Vision Insurance, Eye Care Visits, and Vision Impairment Among Working-Age Adults in the United States
OBJECTIVES To compare rates of eye care visits and vision impairment among working-age adults with vision insurance vs without, among the total sample of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey respondents and among a subsample of respondents who had diagnoses of glaucoma, age-related macular deg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA ophthalmology 2013-04, Vol.131 (4), p.499-506 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 506 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 499 |
container_title | JAMA ophthalmology |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Li, Yi-Jhen Xirasagar, Sudha Pumkam, Chaiporn Krishnaswamy, Malavika Bennett, Charles L |
description | OBJECTIVES To compare rates of eye care visits and vision impairment among working-age adults with vision insurance vs without, among the total sample of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey respondents and among a subsample of respondents who had diagnoses of glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), and/or cataract. DESIGN Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey 2008 vision module data, we examined the likelihood of an eye care visit within the past year and of self-reported visual impairment among 27 152 adults aged 40 to 65 years and among a subset of 3158 persons (11.6%) with glaucoma, ARMD, and/or cataract. Multivariate logistic regression models were used. RESULTS About 40% of both the study population and the subsample with glaucoma, ARMD, and/or cataract had no vision insurance. Respondents with vision insurance were more likely than those without to have had eye care visits (general population adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.89-1.90]; glaucoma-ARMD-cataract subsample AOR, 2.15 [95% CI, 2.13-2.17]), to have no difficulty recognizing friends across the street (general population AOR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.22-1.26]; eye-disease subsample AOR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.42-1.49]), and to have no difficulty reading printed matter (general population AOR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.33-1.35]; eye-disease subsample AOR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.34-1.39]). Respondents from the total sample who had an eye care visit were better able to recognize friends across the street (AOR, 1.07) and had no difficulty reading printed matter (AOR, 1.70), and respondents from the eye-disease subsample who had an eye care visit also were better able to recognize friends across the street (AOR, 1.71) and had no difficulty reading printed matter (AOR, 1.45). CONCLUSIONS Lack of vision insurance impedes eye care utilization, which, in turn, may irrevocably affect vision. Vision insurance for preventive eye care should cease to be a separate insurance benefit and should be mandatory in all health plans. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1165 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1356387437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>1484717</ama_id><sourcerecordid>1356387437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a334t-e35084df3466bd3a53c96914cf436735ee4f244a42d1e582de682b0915cd98373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkT1PwzAURS0Eoqj0DzAgjwxNseOPuGNVFahUiQEKY-TGL21K4hTbGfrvSegHwostvXPvk44RwpSMKCH0casrXe82YaPLqi5HMaFsRKkUF-gmplJFkibs8vyWoocG3m9JexQhnIlr1ItZQokg_AblH4Uvaovn1jdO2wyGeLYHPNUOcDcKfoi1NfiEVTtduApswJOqtmv8Wbuvwq6jyRrwxDRl8LiwOGwAL20RwOC3oAP4W3SV69LD4Hj30fJp9j59iRavz_PpZBFpxniIgAmiuMkZl3JlmBYsG8sx5VnOmUyYAOB5zLnmsaEgVGxAqnhFxlRkZqxYwvro4dC7c_V3Az6kVeEzKEttoW58SpmQTCX8F1UHNHO19w7ydOeKSrt9SknaiU7_i0470Wknuo3eH7c0qwrMOXjS2gJ3B6Bt-Kvliift3_wAg_6FHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1356387437</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vision Insurance, Eye Care Visits, and Vision Impairment Among Working-Age Adults in the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Li, Yi-Jhen ; Xirasagar, Sudha ; Pumkam, Chaiporn ; Krishnaswamy, Malavika ; Bennett, Charles L</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Yi-Jhen ; Xirasagar, Sudha ; Pumkam, Chaiporn ; Krishnaswamy, Malavika ; Bennett, Charles L</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES To compare rates of eye care visits and vision impairment among working-age adults with vision insurance vs without, among the total sample of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey respondents and among a subsample of respondents who had diagnoses of glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), and/or cataract. DESIGN Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey 2008 vision module data, we examined the likelihood of an eye care visit within the past year and of self-reported visual impairment among 27 152 adults aged 40 to 65 years and among a subset of 3158 persons (11.6%) with glaucoma, ARMD, and/or cataract. Multivariate logistic regression models were used. RESULTS About 40% of both the study population and the subsample with glaucoma, ARMD, and/or cataract had no vision insurance. Respondents with vision insurance were more likely than those without to have had eye care visits (general population adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.89-1.90]; glaucoma-ARMD-cataract subsample AOR, 2.15 [95% CI, 2.13-2.17]), to have no difficulty recognizing friends across the street (general population AOR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.22-1.26]; eye-disease subsample AOR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.42-1.49]), and to have no difficulty reading printed matter (general population AOR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.33-1.35]; eye-disease subsample AOR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.34-1.39]). Respondents from the total sample who had an eye care visit were better able to recognize friends across the street (AOR, 1.07) and had no difficulty reading printed matter (AOR, 1.70), and respondents from the eye-disease subsample who had an eye care visit also were better able to recognize friends across the street (AOR, 1.71) and had no difficulty reading printed matter (AOR, 1.45). CONCLUSIONS Lack of vision insurance impedes eye care utilization, which, in turn, may irrevocably affect vision. Vision insurance for preventive eye care should cease to be a separate insurance benefit and should be mandatory in all health plans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6173</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1165</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23710504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Aged ; Cataract - diagnosis ; Cataract - epidemiology ; Cataract - prevention & control ; Educational Status ; Female ; Glaucoma - diagnosis ; Glaucoma - epidemiology ; Glaucoma - prevention & control ; Health Services - utilization ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data ; Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data ; Macular Degeneration - diagnosis ; Macular Degeneration - epidemiology ; Macular Degeneration - prevention & control ; Male ; Medically Uninsured ; Middle Aged ; Office Visits - statistics & numerical data ; Ophthalmology - statistics & numerical data ; Preventive Health Services ; United States - epidemiology ; Vision Disorders - diagnosis ; Vision Disorders - epidemiology ; Visually Impaired Persons - statistics & numerical data]]></subject><ispartof>JAMA ophthalmology, 2013-04, Vol.131 (4), p.499-506</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a334t-e35084df3466bd3a53c96914cf436735ee4f244a42d1e582de682b0915cd98373</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/articlepdf/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1165$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1165$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,776,780,3327,27901,27902,76231,76234</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23710504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Yi-Jhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xirasagar, Sudha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pumkam, Chaiporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnaswamy, Malavika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Charles L</creatorcontrib><title>Vision Insurance, Eye Care Visits, and Vision Impairment Among Working-Age Adults in the United States</title><title>JAMA ophthalmology</title><addtitle>JAMA Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES To compare rates of eye care visits and vision impairment among working-age adults with vision insurance vs without, among the total sample of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey respondents and among a subsample of respondents who had diagnoses of glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), and/or cataract. DESIGN Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey 2008 vision module data, we examined the likelihood of an eye care visit within the past year and of self-reported visual impairment among 27 152 adults aged 40 to 65 years and among a subset of 3158 persons (11.6%) with glaucoma, ARMD, and/or cataract. Multivariate logistic regression models were used. RESULTS About 40% of both the study population and the subsample with glaucoma, ARMD, and/or cataract had no vision insurance. Respondents with vision insurance were more likely than those without to have had eye care visits (general population adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.89-1.90]; glaucoma-ARMD-cataract subsample AOR, 2.15 [95% CI, 2.13-2.17]), to have no difficulty recognizing friends across the street (general population AOR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.22-1.26]; eye-disease subsample AOR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.42-1.49]), and to have no difficulty reading printed matter (general population AOR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.33-1.35]; eye-disease subsample AOR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.34-1.39]). Respondents from the total sample who had an eye care visit were better able to recognize friends across the street (AOR, 1.07) and had no difficulty reading printed matter (AOR, 1.70), and respondents from the eye-disease subsample who had an eye care visit also were better able to recognize friends across the street (AOR, 1.71) and had no difficulty reading printed matter (AOR, 1.45). CONCLUSIONS Lack of vision insurance impedes eye care utilization, which, in turn, may irrevocably affect vision. Vision insurance for preventive eye care should cease to be a separate insurance benefit and should be mandatory in all health plans.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cataract - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cataract - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cataract - prevention & control</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glaucoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Glaucoma - prevention & control</subject><subject>Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Macular Degeneration - diagnosis</subject><subject>Macular Degeneration - epidemiology</subject><subject>Macular Degeneration - prevention & control</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medically Uninsured</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Office Visits - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Ophthalmology - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Preventive Health Services</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Vision Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Vision Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Visually Impaired Persons - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>2168-6165</issn><issn>2168-6173</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkT1PwzAURS0Eoqj0DzAgjwxNseOPuGNVFahUiQEKY-TGL21K4hTbGfrvSegHwostvXPvk44RwpSMKCH0casrXe82YaPLqi5HMaFsRKkUF-gmplJFkibs8vyWoocG3m9JexQhnIlr1ItZQokg_AblH4Uvaovn1jdO2wyGeLYHPNUOcDcKfoi1NfiEVTtduApswJOqtmv8Wbuvwq6jyRrwxDRl8LiwOGwAL20RwOC3oAP4W3SV69LD4Hj30fJp9j59iRavz_PpZBFpxniIgAmiuMkZl3JlmBYsG8sx5VnOmUyYAOB5zLnmsaEgVGxAqnhFxlRkZqxYwvro4dC7c_V3Az6kVeEzKEttoW58SpmQTCX8F1UHNHO19w7ydOeKSrt9SknaiU7_i0470Wknuo3eH7c0qwrMOXjS2gJ3B6Bt-Kvliift3_wAg_6FHQ</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Li, Yi-Jhen</creator><creator>Xirasagar, Sudha</creator><creator>Pumkam, Chaiporn</creator><creator>Krishnaswamy, Malavika</creator><creator>Bennett, Charles L</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Vision Insurance, Eye Care Visits, and Vision Impairment Among Working-Age Adults in the United States</title><author>Li, Yi-Jhen ; Xirasagar, Sudha ; Pumkam, Chaiporn ; Krishnaswamy, Malavika ; Bennett, Charles L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a334t-e35084df3466bd3a53c96914cf436735ee4f244a42d1e582de682b0915cd98373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cataract - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cataract - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cataract - prevention & control</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glaucoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Glaucoma - prevention & control</topic><topic>Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Macular Degeneration - diagnosis</topic><topic>Macular Degeneration - epidemiology</topic><topic>Macular Degeneration - prevention & control</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medically Uninsured</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Office Visits - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Ophthalmology - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Preventive Health Services</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Vision Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Vision Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Visually Impaired Persons - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Yi-Jhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xirasagar, Sudha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pumkam, Chaiporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnaswamy, Malavika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Charles L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Yi-Jhen</au><au>Xirasagar, Sudha</au><au>Pumkam, Chaiporn</au><au>Krishnaswamy, Malavika</au><au>Bennett, Charles L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vision Insurance, Eye Care Visits, and Vision Impairment Among Working-Age Adults in the United States</atitle><jtitle>JAMA ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>499-506</pages><issn>2168-6165</issn><eissn>2168-6173</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES To compare rates of eye care visits and vision impairment among working-age adults with vision insurance vs without, among the total sample of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey respondents and among a subsample of respondents who had diagnoses of glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), and/or cataract. DESIGN Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey 2008 vision module data, we examined the likelihood of an eye care visit within the past year and of self-reported visual impairment among 27 152 adults aged 40 to 65 years and among a subset of 3158 persons (11.6%) with glaucoma, ARMD, and/or cataract. Multivariate logistic regression models were used. RESULTS About 40% of both the study population and the subsample with glaucoma, ARMD, and/or cataract had no vision insurance. Respondents with vision insurance were more likely than those without to have had eye care visits (general population adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.89-1.90]; glaucoma-ARMD-cataract subsample AOR, 2.15 [95% CI, 2.13-2.17]), to have no difficulty recognizing friends across the street (general population AOR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.22-1.26]; eye-disease subsample AOR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.42-1.49]), and to have no difficulty reading printed matter (general population AOR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.33-1.35]; eye-disease subsample AOR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.34-1.39]). Respondents from the total sample who had an eye care visit were better able to recognize friends across the street (AOR, 1.07) and had no difficulty reading printed matter (AOR, 1.70), and respondents from the eye-disease subsample who had an eye care visit also were better able to recognize friends across the street (AOR, 1.71) and had no difficulty reading printed matter (AOR, 1.45). CONCLUSIONS Lack of vision insurance impedes eye care utilization, which, in turn, may irrevocably affect vision. Vision insurance for preventive eye care should cease to be a separate insurance benefit and should be mandatory in all health plans.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>23710504</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1165</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-6165 |
ispartof | JAMA ophthalmology, 2013-04, Vol.131 (4), p.499-506 |
issn | 2168-6165 2168-6173 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1356387437 |
source | MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Cataract - diagnosis Cataract - epidemiology Cataract - prevention & control Educational Status Female Glaucoma - diagnosis Glaucoma - epidemiology Glaucoma - prevention & control Health Services - utilization Health Services Research Humans Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data Macular Degeneration - diagnosis Macular Degeneration - epidemiology Macular Degeneration - prevention & control Male Medically Uninsured Middle Aged Office Visits - statistics & numerical data Ophthalmology - statistics & numerical data Preventive Health Services United States - epidemiology Vision Disorders - diagnosis Vision Disorders - epidemiology Visually Impaired Persons - statistics & numerical data |
title | Vision Insurance, Eye Care Visits, and Vision Impairment Among Working-Age Adults in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A30%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vision%20Insurance,%20Eye%20Care%20Visits,%20and%20Vision%20Impairment%20Among%20Working-Age%20Adults%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Li,%20Yi-Jhen&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=499-506&rft.issn=2168-6165&rft.eissn=2168-6173&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1356387437%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1356387437&rft_id=info:pmid/23710504&rft_ama_id=1484717&rfr_iscdi=true |