Comparison of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast as computed tomographic enteric contrasts

To compare four computed tomographic (CT) enteric contrasts (pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast) in various aspects, including gastrointestinal (GI) distension, mural visualization, GI landmark distinction, taste, patients 'satisfaction, adverse effects,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2013-04, Vol.96 (4), p.467-476
Hauptverfasser: Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn, Tiangpug, Tawanmai, Pongpornsup, Sopa, Janpanich, Sureerat, Suwannasit, Thanyaporn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 476
container_issue 4
container_start_page 467
container_title Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand
container_volume 96
creator Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn
Tiangpug, Tawanmai
Pongpornsup, Sopa
Janpanich, Sureerat
Suwannasit, Thanyaporn
description To compare four computed tomographic (CT) enteric contrasts (pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast) in various aspects, including gastrointestinal (GI) distension, mural visualization, GI landmark distinction, taste, patients 'satisfaction, adverse effects, and prices. Sixty patients scheduled for whole abdominal CT at the present institution were randomized to receive 1,000 ml of pasteurized whole milk (n = 15), UHT whole milk (n = 15), water (n = 15) and diluted iodine contrast (n = 15) as CT enteric contrasts. Two radiologists separately assessed the GI distension (using a 4-point scale: poor, partial, good, and full), mural visualization (using a 3-point scale: poor, partial, and good), GI landmark distinction at esophagogastric (EG) junction, ampulla of Vater, and pancreatic head-duodenal loop (using a 3-point scale: poor, partial, and good). The participants graded the taste of received enteric contrasts and their satisfaction using a 4-point scale (unacceptable, unpleasant, acceptable, and pleasant). Adverse effects were evaluated by GI associated symptoms (nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping/discomfort, and diarrhea). Pasteurized whole milk was superior to other agents in GI distension and tended to be better than other agents in mural visualization and GI landmark distinction. No difference in taste and patients' satisfaction was noted between pasteurized whole milk and other agents. Gallbladder collapse was inevitable in participants with pasteurized and UHT whole milk consumption, due to 4%fat content in whole milk. GI adverse effects were more common in whole milk group than other agents. The prices of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water and diluted iodine contrast were about 42, 40, 14, and 36 Baht, respectively. Pasteurized whole milk is an attractive oral contrast agent, providing good GI distension, mural visualization, and GI landmark discrimination. Apart from gallbladder collapse, increase of GI adverse symptoms was another major drawback of whole milk when used as CT oral contrast, especially in Thai people.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1354789546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1354789546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-d8d2ddf032c6933b992bf997d1f32aa8cdb75266f92f6356e0ff85449c874efd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkDFPwzAUhD2AaCn8BeSRoZEcO3bsEVVAK1ViaefIiW1qiGNjO6pg5JcTQTsw3Tvd9264CzBHJaYFxojPwHVKbwhVVDByBWaYMFHWCM_B98q7IKNNfoDewCBT1mO0X1rB48H3Gjrbvy_hfr37548y67iEclBQ2X7ME269soOGnR9ynFqgTNPtwm-WvfOvUYaD7aAeptdJz2C6AZdG9knfnnQB9k-Pu9W62L48b1YP2yKUmOVCcYWVMojgjglCWiFwa4SoVWkIlpJ3qq0pZswIbBihTCNjOK0q0fG60kaRBbj_6w3Rf4w65cbZ1Om-l4P2Y2pKQquaC1qxCb07oWPrtGpCtE7Gz-a8G_kByhtrEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1354789546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast as computed tomographic enteric contrasts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn ; Tiangpug, Tawanmai ; Pongpornsup, Sopa ; Janpanich, Sureerat ; Suwannasit, Thanyaporn</creator><creatorcontrib>Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn ; Tiangpug, Tawanmai ; Pongpornsup, Sopa ; Janpanich, Sureerat ; Suwannasit, Thanyaporn</creatorcontrib><description>To compare four computed tomographic (CT) enteric contrasts (pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast) in various aspects, including gastrointestinal (GI) distension, mural visualization, GI landmark distinction, taste, patients 'satisfaction, adverse effects, and prices. Sixty patients scheduled for whole abdominal CT at the present institution were randomized to receive 1,000 ml of pasteurized whole milk (n = 15), UHT whole milk (n = 15), water (n = 15) and diluted iodine contrast (n = 15) as CT enteric contrasts. Two radiologists separately assessed the GI distension (using a 4-point scale: poor, partial, good, and full), mural visualization (using a 3-point scale: poor, partial, and good), GI landmark distinction at esophagogastric (EG) junction, ampulla of Vater, and pancreatic head-duodenal loop (using a 3-point scale: poor, partial, and good). The participants graded the taste of received enteric contrasts and their satisfaction using a 4-point scale (unacceptable, unpleasant, acceptable, and pleasant). Adverse effects were evaluated by GI associated symptoms (nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping/discomfort, and diarrhea). Pasteurized whole milk was superior to other agents in GI distension and tended to be better than other agents in mural visualization and GI landmark distinction. No difference in taste and patients' satisfaction was noted between pasteurized whole milk and other agents. Gallbladder collapse was inevitable in participants with pasteurized and UHT whole milk consumption, due to 4%fat content in whole milk. GI adverse effects were more common in whole milk group than other agents. The prices of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water and diluted iodine contrast were about 42, 40, 14, and 36 Baht, respectively. Pasteurized whole milk is an attractive oral contrast agent, providing good GI distension, mural visualization, and GI landmark discrimination. Apart from gallbladder collapse, increase of GI adverse symptoms was another major drawback of whole milk when used as CT oral contrast, especially in Thai people.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0125-2208</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23691702</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thailand</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Animals ; Contrast Media ; Female ; Hot Temperature ; Humans ; Intestines - diagnostic imaging ; Iodine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Milk ; Pasteurization ; Prospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Water ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 2013-04, Vol.96 (4), p.467-476</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23691702$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiangpug, Tawanmai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pongpornsup, Sopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janpanich, Sureerat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwannasit, Thanyaporn</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast as computed tomographic enteric contrasts</title><title>Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand</title><addtitle>J Med Assoc Thai</addtitle><description>To compare four computed tomographic (CT) enteric contrasts (pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast) in various aspects, including gastrointestinal (GI) distension, mural visualization, GI landmark distinction, taste, patients 'satisfaction, adverse effects, and prices. Sixty patients scheduled for whole abdominal CT at the present institution were randomized to receive 1,000 ml of pasteurized whole milk (n = 15), UHT whole milk (n = 15), water (n = 15) and diluted iodine contrast (n = 15) as CT enteric contrasts. Two radiologists separately assessed the GI distension (using a 4-point scale: poor, partial, good, and full), mural visualization (using a 3-point scale: poor, partial, and good), GI landmark distinction at esophagogastric (EG) junction, ampulla of Vater, and pancreatic head-duodenal loop (using a 3-point scale: poor, partial, and good). The participants graded the taste of received enteric contrasts and their satisfaction using a 4-point scale (unacceptable, unpleasant, acceptable, and pleasant). Adverse effects were evaluated by GI associated symptoms (nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping/discomfort, and diarrhea). Pasteurized whole milk was superior to other agents in GI distension and tended to be better than other agents in mural visualization and GI landmark distinction. No difference in taste and patients' satisfaction was noted between pasteurized whole milk and other agents. Gallbladder collapse was inevitable in participants with pasteurized and UHT whole milk consumption, due to 4%fat content in whole milk. GI adverse effects were more common in whole milk group than other agents. The prices of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water and diluted iodine contrast were about 42, 40, 14, and 36 Baht, respectively. Pasteurized whole milk is an attractive oral contrast agent, providing good GI distension, mural visualization, and GI landmark discrimination. Apart from gallbladder collapse, increase of GI adverse symptoms was another major drawback of whole milk when used as CT oral contrast, especially in Thai people.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestines - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Iodine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Pasteurization</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0125-2208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkDFPwzAUhD2AaCn8BeSRoZEcO3bsEVVAK1ViaefIiW1qiGNjO6pg5JcTQTsw3Tvd9264CzBHJaYFxojPwHVKbwhVVDByBWaYMFHWCM_B98q7IKNNfoDewCBT1mO0X1rB48H3Gjrbvy_hfr37548y67iEclBQ2X7ME269soOGnR9ynFqgTNPtwm-WvfOvUYaD7aAeptdJz2C6AZdG9knfnnQB9k-Pu9W62L48b1YP2yKUmOVCcYWVMojgjglCWiFwa4SoVWkIlpJ3qq0pZswIbBihTCNjOK0q0fG60kaRBbj_6w3Rf4w65cbZ1Om-l4P2Y2pKQquaC1qxCb07oWPrtGpCtE7Gz-a8G_kByhtrEA</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn</creator><creator>Tiangpug, Tawanmai</creator><creator>Pongpornsup, Sopa</creator><creator>Janpanich, Sureerat</creator><creator>Suwannasit, Thanyaporn</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Comparison of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast as computed tomographic enteric contrasts</title><author>Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn ; Tiangpug, Tawanmai ; Pongpornsup, Sopa ; Janpanich, Sureerat ; Suwannasit, Thanyaporn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-d8d2ddf032c6933b992bf997d1f32aa8cdb75266f92f6356e0ff85449c874efd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestines - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Iodine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Pasteurization</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiangpug, Tawanmai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pongpornsup, Sopa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janpanich, Sureerat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwannasit, Thanyaporn</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn</au><au>Tiangpug, Tawanmai</au><au>Pongpornsup, Sopa</au><au>Janpanich, Sureerat</au><au>Suwannasit, Thanyaporn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast as computed tomographic enteric contrasts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Assoc Thai</addtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>467</spage><epage>476</epage><pages>467-476</pages><issn>0125-2208</issn><abstract>To compare four computed tomographic (CT) enteric contrasts (pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast) in various aspects, including gastrointestinal (GI) distension, mural visualization, GI landmark distinction, taste, patients 'satisfaction, adverse effects, and prices. Sixty patients scheduled for whole abdominal CT at the present institution were randomized to receive 1,000 ml of pasteurized whole milk (n = 15), UHT whole milk (n = 15), water (n = 15) and diluted iodine contrast (n = 15) as CT enteric contrasts. Two radiologists separately assessed the GI distension (using a 4-point scale: poor, partial, good, and full), mural visualization (using a 3-point scale: poor, partial, and good), GI landmark distinction at esophagogastric (EG) junction, ampulla of Vater, and pancreatic head-duodenal loop (using a 3-point scale: poor, partial, and good). The participants graded the taste of received enteric contrasts and their satisfaction using a 4-point scale (unacceptable, unpleasant, acceptable, and pleasant). Adverse effects were evaluated by GI associated symptoms (nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping/discomfort, and diarrhea). Pasteurized whole milk was superior to other agents in GI distension and tended to be better than other agents in mural visualization and GI landmark distinction. No difference in taste and patients' satisfaction was noted between pasteurized whole milk and other agents. Gallbladder collapse was inevitable in participants with pasteurized and UHT whole milk consumption, due to 4%fat content in whole milk. GI adverse effects were more common in whole milk group than other agents. The prices of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water and diluted iodine contrast were about 42, 40, 14, and 36 Baht, respectively. Pasteurized whole milk is an attractive oral contrast agent, providing good GI distension, mural visualization, and GI landmark discrimination. Apart from gallbladder collapse, increase of GI adverse symptoms was another major drawback of whole milk when used as CT oral contrast, especially in Thai people.</abstract><cop>Thailand</cop><pmid>23691702</pmid><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0125-2208
ispartof Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 2013-04, Vol.96 (4), p.467-476
issn 0125-2208
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1354789546
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Animals
Contrast Media
Female
Hot Temperature
Humans
Intestines - diagnostic imaging
Iodine
Male
Middle Aged
Milk
Pasteurization
Prospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Water
Young Adult
title Comparison of pasteurized whole milk, UHT whole milk, water, and diluted iodine contrast as computed tomographic enteric contrasts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A25%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20pasteurized%20whole%20milk,%20UHT%20whole%20milk,%20water,%20and%20diluted%20iodine%20contrast%20as%20computed%20tomographic%20enteric%20contrasts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Medical%20Association%20of%20Thailand&rft.au=Apisarnthanarak,%20Piyaporn&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=467&rft.epage=476&rft.pages=467-476&rft.issn=0125-2208&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1354789546%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1354789546&rft_id=info:pmid/23691702&rfr_iscdi=true