Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising
The risk that direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals (DTCA) may increase inappropriate medicine use is well recognized. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration addresses this concern by subjecting DTCA content to strict scrutiny. Its strictures are, however, heavily focused on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of bioethics 2013-05, Vol.13 (5), p.3-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | American journal of bioethics |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Biegler, Paul Vargas, Patrick |
description | The risk that direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals (DTCA) may increase inappropriate medicine use is well recognized. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration addresses this concern by subjecting DTCA content to strict scrutiny. Its strictures are, however, heavily focused on the explicit claims made in commercials, what we term their "propositional content." Yet research in social psychology suggests advertising employs techniques to influence viewers via nonpropositional content, for example, images and music. We argue that one such technique, evaluative conditioning, is operative in DTCA. We further argue that evaluative conditioning fosters unjustified beliefs about drug safety and efficacy, antagonising the autonomy of viewers' choices about advertised medicines. We conclude that current guidelines are deficient in failing to account for evaluative conditioning, and that more research and debate are needed to determine the permissibility of this and other forms of nonpropositional persuasion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/15265161.2013.776127 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364727087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1500790326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9c48a6679224e8157b00ec23814ca4cb22ae99592976d11c869c460fdbea63dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhq2qqAHaf1ChPfayYfy9PkVpxJcUQdWWs-V4vWC0sVPbC-Lfs6tAjy0nj-TnnRnNg9BXDHMMDZxiTgTHAs8JYDqXUmAiP6BDzKmoAST_ONVE1BMzQ0c5PwAAG9lPaEYo5xIoP0S3302oyr2rfg0hu7KormPYpbiL2Rcfg-mrVQzFhVKZ0FY_3d3Qm-mjil31496krbFuKN6O4LJ9dKn47MPdZ3TQmT67L6_vMbo9P_u9uqzXNxdXq-W6toyoUivLGiOEVIQw12AuNwDOEtpgZg2zG0KMU4oroqRoMbaNGBMCunbjjKBtS4_Rt33fceU_g8tFb322ru9NcHHIGvPxEgooEf9HqWCSSGjkO1DCqAJBJ5TtUZtizsl1epf81qRnjUFPmvSbJj1p0ntNY-zkdcKw2br2b-jNywgs9oAPXRyP_BRT3-pinvuYumSC9VnTf454AbV5n80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1324390637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Biegler, Paul ; Vargas, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Biegler, Paul ; Vargas, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>The risk that direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals (DTCA) may increase inappropriate medicine use is well recognized. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration addresses this concern by subjecting DTCA content to strict scrutiny. Its strictures are, however, heavily focused on the explicit claims made in commercials, what we term their "propositional content." Yet research in social psychology suggests advertising employs techniques to influence viewers via nonpropositional content, for example, images and music. We argue that one such technique, evaluative conditioning, is operative in DTCA. We further argue that evaluative conditioning fosters unjustified beliefs about drug safety and efficacy, antagonising the autonomy of viewers' choices about advertised medicines. We conclude that current guidelines are deficient in failing to account for evaluative conditioning, and that more research and debate are needed to determine the permissibility of this and other forms of nonpropositional persuasion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-5161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2013.776127</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23557035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Advertising as Topic - ethics ; Advertising as Topic - methods ; Advertising as Topic - trends ; Autonomy ; Bioethics ; Choice Behavior ; Community Participation - methods ; Community Participation - psychology ; Community Participation - trends ; conditioning ; Conditioning (Psychology) ; Decision Making ; Drug Industry - ethics ; Drug Industry - trends ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; ethics ; Humans ; knowledge ; Medicine ; Paternalism - ethics ; Personal Autonomy ; Persuasive Communication ; pharmaceuticals ; Prescriptions ; Regulation ; Risk ; Social psychology ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><ispartof>American journal of bioethics, 2013-05, Vol.13 (5), p.3-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9c48a6679224e8157b00ec23814ca4cb22ae99592976d11c869c460fdbea63dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9c48a6679224e8157b00ec23814ca4cb22ae99592976d11c869c460fdbea63dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15265161.2013.776127$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15265161.2013.776127$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557035$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biegler, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising</title><title>American journal of bioethics</title><addtitle>Am J Bioeth</addtitle><description>The risk that direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals (DTCA) may increase inappropriate medicine use is well recognized. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration addresses this concern by subjecting DTCA content to strict scrutiny. Its strictures are, however, heavily focused on the explicit claims made in commercials, what we term their "propositional content." Yet research in social psychology suggests advertising employs techniques to influence viewers via nonpropositional content, for example, images and music. We argue that one such technique, evaluative conditioning, is operative in DTCA. We further argue that evaluative conditioning fosters unjustified beliefs about drug safety and efficacy, antagonising the autonomy of viewers' choices about advertised medicines. We conclude that current guidelines are deficient in failing to account for evaluative conditioning, and that more research and debate are needed to determine the permissibility of this and other forms of nonpropositional persuasion.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Advertising as Topic - ethics</subject><subject>Advertising as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Advertising as Topic - trends</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Community Participation - methods</subject><subject>Community Participation - psychology</subject><subject>Community Participation - trends</subject><subject>conditioning</subject><subject>Conditioning (Psychology)</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Drug Industry - ethics</subject><subject>Drug Industry - trends</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</subject><subject>ethics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>knowledge</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Paternalism - ethics</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Persuasive Communication</subject><subject>pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><issn>1526-5161</issn><issn>1536-0075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhq2qqAHaf1ChPfayYfy9PkVpxJcUQdWWs-V4vWC0sVPbC-Lfs6tAjy0nj-TnnRnNg9BXDHMMDZxiTgTHAs8JYDqXUmAiP6BDzKmoAST_ONVE1BMzQ0c5PwAAG9lPaEYo5xIoP0S3302oyr2rfg0hu7KormPYpbiL2Rcfg-mrVQzFhVKZ0FY_3d3Qm-mjil31496krbFuKN6O4LJ9dKn47MPdZ3TQmT67L6_vMbo9P_u9uqzXNxdXq-W6toyoUivLGiOEVIQw12AuNwDOEtpgZg2zG0KMU4oroqRoMbaNGBMCunbjjKBtS4_Rt33fceU_g8tFb322ru9NcHHIGvPxEgooEf9HqWCSSGjkO1DCqAJBJ5TtUZtizsl1epf81qRnjUFPmvSbJj1p0ntNY-zkdcKw2br2b-jNywgs9oAPXRyP_BRT3-pinvuYumSC9VnTf454AbV5n80</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Biegler, Paul</creator><creator>Vargas, Patrick</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising</title><author>Biegler, Paul ; Vargas, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9c48a6679224e8157b00ec23814ca4cb22ae99592976d11c869c460fdbea63dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Advertising as Topic - ethics</topic><topic>Advertising as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Advertising as Topic - trends</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Community Participation - methods</topic><topic>Community Participation - psychology</topic><topic>Community Participation - trends</topic><topic>conditioning</topic><topic>Conditioning (Psychology)</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Drug Industry - ethics</topic><topic>Drug Industry - trends</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</topic><topic>ethics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>knowledge</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Paternalism - ethics</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Persuasive Communication</topic><topic>pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Food and Drug Administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biegler, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of bioethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biegler, Paul</au><au>Vargas, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising</atitle><jtitle>American journal of bioethics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bioeth</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>3-13</pages><issn>1526-5161</issn><eissn>1536-0075</eissn><abstract>The risk that direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals (DTCA) may increase inappropriate medicine use is well recognized. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration addresses this concern by subjecting DTCA content to strict scrutiny. Its strictures are, however, heavily focused on the explicit claims made in commercials, what we term their "propositional content." Yet research in social psychology suggests advertising employs techniques to influence viewers via nonpropositional content, for example, images and music. We argue that one such technique, evaluative conditioning, is operative in DTCA. We further argue that evaluative conditioning fosters unjustified beliefs about drug safety and efficacy, antagonising the autonomy of viewers' choices about advertised medicines. We conclude that current guidelines are deficient in failing to account for evaluative conditioning, and that more research and debate are needed to determine the permissibility of this and other forms of nonpropositional persuasion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>23557035</pmid><doi>10.1080/15265161.2013.776127</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-5161 |
ispartof | American journal of bioethics, 2013-05, Vol.13 (5), p.3-13 |
issn | 1526-5161 1536-0075 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364727087 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Advertising Advertising as Topic - ethics Advertising as Topic - methods Advertising as Topic - trends Autonomy Bioethics Choice Behavior Community Participation - methods Community Participation - psychology Community Participation - trends conditioning Conditioning (Psychology) Decision Making Drug Industry - ethics Drug Industry - trends Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ethics Humans knowledge Medicine Paternalism - ethics Personal Autonomy Persuasive Communication pharmaceuticals Prescriptions Regulation Risk Social psychology United States United States Food and Drug Administration |
title | Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A02%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ban%20the%20Sunset?%20Nonpropositional%20Content%20and%20Regulation%20of%20Pharmaceutical%20Advertising&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20bioethics&rft.au=Biegler,%20Paul&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=3-13&rft.issn=1526-5161&rft.eissn=1536-0075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15265161.2013.776127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1500790326%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1324390637&rft_id=info:pmid/23557035&rfr_iscdi=true |