Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study
doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2012.00650.x Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study Objective: Compare the efficacy of amine fluoride toothpaste and gel with chlorhexidine spray in an institutionalised population. Background: People who live in nu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Gerodontology 2013-06, Vol.30 (2), p.112-118 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 118 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 112 |
| container_title | Gerodontology |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | López, Rosa Moreno Uribe, Manuel Ribera Rodríguez, Belisa Olmo Casasempere, Inmaculada Vela |
| description | doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2012.00650.x Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study
Objective: Compare the efficacy of amine fluoride toothpaste and gel with chlorhexidine spray in an institutionalised population.
Background: People who live in nursing homes have poorer oral hygiene because of their dependency for the basic activities of daily living as they rely on caregivers.
Methods: Twenty‐six people over 65 years old who had at least four teeth and living in a nursing home. They were assigned to three groups: A: amine fluoride toothpaste and once a week amine fluoride gel (Elmex®), B: 0.12% spray‐chlorhexidine once a day (Perio‐Aid®) and C: brush teeth without toothpaste. The plaque and gingival index of Silness and Löe, General Oral Health Assessment Index, McLeran and Pfeiffer index were recorded, and the number of colonies of Streptoccocus mutans and Lactobacillus and the remineralisation of caries were evaluated using Diagnodent®. Measurements were taken at the beginning of the study and after 6 months.
Results: Twenty‐two people finished the study. No group showed a statistical difference in the plaque or gingival index, but there was a tendency to show improvement in the amine fluoride group. There was also no difference between the number of colonies of either S. mutans or lactobacillus. There was a significant difference between the plaque and gingival index and the cognitive status (p = 0.0054), along with their requirement for assistance to perform good oral hygiene (p = 0.0001). Both products remineralised the carious lesions in this period compared with the control group (p = 0.0151).
Conclusion: The plaque and gingival indices did not improve during the study, but both products remineralised the previous caries lesions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00650.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1349702912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1349702912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4060-b2d9cee0e35b7e263547e3404c677b52154ba2a4a97d17ace37f6ace2f16d6683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1vEzEQhi0EomnhLyAfuezW304QFxSVpGpFVT7E0XjXs4rD7jrYXiXh17NLSs7MZUaa95mRHoQwJSUd63pbUi1owbicl4xQVhKiJCkPz9DsvHiOZkRzURClxAW6TGlLCJOa8ZfogjGuhORkhn4sQ7ez0afQ4wryHqDHtvM94KYdQvQOsO0drjdtiBs4eDet9j5vsO9T9nnIPvS29b_BYWgdxPQOW7zzbcg45cEdX6EXjW0TvH7qV-jbx5uvy3Vx_7C6XX64L2pBFCkq5hY1AAEuKw1McSk0cEFErbSuJKNSVJZZYRfaUW1r4LpRY2MNVU6pOb9Cb093dzH8GiBl0_lUQ9vaHsKQDOVioQlbUDZG56doHUNKERqzi76z8WgoMZNfszWTRjNpNJNf89evOYzom6cvQ9WBO4P_hI6B96fA3rdw_O_DZnXzeRxGvDjhPmU4nHEbfxqluZbm-6eVWX1Z363X4tHM-R-Xxpls</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1349702912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>López, Rosa Moreno ; Uribe, Manuel Ribera ; Rodríguez, Belisa Olmo ; Casasempere, Inmaculada Vela</creator><creatorcontrib>López, Rosa Moreno ; Uribe, Manuel Ribera ; Rodríguez, Belisa Olmo ; Casasempere, Inmaculada Vela</creatorcontrib><description>doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2012.00650.x Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study
Objective: Compare the efficacy of amine fluoride toothpaste and gel with chlorhexidine spray in an institutionalised population.
Background: People who live in nursing homes have poorer oral hygiene because of their dependency for the basic activities of daily living as they rely on caregivers.
Methods: Twenty‐six people over 65 years old who had at least four teeth and living in a nursing home. They were assigned to three groups: A: amine fluoride toothpaste and once a week amine fluoride gel (Elmex®), B: 0.12% spray‐chlorhexidine once a day (Perio‐Aid®) and C: brush teeth without toothpaste. The plaque and gingival index of Silness and Löe, General Oral Health Assessment Index, McLeran and Pfeiffer index were recorded, and the number of colonies of Streptoccocus mutans and Lactobacillus and the remineralisation of caries were evaluated using Diagnodent®. Measurements were taken at the beginning of the study and after 6 months.
Results: Twenty‐two people finished the study. No group showed a statistical difference in the plaque or gingival index, but there was a tendency to show improvement in the amine fluoride group. There was also no difference between the number of colonies of either S. mutans or lactobacillus. There was a significant difference between the plaque and gingival index and the cognitive status (p = 0.0054), along with their requirement for assistance to perform good oral hygiene (p = 0.0001). Both products remineralised the carious lesions in this period compared with the control group (p = 0.0151).
Conclusion: The plaque and gingival indices did not improve during the study, but both products remineralised the previous caries lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-0664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00650.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22364530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; amine-fluoride ; Anti-Infective Agents, Local - therapeutic use ; Attitude to Health ; Bacterial Load - drug effects ; caries prevention ; Cariostatic Agents - therapeutic use ; chlorhexidine ; Chlorhexidine - therapeutic use ; Cognition - physiology ; Dental Caries - drug therapy ; Dental Plaque - prevention & control ; Dental Plaque Index ; Dentistry ; Diamines - therapeutic use ; elder ; Female ; Fluorides - therapeutic use ; Follow-Up Studies ; Geriatric Assessment ; Gingivitis - prevention & control ; Humans ; Institutionalization ; institutionalized ; Lactobacillus - drug effects ; Lactobacillus - isolation & purification ; Male ; Nursing Homes ; Oral Health ; Oral Hygiene ; Periodontal Index ; Pilot Projects ; Streptococcus mutans - drug effects ; Streptococcus mutans - isolation & purification ; Tooth Remineralization - methods ; Toothbrushing - instrumentation ; Toothpastes - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Gerodontology, 2013-06, Vol.30 (2), p.112-118</ispartof><rights>2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S and The Gerodontology Society. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S and The Gerodontology Society. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4060-b2d9cee0e35b7e263547e3404c677b52154ba2a4a97d17ace37f6ace2f16d6683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4060-b2d9cee0e35b7e263547e3404c677b52154ba2a4a97d17ace37f6ace2f16d6683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1741-2358.2012.00650.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1741-2358.2012.00650.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22364530$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>López, Rosa Moreno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uribe, Manuel Ribera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Belisa Olmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casasempere, Inmaculada Vela</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study</title><title>Gerodontology</title><addtitle>Gerodontology</addtitle><description>doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2012.00650.x Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study
Objective: Compare the efficacy of amine fluoride toothpaste and gel with chlorhexidine spray in an institutionalised population.
Background: People who live in nursing homes have poorer oral hygiene because of their dependency for the basic activities of daily living as they rely on caregivers.
Methods: Twenty‐six people over 65 years old who had at least four teeth and living in a nursing home. They were assigned to three groups: A: amine fluoride toothpaste and once a week amine fluoride gel (Elmex®), B: 0.12% spray‐chlorhexidine once a day (Perio‐Aid®) and C: brush teeth without toothpaste. The plaque and gingival index of Silness and Löe, General Oral Health Assessment Index, McLeran and Pfeiffer index were recorded, and the number of colonies of Streptoccocus mutans and Lactobacillus and the remineralisation of caries were evaluated using Diagnodent®. Measurements were taken at the beginning of the study and after 6 months.
Results: Twenty‐two people finished the study. No group showed a statistical difference in the plaque or gingival index, but there was a tendency to show improvement in the amine fluoride group. There was also no difference between the number of colonies of either S. mutans or lactobacillus. There was a significant difference between the plaque and gingival index and the cognitive status (p = 0.0054), along with their requirement for assistance to perform good oral hygiene (p = 0.0001). Both products remineralised the carious lesions in this period compared with the control group (p = 0.0151).
Conclusion: The plaque and gingival indices did not improve during the study, but both products remineralised the previous caries lesions.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>amine-fluoride</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Bacterial Load - drug effects</subject><subject>caries prevention</subject><subject>Cariostatic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>chlorhexidine</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Dental Caries - drug therapy</subject><subject>Dental Plaque - prevention & control</subject><subject>Dental Plaque Index</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diamines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>elder</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Gingivitis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>institutionalized</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - drug effects</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Oral Health</subject><subject>Oral Hygiene</subject><subject>Periodontal Index</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Streptococcus mutans - drug effects</subject><subject>Streptococcus mutans - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Tooth Remineralization - methods</subject><subject>Toothbrushing - instrumentation</subject><subject>Toothpastes - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0734-0664</issn><issn>1741-2358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1vEzEQhi0EomnhLyAfuezW304QFxSVpGpFVT7E0XjXs4rD7jrYXiXh17NLSs7MZUaa95mRHoQwJSUd63pbUi1owbicl4xQVhKiJCkPz9DsvHiOZkRzURClxAW6TGlLCJOa8ZfogjGuhORkhn4sQ7ez0afQ4wryHqDHtvM94KYdQvQOsO0drjdtiBs4eDet9j5vsO9T9nnIPvS29b_BYWgdxPQOW7zzbcg45cEdX6EXjW0TvH7qV-jbx5uvy3Vx_7C6XX64L2pBFCkq5hY1AAEuKw1McSk0cEFErbSuJKNSVJZZYRfaUW1r4LpRY2MNVU6pOb9Cb093dzH8GiBl0_lUQ9vaHsKQDOVioQlbUDZG56doHUNKERqzi76z8WgoMZNfszWTRjNpNJNf89evOYzom6cvQ9WBO4P_hI6B96fA3rdw_O_DZnXzeRxGvDjhPmU4nHEbfxqluZbm-6eVWX1Z363X4tHM-R-Xxpls</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>López, Rosa Moreno</creator><creator>Uribe, Manuel Ribera</creator><creator>Rodríguez, Belisa Olmo</creator><creator>Casasempere, Inmaculada Vela</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study</title><author>López, Rosa Moreno ; Uribe, Manuel Ribera ; Rodríguez, Belisa Olmo ; Casasempere, Inmaculada Vela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4060-b2d9cee0e35b7e263547e3404c677b52154ba2a4a97d17ace37f6ace2f16d6683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>amine-fluoride</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Bacterial Load - drug effects</topic><topic>caries prevention</topic><topic>Cariostatic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>chlorhexidine</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Dental Caries - drug therapy</topic><topic>Dental Plaque - prevention & control</topic><topic>Dental Plaque Index</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diamines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>elder</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Gingivitis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>institutionalized</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - drug effects</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Oral Health</topic><topic>Oral Hygiene</topic><topic>Periodontal Index</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Streptococcus mutans - drug effects</topic><topic>Streptococcus mutans - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Tooth Remineralization - methods</topic><topic>Toothbrushing - instrumentation</topic><topic>Toothpastes - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>López, Rosa Moreno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uribe, Manuel Ribera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Belisa Olmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casasempere, Inmaculada Vela</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gerodontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>López, Rosa Moreno</au><au>Uribe, Manuel Ribera</au><au>Rodríguez, Belisa Olmo</au><au>Casasempere, Inmaculada Vela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Gerodontology</jtitle><addtitle>Gerodontology</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>112-118</pages><issn>0734-0664</issn><eissn>1741-2358</eissn><abstract>doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2012.00650.x Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study
Objective: Compare the efficacy of amine fluoride toothpaste and gel with chlorhexidine spray in an institutionalised population.
Background: People who live in nursing homes have poorer oral hygiene because of their dependency for the basic activities of daily living as they rely on caregivers.
Methods: Twenty‐six people over 65 years old who had at least four teeth and living in a nursing home. They were assigned to three groups: A: amine fluoride toothpaste and once a week amine fluoride gel (Elmex®), B: 0.12% spray‐chlorhexidine once a day (Perio‐Aid®) and C: brush teeth without toothpaste. The plaque and gingival index of Silness and Löe, General Oral Health Assessment Index, McLeran and Pfeiffer index were recorded, and the number of colonies of Streptoccocus mutans and Lactobacillus and the remineralisation of caries were evaluated using Diagnodent®. Measurements were taken at the beginning of the study and after 6 months.
Results: Twenty‐two people finished the study. No group showed a statistical difference in the plaque or gingival index, but there was a tendency to show improvement in the amine fluoride group. There was also no difference between the number of colonies of either S. mutans or lactobacillus. There was a significant difference between the plaque and gingival index and the cognitive status (p = 0.0054), along with their requirement for assistance to perform good oral hygiene (p = 0.0001). Both products remineralised the carious lesions in this period compared with the control group (p = 0.0151).
Conclusion: The plaque and gingival indices did not improve during the study, but both products remineralised the previous caries lesions.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22364530</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00650.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0734-0664 |
| ispartof | Gerodontology, 2013-06, Vol.30 (2), p.112-118 |
| issn | 0734-0664 1741-2358 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1349702912 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
| subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over amine-fluoride Anti-Infective Agents, Local - therapeutic use Attitude to Health Bacterial Load - drug effects caries prevention Cariostatic Agents - therapeutic use chlorhexidine Chlorhexidine - therapeutic use Cognition - physiology Dental Caries - drug therapy Dental Plaque - prevention & control Dental Plaque Index Dentistry Diamines - therapeutic use elder Female Fluorides - therapeutic use Follow-Up Studies Geriatric Assessment Gingivitis - prevention & control Humans Institutionalization institutionalized Lactobacillus - drug effects Lactobacillus - isolation & purification Male Nursing Homes Oral Health Oral Hygiene Periodontal Index Pilot Projects Streptococcus mutans - drug effects Streptococcus mutans - isolation & purification Tooth Remineralization - methods Toothbrushing - instrumentation Toothpastes - therapeutic use |
| title | Comparison between amine fluoride and chlorhexidine with institutionalized elders: a pilot study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A55%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20amine%20fluoride%20and%20chlorhexidine%20with%20institutionalized%20elders:%20a%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Gerodontology&rft.au=L%C3%B3pez,%20Rosa%20Moreno&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=112-118&rft.issn=0734-0664&rft.eissn=1741-2358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00650.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1349702912%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1349702912&rft_id=info:pmid/22364530&rfr_iscdi=true |