Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology?
Abstract Piriform fossa, trochanteric fossa and greater trochanteric tip have each been described as entry points for antegrade femoral nailing. However, the terminology used for these entry points is confusing. The accuracy of the entry point nomenclature in published text and illustrations was rec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Injury 2013-06, Vol.44 (6), p.722-725 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 725 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 722 |
container_title | Injury |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Ansari Moein, C.M.S Gerrits, P.D Duis, H.J. ten |
description | Abstract Piriform fossa, trochanteric fossa and greater trochanteric tip have each been described as entry points for antegrade femoral nailing. However, the terminology used for these entry points is confusing. The accuracy of the entry point nomenclature in published text and illustrations was recorded in this review study. The trochanteric fossa, a deep depression at the base of the femoral neck is indicated as ‘piriform fossa’ in the vast majority of the publications. Other publications indicate the insertion site of the tendon of the piriformis muscle on the greater trochanteric tip as ‘piriform fossa’. As a result of recurrent terminology error and consistent reproductions of it, the recommended entry point in literature is confusing and seems to need standardisation. The piriform fossa does not appear to exist in the femoral region. The trochanteric fossa is the standard entry point which most surgeons recommend for facilitating a standard straight intramedullary nail, as is in line with the medullary canal. The greater trochanteric tip is the lateral entry point for intramedullary nails with a proximal lateral bend. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.049 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1350894133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0020138312003609</els_id><sourcerecordid>1350894133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f113fa17b592de8bbacd6a00bfe29757a47de418061d6123116ab74760e644833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCGyCUI5eEmThrJxxAqIKCVIkD27Pl2GPqkMSLnSDt2-NoWw5cOHlkffOP5hvGXiFUCCjeDpWfhzWeqhqwrqCtoOmesB22siuhFvIp2wHUUCJv-QW7TGkAQAmcP2cXNc8E4n7H7g4xmHs9LxS9KVxISRchFkcfvQtxevxxxXJPhaNpje-Kg59ynam06NnqaH0iW-SEyc9hDD9OH16wZ06PiV4-vFfs7vOnw_WX8vbbzdfrj7elaVAupUPkTqPs911tqe17bazQAL2jupN7qRtpqcEWBFqBNUcUupeNFECiaVrOr9ibc-4xhl8rpUVNPhkaRz1TWJNCvoe2a5BvaHNGTcwrRXLqGP2k40khqE2oGtRZqNqEKmhVFprbXj9MWPuJ7N-mR4MZeH8GKO_521NUyXiaDVkfySzKBv-_Cf8GmNHP3ujxJ50oDWGNc3aoUKXco75vR91uijUAF9DxPxCTna8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1350894133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ansari Moein, C.M.S ; Gerrits, P.D ; Duis, H.J. ten</creator><creatorcontrib>Ansari Moein, C.M.S ; Gerrits, P.D ; Duis, H.J. ten</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Piriform fossa, trochanteric fossa and greater trochanteric tip have each been described as entry points for antegrade femoral nailing. However, the terminology used for these entry points is confusing. The accuracy of the entry point nomenclature in published text and illustrations was recorded in this review study. The trochanteric fossa, a deep depression at the base of the femoral neck is indicated as ‘piriform fossa’ in the vast majority of the publications. Other publications indicate the insertion site of the tendon of the piriformis muscle on the greater trochanteric tip as ‘piriform fossa’. As a result of recurrent terminology error and consistent reproductions of it, the recommended entry point in literature is confusing and seems to need standardisation. The piriform fossa does not appear to exist in the femoral region. The trochanteric fossa is the standard entry point which most surgeons recommend for facilitating a standard straight intramedullary nail, as is in line with the medullary canal. The greater trochanteric tip is the lateral entry point for intramedullary nails with a proximal lateral bend.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23026115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antegrade femoral nailing ; Entry point-greater trochanter ; Female ; Femoral fractures ; Femoral Fractures - surgery ; Femur - anatomy & histology ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Insertio musculi piriformis ; Intramedullary nailing ; Male ; Orthopedics ; Piriform fossa ; Reference Standards ; Terminology ; Terminology as Topic ; Trochanter tip ; Trochanteric fossa</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2013-06, Vol.44 (6), p.722-725</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f113fa17b592de8bbacd6a00bfe29757a47de418061d6123116ab74760e644833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f113fa17b592de8bbacd6a00bfe29757a47de418061d6123116ab74760e644833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.049$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23026115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ansari Moein, C.M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerrits, P.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duis, H.J. ten</creatorcontrib><title>Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology?</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>Abstract Piriform fossa, trochanteric fossa and greater trochanteric tip have each been described as entry points for antegrade femoral nailing. However, the terminology used for these entry points is confusing. The accuracy of the entry point nomenclature in published text and illustrations was recorded in this review study. The trochanteric fossa, a deep depression at the base of the femoral neck is indicated as ‘piriform fossa’ in the vast majority of the publications. Other publications indicate the insertion site of the tendon of the piriformis muscle on the greater trochanteric tip as ‘piriform fossa’. As a result of recurrent terminology error and consistent reproductions of it, the recommended entry point in literature is confusing and seems to need standardisation. The piriform fossa does not appear to exist in the femoral region. The trochanteric fossa is the standard entry point which most surgeons recommend for facilitating a standard straight intramedullary nail, as is in line with the medullary canal. The greater trochanteric tip is the lateral entry point for intramedullary nails with a proximal lateral bend.</description><subject>Antegrade femoral nailing</subject><subject>Entry point-greater trochanter</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral fractures</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Femur - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insertio musculi piriformis</subject><subject>Intramedullary nailing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Piriform fossa</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>Trochanter tip</subject><subject>Trochanteric fossa</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCGyCUI5eEmThrJxxAqIKCVIkD27Pl2GPqkMSLnSDt2-NoWw5cOHlkffOP5hvGXiFUCCjeDpWfhzWeqhqwrqCtoOmesB22siuhFvIp2wHUUCJv-QW7TGkAQAmcP2cXNc8E4n7H7g4xmHs9LxS9KVxISRchFkcfvQtxevxxxXJPhaNpje-Kg59ynam06NnqaH0iW-SEyc9hDD9OH16wZ06PiV4-vFfs7vOnw_WX8vbbzdfrj7elaVAupUPkTqPs911tqe17bazQAL2jupN7qRtpqcEWBFqBNUcUupeNFECiaVrOr9ibc-4xhl8rpUVNPhkaRz1TWJNCvoe2a5BvaHNGTcwrRXLqGP2k40khqE2oGtRZqNqEKmhVFprbXj9MWPuJ7N-mR4MZeH8GKO_521NUyXiaDVkfySzKBv-_Cf8GmNHP3ujxJ50oDWGNc3aoUKXco75vR91uijUAF9DxPxCTna8</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Ansari Moein, C.M.S</creator><creator>Gerrits, P.D</creator><creator>Duis, H.J. ten</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology?</title><author>Ansari Moein, C.M.S ; Gerrits, P.D ; Duis, H.J. ten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f113fa17b592de8bbacd6a00bfe29757a47de418061d6123116ab74760e644833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Antegrade femoral nailing</topic><topic>Entry point-greater trochanter</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral fractures</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Femur - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insertio musculi piriformis</topic><topic>Intramedullary nailing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Piriform fossa</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>Trochanter tip</topic><topic>Trochanteric fossa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ansari Moein, C.M.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerrits, P.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duis, H.J. ten</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ansari Moein, C.M.S</au><au>Gerrits, P.D</au><au>Duis, H.J. ten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology?</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>722</spage><epage>725</epage><pages>722-725</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>Abstract Piriform fossa, trochanteric fossa and greater trochanteric tip have each been described as entry points for antegrade femoral nailing. However, the terminology used for these entry points is confusing. The accuracy of the entry point nomenclature in published text and illustrations was recorded in this review study. The trochanteric fossa, a deep depression at the base of the femoral neck is indicated as ‘piriform fossa’ in the vast majority of the publications. Other publications indicate the insertion site of the tendon of the piriformis muscle on the greater trochanteric tip as ‘piriform fossa’. As a result of recurrent terminology error and consistent reproductions of it, the recommended entry point in literature is confusing and seems to need standardisation. The piriform fossa does not appear to exist in the femoral region. The trochanteric fossa is the standard entry point which most surgeons recommend for facilitating a standard straight intramedullary nail, as is in line with the medullary canal. The greater trochanteric tip is the lateral entry point for intramedullary nails with a proximal lateral bend.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23026115</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.049</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-1383 |
ispartof | Injury, 2013-06, Vol.44 (6), p.722-725 |
issn | 0020-1383 1879-0267 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1350894133 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Antegrade femoral nailing Entry point-greater trochanter Female Femoral fractures Femoral Fractures - surgery Femur - anatomy & histology Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods Guidelines as Topic Humans Insertio musculi piriformis Intramedullary nailing Male Orthopedics Piriform fossa Reference Standards Terminology Terminology as Topic Trochanter tip Trochanteric fossa |
title | Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: Time for standardised terminology? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A16%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trochanteric%20fossa%20or%20piriform%20fossa%20of%20the%20femur:%20Time%20for%20standardised%20terminology?&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Ansari%20Moein,%20C.M.S&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=722&rft.epage=725&rft.pages=722-725&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1350894133%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1350894133&rft_id=info:pmid/23026115&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0020138312003609&rfr_iscdi=true |