Phasing Out Fee-for-Service Payment

The National Commission on Physician Payment Reform recommends phasing out fee-for-service and outlines strategies to change the model during the transition. The commission advises revision of fee schedules so that evaluation and management are valued as highly as procedures. In March 2012, the Soci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2013-05, Vol.368 (21), p.2029-2032
Hauptverfasser: Schroeder, Steven A, Frist, William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2032
container_issue 21
container_start_page 2029
container_title The New England journal of medicine
container_volume 368
creator Schroeder, Steven A
Frist, William
description The National Commission on Physician Payment Reform recommends phasing out fee-for-service and outlines strategies to change the model during the transition. The commission advises revision of fee schedules so that evaluation and management are valued as highly as procedures. In March 2012, the Society of General Internal Medicine convened the National Commission on Physician Payment Reform to recommend forms of payment that would maximize good clinical outcomes, enhance patient and physician satisfaction and autonomy, and provide cost-effective care. The formation of the commission was spurred by the recognition that the level of spending on health care in the United States is unsustainable, that the return on investment is poor, and that the way physicians are paid drives high medical expenditures. The commission began by examining factors driving the high level of expenditures in the U.S. health care system. It . . .
doi_str_mv 10.1056/NEJMsb1302322
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1355477246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1355477246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-25cd355a18329155ba2313f2e5a7e0d32d5261cfd7e1e62df9f74976ec22a4793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1Lw0AQBfBFFFurR69SKIKX1Z3Z3aQ5Smn9oNqCeg7bzURT8lF3E6H_vamtgoJzmcuPx-MxdgriEoQOrh7H9w9-AVKgRNxjXdBScqVEsM-6QuCQqzCSHXbk_VK0Byo6ZB2UWiqtgi4bzN-Mz8rX_qyp-xMinlaOP5H7yCz152ZdUFkfs4PU5J5Odr_HXibj59Etn85u7kbXU26lhpqjtonU2sBQYgRaLwxKkCmSNiGJRGKiMQCbJiEBBZikURqqKAzIIppNyx672OauXPXekK_jIvOW8tyUVDU-hjZdhSGqoKWDP3RZNa5s230pEAhKtIpvlXWV947SeOWywrh1DCLerBf_Wq_1Z7vUZlFQ8qO_52rB-RYUhY9LWhb_BH0CmaBx6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1355102140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phasing Out Fee-for-Service Payment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Schroeder, Steven A ; Frist, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Steven A ; Frist, William ; National Commission on Physician Payment Reform</creatorcontrib><description>The National Commission on Physician Payment Reform recommends phasing out fee-for-service and outlines strategies to change the model during the transition. The commission advises revision of fee schedules so that evaluation and management are valued as highly as procedures. In March 2012, the Society of General Internal Medicine convened the National Commission on Physician Payment Reform to recommend forms of payment that would maximize good clinical outcomes, enhance patient and physician satisfaction and autonomy, and provide cost-effective care. The formation of the commission was spurred by the recognition that the level of spending on health care in the United States is unsustainable, that the return on investment is poor, and that the way physicians are paid drives high medical expenditures. The commission began by examining factors driving the high level of expenditures in the U.S. health care system. It . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb1302322</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23534546</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Chronic illnesses ; Cost Savings ; Fee-for-Service Plans ; Fees &amp; charges ; Health Care Costs ; Health care expenditures ; Health Policy ; Payment systems ; Physicians ; Physicians - economics ; Quality of Health Care ; Reimbursement Mechanisms ; United States</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2013-05, Vol.368 (21), p.2029-2032</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-25cd355a18329155ba2313f2e5a7e0d32d5261cfd7e1e62df9f74976ec22a4793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-25cd355a18329155ba2313f2e5a7e0d32d5261cfd7e1e62df9f74976ec22a4793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMsb1302322$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1355102140?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,2760,2761,26108,27929,27930,52387,54069,64390,64392,64394,72474</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23534546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Steven A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frist, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Commission on Physician Payment Reform</creatorcontrib><title>Phasing Out Fee-for-Service Payment</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>The National Commission on Physician Payment Reform recommends phasing out fee-for-service and outlines strategies to change the model during the transition. The commission advises revision of fee schedules so that evaluation and management are valued as highly as procedures. In March 2012, the Society of General Internal Medicine convened the National Commission on Physician Payment Reform to recommend forms of payment that would maximize good clinical outcomes, enhance patient and physician satisfaction and autonomy, and provide cost-effective care. The formation of the commission was spurred by the recognition that the level of spending on health care in the United States is unsustainable, that the return on investment is poor, and that the way physicians are paid drives high medical expenditures. The commission began by examining factors driving the high level of expenditures in the U.S. health care system. It . . .</description><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cost Savings</subject><subject>Fee-for-Service Plans</subject><subject>Fees &amp; charges</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Payment systems</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians - economics</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Reimbursement Mechanisms</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1Lw0AQBfBFFFurR69SKIKX1Z3Z3aQ5Smn9oNqCeg7bzURT8lF3E6H_vamtgoJzmcuPx-MxdgriEoQOrh7H9w9-AVKgRNxjXdBScqVEsM-6QuCQqzCSHXbk_VK0Byo6ZB2UWiqtgi4bzN-Mz8rX_qyp-xMinlaOP5H7yCz152ZdUFkfs4PU5J5Odr_HXibj59Etn85u7kbXU26lhpqjtonU2sBQYgRaLwxKkCmSNiGJRGKiMQCbJiEBBZikURqqKAzIIppNyx672OauXPXekK_jIvOW8tyUVDU-hjZdhSGqoKWDP3RZNa5s230pEAhKtIpvlXWV947SeOWywrh1DCLerBf_Wq_1Z7vUZlFQ8qO_52rB-RYUhY9LWhb_BH0CmaBx6Q</recordid><startdate>20130523</startdate><enddate>20130523</enddate><creator>Schroeder, Steven A</creator><creator>Frist, William</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130523</creationdate><title>Phasing Out Fee-for-Service Payment</title><author>Schroeder, Steven A ; Frist, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-25cd355a18329155ba2313f2e5a7e0d32d5261cfd7e1e62df9f74976ec22a4793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cost Savings</topic><topic>Fee-for-Service Plans</topic><topic>Fees &amp; charges</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Payment systems</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians - economics</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Reimbursement Mechanisms</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Steven A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frist, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Commission on Physician Payment Reform</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schroeder, Steven A</au><au>Frist, William</au><aucorp>National Commission on Physician Payment Reform</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phasing Out Fee-for-Service Payment</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2013-05-23</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>368</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>2029</spage><epage>2032</epage><pages>2029-2032</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>The National Commission on Physician Payment Reform recommends phasing out fee-for-service and outlines strategies to change the model during the transition. The commission advises revision of fee schedules so that evaluation and management are valued as highly as procedures. In March 2012, the Society of General Internal Medicine convened the National Commission on Physician Payment Reform to recommend forms of payment that would maximize good clinical outcomes, enhance patient and physician satisfaction and autonomy, and provide cost-effective care. The formation of the commission was spurred by the recognition that the level of spending on health care in the United States is unsustainable, that the return on investment is poor, and that the way physicians are paid drives high medical expenditures. The commission began by examining factors driving the high level of expenditures in the U.S. health care system. It . . .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>23534546</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMsb1302322</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-4793
ispartof The New England journal of medicine, 2013-05, Vol.368 (21), p.2029-2032
issn 0028-4793
1533-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1355477246
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; New England Journal of Medicine
subjects Chronic illnesses
Cost Savings
Fee-for-Service Plans
Fees & charges
Health Care Costs
Health care expenditures
Health Policy
Payment systems
Physicians
Physicians - economics
Quality of Health Care
Reimbursement Mechanisms
United States
title Phasing Out Fee-for-Service Payment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T02%3A22%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phasing%20Out%20Fee-for-Service%20Payment&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Schroeder,%20Steven%20A&rft.aucorp=National%20Commission%20on%20Physician%20Payment%20Reform&rft.date=2013-05-23&rft.volume=368&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=2029&rft.epage=2032&rft.pages=2029-2032&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMsb1302322&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1355477246%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1355102140&rft_id=info:pmid/23534546&rfr_iscdi=true