Electronic Medical Record Adoption in Hospitals That Care for Children

Abstract Objective Hospitals that care for children face unique barriers in electronic medical records (EMR) use that may affect their ability to meaningfully use EMR. The purpose of this study was to investigate hospitals that care for children, both freestanding and adult hospitals with children&#...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic pediatrics 2013-05, Vol.13 (3), p.259-263
Hauptverfasser: Teufel, Ronald J., MD, MSCR, Kazley, Abby Swanson, PhD, Andrews, Annie L., MD, MSCR, Ebeling, Myla D., BS, Basco, William T., MD, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 263
container_issue 3
container_start_page 259
container_title Academic pediatrics
container_volume 13
creator Teufel, Ronald J., MD, MSCR
Kazley, Abby Swanson, PhD
Andrews, Annie L., MD, MSCR
Ebeling, Myla D., BS
Basco, William T., MD, MS
description Abstract Objective Hospitals that care for children face unique barriers in electronic medical records (EMR) use that may affect their ability to meaningfully use EMR. The purpose of this study was to investigate hospitals that care for children, both freestanding and adult hospitals with children's services, to determine progress toward advanced stages of EMR use. Methods The American Hospital Association survey described hospitals across the United States. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society 2006 and 2010 databases identified hospitals' EMR use. EMR stage was classified according to previous studies. Multivariable analysis was used to determine independent predictors of EMR use. Results The analysis included 2794 hospitals. During the study time frame, a significant increase occurred for hospitals moving into any stage of EMR in adult hospitals with children's services (47% to 75%; P < .001), while improvements for freestanding children's hospitals were modest at best (46% to 59%; P = .3). Conversely, freestanding children's hospitals had the largest gain in advance stage 3 adoption (6% to 39%; P < .001) compared to adult hospitals with children's services (6% to 23%; P < .001). Freestanding children's hospitals were less likely to use pharmacy information systems but more likely to use computerized provider order entry. Conclusions In 2010, freestanding children's hospitals had the highest percentage use of advanced stage EMR (39%), but the lowest improvements in percentage of hospitals entering into any stage of adoption over the study period. This trend created a digital divide among freestanding children's hospitals that may improve with pediatric-specific electronic medication management products.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.acap.2013.01.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1353042924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1876285913000119</els_id><sourcerecordid>1353042924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-13ca62e286c1321cc261a4fbd175ffda4645e654cb4abc411ee68999037789123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpidMkX6CHomMvdmYkrXYXSiGYpA4kFPLnLGTtLJa7Xm2ldSDfvlqc-tBDYGAG9N5j9BvGviAsEFBfbhfW2WEhAOUCMBd8YKdYlXouKl1-PM5FPWOfU9oCaFlV-oTNhNQVSCVP2c11R26MofeO31Pjne34A7kQG37VhGH0oee-56uQBj_aLvGnjR350kbibYh8ufFdE6k_Z5_a_EoXb_2MPd9cPy1X87tfP2-XV3dzpxDHOUpntaC8nkMp0Dmh0ap23WBZtG1jlVYF6UK5tbLryUKkq7quQZZlVaOQZ-zbIXeI4c-e0mh2PjnqOttT2CeDspCgRC1UloqD1MWQUqTWDNHvbHw1CGbiZ7Zm4mcmfgYwF2TT17f8_XpHzdHyD1gWfD8IKP_yxVM0yXnqXUYXM0jTBP9-_o__7K7z_UT9N71S2oZ97DM_gyYJA-ZxuuB0QJQAgFjLv1M3lCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1353042924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electronic Medical Record Adoption in Hospitals That Care for Children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Teufel, Ronald J., MD, MSCR ; Kazley, Abby Swanson, PhD ; Andrews, Annie L., MD, MSCR ; Ebeling, Myla D., BS ; Basco, William T., MD, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Teufel, Ronald J., MD, MSCR ; Kazley, Abby Swanson, PhD ; Andrews, Annie L., MD, MSCR ; Ebeling, Myla D., BS ; Basco, William T., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Hospitals that care for children face unique barriers in electronic medical records (EMR) use that may affect their ability to meaningfully use EMR. The purpose of this study was to investigate hospitals that care for children, both freestanding and adult hospitals with children's services, to determine progress toward advanced stages of EMR use. Methods The American Hospital Association survey described hospitals across the United States. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society 2006 and 2010 databases identified hospitals' EMR use. EMR stage was classified according to previous studies. Multivariable analysis was used to determine independent predictors of EMR use. Results The analysis included 2794 hospitals. During the study time frame, a significant increase occurred for hospitals moving into any stage of EMR in adult hospitals with children's services (47% to 75%; P &lt; .001), while improvements for freestanding children's hospitals were modest at best (46% to 59%; P = .3). Conversely, freestanding children's hospitals had the largest gain in advance stage 3 adoption (6% to 39%; P &lt; .001) compared to adult hospitals with children's services (6% to 23%; P &lt; .001). Freestanding children's hospitals were less likely to use pharmacy information systems but more likely to use computerized provider order entry. Conclusions In 2010, freestanding children's hospitals had the highest percentage use of advanced stage EMR (39%), but the lowest improvements in percentage of hospitals entering into any stage of adoption over the study period. This trend created a digital divide among freestanding children's hospitals that may improve with pediatric-specific electronic medication management products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1876-2859</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-2867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.01.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23680343</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>children's hospital ; digital divide ; Electronic Health Records - trends ; Electronic Health Records - utilization ; electronic medical records ; health information technology ; hospital ; Hospital Departments - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospitals, Pediatric - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Meaningful Use ; Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine ; Pediatrics ; Pediatrics - methods ; Pediatrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; United States</subject><ispartof>Academic pediatrics, 2013-05, Vol.13 (3), p.259-263</ispartof><rights>Academic Pediatric Association</rights><rights>2013 Academic Pediatric Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-13ca62e286c1321cc261a4fbd175ffda4645e654cb4abc411ee68999037789123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-13ca62e286c1321cc261a4fbd175ffda4645e654cb4abc411ee68999037789123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2013.01.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23680343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teufel, Ronald J., MD, MSCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazley, Abby Swanson, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Annie L., MD, MSCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Myla D., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basco, William T., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><title>Electronic Medical Record Adoption in Hospitals That Care for Children</title><title>Academic pediatrics</title><addtitle>Acad Pediatr</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Hospitals that care for children face unique barriers in electronic medical records (EMR) use that may affect their ability to meaningfully use EMR. The purpose of this study was to investigate hospitals that care for children, both freestanding and adult hospitals with children's services, to determine progress toward advanced stages of EMR use. Methods The American Hospital Association survey described hospitals across the United States. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society 2006 and 2010 databases identified hospitals' EMR use. EMR stage was classified according to previous studies. Multivariable analysis was used to determine independent predictors of EMR use. Results The analysis included 2794 hospitals. During the study time frame, a significant increase occurred for hospitals moving into any stage of EMR in adult hospitals with children's services (47% to 75%; P &lt; .001), while improvements for freestanding children's hospitals were modest at best (46% to 59%; P = .3). Conversely, freestanding children's hospitals had the largest gain in advance stage 3 adoption (6% to 39%; P &lt; .001) compared to adult hospitals with children's services (6% to 23%; P &lt; .001). Freestanding children's hospitals were less likely to use pharmacy information systems but more likely to use computerized provider order entry. Conclusions In 2010, freestanding children's hospitals had the highest percentage use of advanced stage EMR (39%), but the lowest improvements in percentage of hospitals entering into any stage of adoption over the study period. This trend created a digital divide among freestanding children's hospitals that may improve with pediatric-specific electronic medication management products.</description><subject>children's hospital</subject><subject>digital divide</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - trends</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - utilization</subject><subject>electronic medical records</subject><subject>health information technology</subject><subject>hospital</subject><subject>Hospital Departments - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals, Pediatric - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meaningful Use</subject><subject>Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pediatrics - methods</subject><subject>Pediatrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1876-2859</issn><issn>1876-2867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpidMkX6CHomMvdmYkrXYXSiGYpA4kFPLnLGTtLJa7Xm2ldSDfvlqc-tBDYGAG9N5j9BvGviAsEFBfbhfW2WEhAOUCMBd8YKdYlXouKl1-PM5FPWOfU9oCaFlV-oTNhNQVSCVP2c11R26MofeO31Pjne34A7kQG37VhGH0oee-56uQBj_aLvGnjR350kbibYh8ufFdE6k_Z5_a_EoXb_2MPd9cPy1X87tfP2-XV3dzpxDHOUpntaC8nkMp0Dmh0ap23WBZtG1jlVYF6UK5tbLryUKkq7quQZZlVaOQZ-zbIXeI4c-e0mh2PjnqOttT2CeDspCgRC1UloqD1MWQUqTWDNHvbHw1CGbiZ7Zm4mcmfgYwF2TT17f8_XpHzdHyD1gWfD8IKP_yxVM0yXnqXUYXM0jTBP9-_o__7K7z_UT9N71S2oZ97DM_gyYJA-ZxuuB0QJQAgFjLv1M3lCI</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Teufel, Ronald J., MD, MSCR</creator><creator>Kazley, Abby Swanson, PhD</creator><creator>Andrews, Annie L., MD, MSCR</creator><creator>Ebeling, Myla D., BS</creator><creator>Basco, William T., MD, MS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Electronic Medical Record Adoption in Hospitals That Care for Children</title><author>Teufel, Ronald J., MD, MSCR ; Kazley, Abby Swanson, PhD ; Andrews, Annie L., MD, MSCR ; Ebeling, Myla D., BS ; Basco, William T., MD, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-13ca62e286c1321cc261a4fbd175ffda4645e654cb4abc411ee68999037789123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>children's hospital</topic><topic>digital divide</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - trends</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - utilization</topic><topic>electronic medical records</topic><topic>health information technology</topic><topic>hospital</topic><topic>Hospital Departments - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals, Pediatric - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meaningful Use</topic><topic>Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pediatrics - methods</topic><topic>Pediatrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teufel, Ronald J., MD, MSCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazley, Abby Swanson, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Annie L., MD, MSCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Myla D., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basco, William T., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teufel, Ronald J., MD, MSCR</au><au>Kazley, Abby Swanson, PhD</au><au>Andrews, Annie L., MD, MSCR</au><au>Ebeling, Myla D., BS</au><au>Basco, William T., MD, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electronic Medical Record Adoption in Hospitals That Care for Children</atitle><jtitle>Academic pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Pediatr</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>259-263</pages><issn>1876-2859</issn><eissn>1876-2867</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective Hospitals that care for children face unique barriers in electronic medical records (EMR) use that may affect their ability to meaningfully use EMR. The purpose of this study was to investigate hospitals that care for children, both freestanding and adult hospitals with children's services, to determine progress toward advanced stages of EMR use. Methods The American Hospital Association survey described hospitals across the United States. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society 2006 and 2010 databases identified hospitals' EMR use. EMR stage was classified according to previous studies. Multivariable analysis was used to determine independent predictors of EMR use. Results The analysis included 2794 hospitals. During the study time frame, a significant increase occurred for hospitals moving into any stage of EMR in adult hospitals with children's services (47% to 75%; P &lt; .001), while improvements for freestanding children's hospitals were modest at best (46% to 59%; P = .3). Conversely, freestanding children's hospitals had the largest gain in advance stage 3 adoption (6% to 39%; P &lt; .001) compared to adult hospitals with children's services (6% to 23%; P &lt; .001). Freestanding children's hospitals were less likely to use pharmacy information systems but more likely to use computerized provider order entry. Conclusions In 2010, freestanding children's hospitals had the highest percentage use of advanced stage EMR (39%), but the lowest improvements in percentage of hospitals entering into any stage of adoption over the study period. This trend created a digital divide among freestanding children's hospitals that may improve with pediatric-specific electronic medication management products.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23680343</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.acap.2013.01.010</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1876-2859
ispartof Academic pediatrics, 2013-05, Vol.13 (3), p.259-263
issn 1876-2859
1876-2867
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1353042924
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects children's hospital
digital divide
Electronic Health Records - trends
Electronic Health Records - utilization
electronic medical records
health information technology
hospital
Hospital Departments - statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Pediatric - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Meaningful Use
Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine
Pediatrics
Pediatrics - methods
Pediatrics - statistics & numerical data
United States
title Electronic Medical Record Adoption in Hospitals That Care for Children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T09%3A42%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electronic%20Medical%20Record%20Adoption%20in%20Hospitals%20That%20Care%20for%20Children&rft.jtitle=Academic%20pediatrics&rft.au=Teufel,%20Ronald%20J.,%20MD,%20MSCR&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=259-263&rft.issn=1876-2859&rft.eissn=1876-2867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acap.2013.01.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1353042924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1353042924&rft_id=info:pmid/23680343&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1876285913000119&rfr_iscdi=true