The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond

This article explores the two different kinds of uncertainty, ‘hard’ uncertainty (unknown unknowns) and ‘soft’ uncertainty (known unknowns), in the context of environmental law decision making. First, it is argued that these different categories should not be treated the same when facing decisions u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of European Community & international environmental law 2013-04, Vol.22 (1), p.68-77
Hauptverfasser: Cassuto, David N., Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 77
container_issue 1
container_start_page 68
container_title Review of European Community & international environmental law
container_volume 22
creator Cassuto, David N.
Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.
description This article explores the two different kinds of uncertainty, ‘hard’ uncertainty (unknown unknowns) and ‘soft’ uncertainty (known unknowns), in the context of environmental law decision making. First, it is argued that these different categories should not be treated the same when facing decisions under uncertainty. To deal with these different uncertainties, a tiered risk analysis process is called for, wherein participatory techniques are used both to turn hard uncertainty into (more manageable) soft uncertainty as well as to increase the legitimacy of environmental decision making, even in cases of hard uncertainty. This methodology can and should apply to all instances of domestic, transnational and international environmental law making. This article applies this conceptual platform to analyze how participatory techniques can be factored in to manage uncertainty by reference to two domestic systems – American and Brazilian environmental law – as well as to international (environmental) law. The article concludes that managing uncertainty in the environmental decision‐making process is a procedural justice tool to promote more balanced and equitable outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/reel.12019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364697085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1364697085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3659-9c306a06ce664217a39c58c96d8375e64078ce5f7e77a0d606e9f21febf3bd3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtP3DAUhaOqlYqATX-BpW5YEHodJ34sYTSFkUYwakFdWsa5UQ2JPXU8HYZfX4epWLDibu5D3znS1SmKLxTOaK5vEbE_oxVQ9aE4qKCBEpiqP77Okn8ujsfxAQAoMEFlfVBsb38jWQzrEJPxFknoyMJ3IQ4mueCJ8S1ZmZicdev9ZRWdz0uPI3GezP1fF4Mf0CfTk6XZTseLaJ5df0pStr7zLmFLfiaTsmKyu8Bd8O1R8akz_YjH__thcfd9fju7Kpc3l4vZ-bJ0jDeqVJYBN8Atcl5XVBimbCOt4q1kokFeg5AWm06gEAZaDhxVV9EO7zt23zLLDouTve86hj8bHJMe3Gix743HsBk1ZbzmSoBs3oFWsqlAqTqjX9-gD2ETfX5koiqoRSVYpuie2roed3od3WDiTlPQU1x6iku_xKV_zOfLlylryr3GjQmfXjUmPmou8sv61_Wlnl2t6LVkUjP2DwzqmHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1322047273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Cassuto, David N. ; Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cassuto, David N. ; Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the two different kinds of uncertainty, ‘hard’ uncertainty (unknown unknowns) and ‘soft’ uncertainty (known unknowns), in the context of environmental law decision making. First, it is argued that these different categories should not be treated the same when facing decisions under uncertainty. To deal with these different uncertainties, a tiered risk analysis process is called for, wherein participatory techniques are used both to turn hard uncertainty into (more manageable) soft uncertainty as well as to increase the legitimacy of environmental decision making, even in cases of hard uncertainty. This methodology can and should apply to all instances of domestic, transnational and international environmental law making. This article applies this conceptual platform to analyze how participatory techniques can be factored in to manage uncertainty by reference to two domestic systems – American and Brazilian environmental law – as well as to international (environmental) law. The article concludes that managing uncertainty in the environmental decision‐making process is a procedural justice tool to promote more balanced and equitable outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-0386</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-0394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9388</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/reel.12019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Brazil ; Decision Making ; Environmental Law ; International law ; Justice ; Legitimacy ; Participation ; Risk ; Studies ; Transnationalism ; Uncertainty ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Review of European Community &amp; international environmental law, 2013-04, Vol.22 (1), p.68-77</ispartof><rights>2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Freel.12019$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Freel.12019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cassuto, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond</title><title>Review of European Community &amp; international environmental law</title><addtitle>Rev Euro Comp &amp; Int Env Law</addtitle><description>This article explores the two different kinds of uncertainty, ‘hard’ uncertainty (unknown unknowns) and ‘soft’ uncertainty (known unknowns), in the context of environmental law decision making. First, it is argued that these different categories should not be treated the same when facing decisions under uncertainty. To deal with these different uncertainties, a tiered risk analysis process is called for, wherein participatory techniques are used both to turn hard uncertainty into (more manageable) soft uncertainty as well as to increase the legitimacy of environmental decision making, even in cases of hard uncertainty. This methodology can and should apply to all instances of domestic, transnational and international environmental law making. This article applies this conceptual platform to analyze how participatory techniques can be factored in to manage uncertainty by reference to two domestic systems – American and Brazilian environmental law – as well as to international (environmental) law. The article concludes that managing uncertainty in the environmental decision‐making process is a procedural justice tool to promote more balanced and equitable outcomes.</description><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Environmental Law</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>2050-0386</issn><issn>0962-8797</issn><issn>2050-0394</issn><issn>1467-9388</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtP3DAUhaOqlYqATX-BpW5YEHodJ34sYTSFkUYwakFdWsa5UQ2JPXU8HYZfX4epWLDibu5D3znS1SmKLxTOaK5vEbE_oxVQ9aE4qKCBEpiqP77Okn8ujsfxAQAoMEFlfVBsb38jWQzrEJPxFknoyMJ3IQ4mueCJ8S1ZmZicdev9ZRWdz0uPI3GezP1fF4Mf0CfTk6XZTseLaJ5df0pStr7zLmFLfiaTsmKyu8Bd8O1R8akz_YjH__thcfd9fju7Kpc3l4vZ-bJ0jDeqVJYBN8Atcl5XVBimbCOt4q1kokFeg5AWm06gEAZaDhxVV9EO7zt23zLLDouTve86hj8bHJMe3Gix743HsBk1ZbzmSoBs3oFWsqlAqTqjX9-gD2ETfX5koiqoRSVYpuie2roed3od3WDiTlPQU1x6iku_xKV_zOfLlylryr3GjQmfXjUmPmou8sv61_Wlnl2t6LVkUjP2DwzqmHg</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Cassuto, David N.</creator><creator>Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond</title><author>Cassuto, David N. ; Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3659-9c306a06ce664217a39c58c96d8375e64078ce5f7e77a0d606e9f21febf3bd3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Environmental Law</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cassuto, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Review of European Community &amp; international environmental law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cassuto, David N.</au><au>Sampaio, Rômulo S.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond</atitle><jtitle>Review of European Community &amp; international environmental law</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Euro Comp &amp; Int Env Law</addtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>68</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>68-77</pages><issn>2050-0386</issn><issn>0962-8797</issn><eissn>2050-0394</eissn><eissn>1467-9388</eissn><abstract>This article explores the two different kinds of uncertainty, ‘hard’ uncertainty (unknown unknowns) and ‘soft’ uncertainty (known unknowns), in the context of environmental law decision making. First, it is argued that these different categories should not be treated the same when facing decisions under uncertainty. To deal with these different uncertainties, a tiered risk analysis process is called for, wherein participatory techniques are used both to turn hard uncertainty into (more manageable) soft uncertainty as well as to increase the legitimacy of environmental decision making, even in cases of hard uncertainty. This methodology can and should apply to all instances of domestic, transnational and international environmental law making. This article applies this conceptual platform to analyze how participatory techniques can be factored in to manage uncertainty by reference to two domestic systems – American and Brazilian environmental law – as well as to international (environmental) law. The article concludes that managing uncertainty in the environmental decision‐making process is a procedural justice tool to promote more balanced and equitable outcomes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/reel.12019</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2050-0386
ispartof Review of European Community & international environmental law, 2013-04, Vol.22 (1), p.68-77
issn 2050-0386
0962-8797
2050-0394
1467-9388
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1364697085
source Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete
subjects Brazil
Decision Making
Environmental Law
International law
Justice
Legitimacy
Participation
Risk
Studies
Transnationalism
Uncertainty
United States of America
title The Importance of Information and Participation Principles in Environmental Law in Brazil, the United States and Beyond
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T00%3A58%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Importance%20of%20Information%20and%20Participation%20Principles%20in%20Environmental%20Law%20in%20Brazil,%20the%20United%20States%20and%20Beyond&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20European%20Community%20&%20international%20environmental%20law&rft.au=Cassuto,%20David%20N.&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=68-77&rft.issn=2050-0386&rft.eissn=2050-0394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/reel.12019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1364697085%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1322047273&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true