Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology?

Abstract Piriform fossa, trochanteric fossa and greater trochanteric tip have each been described as entry points for antegrade femoral nailing. However, the terminology used for these entry points is confusing. The accuracy of the entry point nomenclature in published text and illustrations was rec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2013-06, Vol.44 (6), p.722-725
Hauptverfasser: Ansari Moein, C.M.S, Gerrits, P.D, Duis, H.J. ten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 725
container_issue 6
container_start_page 722
container_title Injury
container_volume 44
creator Ansari Moein, C.M.S
Gerrits, P.D
Duis, H.J. ten
description Abstract Piriform fossa, trochanteric fossa and greater trochanteric tip have each been described as entry points for antegrade femoral nailing. However, the terminology used for these entry points is confusing. The accuracy of the entry point nomenclature in published text and illustrations was recorded in this review study. The trochanteric fossa, a deep depression at the base of the femoral neck is indicated as ‘piriform fossa’ in the vast majority of the publications. Other publications indicate the insertion site of the tendon of the piriformis muscle on the greater trochanteric tip as ‘piriform fossa’. As a result of recurrent terminology error and consistent reproductions of it, the recommended entry point in literature is confusing and seems to need standardisation. The piriform fossa does not appear to exist in the femoral region. The trochanteric fossa is the standard entry point which most surgeons recommend for facilitating a standard straight intramedullary nail, as is in line with the medullary canal. The greater trochanteric tip is the lateral entry point for intramedullary nails with a proximal lateral bend.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.049
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1350894133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0020138312003609</els_id><sourcerecordid>1350894133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f113fa17b592de8bbacd6a00bfe29757a47de418061d6123116ab74760e644833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCGyCUI5eEmThrJxxAqIKCVIkD27Pl2GPqkMSLnSDt2-NoWw5cOHlkffOP5hvGXiFUCCjeDpWfhzWeqhqwrqCtoOmesB22siuhFvIp2wHUUCJv-QW7TGkAQAmcP2cXNc8E4n7H7g4xmHs9LxS9KVxISRchFkcfvQtxevxxxXJPhaNpje-Kg59ynam06NnqaH0iW-SEyc9hDD9OH16wZ06PiV4-vFfs7vOnw_WX8vbbzdfrj7elaVAupUPkTqPs911tqe17bazQAL2jupN7qRtpqcEWBFqBNUcUupeNFECiaVrOr9ibc-4xhl8rpUVNPhkaRz1TWJNCvoe2a5BvaHNGTcwrRXLqGP2k40khqE2oGtRZqNqEKmhVFprbXj9MWPuJ7N-mR4MZeH8GKO_521NUyXiaDVkfySzKBv-_Cf8GmNHP3ujxJ50oDWGNc3aoUKXco75vR91uijUAF9DxPxCTna8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1350894133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ansari Moein, C.M.S ; Gerrits, P.D ; Duis, H.J. ten</creator><creatorcontrib>Ansari Moein, C.M.S ; Gerrits, P.D ; Duis, H.J. ten</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Piriform fossa, trochanteric fossa and greater trochanteric tip have each been described as entry points for antegrade femoral nailing. However, the terminology used for these entry points is confusing. The accuracy of the entry point nomenclature in published text and illustrations was recorded in this review study. The trochanteric fossa, a deep depression at the base of the femoral neck is indicated as ‘piriform fossa’ in the vast majority of the publications. Other publications indicate the insertion site of the tendon of the piriformis muscle on the greater trochanteric tip as ‘piriform fossa’. As a result of recurrent terminology error and consistent reproductions of it, the recommended entry point in literature is confusing and seems to need standardisation. The piriform fossa does not appear to exist in the femoral region. The trochanteric fossa is the standard entry point which most surgeons recommend for facilitating a standard straight intramedullary nail, as is in line with the medullary canal. The greater trochanteric tip is the lateral entry point for intramedullary nails with a proximal lateral bend.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23026115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antegrade femoral nailing ; Entry point-greater trochanter ; Female ; Femoral fractures ; Femoral Fractures - surgery ; Femur - anatomy &amp; histology ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Insertio musculi piriformis ; Intramedullary nailing ; Male ; Orthopedics ; Piriform fossa ; Reference Standards ; Terminology ; Terminology as Topic ; Trochanter tip ; Trochanteric fossa</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2013-06, Vol.44 (6), p.722-725</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f113fa17b592de8bbacd6a00bfe29757a47de418061d6123116ab74760e644833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f113fa17b592de8bbacd6a00bfe29757a47de418061d6123116ab74760e644833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.049$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23026115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ansari Moein, C.M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerrits, P.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duis, H.J. ten</creatorcontrib><title>Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology?</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>Abstract Piriform fossa, trochanteric fossa and greater trochanteric tip have each been described as entry points for antegrade femoral nailing. However, the terminology used for these entry points is confusing. The accuracy of the entry point nomenclature in published text and illustrations was recorded in this review study. The trochanteric fossa, a deep depression at the base of the femoral neck is indicated as ‘piriform fossa’ in the vast majority of the publications. Other publications indicate the insertion site of the tendon of the piriformis muscle on the greater trochanteric tip as ‘piriform fossa’. As a result of recurrent terminology error and consistent reproductions of it, the recommended entry point in literature is confusing and seems to need standardisation. The piriform fossa does not appear to exist in the femoral region. The trochanteric fossa is the standard entry point which most surgeons recommend for facilitating a standard straight intramedullary nail, as is in line with the medullary canal. The greater trochanteric tip is the lateral entry point for intramedullary nails with a proximal lateral bend.</description><subject>Antegrade femoral nailing</subject><subject>Entry point-greater trochanter</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral fractures</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insertio musculi piriformis</subject><subject>Intramedullary nailing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Piriform fossa</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>Trochanter tip</subject><subject>Trochanteric fossa</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCGyCUI5eEmThrJxxAqIKCVIkD27Pl2GPqkMSLnSDt2-NoWw5cOHlkffOP5hvGXiFUCCjeDpWfhzWeqhqwrqCtoOmesB22siuhFvIp2wHUUCJv-QW7TGkAQAmcP2cXNc8E4n7H7g4xmHs9LxS9KVxISRchFkcfvQtxevxxxXJPhaNpje-Kg59ynam06NnqaH0iW-SEyc9hDD9OH16wZ06PiV4-vFfs7vOnw_WX8vbbzdfrj7elaVAupUPkTqPs911tqe17bazQAL2jupN7qRtpqcEWBFqBNUcUupeNFECiaVrOr9ibc-4xhl8rpUVNPhkaRz1TWJNCvoe2a5BvaHNGTcwrRXLqGP2k40khqE2oGtRZqNqEKmhVFprbXj9MWPuJ7N-mR4MZeH8GKO_521NUyXiaDVkfySzKBv-_Cf8GmNHP3ujxJ50oDWGNc3aoUKXco75vR91uijUAF9DxPxCTna8</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Ansari Moein, C.M.S</creator><creator>Gerrits, P.D</creator><creator>Duis, H.J. ten</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology?</title><author>Ansari Moein, C.M.S ; Gerrits, P.D ; Duis, H.J. ten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f113fa17b592de8bbacd6a00bfe29757a47de418061d6123116ab74760e644833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Antegrade femoral nailing</topic><topic>Entry point-greater trochanter</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral fractures</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insertio musculi piriformis</topic><topic>Intramedullary nailing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Piriform fossa</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>Trochanter tip</topic><topic>Trochanteric fossa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ansari Moein, C.M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerrits, P.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duis, H.J. ten</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ansari Moein, C.M.S</au><au>Gerrits, P.D</au><au>Duis, H.J. ten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology?</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>722</spage><epage>725</epage><pages>722-725</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>Abstract Piriform fossa, trochanteric fossa and greater trochanteric tip have each been described as entry points for antegrade femoral nailing. However, the terminology used for these entry points is confusing. The accuracy of the entry point nomenclature in published text and illustrations was recorded in this review study. The trochanteric fossa, a deep depression at the base of the femoral neck is indicated as ‘piriform fossa’ in the vast majority of the publications. Other publications indicate the insertion site of the tendon of the piriformis muscle on the greater trochanteric tip as ‘piriform fossa’. As a result of recurrent terminology error and consistent reproductions of it, the recommended entry point in literature is confusing and seems to need standardisation. The piriform fossa does not appear to exist in the femoral region. The trochanteric fossa is the standard entry point which most surgeons recommend for facilitating a standard straight intramedullary nail, as is in line with the medullary canal. The greater trochanteric tip is the lateral entry point for intramedullary nails with a proximal lateral bend.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23026115</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.049</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2013-06, Vol.44 (6), p.722-725
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1350894133
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Antegrade femoral nailing
Entry point-greater trochanter
Female
Femoral fractures
Femoral Fractures - surgery
Femur - anatomy & histology
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
Insertio musculi piriformis
Intramedullary nailing
Male
Orthopedics
Piriform fossa
Reference Standards
Terminology
Terminology as Topic
Trochanter tip
Trochanteric fossa
title Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A16%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trochanteric%20fossa%20or%20piriform%20fossa%20of%20the%20femur:%20Time%20for%20standardised%20terminology?&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Ansari%20Moein,%20C.M.S&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=722&rft.epage=725&rft.pages=722-725&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1350894133%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1350894133&rft_id=info:pmid/23026115&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0020138312003609&rfr_iscdi=true