STATE BUDGET INDEPENDENT, MARKET-BASED INSTRUMENTS TO FINANCE RENEWABLE HEAT STRATEGIES
At present, expanding the use of renewable energy sources for heating (RES-H) relies predominantly on publicly funded support instruments. As these are subject to subsidy cuts and suspensions, these instruments do not provide long-term security for investors and technology suppliers. Although feed-i...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Energy & environment (Essex, England) England), 2013-02, Vol.24 (1/2), p.195-218 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 218 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1/2 |
| container_start_page | 195 |
| container_title | Energy & environment (Essex, England) |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Steinbach, Jan Seefeldt, Friedrich Brandt, Edmund Bürger, Veit Jacobshagen, Ulf Kachel, Markus Nast, Michael Ragwitz, Mario |
| description | At present, expanding the use of renewable energy sources for heating (RES-H) relies predominantly on publicly funded support instruments. As these are subject to subsidy cuts and suspensions, these instruments do not provide long-term security for investors and technology suppliers. Although feed-in tariffs and quota-based systems are the major support schemes for renewable energy sources in the electricity sector, similar policy designs have not been applied to RES-H. This paper presents and evaluates three different policy instruments which have the potential to finance RES-H without using public funds: a physical quota system for biomass, a technology-based quota system (Portfolio Model) and a remuneration-based system (Premium model). The assessment suggests that while the Portfolio Model and the Premium Model are both promising policies to enhance RES-H deployment, there is greater acceptance among stakeholders for the Premium Model. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1260/0958-305X.24.1-2.195 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1349466593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43735167</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1260_0958-305X.24.1-2.195</sage_id><sourcerecordid>43735167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b039ab627230381e63ea4f6c465a8c1a52e3f33e2bce52aeda2406ad4502b1433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwkAUhSdGExF9A01m6cLW-W-7LDBAIxRDh-BuMi1TAwGKHVj49rapcevm3sX5zrm5B4BHjHxMBHpFEQ89iviHT5iPPeLjiF-BHkEs9BgK0DXo_SG34M65HUIERTjqgXWmYiXhYDWaSAWTdCTfZTNS9QLn8fJNKm8QZ3LUKJlaruaNkEG1gOMkjdOhhEuZynU8mEk4lbGCDdOkTRKZ3YOb0uydffjdfbAaSzWcerPFJBnGM6-gLDx7OaKRyQUJCEU0xFZQa1gpCia4CQtsOLG0pNSSvLCcGLsxhCFhNowjkmNGaR88d7mnuvq6WHfWh60r7H5vjra6OI0pi5gQPGpR1qFFXTlX21Kf6u3B1N8aI932qNuSdFuSJkxjTXTTY2PDnc2ZT6t31aU-Ng_953nqPDt3ruq_O4wGlGMR0B-7l3Yk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1349466593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>STATE BUDGET INDEPENDENT, MARKET-BASED INSTRUMENTS TO FINANCE RENEWABLE HEAT STRATEGIES</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Steinbach, Jan ; Seefeldt, Friedrich ; Brandt, Edmund ; Bürger, Veit ; Jacobshagen, Ulf ; Kachel, Markus ; Nast, Michael ; Ragwitz, Mario</creator><creatorcontrib>Steinbach, Jan ; Seefeldt, Friedrich ; Brandt, Edmund ; Bürger, Veit ; Jacobshagen, Ulf ; Kachel, Markus ; Nast, Michael ; Ragwitz, Mario</creatorcontrib><description>At present, expanding the use of renewable energy sources for heating (RES-H) relies predominantly on publicly funded support instruments. As these are subject to subsidy cuts and suspensions, these instruments do not provide long-term security for investors and technology suppliers. Although feed-in tariffs and quota-based systems are the major support schemes for renewable energy sources in the electricity sector, similar policy designs have not been applied to RES-H. This paper presents and evaluates three different policy instruments which have the potential to finance RES-H without using public funds: a physical quota system for biomass, a technology-based quota system (Portfolio Model) and a remuneration-based system (Premium model). The assessment suggests that while the Portfolio Model and the Premium Model are both promising policies to enhance RES-H deployment, there is greater acceptance among stakeholders for the Premium Model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-305X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2048-4070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1260/0958-305X.24.1-2.195</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd</publisher><subject>Biofuels ; Biomass energy production ; Energy ; Energy technology ; Environmental policy ; Environmental technology ; Financial instruments ; Fossil fuels ; Future promotion schemes for renewable heat generation (RES-H) ; Heat ; Renewable energy</subject><ispartof>Energy & environment (Essex, England), 2013-02, Vol.24 (1/2), p.195-218</ispartof><rights>2013 MULTI-SCIENCE PUBLISHING CO. LTD.</rights><rights>2013 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b039ab627230381e63ea4f6c465a8c1a52e3f33e2bce52aeda2406ad4502b1433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b039ab627230381e63ea4f6c465a8c1a52e3f33e2bce52aeda2406ad4502b1433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43735167$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43735167$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steinbach, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seefeldt, Friedrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bürger, Veit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobshagen, Ulf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachel, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nast, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragwitz, Mario</creatorcontrib><title>STATE BUDGET INDEPENDENT, MARKET-BASED INSTRUMENTS TO FINANCE RENEWABLE HEAT STRATEGIES</title><title>Energy & environment (Essex, England)</title><description>At present, expanding the use of renewable energy sources for heating (RES-H) relies predominantly on publicly funded support instruments. As these are subject to subsidy cuts and suspensions, these instruments do not provide long-term security for investors and technology suppliers. Although feed-in tariffs and quota-based systems are the major support schemes for renewable energy sources in the electricity sector, similar policy designs have not been applied to RES-H. This paper presents and evaluates three different policy instruments which have the potential to finance RES-H without using public funds: a physical quota system for biomass, a technology-based quota system (Portfolio Model) and a remuneration-based system (Premium model). The assessment suggests that while the Portfolio Model and the Premium Model are both promising policies to enhance RES-H deployment, there is greater acceptance among stakeholders for the Premium Model.</description><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomass energy production</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy technology</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental technology</subject><subject>Financial instruments</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Future promotion schemes for renewable heat generation (RES-H)</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><issn>0958-305X</issn><issn>2048-4070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1OwkAUhSdGExF9A01m6cLW-W-7LDBAIxRDh-BuMi1TAwGKHVj49rapcevm3sX5zrm5B4BHjHxMBHpFEQ89iviHT5iPPeLjiF-BHkEs9BgK0DXo_SG34M65HUIERTjqgXWmYiXhYDWaSAWTdCTfZTNS9QLn8fJNKm8QZ3LUKJlaruaNkEG1gOMkjdOhhEuZynU8mEk4lbGCDdOkTRKZ3YOb0uydffjdfbAaSzWcerPFJBnGM6-gLDx7OaKRyQUJCEU0xFZQa1gpCia4CQtsOLG0pNSSvLCcGLsxhCFhNowjkmNGaR88d7mnuvq6WHfWh60r7H5vjra6OI0pi5gQPGpR1qFFXTlX21Kf6u3B1N8aI932qNuSdFuSJkxjTXTTY2PDnc2ZT6t31aU-Ng_953nqPDt3ruq_O4wGlGMR0B-7l3Yk</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Steinbach, Jan</creator><creator>Seefeldt, Friedrich</creator><creator>Brandt, Edmund</creator><creator>Bürger, Veit</creator><creator>Jacobshagen, Ulf</creator><creator>Kachel, Markus</creator><creator>Nast, Michael</creator><creator>Ragwitz, Mario</creator><general>Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>STATE BUDGET INDEPENDENT, MARKET-BASED INSTRUMENTS TO FINANCE RENEWABLE HEAT STRATEGIES</title><author>Steinbach, Jan ; Seefeldt, Friedrich ; Brandt, Edmund ; Bürger, Veit ; Jacobshagen, Ulf ; Kachel, Markus ; Nast, Michael ; Ragwitz, Mario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-b039ab627230381e63ea4f6c465a8c1a52e3f33e2bce52aeda2406ad4502b1433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomass energy production</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy technology</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental technology</topic><topic>Financial instruments</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Future promotion schemes for renewable heat generation (RES-H)</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steinbach, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seefeldt, Friedrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bürger, Veit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobshagen, Ulf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachel, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nast, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragwitz, Mario</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy & environment (Essex, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steinbach, Jan</au><au>Seefeldt, Friedrich</au><au>Brandt, Edmund</au><au>Bürger, Veit</au><au>Jacobshagen, Ulf</au><au>Kachel, Markus</au><au>Nast, Michael</au><au>Ragwitz, Mario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>STATE BUDGET INDEPENDENT, MARKET-BASED INSTRUMENTS TO FINANCE RENEWABLE HEAT STRATEGIES</atitle><jtitle>Energy & environment (Essex, England)</jtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>195-218</pages><issn>0958-305X</issn><eissn>2048-4070</eissn><abstract>At present, expanding the use of renewable energy sources for heating (RES-H) relies predominantly on publicly funded support instruments. As these are subject to subsidy cuts and suspensions, these instruments do not provide long-term security for investors and technology suppliers. Although feed-in tariffs and quota-based systems are the major support schemes for renewable energy sources in the electricity sector, similar policy designs have not been applied to RES-H. This paper presents and evaluates three different policy instruments which have the potential to finance RES-H without using public funds: a physical quota system for biomass, a technology-based quota system (Portfolio Model) and a remuneration-based system (Premium model). The assessment suggests that while the Portfolio Model and the Premium Model are both promising policies to enhance RES-H deployment, there is greater acceptance among stakeholders for the Premium Model.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd</pub><doi>10.1260/0958-305X.24.1-2.195</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0958-305X |
| ispartof | Energy & environment (Essex, England), 2013-02, Vol.24 (1/2), p.195-218 |
| issn | 0958-305X 2048-4070 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1349466593 |
| source | SAGE Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Biofuels Biomass energy production Energy Energy technology Environmental policy Environmental technology Financial instruments Fossil fuels Future promotion schemes for renewable heat generation (RES-H) Heat Renewable energy |
| title | STATE BUDGET INDEPENDENT, MARKET-BASED INSTRUMENTS TO FINANCE RENEWABLE HEAT STRATEGIES |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A43%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=STATE%20BUDGET%20INDEPENDENT,%20MARKET-BASED%20INSTRUMENTS%20TO%20FINANCE%20RENEWABLE%20HEAT%20STRATEGIES&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20environment%20(Essex,%20England)&rft.au=Steinbach,%20Jan&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=195-218&rft.issn=0958-305X&rft.eissn=2048-4070&rft_id=info:doi/10.1260/0958-305X.24.1-2.195&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43735167%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1349466593&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43735167&rft_sage_id=10.1260_0958-305X.24.1-2.195&rfr_iscdi=true |