Selective predation by the backswimmer, Notonecta [hoffmani, Biological control, mosquitoes]
In laboratory experiments Notonecta hoffmani was size-selective, although prey size alone did not explain its preference between prey species. When Notonecta was fed mosquito larvae, its preference first increased and then decreased with increasing prey size. Its consistent preference for the larger...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Limnology and oceanography 1983-01, Vol.28 (2), p.352-366 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 366 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 352 |
container_title | Limnology and oceanography |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Scott, M.A Murdoch, W.W |
description | In laboratory experiments Notonecta hoffmani was size-selective, although prey size alone did not explain its preference between prey species. When Notonecta was fed mosquito larvae, its preference first increased and then decreased with increasing prey size. Its consistent preference for the larger size class of a given species of zooplankton presumably reflects the fact that all zooplankton were small relative to the predator. Preference was determined mainly by differences in the relative attack rates on the different prey, but in two instances relative success rates of attacks were equally or more important. Although differences in the frequency of encounter influenced attack rates, the main determinant appeared to be the differences in the predator's response to different prey once they were encountered. The results suggest that the behavior underlying Notonecta's preferences is stereotyped and inflexible. The results help explain the effects of Notonecta on field populations of prey. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4319/lo.1983.28.2.0352 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13576890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2835902</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2835902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f224t-24e3baa5e88ef619743e6b5ac46933544cfb0ed8726e977e28b52a8a4a490933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtOwzAURC0EEqXwASAWXrFqguNHYi8B8ZIQLFpWgKKb9KZ1SeJiu6D-PUFlNSOdo1kMIacZS6XIzGXr0sxokXKd8pQJxffIKDPCJEoZtk9GjHGZiKEfkqMQVowxo5QakfcptlhH-4107XEO0bqeVlsal0grqD_Dj-069BP67KLrBxPo29I1TQe9ndBr61q3sDW0tHZ99K6d0M6Fr42NDsPHMTlooA148p9jMru7nd08JE8v9483V09Jw7mMCZcoKgCFWmOTZ6aQAvNKQS1zI4SSsm4qhnNd8BxNUSDXleKgQYI0bDDG5GI3u_bua4Mhlp0NNbYt9Og2ocyEKnJt2CCe78RViM6Xa2878NuS679j-IDPdrgBV8LC21C-TjXPheRc_AJiSGj3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13576890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selective predation by the backswimmer, Notonecta [hoffmani, Biological control, mosquitoes]</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Scott, M.A ; Murdoch, W.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Scott, M.A ; Murdoch, W.W</creatorcontrib><description>In laboratory experiments Notonecta hoffmani was size-selective, although prey size alone did not explain its preference between prey species. When Notonecta was fed mosquito larvae, its preference first increased and then decreased with increasing prey size. Its consistent preference for the larger size class of a given species of zooplankton presumably reflects the fact that all zooplankton were small relative to the predator. Preference was determined mainly by differences in the relative attack rates on the different prey, but in two instances relative success rates of attacks were equally or more important. Although differences in the frequency of encounter influenced attack rates, the main determinant appeared to be the differences in the predator's response to different prey once they were encountered. The results suggest that the behavior underlying Notonecta's preferences is stereotyped and inflexible. The results help explain the effects of Notonecta on field populations of prey.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5590</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4319/lo.1983.28.2.0352</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</publisher><subject>Ecological competition ; Freshwater ; Instars ; Invertebrates ; Larvae ; Mosquitos ; Notonectidae ; Plankton ; Ponds ; Predation ; Predators ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Limnology and oceanography, 1983-01, Vol.28 (2), p.352-366</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1983 American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2835902$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2835902$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scott, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murdoch, W.W</creatorcontrib><title>Selective predation by the backswimmer, Notonecta [hoffmani, Biological control, mosquitoes]</title><title>Limnology and oceanography</title><description>In laboratory experiments Notonecta hoffmani was size-selective, although prey size alone did not explain its preference between prey species. When Notonecta was fed mosquito larvae, its preference first increased and then decreased with increasing prey size. Its consistent preference for the larger size class of a given species of zooplankton presumably reflects the fact that all zooplankton were small relative to the predator. Preference was determined mainly by differences in the relative attack rates on the different prey, but in two instances relative success rates of attacks were equally or more important. Although differences in the frequency of encounter influenced attack rates, the main determinant appeared to be the differences in the predator's response to different prey once they were encountered. The results suggest that the behavior underlying Notonecta's preferences is stereotyped and inflexible. The results help explain the effects of Notonecta on field populations of prey.</description><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Instars</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Mosquitos</subject><subject>Notonectidae</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0024-3590</issn><issn>1939-5590</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMtOwzAURC0EEqXwASAWXrFqguNHYi8B8ZIQLFpWgKKb9KZ1SeJiu6D-PUFlNSOdo1kMIacZS6XIzGXr0sxokXKd8pQJxffIKDPCJEoZtk9GjHGZiKEfkqMQVowxo5QakfcptlhH-4107XEO0bqeVlsal0grqD_Dj-069BP67KLrBxPo29I1TQe9ndBr61q3sDW0tHZ99K6d0M6Fr42NDsPHMTlooA148p9jMru7nd08JE8v9483V09Jw7mMCZcoKgCFWmOTZ6aQAvNKQS1zI4SSsm4qhnNd8BxNUSDXleKgQYI0bDDG5GI3u_bua4Mhlp0NNbYt9Og2ocyEKnJt2CCe78RViM6Xa2878NuS679j-IDPdrgBV8LC21C-TjXPheRc_AJiSGj3</recordid><startdate>19830101</startdate><enddate>19830101</enddate><creator>Scott, M.A</creator><creator>Murdoch, W.W</creator><general>American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19830101</creationdate><title>Selective predation by the backswimmer, Notonecta [hoffmani, Biological control, mosquitoes]</title><author>Scott, M.A ; Murdoch, W.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f224t-24e3baa5e88ef619743e6b5ac46933544cfb0ed8726e977e28b52a8a4a490933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Instars</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Mosquitos</topic><topic>Notonectidae</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scott, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murdoch, W.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scott, M.A</au><au>Murdoch, W.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selective predation by the backswimmer, Notonecta [hoffmani, Biological control, mosquitoes]</atitle><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle><date>1983-01-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>352-366</pages><issn>0024-3590</issn><eissn>1939-5590</eissn><abstract>In laboratory experiments Notonecta hoffmani was size-selective, although prey size alone did not explain its preference between prey species. When Notonecta was fed mosquito larvae, its preference first increased and then decreased with increasing prey size. Its consistent preference for the larger size class of a given species of zooplankton presumably reflects the fact that all zooplankton were small relative to the predator. Preference was determined mainly by differences in the relative attack rates on the different prey, but in two instances relative success rates of attacks were equally or more important. Although differences in the frequency of encounter influenced attack rates, the main determinant appeared to be the differences in the predator's response to different prey once they were encountered. The results suggest that the behavior underlying Notonecta's preferences is stereotyped and inflexible. The results help explain the effects of Notonecta on field populations of prey.</abstract><pub>American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</pub><doi>10.4319/lo.1983.28.2.0352</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0024-3590 |
ispartof | Limnology and oceanography, 1983-01, Vol.28 (2), p.352-366 |
issn | 0024-3590 1939-5590 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13576890 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Ecological competition Freshwater Instars Invertebrates Larvae Mosquitos Notonectidae Plankton Ponds Predation Predators Zooplankton |
title | Selective predation by the backswimmer, Notonecta [hoffmani, Biological control, mosquitoes] |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T04%3A49%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective%20predation%20by%20the%20backswimmer,%20Notonecta%20%5Bhoffmani,%20Biological%20control,%20mosquitoes%5D&rft.jtitle=Limnology%20and%20oceanography&rft.au=Scott,%20M.A&rft.date=1983-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=352-366&rft.issn=0024-3590&rft.eissn=1939-5590&rft_id=info:doi/10.4319/lo.1983.28.2.0352&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2835902%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13576890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2835902&rfr_iscdi=true |