Predicting Counterproductive Work Behavior from Guilt Proneness
We investigated the relationship between guilt proneness and counterproductive work behavior (CWB) using a diverse sample of employed adults working in a variety of different industries at various levels in their organizations. CWB refers to behaviors that harm or are intended to harm organizations...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business ethics 2013-04, Vol.114 (1), p.45-53 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 53 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 45 |
| container_title | Journal of business ethics |
| container_volume | 114 |
| creator | Cohen, Taya R. Panter, A. T. Turan, Nazli |
| description | We investigated the relationship between guilt proneness and counterproductive work behavior (CWB) using a diverse sample of employed adults working in a variety of different industries at various levels in their organizations. CWB refers to behaviors that harm or are intended to harm organizations or people in organizations. Guilt proneness is a personality trait characterized by a predisposition to experience negative feelings about personal wrongdoing. CWB was engaged in less frequently by individuals high in guilt proneness compared to those low in guilt proneness, controlling for other known correlates of CWB. CWB was also predicted by gender, age, intention to turnover, interpersonal conflict at work, and negative affect at work. Given the detrimental impact of CWB on people and organizations, it may be wise for employers to consider guilt proneness when making hiring decisions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10551-012-1326-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364722381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23433649</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23433649</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ce2ce9ea02101b091e7bcb2650013d29f050615417c1840c181914488b4f7acc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfwAehIIIv1Xvzp2mfRIdOQXAPio8hy9LZ2TUzaQd-ezM6VHwwDzeQ-zuHk0PIMcIFAsjLgCAEpoA0RUazlO6QAQrJUsgKuUsGgJlMueB8nxyEsIB4BPIBuZp4O6tMWzXzZOS6prV-5d2siy9rm7w6_57c2De9rpxPSu-Wybir6jaZeNfYxoZwSPZKXQd7tL2H5OXu9nl0nz4-jR9G14-p4Yy2qbHU2MJqoAg4hQKtnJopzQQAshktShCQoeAoDeYc4sACOc_zKS-lNoYNyXnvG9N9dDa0alkFY-taN9Z1QSHLuKSU5RjR0z_ownW-iekiJbIsFxxkpLCnjHcheFuqla-W2n8qBLWpVPWVqlip2lSqaNScbZ11MLouvW5MFb6FVDKZF3KTgPZciKtmbv2vBP-Yn_SiRWid_zFlnMW_FewLZt-Nag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1356685407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Counterproductive Work Behavior from Guilt Proneness</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Cohen, Taya R. ; Panter, A. T. ; Turan, Nazli</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Taya R. ; Panter, A. T. ; Turan, Nazli</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the relationship between guilt proneness and counterproductive work behavior (CWB) using a diverse sample of employed adults working in a variety of different industries at various levels in their organizations. CWB refers to behaviors that harm or are intended to harm organizations or people in organizations. Guilt proneness is a personality trait characterized by a predisposition to experience negative feelings about personal wrongdoing. CWB was engaged in less frequently by individuals high in guilt proneness compared to those low in guilt proneness, controlling for other known correlates of CWB. CWB was also predicted by gender, age, intention to turnover, interpersonal conflict at work, and negative affect at work. Given the detrimental impact of CWB on people and organizations, it may be wise for employers to consider guilt proneness when making hiring decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1326-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBUEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Decision making ; Education ; Emotions ; Employees ; Employment ; Ethical behavior ; Ethics ; Ethics and moral life ; Factor analysis ; Guilt ; Job satisfaction ; Management ; Morality ; Organizational behaviour ; Personality ; Personality psychology ; Personality traits ; Philosophy ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life Research ; Regression analysis ; Self reports ; Sociology ; Sociology of knowledge and ethics ; Sociology of knowledge and sociology of culture ; Sociology of work ; Sociology of work and sociology of organizations ; Studies ; Work organization. Working relations</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2013-04, Vol.114 (1), p.45-53</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ce2ce9ea02101b091e7bcb2650013d29f050615417c1840c181914488b4f7acc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ce2ce9ea02101b091e7bcb2650013d29f050615417c1840c181914488b4f7acc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23433649$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23433649$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,799,23909,23910,25118,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27378971$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Taya R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panter, A. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turan, Nazli</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Counterproductive Work Behavior from Guilt Proneness</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>We investigated the relationship between guilt proneness and counterproductive work behavior (CWB) using a diverse sample of employed adults working in a variety of different industries at various levels in their organizations. CWB refers to behaviors that harm or are intended to harm organizations or people in organizations. Guilt proneness is a personality trait characterized by a predisposition to experience negative feelings about personal wrongdoing. CWB was engaged in less frequently by individuals high in guilt proneness compared to those low in guilt proneness, controlling for other known correlates of CWB. CWB was also predicted by gender, age, intention to turnover, interpersonal conflict at work, and negative affect at work. Given the detrimental impact of CWB on people and organizations, it may be wise for employers to consider guilt proneness when making hiring decisions.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Ethical behavior</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics and moral life</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Guilt</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Organizational behaviour</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality psychology</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Self reports</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of knowledge and ethics</subject><subject>Sociology of knowledge and sociology of culture</subject><subject>Sociology of work</subject><subject>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Work organization. Working relations</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfwAehIIIv1Xvzp2mfRIdOQXAPio8hy9LZ2TUzaQd-ezM6VHwwDzeQ-zuHk0PIMcIFAsjLgCAEpoA0RUazlO6QAQrJUsgKuUsGgJlMueB8nxyEsIB4BPIBuZp4O6tMWzXzZOS6prV-5d2siy9rm7w6_57c2De9rpxPSu-Wybir6jaZeNfYxoZwSPZKXQd7tL2H5OXu9nl0nz4-jR9G14-p4Yy2qbHU2MJqoAg4hQKtnJopzQQAshktShCQoeAoDeYc4sACOc_zKS-lNoYNyXnvG9N9dDa0alkFY-taN9Z1QSHLuKSU5RjR0z_ownW-iekiJbIsFxxkpLCnjHcheFuqla-W2n8qBLWpVPWVqlip2lSqaNScbZ11MLouvW5MFb6FVDKZF3KTgPZciKtmbv2vBP-Yn_SiRWid_zFlnMW_FewLZt-Nag</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Cohen, Taya R.</creator><creator>Panter, A. T.</creator><creator>Turan, Nazli</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Predicting Counterproductive Work Behavior from Guilt Proneness</title><author>Cohen, Taya R. ; Panter, A. T. ; Turan, Nazli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ce2ce9ea02101b091e7bcb2650013d29f050615417c1840c181914488b4f7acc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Ethical behavior</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics and moral life</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Guilt</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Organizational behaviour</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality psychology</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Self reports</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of knowledge and ethics</topic><topic>Sociology of knowledge and sociology of culture</topic><topic>Sociology of work</topic><topic>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Work organization. Working relations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Taya R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panter, A. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turan, Nazli</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Taya R.</au><au>Panter, A. T.</au><au>Turan, Nazli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Counterproductive Work Behavior from Guilt Proneness</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>45-53</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><coden>JBUEDJ</coden><abstract>We investigated the relationship between guilt proneness and counterproductive work behavior (CWB) using a diverse sample of employed adults working in a variety of different industries at various levels in their organizations. CWB refers to behaviors that harm or are intended to harm organizations or people in organizations. Guilt proneness is a personality trait characterized by a predisposition to experience negative feelings about personal wrongdoing. CWB was engaged in less frequently by individuals high in guilt proneness compared to those low in guilt proneness, controlling for other known correlates of CWB. CWB was also predicted by gender, age, intention to turnover, interpersonal conflict at work, and negative affect at work. Given the detrimental impact of CWB on people and organizations, it may be wise for employers to consider guilt proneness when making hiring decisions.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-012-1326-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-4544 |
| ispartof | Journal of business ethics, 2013-04, Vol.114 (1), p.45-53 |
| issn | 0167-4544 1573-0697 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364722381 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Behavior Business and Management Business Ethics Decision making Education Emotions Employees Employment Ethical behavior Ethics Ethics and moral life Factor analysis Guilt Job satisfaction Management Morality Organizational behaviour Personality Personality psychology Personality traits Philosophy Psychometrics Quality of Life Research Regression analysis Self reports Sociology Sociology of knowledge and ethics Sociology of knowledge and sociology of culture Sociology of work Sociology of work and sociology of organizations Studies Work organization. Working relations |
| title | Predicting Counterproductive Work Behavior from Guilt Proneness |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A15%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Counterproductive%20Work%20Behavior%20from%20Guilt%20Proneness&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Cohen,%20Taya%20R.&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=45-53&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft.coden=JBUEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-012-1326-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23433649%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1356685407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23433649&rfr_iscdi=true |