Risk factors for surgical site infection in breast surgery
Aims and objectives To study risks of surgical site infection in breast surgery. The objectives were to measure the association of postoperative infection with patient‐ and procedure‐related factors. Background The infection rate in breast surgery is expected to be low but it varies a lot. The varia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical nursing 2013-04, Vol.22 (7-8), p.948-957 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 957 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7-8 |
container_start_page | 948 |
container_title | Journal of clinical nursing |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Teija-Kaisa, Aholaakko Eija, Metsälä Marja, Sihvonen Outi, Lyytikäinen |
description | Aims and objectives
To study risks of surgical site infection in breast surgery. The objectives were to measure the association of postoperative infection with patient‐ and procedure‐related factors.
Background
The infection rate in breast surgery is expected to be low but it varies a lot. The variation is recommended to be assessed by measuring procedure‐related factors.
Design
A retrospective chart review of 982 breast surgery patients was completed.
Methods
The data on patient demographics, procedure types, patient and surgery‐related factors were collected. A multivariate logistic regression model for all breast operations (n = 982), lumpectomies (n = 700) and mastectomies (n = 282) was performed.
Results
The infection rate was 6·7%. In a multivariate logistic regression model for all operations, a contaminated or dirty wound, high American Society of Anesthesiologists score, high body mass index, use of surgical drains and re‐operation predicted increased infection risk. In lumpectomies high body mass index and use of surgical drains predicted increased risk. In mastectomies, the significant predictor was re‐operation.
Conclusions
The surgical site infection rate was high. In addition to the two classical risks (high wound class and anaesthesia risk), high body mass index, re‐operation and use of surgical drain increased the infection risk among all patients.
Relevance to clinical practice
In breast surgery careful assessment, documentation and adherence to aseptic practices are important with all patients. Patients with heavy weight need special attention. The need for antimicrobial prophylaxis in re‐operations and the need of surgical drains in lumpectomies are important to consider carefully. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jocn.12009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1349697122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2916273831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4649-ec5cce7a403bf4237304cc0d7d72851aeb89998883a4c5f066c8ffeaef96dd1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EFP2zAUB3ALDY1SduEDTJF2mSaF-dmOHe82VcCGqqIhUI-W6zxPLmkCdiLWb0_aQg87gC_Ph9_7S-9PyCnQMxje92XrmjNglOoDMgIui5wpyj6QEdWS5UClOiLHKS0pBc4Y_0iOGAcGTIoR-XET0n3mrevamDLfxiz18W9wts5S6DALjUfXhbYZftkiok3dVmBcn5BDb-uEn17mmNxdnN9OfuXT68vfk5_T3AkpdI6ucA6VFZQvvGBccSqco5WqFCsLsLgotdZlWXIrXOGplK70Hi16LasKKj4mX3e5D7F97DF1ZhWSw7q2DbZ9MsCFllrBcNr7FJSgUig-0C__0WXbx2Y4ZKOkLAsqYVDfdsrFNqWI3jzEsLJxbYCaTflmU77Zlj_gzy-R_WKF1Z6-tj0A2IGnUOP6jShzdT2ZvYbmu52QOvy337Hx3kjFVWHms0vzR16UcwYzM-fPQV-caw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1316685061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk factors for surgical site infection in breast surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Teija-Kaisa, Aholaakko ; Eija, Metsälä ; Marja, Sihvonen ; Outi, Lyytikäinen</creator><creatorcontrib>Teija-Kaisa, Aholaakko ; Eija, Metsälä ; Marja, Sihvonen ; Outi, Lyytikäinen</creatorcontrib><description>Aims and objectives
To study risks of surgical site infection in breast surgery. The objectives were to measure the association of postoperative infection with patient‐ and procedure‐related factors.
Background
The infection rate in breast surgery is expected to be low but it varies a lot. The variation is recommended to be assessed by measuring procedure‐related factors.
Design
A retrospective chart review of 982 breast surgery patients was completed.
Methods
The data on patient demographics, procedure types, patient and surgery‐related factors were collected. A multivariate logistic regression model for all breast operations (n = 982), lumpectomies (n = 700) and mastectomies (n = 282) was performed.
Results
The infection rate was 6·7%. In a multivariate logistic regression model for all operations, a contaminated or dirty wound, high American Society of Anesthesiologists score, high body mass index, use of surgical drains and re‐operation predicted increased infection risk. In lumpectomies high body mass index and use of surgical drains predicted increased risk. In mastectomies, the significant predictor was re‐operation.
Conclusions
The surgical site infection rate was high. In addition to the two classical risks (high wound class and anaesthesia risk), high body mass index, re‐operation and use of surgical drain increased the infection risk among all patients.
Relevance to clinical practice
In breast surgery careful assessment, documentation and adherence to aseptic practices are important with all patients. Patients with heavy weight need special attention. The need for antimicrobial prophylaxis in re‐operations and the need of surgical drains in lumpectomies are important to consider carefully.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-1067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23121264</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast - surgery ; Breast cancer ; Female ; Humans ; Infections ; lumpectomy ; Mastectomy ; Middle Aged ; Nursing ; patient-related risk factors ; procedure-related risk factors ; Regression analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Surgical outcomes ; surgical site infection ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical nursing, 2013-04, Vol.22 (7-8), p.948-957</ispartof><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Apr 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4649-ec5cce7a403bf4237304cc0d7d72851aeb89998883a4c5f066c8ffeaef96dd1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4649-ec5cce7a403bf4237304cc0d7d72851aeb89998883a4c5f066c8ffeaef96dd1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocn.12009$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocn.12009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23121264$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teija-Kaisa, Aholaakko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eija, Metsälä</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marja, Sihvonen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Outi, Lyytikäinen</creatorcontrib><title>Risk factors for surgical site infection in breast surgery</title><title>Journal of clinical nursing</title><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><description>Aims and objectives
To study risks of surgical site infection in breast surgery. The objectives were to measure the association of postoperative infection with patient‐ and procedure‐related factors.
Background
The infection rate in breast surgery is expected to be low but it varies a lot. The variation is recommended to be assessed by measuring procedure‐related factors.
Design
A retrospective chart review of 982 breast surgery patients was completed.
Methods
The data on patient demographics, procedure types, patient and surgery‐related factors were collected. A multivariate logistic regression model for all breast operations (n = 982), lumpectomies (n = 700) and mastectomies (n = 282) was performed.
Results
The infection rate was 6·7%. In a multivariate logistic regression model for all operations, a contaminated or dirty wound, high American Society of Anesthesiologists score, high body mass index, use of surgical drains and re‐operation predicted increased infection risk. In lumpectomies high body mass index and use of surgical drains predicted increased risk. In mastectomies, the significant predictor was re‐operation.
Conclusions
The surgical site infection rate was high. In addition to the two classical risks (high wound class and anaesthesia risk), high body mass index, re‐operation and use of surgical drain increased the infection risk among all patients.
Relevance to clinical practice
In breast surgery careful assessment, documentation and adherence to aseptic practices are important with all patients. Patients with heavy weight need special attention. The need for antimicrobial prophylaxis in re‐operations and the need of surgical drains in lumpectomies are important to consider carefully.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast - surgery</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>lumpectomy</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>patient-related risk factors</subject><subject>procedure-related risk factors</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>surgical site infection</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EFP2zAUB3ALDY1SduEDTJF2mSaF-dmOHe82VcCGqqIhUI-W6zxPLmkCdiLWb0_aQg87gC_Ph9_7S-9PyCnQMxje92XrmjNglOoDMgIui5wpyj6QEdWS5UClOiLHKS0pBc4Y_0iOGAcGTIoR-XET0n3mrevamDLfxiz18W9wts5S6DALjUfXhbYZftkiok3dVmBcn5BDb-uEn17mmNxdnN9OfuXT68vfk5_T3AkpdI6ucA6VFZQvvGBccSqco5WqFCsLsLgotdZlWXIrXOGplK70Hi16LasKKj4mX3e5D7F97DF1ZhWSw7q2DbZ9MsCFllrBcNr7FJSgUig-0C__0WXbx2Y4ZKOkLAsqYVDfdsrFNqWI3jzEsLJxbYCaTflmU77Zlj_gzy-R_WKF1Z6-tj0A2IGnUOP6jShzdT2ZvYbmu52QOvy337Hx3kjFVWHms0vzR16UcwYzM-fPQV-caw</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Teija-Kaisa, Aholaakko</creator><creator>Eija, Metsälä</creator><creator>Marja, Sihvonen</creator><creator>Outi, Lyytikäinen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Risk factors for surgical site infection in breast surgery</title><author>Teija-Kaisa, Aholaakko ; Eija, Metsälä ; Marja, Sihvonen ; Outi, Lyytikäinen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4649-ec5cce7a403bf4237304cc0d7d72851aeb89998883a4c5f066c8ffeaef96dd1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast - surgery</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>lumpectomy</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>patient-related risk factors</topic><topic>procedure-related risk factors</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>surgical site infection</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teija-Kaisa, Aholaakko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eija, Metsälä</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marja, Sihvonen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Outi, Lyytikäinen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teija-Kaisa, Aholaakko</au><au>Eija, Metsälä</au><au>Marja, Sihvonen</au><au>Outi, Lyytikäinen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk factors for surgical site infection in breast surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>7-8</issue><spage>948</spage><epage>957</epage><pages>948-957</pages><issn>0962-1067</issn><eissn>1365-2702</eissn><abstract>Aims and objectives
To study risks of surgical site infection in breast surgery. The objectives were to measure the association of postoperative infection with patient‐ and procedure‐related factors.
Background
The infection rate in breast surgery is expected to be low but it varies a lot. The variation is recommended to be assessed by measuring procedure‐related factors.
Design
A retrospective chart review of 982 breast surgery patients was completed.
Methods
The data on patient demographics, procedure types, patient and surgery‐related factors were collected. A multivariate logistic regression model for all breast operations (n = 982), lumpectomies (n = 700) and mastectomies (n = 282) was performed.
Results
The infection rate was 6·7%. In a multivariate logistic regression model for all operations, a contaminated or dirty wound, high American Society of Anesthesiologists score, high body mass index, use of surgical drains and re‐operation predicted increased infection risk. In lumpectomies high body mass index and use of surgical drains predicted increased risk. In mastectomies, the significant predictor was re‐operation.
Conclusions
The surgical site infection rate was high. In addition to the two classical risks (high wound class and anaesthesia risk), high body mass index, re‐operation and use of surgical drain increased the infection risk among all patients.
Relevance to clinical practice
In breast surgery careful assessment, documentation and adherence to aseptic practices are important with all patients. Patients with heavy weight need special attention. The need for antimicrobial prophylaxis in re‐operations and the need of surgical drains in lumpectomies are important to consider carefully.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23121264</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocn.12009</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-1067 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical nursing, 2013-04, Vol.22 (7-8), p.948-957 |
issn | 0962-1067 1365-2702 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1349697122 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Breast - surgery Breast cancer Female Humans Infections lumpectomy Mastectomy Middle Aged Nursing patient-related risk factors procedure-related risk factors Regression analysis Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Surgical outcomes surgical site infection Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology Young Adult |
title | Risk factors for surgical site infection in breast surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A30%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20factors%20for%20surgical%20site%20infection%20in%20breast%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20nursing&rft.au=Teija-Kaisa,%20Aholaakko&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=7-8&rft.spage=948&rft.epage=957&rft.pages=948-957&rft.issn=0962-1067&rft.eissn=1365-2702&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocn.12009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2916273831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1316685061&rft_id=info:pmid/23121264&rfr_iscdi=true |