The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond
This article explores the two different kinds of uncertainty, ‘hard’ uncertainty (unknown unknowns) and ‘soft’ uncertainty (known unknowns), in the context of environmental law decision making. First, it is argued that these different categories should not be treated the same when facing decisions u...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Review of European Community & international environmental law 2013-04, Vol.22 (1), p.68-77 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 77 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 68 |
container_title | Review of European Community & international environmental law |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Cassuto, David N. Sampaio, Rômulo S.R. |
description | This article explores the two different kinds of uncertainty, ‘hard’ uncertainty (unknown unknowns) and ‘soft’ uncertainty (known unknowns), in the context of environmental law decision making. First, it is argued that these different categories should not be treated the same when facing decisions under uncertainty. To deal with these different uncertainties, a tiered risk analysis process is called for, wherein participatory techniques are used both to turn hard uncertainty into (more manageable) soft uncertainty as well as to increase the legitimacy of environmental decision making, even in cases of hard uncertainty. This methodology can and should apply to all instances of domestic, transnational and international environmental law making. This article applies this conceptual platform to analyze how participatory techniques can be factored in to manage uncertainty by reference to two domestic systems – American and Brazilian environmental law – as well as to international (environmental) law. The article concludes that managing uncertainty in the environmental decision‐making process is a procedural justice tool to promote more balanced and equitable outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/reel.12019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364697085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1364697085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3659-9c306a06ce664217a39c58c96d8375e64078ce5f7e77a0d606e9f21febf3bd3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtP3DAUhaOqlYqATX-BpW5YEHodJ34sYTSFkUYwakFdWsa5UQ2JPXU8HYZfX4epWLDibu5D3znS1SmKLxTOaK5vEbE_oxVQ9aE4qKCBEpiqP77Okn8ujsfxAQAoMEFlfVBsb38jWQzrEJPxFknoyMJ3IQ4mueCJ8S1ZmZicdev9ZRWdz0uPI3GezP1fF4Mf0CfTk6XZTseLaJ5df0pStr7zLmFLfiaTsmKyu8Bd8O1R8akz_YjH__thcfd9fju7Kpc3l4vZ-bJ0jDeqVJYBN8Atcl5XVBimbCOt4q1kokFeg5AWm06gEAZaDhxVV9EO7zt23zLLDouTve86hj8bHJMe3Gix743HsBk1ZbzmSoBs3oFWsqlAqTqjX9-gD2ETfX5koiqoRSVYpuie2roed3od3WDiTlPQU1x6iku_xKV_zOfLlylryr3GjQmfXjUmPmou8sv61_Wlnl2t6LVkUjP2DwzqmHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1322047273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Cassuto, David N. ; Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cassuto, David N. ; Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the two different kinds of uncertainty, ‘hard’ uncertainty (unknown unknowns) and ‘soft’ uncertainty (known unknowns), in the context of environmental law decision making. First, it is argued that these different categories should not be treated the same when facing decisions under uncertainty. To deal with these different uncertainties, a tiered risk analysis process is called for, wherein participatory techniques are used both to turn hard uncertainty into (more manageable) soft uncertainty as well as to increase the legitimacy of environmental decision making, even in cases of hard uncertainty. This methodology can and should apply to all instances of domestic, transnational and international environmental law making. This article applies this conceptual platform to analyze how participatory techniques can be factored in to manage uncertainty by reference to two domestic systems – American and Brazilian environmental law – as well as to international (environmental) law. The article concludes that managing uncertainty in the environmental decision‐making process is a procedural justice tool to promote more balanced and equitable outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-0386</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-0394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9388</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/reel.12019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Brazil ; Decision Making ; Environmental Law ; International law ; Justice ; Legitimacy ; Participation ; Risk ; Studies ; Transnationalism ; Uncertainty ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Review of European Community & international environmental law, 2013-04, Vol.22 (1), p.68-77</ispartof><rights>2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Freel.12019$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Freel.12019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cassuto, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond</title><title>Review of European Community & international environmental law</title><addtitle>Rev Euro Comp & Int Env Law</addtitle><description>This article explores the two different kinds of uncertainty, ‘hard’ uncertainty (unknown unknowns) and ‘soft’ uncertainty (known unknowns), in the context of environmental law decision making. First, it is argued that these different categories should not be treated the same when facing decisions under uncertainty. To deal with these different uncertainties, a tiered risk analysis process is called for, wherein participatory techniques are used both to turn hard uncertainty into (more manageable) soft uncertainty as well as to increase the legitimacy of environmental decision making, even in cases of hard uncertainty. This methodology can and should apply to all instances of domestic, transnational and international environmental law making. This article applies this conceptual platform to analyze how participatory techniques can be factored in to manage uncertainty by reference to two domestic systems – American and Brazilian environmental law – as well as to international (environmental) law. The article concludes that managing uncertainty in the environmental decision‐making process is a procedural justice tool to promote more balanced and equitable outcomes.</description><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Environmental Law</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>2050-0386</issn><issn>0962-8797</issn><issn>2050-0394</issn><issn>1467-9388</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtP3DAUhaOqlYqATX-BpW5YEHodJ34sYTSFkUYwakFdWsa5UQ2JPXU8HYZfX4epWLDibu5D3znS1SmKLxTOaK5vEbE_oxVQ9aE4qKCBEpiqP77Okn8ujsfxAQAoMEFlfVBsb38jWQzrEJPxFknoyMJ3IQ4mueCJ8S1ZmZicdev9ZRWdz0uPI3GezP1fF4Mf0CfTk6XZTseLaJ5df0pStr7zLmFLfiaTsmKyu8Bd8O1R8akz_YjH__thcfd9fju7Kpc3l4vZ-bJ0jDeqVJYBN8Atcl5XVBimbCOt4q1kokFeg5AWm06gEAZaDhxVV9EO7zt23zLLDouTve86hj8bHJMe3Gix743HsBk1ZbzmSoBs3oFWsqlAqTqjX9-gD2ETfX5koiqoRSVYpuie2roed3od3WDiTlPQU1x6iku_xKV_zOfLlylryr3GjQmfXjUmPmou8sv61_Wlnl2t6LVkUjP2DwzqmHg</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Cassuto, David N.</creator><creator>Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond</title><author>Cassuto, David N. ; Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3659-9c306a06ce664217a39c58c96d8375e64078ce5f7e77a0d606e9f21febf3bd3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Environmental Law</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cassuto, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Review of European Community & international environmental law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cassuto, David N.</au><au>Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond</atitle><jtitle>Review of European Community & international environmental law</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Euro Comp & Int Env Law</addtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>68</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>68-77</pages><issn>2050-0386</issn><issn>0962-8797</issn><eissn>2050-0394</eissn><eissn>1467-9388</eissn><abstract>This article explores the two different kinds of uncertainty, ‘hard’ uncertainty (unknown unknowns) and ‘soft’ uncertainty (known unknowns), in the context of environmental law decision making. First, it is argued that these different categories should not be treated the same when facing decisions under uncertainty. To deal with these different uncertainties, a tiered risk analysis process is called for, wherein participatory techniques are used both to turn hard uncertainty into (more manageable) soft uncertainty as well as to increase the legitimacy of environmental decision making, even in cases of hard uncertainty. This methodology can and should apply to all instances of domestic, transnational and international environmental law making. This article applies this conceptual platform to analyze how participatory techniques can be factored in to manage uncertainty by reference to two domestic systems – American and Brazilian environmental law – as well as to international (environmental) law. The article concludes that managing uncertainty in the environmental decision‐making process is a procedural justice tool to promote more balanced and equitable outcomes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/reel.12019</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2050-0386 |
ispartof | Review of European Community & international environmental law, 2013-04, Vol.22 (1), p.68-77 |
issn | 2050-0386 0962-8797 2050-0394 1467-9388 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364697085 |
source | Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Brazil Decision Making Environmental Law International law Justice Legitimacy Participation Risk Studies Transnationalism Uncertainty United States of America |
title | The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T00%3A58%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Importance%20of%20Information%20and%20Participation%20Principles%20in%20Environmental%20Law%20in%20Brazil,%20the%20United%20States%20and%20Beyond&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20European%20Community%20&%20international%20environmental%20law&rft.au=Cassuto,%20David%20N.&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=68-77&rft.issn=2050-0386&rft.eissn=2050-0394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/reel.12019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1364697085%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1322047273&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |