Trends in the surgical management of localized renal masses: thermal ablation, partial and radical nephrectomy in the USA, 1998–2008

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Treatment options for small renal masses include radical nephrectomy (RN), and nephron sparing modalities (NSM) such as partial nephrectomy (PN), and thermal ablation (Cryo‐ and radiofrequency ablation, C/RFA). Prior studies had demonstr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJU international 2013-06, Vol.111 (8), p.1261-1268
Hauptverfasser: Woldrich, Jeffrey M., Palazzi, Kerrin, Stroup, Sean P., Sur, Roger L., Parsons, J. Kellogg, Chang, David, Derweesh, Ithaar H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1268
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1261
container_title BJU international
container_volume 111
creator Woldrich, Jeffrey M.
Palazzi, Kerrin
Stroup, Sean P.
Sur, Roger L.
Parsons, J. Kellogg
Chang, David
Derweesh, Ithaar H.
description What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Treatment options for small renal masses include radical nephrectomy (RN), and nephron sparing modalities (NSM) such as partial nephrectomy (PN), and thermal ablation (Cryo‐ and radiofrequency ablation, C/RFA). Prior studies had demonstrated gross underutilization of PN; however overall treatment trends for C/RFA had not been well studied using a population‐based cohort. In this study, which examined management trends of localized renal masses in the USA, we identified an increased prevalence of RN, PN and C/RFA over the study period, with PN increasing the most rapidly, and with RN continuing to account for the vast majority of procedures. This is the first study to examine surgical management of renal masses in patients with non‐dialysis dependent chronic renal insufficiency. Although nephron sparing modalities were increasingly utilized over the study period, it is particularly concerning that patients with pre‐existing non‐dialysis dependent chronic renal insufficiency are receiving less nephron sparing approaches. Further investigations are required to confirm these findings and to identify impediments to the dissemination of nephron sparing modalities. Objective To evaluate the diffusion of nephron‐sparing modalities (NSM) for the treatment of renal neoplasms in the USA over the last decade and to identify the factors associated with renal procedure selection. Patients and Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was utlized to identify patients undergoing cryo/radiofrequency ablation (C/RFA), radical nephrectomy (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) from 1998 to 2008. Annual trends in procedure prevalence were determined. Multivariate analyses were performed to query the influence of age, race, sex and comorbid disease on surgery selection. Results We identified 443 853 procedures performed during the study period: 25 599 C/RFA, 79 568 PN and 338 687 RN. The prevalence per 100 000 hospital admissions in 1998 was 3.7 for C/RFA, nine for PN and 87.1 for RN. All procedures increased over the study period, by 1.05, 3.1 and 2.2/100 000 admissions per year, respectively (all P < 0.001). Diabetes, urban, teaching and large capacity hospitals were associated with NSM (either C/RFA or PN) compared to RN (all P ≤ 0.011). Age ≥70 years, female, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and region outside the Northeast favoured C/RFA over PN (all P ≤ 0.026). Compared to those without CKD, patients
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11497.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1356954230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3911928931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4287-d7302a1d3a55e8d9f48ae31ef9802202f499cb7bb0152cfd64c13d1498529a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxyNERUvhFZAlhMShu_grsc0BqVRAW1XiwFbiZjn2pPUqcbZ2IrqcOPECvCFPgrMfReKEL56P38zY8y8KRPCc5PNmOSe84jNO8Nc5xYTmKFdifv-oOHpIPN7bWFWHxdOUlhjnQFU-KQ4p4yI7-Kj4uYgQXEI-oOEWUBrjjbemRZ0J5gY6CAPqG9T2Oea_g0OZ3mRTgvR2Kold9k3dmsH34QStTBz8FAmZNW7TK8DqNoId-m69n3P95fQEEaXk7x-_KMbyWXHQmDbB8919XCw-flicnc-uPn-6ODu9mllOpZg5wTA1xDFTliCdarg0wAg0SmJKMW24UrYWdY1JSW3jKm4Jc3k3sqTKSHZcvN62XcX-boQ06M4nC21rAvRj0oSVlSo5ZTijL_9Bl_0Y8-czJUpGFeFMZUpuKRv7lCI0ehV9Z-JaE6wnqfRSTyroSRE9SaU3Uun7XPpiN2CsO3APhXttMvBqB5iU19hEE6xPfznBlBAVydy7LffNt7D-7wfo95fXG5P9AZwhrsI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1753291439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in the surgical management of localized renal masses: thermal ablation, partial and radical nephrectomy in the USA, 1998–2008</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Woldrich, Jeffrey M. ; Palazzi, Kerrin ; Stroup, Sean P. ; Sur, Roger L. ; Parsons, J. Kellogg ; Chang, David ; Derweesh, Ithaar H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Woldrich, Jeffrey M. ; Palazzi, Kerrin ; Stroup, Sean P. ; Sur, Roger L. ; Parsons, J. Kellogg ; Chang, David ; Derweesh, Ithaar H.</creatorcontrib><description>What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Treatment options for small renal masses include radical nephrectomy (RN), and nephron sparing modalities (NSM) such as partial nephrectomy (PN), and thermal ablation (Cryo‐ and radiofrequency ablation, C/RFA). Prior studies had demonstrated gross underutilization of PN; however overall treatment trends for C/RFA had not been well studied using a population‐based cohort. In this study, which examined management trends of localized renal masses in the USA, we identified an increased prevalence of RN, PN and C/RFA over the study period, with PN increasing the most rapidly, and with RN continuing to account for the vast majority of procedures. This is the first study to examine surgical management of renal masses in patients with non‐dialysis dependent chronic renal insufficiency. Although nephron sparing modalities were increasingly utilized over the study period, it is particularly concerning that patients with pre‐existing non‐dialysis dependent chronic renal insufficiency are receiving less nephron sparing approaches. Further investigations are required to confirm these findings and to identify impediments to the dissemination of nephron sparing modalities. Objective To evaluate the diffusion of nephron‐sparing modalities (NSM) for the treatment of renal neoplasms in the USA over the last decade and to identify the factors associated with renal procedure selection. Patients and Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was utlized to identify patients undergoing cryo/radiofrequency ablation (C/RFA), radical nephrectomy (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) from 1998 to 2008. Annual trends in procedure prevalence were determined. Multivariate analyses were performed to query the influence of age, race, sex and comorbid disease on surgery selection. Results We identified 443 853 procedures performed during the study period: 25 599 C/RFA, 79 568 PN and 338 687 RN. The prevalence per 100 000 hospital admissions in 1998 was 3.7 for C/RFA, nine for PN and 87.1 for RN. All procedures increased over the study period, by 1.05, 3.1 and 2.2/100 000 admissions per year, respectively (all P &lt; 0.001). Diabetes, urban, teaching and large capacity hospitals were associated with NSM (either C/RFA or PN) compared to RN (all P ≤ 0.011). Age ≥70 years, female, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and region outside the Northeast favoured C/RFA over PN (all P ≤ 0.026). Compared to those without CKD, patients with CKD had an almost twofold higher probability of undergoing RN than NSM (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.7–2.1). Despite increasing NSM utilization over the study period, most patients with CKD still received RN. Conclusions Although the prevalence of NSM is increasing, RN is more common. The low utilization of NSM in patients with pre‐existing CKD warrants further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11497.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23470140</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJINFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiology ; Catheter Ablation - methods ; Catheter Ablation - utilization ; chronic kidney disease ; Comorbidity - trends ; Confidence intervals ; cryosurgery ; Cryosurgery - methods ; Cryosurgery - utilization ; Diabetes ; Disease Management ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health risk assessment ; Hospitalization - trends ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Kidney Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Kidneys ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; nationwide inpatient sample ; Neoplasm Staging ; nephrectomy ; Nephrectomy - methods ; Nephrectomy - utilization ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; partial nephrectomy ; radical nephrectomy ; radiofrequency ablation ; renal cell carcinoma ; Retrospective Studies ; Sex Factors ; Tumors of the urinary system ; United States - epidemiology ; Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2013-06, Vol.111 (8), p.1261-1268</ispartof><rights>2013 BJU International</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 BJU International.</rights><rights>BJUI © 2013 BJU International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4287-d7302a1d3a55e8d9f48ae31ef9802202f499cb7bb0152cfd64c13d1498529a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4287-d7302a1d3a55e8d9f48ae31ef9802202f499cb7bb0152cfd64c13d1498529a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2012.11497.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2012.11497.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27397761$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23470140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woldrich, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palazzi, Kerrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stroup, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sur, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, J. Kellogg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derweesh, Ithaar H.</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in the surgical management of localized renal masses: thermal ablation, partial and radical nephrectomy in the USA, 1998–2008</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Treatment options for small renal masses include radical nephrectomy (RN), and nephron sparing modalities (NSM) such as partial nephrectomy (PN), and thermal ablation (Cryo‐ and radiofrequency ablation, C/RFA). Prior studies had demonstrated gross underutilization of PN; however overall treatment trends for C/RFA had not been well studied using a population‐based cohort. In this study, which examined management trends of localized renal masses in the USA, we identified an increased prevalence of RN, PN and C/RFA over the study period, with PN increasing the most rapidly, and with RN continuing to account for the vast majority of procedures. This is the first study to examine surgical management of renal masses in patients with non‐dialysis dependent chronic renal insufficiency. Although nephron sparing modalities were increasingly utilized over the study period, it is particularly concerning that patients with pre‐existing non‐dialysis dependent chronic renal insufficiency are receiving less nephron sparing approaches. Further investigations are required to confirm these findings and to identify impediments to the dissemination of nephron sparing modalities. Objective To evaluate the diffusion of nephron‐sparing modalities (NSM) for the treatment of renal neoplasms in the USA over the last decade and to identify the factors associated with renal procedure selection. Patients and Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was utlized to identify patients undergoing cryo/radiofrequency ablation (C/RFA), radical nephrectomy (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) from 1998 to 2008. Annual trends in procedure prevalence were determined. Multivariate analyses were performed to query the influence of age, race, sex and comorbid disease on surgery selection. Results We identified 443 853 procedures performed during the study period: 25 599 C/RFA, 79 568 PN and 338 687 RN. The prevalence per 100 000 hospital admissions in 1998 was 3.7 for C/RFA, nine for PN and 87.1 for RN. All procedures increased over the study period, by 1.05, 3.1 and 2.2/100 000 admissions per year, respectively (all P &lt; 0.001). Diabetes, urban, teaching and large capacity hospitals were associated with NSM (either C/RFA or PN) compared to RN (all P ≤ 0.011). Age ≥70 years, female, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and region outside the Northeast favoured C/RFA over PN (all P ≤ 0.026). Compared to those without CKD, patients with CKD had an almost twofold higher probability of undergoing RN than NSM (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.7–2.1). Despite increasing NSM utilization over the study period, most patients with CKD still received RN. Conclusions Although the prevalence of NSM is increasing, RN is more common. The low utilization of NSM in patients with pre‐existing CKD warrants further investigation.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - methods</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - utilization</subject><subject>chronic kidney disease</subject><subject>Comorbidity - trends</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>cryosurgery</subject><subject>Cryosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Cryosurgery - utilization</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Hospitalization - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nationwide inpatient sample</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>nephrectomy</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - utilization</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>partial nephrectomy</subject><subject>radical nephrectomy</subject><subject>radiofrequency ablation</subject><subject>renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Tumors of the urinary system</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxyNERUvhFZAlhMShu_grsc0BqVRAW1XiwFbiZjn2pPUqcbZ2IrqcOPECvCFPgrMfReKEL56P38zY8y8KRPCc5PNmOSe84jNO8Nc5xYTmKFdifv-oOHpIPN7bWFWHxdOUlhjnQFU-KQ4p4yI7-Kj4uYgQXEI-oOEWUBrjjbemRZ0J5gY6CAPqG9T2Oea_g0OZ3mRTgvR2Kold9k3dmsH34QStTBz8FAmZNW7TK8DqNoId-m69n3P95fQEEaXk7x-_KMbyWXHQmDbB8919XCw-flicnc-uPn-6ODu9mllOpZg5wTA1xDFTliCdarg0wAg0SmJKMW24UrYWdY1JSW3jKm4Jc3k3sqTKSHZcvN62XcX-boQ06M4nC21rAvRj0oSVlSo5ZTijL_9Bl_0Y8-czJUpGFeFMZUpuKRv7lCI0ehV9Z-JaE6wnqfRSTyroSRE9SaU3Uun7XPpiN2CsO3APhXttMvBqB5iU19hEE6xPfznBlBAVydy7LffNt7D-7wfo95fXG5P9AZwhrsI</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Woldrich, Jeffrey M.</creator><creator>Palazzi, Kerrin</creator><creator>Stroup, Sean P.</creator><creator>Sur, Roger L.</creator><creator>Parsons, J. Kellogg</creator><creator>Chang, David</creator><creator>Derweesh, Ithaar H.</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Trends in the surgical management of localized renal masses: thermal ablation, partial and radical nephrectomy in the USA, 1998–2008</title><author>Woldrich, Jeffrey M. ; Palazzi, Kerrin ; Stroup, Sean P. ; Sur, Roger L. ; Parsons, J. Kellogg ; Chang, David ; Derweesh, Ithaar H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4287-d7302a1d3a55e8d9f48ae31ef9802202f499cb7bb0152cfd64c13d1498529a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - methods</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - utilization</topic><topic>chronic kidney disease</topic><topic>Comorbidity - trends</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>cryosurgery</topic><topic>Cryosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Cryosurgery - utilization</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Hospitalization - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nationwide inpatient sample</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>nephrectomy</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - utilization</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>partial nephrectomy</topic><topic>radical nephrectomy</topic><topic>radiofrequency ablation</topic><topic>renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Tumors of the urinary system</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woldrich, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palazzi, Kerrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stroup, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sur, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, J. Kellogg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derweesh, Ithaar H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woldrich, Jeffrey M.</au><au>Palazzi, Kerrin</au><au>Stroup, Sean P.</au><au>Sur, Roger L.</au><au>Parsons, J. Kellogg</au><au>Chang, David</au><au>Derweesh, Ithaar H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in the surgical management of localized renal masses: thermal ablation, partial and radical nephrectomy in the USA, 1998–2008</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1261</spage><epage>1268</epage><pages>1261-1268</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><coden>BJINFO</coden><abstract>What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Treatment options for small renal masses include radical nephrectomy (RN), and nephron sparing modalities (NSM) such as partial nephrectomy (PN), and thermal ablation (Cryo‐ and radiofrequency ablation, C/RFA). Prior studies had demonstrated gross underutilization of PN; however overall treatment trends for C/RFA had not been well studied using a population‐based cohort. In this study, which examined management trends of localized renal masses in the USA, we identified an increased prevalence of RN, PN and C/RFA over the study period, with PN increasing the most rapidly, and with RN continuing to account for the vast majority of procedures. This is the first study to examine surgical management of renal masses in patients with non‐dialysis dependent chronic renal insufficiency. Although nephron sparing modalities were increasingly utilized over the study period, it is particularly concerning that patients with pre‐existing non‐dialysis dependent chronic renal insufficiency are receiving less nephron sparing approaches. Further investigations are required to confirm these findings and to identify impediments to the dissemination of nephron sparing modalities. Objective To evaluate the diffusion of nephron‐sparing modalities (NSM) for the treatment of renal neoplasms in the USA over the last decade and to identify the factors associated with renal procedure selection. Patients and Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was utlized to identify patients undergoing cryo/radiofrequency ablation (C/RFA), radical nephrectomy (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) from 1998 to 2008. Annual trends in procedure prevalence were determined. Multivariate analyses were performed to query the influence of age, race, sex and comorbid disease on surgery selection. Results We identified 443 853 procedures performed during the study period: 25 599 C/RFA, 79 568 PN and 338 687 RN. The prevalence per 100 000 hospital admissions in 1998 was 3.7 for C/RFA, nine for PN and 87.1 for RN. All procedures increased over the study period, by 1.05, 3.1 and 2.2/100 000 admissions per year, respectively (all P &lt; 0.001). Diabetes, urban, teaching and large capacity hospitals were associated with NSM (either C/RFA or PN) compared to RN (all P ≤ 0.011). Age ≥70 years, female, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and region outside the Northeast favoured C/RFA over PN (all P ≤ 0.026). Compared to those without CKD, patients with CKD had an almost twofold higher probability of undergoing RN than NSM (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.7–2.1). Despite increasing NSM utilization over the study period, most patients with CKD still received RN. Conclusions Although the prevalence of NSM is increasing, RN is more common. The low utilization of NSM in patients with pre‐existing CKD warrants further investigation.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>23470140</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11497.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4096
ispartof BJU international, 2013-06, Vol.111 (8), p.1261-1268
issn 1464-4096
1464-410X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1356954230
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Age Factors
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiology
Catheter Ablation - methods
Catheter Ablation - utilization
chronic kidney disease
Comorbidity - trends
Confidence intervals
cryosurgery
Cryosurgery - methods
Cryosurgery - utilization
Diabetes
Disease Management
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health risk assessment
Hospitalization - trends
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms - diagnosis
Kidney Neoplasms - epidemiology
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
Kidneys
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
nationwide inpatient sample
Neoplasm Staging
nephrectomy
Nephrectomy - methods
Nephrectomy - utilization
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
partial nephrectomy
radical nephrectomy
radiofrequency ablation
renal cell carcinoma
Retrospective Studies
Sex Factors
Tumors of the urinary system
United States - epidemiology
Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous
title Trends in the surgical management of localized renal masses: thermal ablation, partial and radical nephrectomy in the USA, 1998–2008
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T02%3A23%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20the%20surgical%20management%20of%20localized%20renal%20masses:%20thermal%20ablation,%20partial%20and%20radical%20nephrectomy%20in%20the%20USA,%201998%E2%80%932008&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Woldrich,%20Jeffrey%20M.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1261&rft.epage=1268&rft.pages=1261-1268&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft.coden=BJINFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11497.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3911928931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1753291439&rft_id=info:pmid/23470140&rfr_iscdi=true