Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development
Introduction: Few studies have examined the safety of midwife‐led care for low‐risk childbearing women. While most women have a low‐risk profile at the start of pregnancy, validated measures to detect patient safety risks for this population are needed. The increased interest of midwife‐led care for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of midwifery & women's health 2012-07, Vol.57 (4), p.386-395 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 395 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 386 |
container_title | Journal of midwifery & women's health |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Martijn, Lucie Jacobs, Annelies Harmsen, Mirjam Maassen, Irma Wensing, Michel |
description | Introduction: Few studies have examined the safety of midwife‐led care for low‐risk childbearing women. While most women have a low‐risk profile at the start of pregnancy, validated measures to detect patient safety risks for this population are needed. The increased interest of midwife‐led care for childbearing women to substitute for other models of care requires careful evaluation of safety aspects. In this study, we developed and tested an instrument for safety assessment of midwifery care.
Methods: A structured approach was followed for instrument development. First, we reviewed the literature on patient safety in general and obstetric and midwifery care in particular. We identified 5 domains of patient risk: organization, communication, patient‐related risk factors, clinical management, and outcomes. We then developed a prototype to assess patient records and, in an iterative process, reviewed the prototype with the help of a review team of midwives and safety experts. The instrument was pilot tested for content validity, reliability, and feasibility.
Results: Trained reviewers with clinical midwifery expertise applied the instrument. We were able to reduce the original 100‐item screening instrument to 32 items and applied the instrument to patient records in a reliable manner. With regard to the validity of the instrument, review of the literature and the validation procedure produced good content validity.
Discussion: A valid and feasible instrument to assess patient safety in low‐risk childbearing women is now available and can be used for quantitative analyses of patient records and to identify unsafe situations. Identification and analysis of patient safety incidents required clinical judgment and consultation with the panel of safety experts. The instrument allows us to draw conclusions about safety and to recommend steps for specific, domain‐based improvements. Studies on the use of the instrument for improving patient safety are recommended. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00147.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364767599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1038589925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5797-84a30225943dd95940234e15c02a05f5a5ae0ba66c7b55e3d0835d75499862773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUmPEzEQhS0EYoaBv4AsceHSwVu120gcUAZmy2QWlkhcLKfbLTnTS7C7SfLvcU8POXCA8aGqJH_vlUoPIUzJhMb3bjWhIFjCCKWT-0IIFXKyfYIO9x9Ph5mliQLGD9CLEFYRkkSR5-iAMckklfwQXVybztmmw19Mabsddg2-dMXGldbv8NR4i8vW41m7SW5duMOLtrbNe3zWhM739aA7tr9s1a6H-SV6Vpoq2FcP_Qh9-_zp6_Q0mV2dnE0_zpIcpJJJJgwnjIESvChUbIRxYSnkhBkCJRgwlixNmuZyCWB5QTIOhQShVJYyKfkRejv6rn37s7eh07ULua0q09i2D5ryVMhUglL_RwnPIFOKwSNQxoELylhE3_yFrtreN_FmzYRQXEDE_kVFL5FKQsSwNhup3LcheFvqtXe18bsI6SFsvdJDpnrIdCz3YettlL5-WNAva1vshX_SjcCHEdi4yu4ebazPLxencYr6ZNS70NntXm_8nU4ll6AX8xP9_cfxzfnFnOs5_w2oxsHZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024670045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Martijn, Lucie ; Jacobs, Annelies ; Harmsen, Mirjam ; Maassen, Irma ; Wensing, Michel</creator><creatorcontrib>Martijn, Lucie ; Jacobs, Annelies ; Harmsen, Mirjam ; Maassen, Irma ; Wensing, Michel</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Few studies have examined the safety of midwife‐led care for low‐risk childbearing women. While most women have a low‐risk profile at the start of pregnancy, validated measures to detect patient safety risks for this population are needed. The increased interest of midwife‐led care for childbearing women to substitute for other models of care requires careful evaluation of safety aspects. In this study, we developed and tested an instrument for safety assessment of midwifery care.
Methods: A structured approach was followed for instrument development. First, we reviewed the literature on patient safety in general and obstetric and midwifery care in particular. We identified 5 domains of patient risk: organization, communication, patient‐related risk factors, clinical management, and outcomes. We then developed a prototype to assess patient records and, in an iterative process, reviewed the prototype with the help of a review team of midwives and safety experts. The instrument was pilot tested for content validity, reliability, and feasibility.
Results: Trained reviewers with clinical midwifery expertise applied the instrument. We were able to reduce the original 100‐item screening instrument to 32 items and applied the instrument to patient records in a reliable manner. With regard to the validity of the instrument, review of the literature and the validation procedure produced good content validity.
Discussion: A valid and feasible instrument to assess patient safety in low‐risk childbearing women is now available and can be used for quantitative analyses of patient records and to identify unsafe situations. Identification and analysis of patient safety incidents required clinical judgment and consultation with the panel of safety experts. The instrument allows us to draw conclusions about safety and to recommend steps for specific, domain‐based improvements. Studies on the use of the instrument for improving patient safety are recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-2011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00147.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22727173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Child ; Childbearing ; Clinical decision making ; Communication ; Experts ; Feasibility ; Female ; Health care management ; Humans ; instrument ; Literature reviews ; low-risk pregnancy ; Medical screening ; Midwifery ; midwifery-led care ; Midwives ; Nursing ; Obstetrics ; Patient care ; Patient Safety ; Patients ; Perinatal Care ; Pregnancy ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk ; Risk Assessment ; Risk factors ; Safety ; safety incident ; Safety measures ; Teams ; Unsafe ; Validity ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2012-07, Vol.57 (4), p.386-395</ispartof><rights>2012 by the American College of Nurse‐Midwives</rights><rights>2012 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul/Aug 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jul/Aug 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5797-84a30225943dd95940234e15c02a05f5a5ae0ba66c7b55e3d0835d75499862773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5797-84a30225943dd95940234e15c02a05f5a5ae0ba66c7b55e3d0835d75499862773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1542-2011.2011.00147.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1542-2011.2011.00147.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22727173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martijn, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Annelies</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmsen, Mirjam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Irma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensing, Michel</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development</title><title>Journal of midwifery & women's health</title><addtitle>J Midwifery Womens Health</addtitle><description>Introduction: Few studies have examined the safety of midwife‐led care for low‐risk childbearing women. While most women have a low‐risk profile at the start of pregnancy, validated measures to detect patient safety risks for this population are needed. The increased interest of midwife‐led care for childbearing women to substitute for other models of care requires careful evaluation of safety aspects. In this study, we developed and tested an instrument for safety assessment of midwifery care.
Methods: A structured approach was followed for instrument development. First, we reviewed the literature on patient safety in general and obstetric and midwifery care in particular. We identified 5 domains of patient risk: organization, communication, patient‐related risk factors, clinical management, and outcomes. We then developed a prototype to assess patient records and, in an iterative process, reviewed the prototype with the help of a review team of midwives and safety experts. The instrument was pilot tested for content validity, reliability, and feasibility.
Results: Trained reviewers with clinical midwifery expertise applied the instrument. We were able to reduce the original 100‐item screening instrument to 32 items and applied the instrument to patient records in a reliable manner. With regard to the validity of the instrument, review of the literature and the validation procedure produced good content validity.
Discussion: A valid and feasible instrument to assess patient safety in low‐risk childbearing women is now available and can be used for quantitative analyses of patient records and to identify unsafe situations. Identification and analysis of patient safety incidents required clinical judgment and consultation with the panel of safety experts. The instrument allows us to draw conclusions about safety and to recommend steps for specific, domain‐based improvements. Studies on the use of the instrument for improving patient safety are recommended.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Childbearing</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care management</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>instrument</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>low-risk pregnancy</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>midwifery-led care</subject><subject>Midwives</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Patient care</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perinatal Care</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>safety incident</subject><subject>Safety measures</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Unsafe</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1526-9523</issn><issn>1542-2011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUmPEzEQhS0EYoaBv4AsceHSwVu120gcUAZmy2QWlkhcLKfbLTnTS7C7SfLvcU8POXCA8aGqJH_vlUoPIUzJhMb3bjWhIFjCCKWT-0IIFXKyfYIO9x9Ph5mliQLGD9CLEFYRkkSR5-iAMckklfwQXVybztmmw19Mabsddg2-dMXGldbv8NR4i8vW41m7SW5duMOLtrbNe3zWhM739aA7tr9s1a6H-SV6Vpoq2FcP_Qh9-_zp6_Q0mV2dnE0_zpIcpJJJJgwnjIESvChUbIRxYSnkhBkCJRgwlixNmuZyCWB5QTIOhQShVJYyKfkRejv6rn37s7eh07ULua0q09i2D5ryVMhUglL_RwnPIFOKwSNQxoELylhE3_yFrtreN_FmzYRQXEDE_kVFL5FKQsSwNhup3LcheFvqtXe18bsI6SFsvdJDpnrIdCz3YettlL5-WNAva1vshX_SjcCHEdi4yu4ebazPLxencYr6ZNS70NntXm_8nU4ll6AX8xP9_cfxzfnFnOs5_w2oxsHZ</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Martijn, Lucie</creator><creator>Jacobs, Annelies</creator><creator>Harmsen, Mirjam</creator><creator>Maassen, Irma</creator><creator>Wensing, Michel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development</title><author>Martijn, Lucie ; Jacobs, Annelies ; Harmsen, Mirjam ; Maassen, Irma ; Wensing, Michel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5797-84a30225943dd95940234e15c02a05f5a5ae0ba66c7b55e3d0835d75499862773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Childbearing</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care management</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>instrument</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>low-risk pregnancy</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>midwifery-led care</topic><topic>Midwives</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Patient care</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perinatal Care</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>safety incident</topic><topic>Safety measures</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Unsafe</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martijn, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Annelies</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmsen, Mirjam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maassen, Irma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensing, Michel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of midwifery & women's health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martijn, Lucie</au><au>Jacobs, Annelies</au><au>Harmsen, Mirjam</au><au>Maassen, Irma</au><au>Wensing, Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development</atitle><jtitle>Journal of midwifery & women's health</jtitle><addtitle>J Midwifery Womens Health</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>386</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>386-395</pages><issn>1526-9523</issn><eissn>1542-2011</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Few studies have examined the safety of midwife‐led care for low‐risk childbearing women. While most women have a low‐risk profile at the start of pregnancy, validated measures to detect patient safety risks for this population are needed. The increased interest of midwife‐led care for childbearing women to substitute for other models of care requires careful evaluation of safety aspects. In this study, we developed and tested an instrument for safety assessment of midwifery care.
Methods: A structured approach was followed for instrument development. First, we reviewed the literature on patient safety in general and obstetric and midwifery care in particular. We identified 5 domains of patient risk: organization, communication, patient‐related risk factors, clinical management, and outcomes. We then developed a prototype to assess patient records and, in an iterative process, reviewed the prototype with the help of a review team of midwives and safety experts. The instrument was pilot tested for content validity, reliability, and feasibility.
Results: Trained reviewers with clinical midwifery expertise applied the instrument. We were able to reduce the original 100‐item screening instrument to 32 items and applied the instrument to patient records in a reliable manner. With regard to the validity of the instrument, review of the literature and the validation procedure produced good content validity.
Discussion: A valid and feasible instrument to assess patient safety in low‐risk childbearing women is now available and can be used for quantitative analyses of patient records and to identify unsafe situations. Identification and analysis of patient safety incidents required clinical judgment and consultation with the panel of safety experts. The instrument allows us to draw conclusions about safety and to recommend steps for specific, domain‐based improvements. Studies on the use of the instrument for improving patient safety are recommended.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>22727173</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00147.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-9523 |
ispartof | Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2012-07, Vol.57 (4), p.386-395 |
issn | 1526-9523 1542-2011 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364767599 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Adult Child Childbearing Clinical decision making Communication Experts Feasibility Female Health care management Humans instrument Literature reviews low-risk pregnancy Medical screening Midwifery midwifery-led care Midwives Nursing Obstetrics Patient care Patient Safety Patients Perinatal Care Pregnancy Reliability Reproducibility of Results Risk Risk Assessment Risk factors Safety safety incident Safety measures Teams Unsafe Validity Women Womens health |
title | Patient Safety in Midwifery Care for Low-Risk Women: Instrument Development |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A19%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Safety%20in%20Midwifery%20Care%20for%20Low-Risk%20Women:%20Instrument%20Development&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20midwifery%20&%20women's%20health&rft.au=Martijn,%20Lucie&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=386&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=386-395&rft.issn=1526-9523&rft.eissn=1542-2011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00147.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1038589925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024670045&rft_id=info:pmid/22727173&rfr_iscdi=true |