Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising

The risk that direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals (DTCA) may increase inappropriate medicine use is well recognized. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration addresses this concern by subjecting DTCA content to strict scrutiny. Its strictures are, however, heavily focused on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of bioethics 2013-05, Vol.13 (5), p.3-13
Hauptverfasser: Biegler, Paul, Vargas, Patrick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 5
container_start_page 3
container_title American journal of bioethics
container_volume 13
creator Biegler, Paul
Vargas, Patrick
description The risk that direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals (DTCA) may increase inappropriate medicine use is well recognized. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration addresses this concern by subjecting DTCA content to strict scrutiny. Its strictures are, however, heavily focused on the explicit claims made in commercials, what we term their "propositional content." Yet research in social psychology suggests advertising employs techniques to influence viewers via nonpropositional content, for example, images and music. We argue that one such technique, evaluative conditioning, is operative in DTCA. We further argue that evaluative conditioning fosters unjustified beliefs about drug safety and efficacy, antagonising the autonomy of viewers' choices about advertised medicines. We conclude that current guidelines are deficient in failing to account for evaluative conditioning, and that more research and debate are needed to determine the permissibility of this and other forms of nonpropositional persuasion.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/15265161.2013.776127
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364727087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1500790326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9c48a6679224e8157b00ec23814ca4cb22ae99592976d11c869c460fdbea63dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhq2qqAHaf1ChPfayYfy9PkVpxJcUQdWWs-V4vWC0sVPbC-Lfs6tAjy0nj-TnnRnNg9BXDHMMDZxiTgTHAs8JYDqXUmAiP6BDzKmoAST_ONVE1BMzQ0c5PwAAG9lPaEYo5xIoP0S3302oyr2rfg0hu7KormPYpbiL2Rcfg-mrVQzFhVKZ0FY_3d3Qm-mjil31496krbFuKN6O4LJ9dKn47MPdZ3TQmT67L6_vMbo9P_u9uqzXNxdXq-W6toyoUivLGiOEVIQw12AuNwDOEtpgZg2zG0KMU4oroqRoMbaNGBMCunbjjKBtS4_Rt33fceU_g8tFb322ru9NcHHIGvPxEgooEf9HqWCSSGjkO1DCqAJBJ5TtUZtizsl1epf81qRnjUFPmvSbJj1p0ntNY-zkdcKw2br2b-jNywgs9oAPXRyP_BRT3-pinvuYumSC9VnTf454AbV5n80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1324390637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Biegler, Paul ; Vargas, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Biegler, Paul ; Vargas, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>The risk that direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals (DTCA) may increase inappropriate medicine use is well recognized. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration addresses this concern by subjecting DTCA content to strict scrutiny. Its strictures are, however, heavily focused on the explicit claims made in commercials, what we term their "propositional content." Yet research in social psychology suggests advertising employs techniques to influence viewers via nonpropositional content, for example, images and music. We argue that one such technique, evaluative conditioning, is operative in DTCA. We further argue that evaluative conditioning fosters unjustified beliefs about drug safety and efficacy, antagonising the autonomy of viewers' choices about advertised medicines. We conclude that current guidelines are deficient in failing to account for evaluative conditioning, and that more research and debate are needed to determine the permissibility of this and other forms of nonpropositional persuasion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-5161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2013.776127</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23557035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Advertising as Topic - ethics ; Advertising as Topic - methods ; Advertising as Topic - trends ; Autonomy ; Bioethics ; Choice Behavior ; Community Participation - methods ; Community Participation - psychology ; Community Participation - trends ; conditioning ; Conditioning (Psychology) ; Decision Making ; Drug Industry - ethics ; Drug Industry - trends ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; ethics ; Humans ; knowledge ; Medicine ; Paternalism - ethics ; Personal Autonomy ; Persuasive Communication ; pharmaceuticals ; Prescriptions ; Regulation ; Risk ; Social psychology ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><ispartof>American journal of bioethics, 2013-05, Vol.13 (5), p.3-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9c48a6679224e8157b00ec23814ca4cb22ae99592976d11c869c460fdbea63dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9c48a6679224e8157b00ec23814ca4cb22ae99592976d11c869c460fdbea63dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15265161.2013.776127$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15265161.2013.776127$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557035$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biegler, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising</title><title>American journal of bioethics</title><addtitle>Am J Bioeth</addtitle><description>The risk that direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals (DTCA) may increase inappropriate medicine use is well recognized. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration addresses this concern by subjecting DTCA content to strict scrutiny. Its strictures are, however, heavily focused on the explicit claims made in commercials, what we term their "propositional content." Yet research in social psychology suggests advertising employs techniques to influence viewers via nonpropositional content, for example, images and music. We argue that one such technique, evaluative conditioning, is operative in DTCA. We further argue that evaluative conditioning fosters unjustified beliefs about drug safety and efficacy, antagonising the autonomy of viewers' choices about advertised medicines. We conclude that current guidelines are deficient in failing to account for evaluative conditioning, and that more research and debate are needed to determine the permissibility of this and other forms of nonpropositional persuasion.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Advertising as Topic - ethics</subject><subject>Advertising as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Advertising as Topic - trends</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Community Participation - methods</subject><subject>Community Participation - psychology</subject><subject>Community Participation - trends</subject><subject>conditioning</subject><subject>Conditioning (Psychology)</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Drug Industry - ethics</subject><subject>Drug Industry - trends</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</subject><subject>ethics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>knowledge</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Paternalism - ethics</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Persuasive Communication</subject><subject>pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><issn>1526-5161</issn><issn>1536-0075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhq2qqAHaf1ChPfayYfy9PkVpxJcUQdWWs-V4vWC0sVPbC-Lfs6tAjy0nj-TnnRnNg9BXDHMMDZxiTgTHAs8JYDqXUmAiP6BDzKmoAST_ONVE1BMzQ0c5PwAAG9lPaEYo5xIoP0S3302oyr2rfg0hu7KormPYpbiL2Rcfg-mrVQzFhVKZ0FY_3d3Qm-mjil31496krbFuKN6O4LJ9dKn47MPdZ3TQmT67L6_vMbo9P_u9uqzXNxdXq-W6toyoUivLGiOEVIQw12AuNwDOEtpgZg2zG0KMU4oroqRoMbaNGBMCunbjjKBtS4_Rt33fceU_g8tFb322ru9NcHHIGvPxEgooEf9HqWCSSGjkO1DCqAJBJ5TtUZtizsl1epf81qRnjUFPmvSbJj1p0ntNY-zkdcKw2br2b-jNywgs9oAPXRyP_BRT3-pinvuYumSC9VnTf454AbV5n80</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Biegler, Paul</creator><creator>Vargas, Patrick</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising</title><author>Biegler, Paul ; Vargas, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-9c48a6679224e8157b00ec23814ca4cb22ae99592976d11c869c460fdbea63dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Advertising as Topic - ethics</topic><topic>Advertising as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Advertising as Topic - trends</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Community Participation - methods</topic><topic>Community Participation - psychology</topic><topic>Community Participation - trends</topic><topic>conditioning</topic><topic>Conditioning (Psychology)</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Drug Industry - ethics</topic><topic>Drug Industry - trends</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</topic><topic>ethics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>knowledge</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Paternalism - ethics</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Persuasive Communication</topic><topic>pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Food and Drug Administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biegler, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of bioethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biegler, Paul</au><au>Vargas, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising</atitle><jtitle>American journal of bioethics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bioeth</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>3-13</pages><issn>1526-5161</issn><eissn>1536-0075</eissn><abstract>The risk that direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals (DTCA) may increase inappropriate medicine use is well recognized. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration addresses this concern by subjecting DTCA content to strict scrutiny. Its strictures are, however, heavily focused on the explicit claims made in commercials, what we term their "propositional content." Yet research in social psychology suggests advertising employs techniques to influence viewers via nonpropositional content, for example, images and music. We argue that one such technique, evaluative conditioning, is operative in DTCA. We further argue that evaluative conditioning fosters unjustified beliefs about drug safety and efficacy, antagonising the autonomy of viewers' choices about advertised medicines. We conclude that current guidelines are deficient in failing to account for evaluative conditioning, and that more research and debate are needed to determine the permissibility of this and other forms of nonpropositional persuasion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><pmid>23557035</pmid><doi>10.1080/15265161.2013.776127</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-5161
ispartof American journal of bioethics, 2013-05, Vol.13 (5), p.3-13
issn 1526-5161
1536-0075
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364727087
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Advertising
Advertising as Topic - ethics
Advertising as Topic - methods
Advertising as Topic - trends
Autonomy
Bioethics
Choice Behavior
Community Participation - methods
Community Participation - psychology
Community Participation - trends
conditioning
Conditioning (Psychology)
Decision Making
Drug Industry - ethics
Drug Industry - trends
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
ethics
Humans
knowledge
Medicine
Paternalism - ethics
Personal Autonomy
Persuasive Communication
pharmaceuticals
Prescriptions
Regulation
Risk
Social psychology
United States
United States Food and Drug Administration
title Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A02%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ban%20the%20Sunset?%20Nonpropositional%20Content%20and%20Regulation%20of%20Pharmaceutical%20Advertising&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20bioethics&rft.au=Biegler,%20Paul&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=3-13&rft.issn=1526-5161&rft.eissn=1536-0075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15265161.2013.776127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1500790326%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1324390637&rft_id=info:pmid/23557035&rfr_iscdi=true