Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autografts Compared With Non-irradiated, Non-chemically Treated Allografts

Purpose Allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction obviates donor site morbidity and may accelerate postoperative recovery. However, allograft use can lead to increased rates of surgical failure, particularly when chemical processing or irradiation is used. Few studies have rigorously...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2013-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1113-1122
Hauptverfasser: Lamblin, Cory J., M.D, Waterman, Brian R., M.D, Lubowitz, James H., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1122
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1113
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 29
creator Lamblin, Cory J., M.D
Waterman, Brian R., M.D
Lubowitz, James H., M.D
description Purpose Allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction obviates donor site morbidity and may accelerate postoperative recovery. However, allograft use can lead to increased rates of surgical failure, particularly when chemical processing or irradiation is used. Few studies have rigorously evaluated the comparative outcomes of autografts and fresh-frozen allograft tissue for ACL reconstruction. Methods We performed a PubMed search to identify and systematically evaluate outcomes of autograft and non–chemically treated non-irradiated allograft tissue in ACL reconstruction between 1980 and 2012. We included studies with Level of evidence of I to III, determinate graft treatment, a minimum of 25 patients per treatment arm, a minimum 2-year follow-up, and selected subjective and objective outcome measures. Results After the exclusion of 585 citations, we isolated 11 studies for further review. All patients showed improvement in clinical outcome measures and knee stability end points from injury to definitive surgical management. No statistically significant differences were detected between autografts and non-chemically processed non-irradiated allografts in Lysholm scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Lachman examinations, pivot-shift testing, KT-1000 measurements, or failure rates. Conclusions Further large-scale, well-designed studies are required to better evaluate the comparative outcomes after fresh-frozen allograft ACL reconstruction. The current study suggests that the results after autograft ACL reconstruction are comparable to those using non-chemically processed nonirradiated allograft tissue. Level of Evidence Systematic review of Level I to III studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364707505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0749806313000583</els_id><sourcerecordid>1364707505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-99d8ca0f99d475bb3bbb7600857a68ed98488da14961267f42802e74e5a07c4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-P0zAQxSMEYrsL3wChHDmQMP6T2LkgVdXCIlUgwSKOlmNPti5JXGwHqd-ehBQOXDiNPH5vRvN7WfaCQEmA1G-OpQ7pEHxJgbASSAmUPso2pKJ1wSgjj7MNCN4UEmp2lV3HeAQAxiR7ml1RVlHaSLnJztsxYXA-5LswGacT5nv3oAccU_4ZjR9jmvvJ-TH_5tIh307JPwTdpZjv_HDSAe368dGPhQtB22WGff37bQ44OKP7_pzfB1z6-bbvL_5n2ZNO9xGfX-pN9vXd7f3urth_ev9ht90XhhORiqax0mjo5spF1basbVtRA8hK6FqibSSX0mrCm5rQWnScSqAoOFYahOGW3WSv1rmn4H9MGJMaXDTY93pEP0VFWM0FiAqqWcpXqQk-xoCdOgU36HBWBNQCXR3VCl0t0BUQNUOfbS8vG6Z2QPvX9IfyLHi7CnC-86fDoKJxOBq0LqBJynr3vw3_DjC9Gxe03_GM8einMM4MFVGRKlBfluCX3AmbM68kY78AzXerCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1364707505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autografts Compared With Non-irradiated, Non-chemically Treated Allografts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lamblin, Cory J., M.D ; Waterman, Brian R., M.D ; Lubowitz, James H., M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Lamblin, Cory J., M.D ; Waterman, Brian R., M.D ; Lubowitz, James H., M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction obviates donor site morbidity and may accelerate postoperative recovery. However, allograft use can lead to increased rates of surgical failure, particularly when chemical processing or irradiation is used. Few studies have rigorously evaluated the comparative outcomes of autografts and fresh-frozen allograft tissue for ACL reconstruction. Methods We performed a PubMed search to identify and systematically evaluate outcomes of autograft and non–chemically treated non-irradiated allograft tissue in ACL reconstruction between 1980 and 2012. We included studies with Level of evidence of I to III, determinate graft treatment, a minimum of 25 patients per treatment arm, a minimum 2-year follow-up, and selected subjective and objective outcome measures. Results After the exclusion of 585 citations, we isolated 11 studies for further review. All patients showed improvement in clinical outcome measures and knee stability end points from injury to definitive surgical management. No statistically significant differences were detected between autografts and non-chemically processed non-irradiated allografts in Lysholm scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Lachman examinations, pivot-shift testing, KT-1000 measurements, or failure rates. Conclusions Further large-scale, well-designed studies are required to better evaluate the comparative outcomes after fresh-frozen allograft ACL reconstruction. The current study suggests that the results after autograft ACL reconstruction are comparable to those using non-chemically processed nonirradiated allograft tissue. Level of Evidence Systematic review of Level I to III studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23522988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Allografts - drug effects ; Allografts - radiation effects ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods ; Humans ; Joint Instability - diagnosis ; Knee Joint ; Orthopedics ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2013-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1113-1122</ispartof><rights>Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-99d8ca0f99d475bb3bbb7600857a68ed98488da14961267f42802e74e5a07c4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-99d8ca0f99d475bb3bbb7600857a68ed98488da14961267f42802e74e5a07c4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23522988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lamblin, Cory J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterman, Brian R., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubowitz, James H., M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autografts Compared With Non-irradiated, Non-chemically Treated Allografts</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>Purpose Allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction obviates donor site morbidity and may accelerate postoperative recovery. However, allograft use can lead to increased rates of surgical failure, particularly when chemical processing or irradiation is used. Few studies have rigorously evaluated the comparative outcomes of autografts and fresh-frozen allograft tissue for ACL reconstruction. Methods We performed a PubMed search to identify and systematically evaluate outcomes of autograft and non–chemically treated non-irradiated allograft tissue in ACL reconstruction between 1980 and 2012. We included studies with Level of evidence of I to III, determinate graft treatment, a minimum of 25 patients per treatment arm, a minimum 2-year follow-up, and selected subjective and objective outcome measures. Results After the exclusion of 585 citations, we isolated 11 studies for further review. All patients showed improvement in clinical outcome measures and knee stability end points from injury to definitive surgical management. No statistically significant differences were detected between autografts and non-chemically processed non-irradiated allografts in Lysholm scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Lachman examinations, pivot-shift testing, KT-1000 measurements, or failure rates. Conclusions Further large-scale, well-designed studies are required to better evaluate the comparative outcomes after fresh-frozen allograft ACL reconstruction. The current study suggests that the results after autograft ACL reconstruction are comparable to those using non-chemically processed nonirradiated allograft tissue. Level of Evidence Systematic review of Level I to III studies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Allografts - drug effects</subject><subject>Allografts - radiation effects</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - diagnosis</subject><subject>Knee Joint</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-P0zAQxSMEYrsL3wChHDmQMP6T2LkgVdXCIlUgwSKOlmNPti5JXGwHqd-ehBQOXDiNPH5vRvN7WfaCQEmA1G-OpQ7pEHxJgbASSAmUPso2pKJ1wSgjj7MNCN4UEmp2lV3HeAQAxiR7ml1RVlHaSLnJztsxYXA-5LswGacT5nv3oAccU_4ZjR9jmvvJ-TH_5tIh307JPwTdpZjv_HDSAe368dGPhQtB22WGff37bQ44OKP7_pzfB1z6-bbvL_5n2ZNO9xGfX-pN9vXd7f3urth_ev9ht90XhhORiqax0mjo5spF1basbVtRA8hK6FqibSSX0mrCm5rQWnScSqAoOFYahOGW3WSv1rmn4H9MGJMaXDTY93pEP0VFWM0FiAqqWcpXqQk-xoCdOgU36HBWBNQCXR3VCl0t0BUQNUOfbS8vG6Z2QPvX9IfyLHi7CnC-86fDoKJxOBq0LqBJynr3vw3_DjC9Gxe03_GM8einMM4MFVGRKlBfluCX3AmbM68kY78AzXerCw</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Lamblin, Cory J., M.D</creator><creator>Waterman, Brian R., M.D</creator><creator>Lubowitz, James H., M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autografts Compared With Non-irradiated, Non-chemically Treated Allografts</title><author>Lamblin, Cory J., M.D ; Waterman, Brian R., M.D ; Lubowitz, James H., M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-99d8ca0f99d475bb3bbb7600857a68ed98488da14961267f42802e74e5a07c4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Allografts - drug effects</topic><topic>Allografts - radiation effects</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - diagnosis</topic><topic>Knee Joint</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lamblin, Cory J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterman, Brian R., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubowitz, James H., M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lamblin, Cory J., M.D</au><au>Waterman, Brian R., M.D</au><au>Lubowitz, James H., M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autografts Compared With Non-irradiated, Non-chemically Treated Allografts</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1113</spage><epage>1122</epage><pages>1113-1122</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>Purpose Allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction obviates donor site morbidity and may accelerate postoperative recovery. However, allograft use can lead to increased rates of surgical failure, particularly when chemical processing or irradiation is used. Few studies have rigorously evaluated the comparative outcomes of autografts and fresh-frozen allograft tissue for ACL reconstruction. Methods We performed a PubMed search to identify and systematically evaluate outcomes of autograft and non–chemically treated non-irradiated allograft tissue in ACL reconstruction between 1980 and 2012. We included studies with Level of evidence of I to III, determinate graft treatment, a minimum of 25 patients per treatment arm, a minimum 2-year follow-up, and selected subjective and objective outcome measures. Results After the exclusion of 585 citations, we isolated 11 studies for further review. All patients showed improvement in clinical outcome measures and knee stability end points from injury to definitive surgical management. No statistically significant differences were detected between autografts and non-chemically processed non-irradiated allografts in Lysholm scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Lachman examinations, pivot-shift testing, KT-1000 measurements, or failure rates. Conclusions Further large-scale, well-designed studies are required to better evaluate the comparative outcomes after fresh-frozen allograft ACL reconstruction. The current study suggests that the results after autograft ACL reconstruction are comparable to those using non-chemically processed nonirradiated allograft tissue. Level of Evidence Systematic review of Level I to III studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23522988</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.022</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2013-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1113-1122
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364707505
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adolescent
Allografts - drug effects
Allografts - radiation effects
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods
Humans
Joint Instability - diagnosis
Knee Joint
Orthopedics
Transplantation, Homologous
Treatment Outcome
title Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autografts Compared With Non-irradiated, Non-chemically Treated Allografts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T06%3A27%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anterior%20Cruciate%20Ligament%20Reconstruction%20With%20Autografts%20Compared%20With%20Non-irradiated,%20Non-chemically%20Treated%20Allografts&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Lamblin,%20Cory%20J.,%20M.D&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1113&rft.epage=1122&rft.pages=1113-1122&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1364707505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1364707505&rft_id=info:pmid/23522988&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0749806313000583&rfr_iscdi=true