Comparison of propulsion kinetics and forearm EMG between two wheelchair pushrim designs

Comparison of propulsion kinetics and forearm EMG between two wheelchair pushrim designs

The electromyographic (EMG) activity of forearm muscles and pushrim forces were compared between a standard and an ergonomic wheelchair pushrim for a group of non-impaired subjects propelling at two and four miles per hour. The maximum EMG signals were not statistically different for any of the musc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Baldwin, M.A., Boninger, M.L., Koontz, A.M., Fay, B.T., Cooper, R.A.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Biomechanics
Biomedical engineering
Electrodes
Electromyography
Ergonomics
Injuries
Kinetic theory
Muscles
Propulsion
Wheelchairs
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 608
container_issue
container_start_page 608 vol.1
container_title
container_volume 1
creator Baldwin, M.A.
Boninger, M.L.
Koontz, A.M.
Fay, B.T.
Cooper, R.A.
description The electromyographic (EMG) activity of forearm muscles and pushrim forces were compared between a standard and an ergonomic wheelchair pushrim for a group of non-impaired subjects propelling at two and four miles per hour. The maximum EMG signals were not statistically different for any of the muscles between rims while significantly higher peak tangential, radial, and resultant forces were found for the ergonomic pushrims.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/IEMBS.1999.802686
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13540987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>802686</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>440038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i118t-afa1c372b5d58f1fb9e904ddf25f88ff3aec2d342b384a2fba7c7095b451ee303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1Lw0AYhBc_wLb6A_S0J2-p-5nsHrXEWmjxoEJvYZO8a1eTbNxNKP57A_U0DPMwDIPQLSVLSol-2OS7p7cl1VovFWGpSs_QjEqpEpFSeY7mJFOEyzQT6mIKiBZJqrL9FZrH-EUII0TSGdqvfNub4KLvsLe4D74fm-gm9-06GFwVselqbH0AE1qc79a4hOEI0OHh6PHxANBUB-MC7sd4CK7FNUT32cVrdGlNE-HmXxfo4zl_X70k29f1ZvW4TRylakiMNbTiGStlLZWlttSgiahry6RVylpuoGI1F6zkShhmS5NVGdGyFJICcMIX6P7UO03_GSEORetiBU1jOvBjLCiXgmiVTeDdCXQAUPTTVBN-i9Nz_A9jsmJv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>13540987</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison of propulsion kinetics and forearm EMG between two wheelchair pushrim designs</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Baldwin, M.A. ; Boninger, M.L. ; Koontz, A.M. ; Fay, B.T. ; Cooper, R.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, M.A. ; Boninger, M.L. ; Koontz, A.M. ; Fay, B.T. ; Cooper, R.A.</creatorcontrib><description>The electromyographic (EMG) activity of forearm muscles and pushrim forces were compared between a standard and an ergonomic wheelchair pushrim for a group of non-impaired subjects propelling at two and four miles per hour. The maximum EMG signals were not statistically different for any of the muscles between rims while significantly higher peak tangential, radial, and resultant forces were found for the ergonomic pushrims.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-687X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0589-1019</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780356748</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780356740</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780356757</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780356756</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.1999.802686</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Biomechanics ; Biomedical engineering ; Electrodes ; Electromyography ; Ergonomics ; Injuries ; Kinetic theory ; Muscles ; Propulsion ; Wheelchairs</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference : serving humanity advancing technology, Oct. 13-16, 99, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1999, Vol.1, p.608 vol.1-608</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/802686$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27924,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/802686$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boninger, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koontz, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, B.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, R.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of propulsion kinetics and forearm EMG between two wheelchair pushrim designs</title><title>Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference : serving humanity advancing technology, Oct. 13-16, 99, Atlanta, GA, USA</title><addtitle>IEMBS</addtitle><description>The electromyographic (EMG) activity of forearm muscles and pushrim forces were compared between a standard and an ergonomic wheelchair pushrim for a group of non-impaired subjects propelling at two and four miles per hour. The maximum EMG signals were not statistically different for any of the muscles between rims while significantly higher peak tangential, radial, and resultant forces were found for the ergonomic pushrims.</description><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Biomedical engineering</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Kinetic theory</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Propulsion</subject><subject>Wheelchairs</subject><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>0589-1019</issn><issn>1558-4615</issn><isbn>0780356748</isbn><isbn>9780780356740</isbn><isbn>9780780356757</isbn><isbn>0780356756</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1Lw0AYhBc_wLb6A_S0J2-p-5nsHrXEWmjxoEJvYZO8a1eTbNxNKP57A_U0DPMwDIPQLSVLSol-2OS7p7cl1VovFWGpSs_QjEqpEpFSeY7mJFOEyzQT6mIKiBZJqrL9FZrH-EUII0TSGdqvfNub4KLvsLe4D74fm-gm9-06GFwVselqbH0AE1qc79a4hOEI0OHh6PHxANBUB-MC7sd4CK7FNUT32cVrdGlNE-HmXxfo4zl_X70k29f1ZvW4TRylakiMNbTiGStlLZWlttSgiahry6RVylpuoGI1F6zkShhmS5NVGdGyFJICcMIX6P7UO03_GSEORetiBU1jOvBjLCiXgmiVTeDdCXQAUPTTVBN-i9Nz_A9jsmJv</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Baldwin, M.A.</creator><creator>Boninger, M.L.</creator><creator>Koontz, A.M.</creator><creator>Fay, B.T.</creator><creator>Cooper, R.A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>Comparison of propulsion kinetics and forearm EMG between two wheelchair pushrim designs</title><author>Baldwin, M.A. ; Boninger, M.L. ; Koontz, A.M. ; Fay, B.T. ; Cooper, R.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i118t-afa1c372b5d58f1fb9e904ddf25f88ff3aec2d342b384a2fba7c7095b451ee303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Biomedical engineering</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Kinetic theory</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Propulsion</topic><topic>Wheelchairs</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boninger, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koontz, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, B.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, R.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baldwin, M.A.</au><au>Boninger, M.L.</au><au>Koontz, A.M.</au><au>Fay, B.T.</au><au>Cooper, R.A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison of propulsion kinetics and forearm EMG between two wheelchair pushrim designs</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference : serving humanity advancing technology, Oct. 13-16, 99, Atlanta, GA, USA</btitle><stitle>IEMBS</stitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>1</volume><spage>608 vol.1</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>608 vol.1-608</pages><issn>1094-687X</issn><issn>0589-1019</issn><eissn>1558-4615</eissn><isbn>0780356748</isbn><isbn>9780780356740</isbn><isbn>9780780356757</isbn><isbn>0780356756</isbn><abstract>The electromyographic (EMG) activity of forearm muscles and pushrim forces were compared between a standard and an ergonomic wheelchair pushrim for a group of non-impaired subjects propelling at two and four miles per hour. The maximum EMG signals were not statistically different for any of the muscles between rims while significantly higher peak tangential, radial, and resultant forces were found for the ergonomic pushrims.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/IEMBS.1999.802686</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1094-687X
ispartof Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference : serving humanity advancing technology, Oct. 13-16, 99, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1999, Vol.1, p.608 vol.1-608
issn 1094-687X
0589-1019
1558-4615
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13540987
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Biomechanics
Biomedical engineering
Electrodes
Electromyography
Ergonomics
Injuries
Kinetic theory
Muscles
Propulsion
Wheelchairs
title Comparison of propulsion kinetics and forearm EMG between two wheelchair pushrim designs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A03%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20propulsion%20kinetics%20and%20forearm%20EMG%20between%20two%20wheelchair%20pushrim%20designs&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20First%20Joint%20BMES/EMBS%20Conference%20:%20serving%20humanity%20advancing%20technology,%20Oct.%2013-16,%2099,%20Atlanta,%20GA,%20USA&rft.au=Baldwin,%20M.A.&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=1&rft.spage=608%20vol.1&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=608%20vol.1-608&rft.issn=1094-687X&rft.eissn=1558-4615&rft.isbn=0780356748&rft.isbn_list=9780780356740&rft.isbn_list=9780780356757&rft.isbn_list=0780356756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/IEMBS.1999.802686&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_6IE%3E440038%3C/proquest_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13540987&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=802686&rfr_iscdi=true