5ae0ba66c7b55e3d0835d75499862773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5797-84a30225943dd95940234e15c02a05f5a5ae0ba66c7b55e3d0835d75499862773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1542-2011.2011.00147.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1542-2011.2011.00147.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22727173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martijn, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Annelies</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmsen, Mirjam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Irma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensing, Michel</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development</title><title>Journal of midwifery &amp; women's health</title><addtitle>J Midwifery Womens Health</addtitle><description>Introduction: Few studies have examined the safety of midwife‐led care for low‐risk childbearing women. While most women have a low‐risk profile at the start of pregnancy, validated measures to detect patient safety risks for this population are needed. The increased interest of midwife‐led care for childbearing women to substitute for other models of care requires careful evaluation of safety aspects. In this study, we developed and tested an instrument for safety assessment of midwifery care. Methods: A structured approach was followed for instrument development. First, we reviewed the literature on patient safety in general and obstetric and midwifery care in particular. We identified 5 domains of patient risk: organization, communication, patient‐related risk factors, clinical management, and outcomes. We then developed a prototype to assess patient records and, in an iterative process, reviewed the prototype with the help of a review team of midwives and safety experts. The instrument was pilot tested for content validity, reliability, and feasibility. Results: Trained reviewers with clinical midwifery expertise applied the instrument. We were able to reduce the original 100‐item screening instrument to 32 items and applied the instrument to patient records in a reliable manner. With regard to the validity of the instrument, review of the literature and the validation procedure produced good content validity. Discussion: A valid and feasible instrument to assess patient safety in low‐risk childbearing women is now available and can be used for quantitative analyses of patient records and to identify unsafe situations. Identification and analysis of patient safety incidents required clinical judgment and consultation with the panel of safety experts. The instrument allows us to draw conclusions about safety and to recommend steps for specific, domain‐based improvements. Studies on the use of the instrument for improving patient safety are recommended.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Childbearing</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care management</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>instrument</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>low-risk pregnancy</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>midwifery-led care</subject><subject>Midwives</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Patient care</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perinatal Care</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>safety incident</subject><subject>Safety measures</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Unsafe</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1526-9523</issn><issn>1542-2011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUmPEzEQhS0EYoaBv4AsceHSwVu120gcUAZmy2QWlkhcLKfbLTnTS7C7SfLvcU8POXCA8aGqJH_vlUoPIUzJhMb3bjWhIFjCCKWT-0IIFXKyfYIO9x9Ph5mliQLGD9CLEFYRkkSR5-iAMckklfwQXVybztmmw19Mabsddg2-dMXGldbv8NR4i8vW41m7SW5duMOLtrbNe3zWhM739aA7tr9s1a6H-SV6Vpoq2FcP_Qh9-_zp6_Q0mV2dnE0_zpIcpJJJJgwnjIESvChUbIRxYSnkhBkCJRgwlixNmuZyCWB5QTIOhQShVJYyKfkRejv6rn37s7eh07ULua0q09i2D5ryVMhUglL_RwnPIFOKwSNQxoELylhE3_yFrtreN_FmzYRQXEDE_kVFL5FKQsSwNhup3LcheFvqtXe18bsI6SFsvdJDpnrIdCz3YettlL5-WNAva1vshX_SjcCHEdi4yu4ebazPLxencYr6ZNS70NntXm_8nU4ll6AX8xP9_cfxzfnFnOs5_w2oxsHZ</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Martijn, Lucie</creator><creator>Jacobs, Annelies</creator><creator>Harmsen, Mirjam</creator><creator>Maassen, Irma</creator><creator>Wensing, Michel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development</title><author>Martijn, Lucie ; Jacobs, Annelies ; Harmsen, Mirjam ; Maassen, Irma ; Wensing, Michel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5797-84a30225943dd95940234e15c02a05f5a5ae0ba66c7b55e3d0835d75499862773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Childbearing</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care management</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>instrument</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>low-risk pregnancy</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>midwifery-led care</topic><topic>Midwives</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Patient care</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perinatal Care</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>safety incident</topic><topic>Safety measures</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Unsafe</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martijn, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Annelies</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmsen, Mirjam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Irma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensing, Michel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of midwifery &amp; women's health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martijn, Lucie</au><au>Jacobs, Annelies</au><au>Harmsen, Mirjam</au><au>Maassen, Irma</au><au>Wensing, Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development</atitle><jtitle>Journal of midwifery &amp; women's health</jtitle><addtitle>J Midwifery Womens Health</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>386</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>386-395</pages><issn>1526-9523</issn><eissn>1542-2011</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Few studies have examined the safety of midwife‐led care for low‐risk childbearing women. While most women have a low‐risk profile at the start of pregnancy, validated measures to detect patient safety risks for this population are needed. The increased interest of midwife‐led care for childbearing women to substitute for other models of care requires careful evaluation of safety aspects. In this study, we developed and tested an instrument for safety assessment of midwifery care. Methods: A structured approach was followed for instrument development. First, we reviewed the literature on patient safety in general and obstetric and midwifery care in particular. We identified 5 domains of patient risk: organization, communication, patient‐related risk factors, clinical management, and outcomes. We then developed a prototype to assess patient records and, in an iterative process, reviewed the prototype with the help of a review team of midwives and safety experts. The instrument was pilot tested for content validity, reliability, and feasibility. Results: Trained reviewers with clinical midwifery expertise applied the instrument. We were able to reduce the original 100‐item screening instrument to 32 items and applied the instrument to patient records in a reliable manner. With regard to the validity of the instrument, review of the literature and the validation procedure produced good content validity. Discussion: A valid and feasible instrument to assess patient safety in low‐risk childbearing women is now available and can be used for quantitative analyses of patient records and to identify unsafe situations. Identification and analysis of patient safety incidents required clinical judgment and consultation with the panel of safety experts. The instrument allows us to draw conclusions about safety and to recommend steps for specific, domain‐based improvements. Studies on the use of the instrument for improving patient safety are recommended.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>22727173</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00147.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9523
ispartof Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2012-07, Vol.57 (4), p.386-395
issn 1526-9523
1542-2011
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364767599
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adult
Child
Childbearing
Clinical decision making
Communication
Experts
Feasibility
Female
Health care management
Humans
instrument
Literature reviews
low-risk pregnancy
Medical screening
Midwifery
midwifery-led care
Midwives
Nursing
Obstetrics
Patient care
Patient Safety
Patients
Perinatal Care
Pregnancy
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Risk
Risk Assessment
Risk factors
Safety
safety incident
Safety measures
Teams
Unsafe
Validity
Women
Womens health
title Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A19%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Safety%20in%20Midwifery%20Care%20for%20Low-Risk%20Women:%20Instrument%20Development&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20midwifery%20&%20women's%20health&rft.au=Martijn,%20Lucie&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=386&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=386-395&rft.issn=1526-9523&rft.eissn=1542-2011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00147.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1038589925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024670045&rft_id=info:pmid/22727173&rfr_iscdi=true