Prediction of total fat, fatty acid composition and nutritional parameters in fish fillets using MID-FTIR spectroscopy and chemometrics
Fourier transform mid-infrared (MID-FTIR) spectroscopy coupled with partial least square algorithm (PLS-1) was used to predict total fat, fatty acid composition, and nutritional parameters as content of omega-3/100 g of fish, and fish lipid quality index (FLQ index) of Atlantic bluefin tuna, crevall...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food science & technology 2013-06, Vol.52 (1), p.12-20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Fourier transform mid-infrared (MID-FTIR) spectroscopy coupled with partial least square algorithm (PLS-1) was used to predict total fat, fatty acid composition, and nutritional parameters as content of omega-3/100 g of fish, and fish lipid quality index (FLQ index) of Atlantic bluefin tuna, crevalle jack, and Atlantic Spanish mackerel chilled fillets. Chemometric model was developed with 84 samples from the 3 fish species at different season capture and varying the storage times. The performance of the regression model was evaluated according to coefficients of determination (R2), residual predictive deviation of cross-validation (RPDcv), and percentage relative difference (% RD). Chemometric model provided good reliability in the prediction of total fat (R2 = 0.968, RPDcv = 4.76), fatty acids (R2 between 0.893 and 0.996, RPDcv between 2.35 and 7.68), FLQ index (R2 = 0.997, RPDcv = 8.52), and content of omega-3/100 g of fish (R2 = 0.968, RPDcv = 3.74). The results demonstrated that chemometric model could be applied simultaneously to chilled fillets of these three species.
► Fish fatty acid profile was predicted by MID-FTIR chemometric model. ► Total fat, SFA, MUFA, PUFA, DHA + EPA, FLQ index, Ω-3/100 g flesh were also modeled. ► Good estimations were obtained for parameters in terms of R2, SECV, RPD of cross-validation, and % relative difference. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0023-6438 1096-1127 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.lwt.2013.01.001 |